The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth
This study compared the performance of a glass ionomer (GC Gold Label 1, GIC) as a fiber post cementation system for glass fiber posts with a self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, RUC) and a conventional resin cement system (Scotchbond Muli‐Purpose and Relyx ARC, RAC). Thirty endodontically treate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Microscopy research and technique 2019-07, Vol.82 (7), p.1191-1197 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1197 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1191 |
| container_title | Microscopy research and technique |
| container_volume | 82 |
| creator | Lorenzetti, Camila C. Bortolatto, Janaina F. Ramos, Anna T. P. R. Shinohara, André L. Saad, Jose R. C. Kuga, Milton C. |
| description | This study compared the performance of a glass ionomer (GC Gold Label 1, GIC) as a fiber post cementation system for glass fiber posts with a self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, RUC) and a conventional resin cement system (Scotchbond Muli‐Purpose and Relyx ARC, RAC). Thirty endodontically treated canines were randomly divided in three groups (n = 10), according to the fiber post cementation system: (RAC)—Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose and Relyx X ARC; (RUC)—Relyx U200 and (GIC)—GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining. Rhodamine was incorporated into the cementation system prior to the fiber post cementation. After glass fiber post cementation, roots were incubated in artificial saliva for 6 months. After that, specimens from the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the post space were prepared and analyzed using a push‐out bond strength test and confocal laser microscopy. ANOVA one way and Tukey tests showed that GIC and RUC demonstrated similar push‐out bond strength values, independently of the post space third (p > .05); however, values were greater than those shown by RAC (p 0.05) and lower than RAC (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jemt.23268 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2199187456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2199187456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-99aea28f2446f53ff0304a49fa468da4332fddf8ea77a6b8bed3399e719250fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gATciTM1tLllKqTcUNxXchXRyYqfMTOoko_TtTW114cJVDoePn0N-hE4pGVNC2NUSmjBmnGXFHhpSIvMkbuX-Zk5lIil5HaAj75eEUJpScYgGnEhGIhyierYADNZCGaoPaMF77Cx-q3UcKte6BjpcQgNtwNpjjW01j5uV82G31iEy7Nc-QIOrFkNrnHFtqEpd12scOtABDA4AYXGMDqyuPZzs3hF6uZnOJnfJ4_Pt_eT6MSkF40UipQbNCsuEyGzKrSWcCC2k1SIrjBacM2uMLUDnuc7mxRwM51JCTiVLiTV8hC62uavOvffgg2oqX0Jd6xZc7xWjUtIiF2kW6fkfunR918brFGOCURppEdXlVpWd874Dq1Zd1ehurShRmw7UpgP13UHEZ7vIft6A-aU_nx4B3YLPqob1P1HqYfo024Z-AT1ckq4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242111998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lorenzetti, Camila C. ; Bortolatto, Janaina F. ; Ramos, Anna T. P. R. ; Shinohara, André L. ; Saad, Jose R. C. ; Kuga, Milton C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lorenzetti, Camila C. ; Bortolatto, Janaina F. ; Ramos, Anna T. P. R. ; Shinohara, André L. ; Saad, Jose R. C. ; Kuga, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the performance of a glass ionomer (GC Gold Label 1, GIC) as a fiber post cementation system for glass fiber posts with a self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, RUC) and a conventional resin cement system (Scotchbond Muli‐Purpose and Relyx ARC, RAC). Thirty endodontically treated canines were randomly divided in three groups (n = 10), according to the fiber post cementation system: (RAC)—Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose and Relyx X ARC; (RUC)—Relyx U200 and (GIC)—GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining. Rhodamine was incorporated into the cementation system prior to the fiber post cementation. After glass fiber post cementation, roots were incubated in artificial saliva for 6 months. After that, specimens from the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the post space were prepared and analyzed using a push‐out bond strength test and confocal laser microscopy. ANOVA one way and Tukey tests showed that GIC and RUC demonstrated similar push‐out bond strength values, independently of the post space third (p > .05); however, values were greater than those shown by RAC (p < .05). For dentin penetrability, GIC and RUC also had similar results (p > 0.05) and lower than RAC (p < 0.05). Inside the root canal, the cementation system using glass ionomer cement (GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining) has similar push‐out bond strength to the self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200) and these were higher than the conventional resin (Relyx ARC), despite its higher dentin penetrability.
In the root canal, glass ionomer cement showed similar bonding strength to a self‐adhesive resin cement.
Glass ionomer cement and self‐adhesive resin cement had higher bond strength than a conventional resin cement.
In the root canal, conventional resin cement showed the highest percentage of dentin penetrability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-910X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23268</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30920097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Bond strength ; Bonding strength ; Cement ; Cementation ; Dental cement ; Dental roots ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Endodontics ; Glass fiber reinforced plastics ; Glass ionomer cements ; Gold ; image analysis ; Laser microscopy ; Resins ; Rhodamine ; Root canals ; Saliva ; scanning electron microscopy ; Teeth ; Variance analysis ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Microscopy research and technique, 2019-07, Vol.82 (7), p.1191-1197</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-99aea28f2446f53ff0304a49fa468da4332fddf8ea77a6b8bed3399e719250fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-99aea28f2446f53ff0304a49fa468da4332fddf8ea77a6b8bed3399e719250fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0256-2253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjemt.23268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjemt.23268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30920097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lorenzetti, Camila C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortolatto, Janaina F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Anna T. P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, André L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Jose R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuga, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth</title><title>Microscopy research and technique</title><addtitle>Microsc Res Tech</addtitle><description>This study compared the performance of a glass ionomer (GC Gold Label 1, GIC) as a fiber post cementation system for glass fiber posts with a self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, RUC) and a conventional resin cement system (Scotchbond Muli‐Purpose and Relyx ARC, RAC). Thirty endodontically treated canines were randomly divided in three groups (n = 10), according to the fiber post cementation system: (RAC)—Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose and Relyx X ARC; (RUC)—Relyx U200 and (GIC)—GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining. Rhodamine was incorporated into the cementation system prior to the fiber post cementation. After glass fiber post cementation, roots were incubated in artificial saliva for 6 months. After that, specimens from the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the post space were prepared and analyzed using a push‐out bond strength test and confocal laser microscopy. ANOVA one way and Tukey tests showed that GIC and RUC demonstrated similar push‐out bond strength values, independently of the post space third (p > .05); however, values were greater than those shown by RAC (p < .05). For dentin penetrability, GIC and RUC also had similar results (p > 0.05) and lower than RAC (p < 0.05). Inside the root canal, the cementation system using glass ionomer cement (GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining) has similar push‐out bond strength to the self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200) and these were higher than the conventional resin (Relyx ARC), despite its higher dentin penetrability.
In the root canal, glass ionomer cement showed similar bonding strength to a self‐adhesive resin cement.
Glass ionomer cement and self‐adhesive resin cement had higher bond strength than a conventional resin cement.
In the root canal, conventional resin cement showed the highest percentage of dentin penetrability.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Cementation</subject><subject>Dental cement</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Glass ionomer cements</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>Laser microscopy</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Rhodamine</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1059-910X</issn><issn>1097-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gATciTM1tLllKqTcUNxXchXRyYqfMTOoko_TtTW114cJVDoePn0N-hE4pGVNC2NUSmjBmnGXFHhpSIvMkbuX-Zk5lIil5HaAj75eEUJpScYgGnEhGIhyierYADNZCGaoPaMF77Cx-q3UcKte6BjpcQgNtwNpjjW01j5uV82G31iEy7Nc-QIOrFkNrnHFtqEpd12scOtABDA4AYXGMDqyuPZzs3hF6uZnOJnfJ4_Pt_eT6MSkF40UipQbNCsuEyGzKrSWcCC2k1SIrjBacM2uMLUDnuc7mxRwM51JCTiVLiTV8hC62uavOvffgg2oqX0Jd6xZc7xWjUtIiF2kW6fkfunR918brFGOCURppEdXlVpWd874Dq1Zd1ehurShRmw7UpgP13UHEZ7vIft6A-aU_nx4B3YLPqob1P1HqYfo024Z-AT1ckq4</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Lorenzetti, Camila C.</creator><creator>Bortolatto, Janaina F.</creator><creator>Ramos, Anna T. P. R.</creator><creator>Shinohara, André L.</creator><creator>Saad, Jose R. C.</creator><creator>Kuga, Milton C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-2253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth</title><author>Lorenzetti, Camila C. ; Bortolatto, Janaina F. ; Ramos, Anna T. P. R. ; Shinohara, André L. ; Saad, Jose R. C. ; Kuga, Milton C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-99aea28f2446f53ff0304a49fa468da4332fddf8ea77a6b8bed3399e719250fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Cementation</topic><topic>Dental cement</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Glass ionomer cements</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>Laser microscopy</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Rhodamine</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lorenzetti, Camila C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortolatto, Janaina F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Anna T. P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, André L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Jose R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuga, Milton C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microscopy research and technique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lorenzetti, Camila C.</au><au>Bortolatto, Janaina F.</au><au>Ramos, Anna T. P. R.</au><au>Shinohara, André L.</au><au>Saad, Jose R. C.</au><au>Kuga, Milton C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth</atitle><jtitle>Microscopy research and technique</jtitle><addtitle>Microsc Res Tech</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1197</epage><pages>1191-1197</pages><issn>1059-910X</issn><eissn>1097-0029</eissn><abstract>This study compared the performance of a glass ionomer (GC Gold Label 1, GIC) as a fiber post cementation system for glass fiber posts with a self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, RUC) and a conventional resin cement system (Scotchbond Muli‐Purpose and Relyx ARC, RAC). Thirty endodontically treated canines were randomly divided in three groups (n = 10), according to the fiber post cementation system: (RAC)—Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose and Relyx X ARC; (RUC)—Relyx U200 and (GIC)—GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining. Rhodamine was incorporated into the cementation system prior to the fiber post cementation. After glass fiber post cementation, roots were incubated in artificial saliva for 6 months. After that, specimens from the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the post space were prepared and analyzed using a push‐out bond strength test and confocal laser microscopy. ANOVA one way and Tukey tests showed that GIC and RUC demonstrated similar push‐out bond strength values, independently of the post space third (p > .05); however, values were greater than those shown by RAC (p < .05). For dentin penetrability, GIC and RUC also had similar results (p > 0.05) and lower than RAC (p < 0.05). Inside the root canal, the cementation system using glass ionomer cement (GC Gold Label 1 Luting & Lining) has similar push‐out bond strength to the self‐adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200) and these were higher than the conventional resin (Relyx ARC), despite its higher dentin penetrability.
In the root canal, glass ionomer cement showed similar bonding strength to a self‐adhesive resin cement.
Glass ionomer cement and self‐adhesive resin cement had higher bond strength than a conventional resin cement.
In the root canal, conventional resin cement showed the highest percentage of dentin penetrability.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30920097</pmid><doi>10.1002/jemt.23268</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-2253</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1059-910X |
| ispartof | Microscopy research and technique, 2019-07, Vol.82 (7), p.1191-1197 |
| issn | 1059-910X 1097-0029 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2199187456 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Adhesives Bond strength Bonding strength Cement Cementation Dental cement Dental roots Dentin Dentistry Endodontics Glass fiber reinforced plastics Glass ionomer cements Gold image analysis Laser microscopy Resins Rhodamine Root canals Saliva scanning electron microscopy Teeth Variance analysis Vulnerability |
| title | The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20glass%20ionomer%20cement%20as%20a%20fiber%20post%20cementation%20system%20in%20endodontically%20treated%20teeth&rft.jtitle=Microscopy%20research%20and%20technique&rft.au=Lorenzetti,%20Camila%20C.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1197&rft.pages=1191-1197&rft.issn=1059-910X&rft.eissn=1097-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jemt.23268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2199187456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242111998&rft_id=info:pmid/30920097&rfr_iscdi=true |