A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial
•Evaluation of an online patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy across Canada is feasible.•The patient decision aid is acceptable to women.•The patient decision aid reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting.•Evaluation of the patient deci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2019-05, Vol.251, p.91-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Journal of affective disorders |
container_volume | 251 |
creator | Vigod, Simone N. Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha Stewart, Donna E. Grigoriadis, Sophie Metcalfe, Kelly Oberlander, Tim F. Schram, Carrie Taylor, Valerie H. Dennis, Cindy-Lee |
description | •Evaluation of an online patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy across Canada is feasible.•The patient decision aid is acceptable to women.•The patient decision aid reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting.•Evaluation of the patient decision aid's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.
Decisions about antidepressant use in pregnancy are complex. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility of a trial protocol for an online patient decision aid (PDA) for women deciding about antidepressant use in pregnancy.
96 preconception and pregnant Canadian women recruited from specialist (n = 51) and non-specialist (n = 45) settings with Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS, range 0–100) score of ≥25 signifying moderate-to-high decisional conflict were randomly allocated to either the PDA or a control condition that guided participants to publicly available resources for advice around antidepressants and pregnancy. Follow-up data were collected at 4 weeks post-randomization.
About 88.9% of eligible participants consented to participate. Women's views of the tool were positive; 88.7% of participants provided follow-up data. At follow-up, mean DCS score had decreased by 19.9 points in the PDA group vs. 13.3 in controls (adjusted mean difference, MD, 7.01, 95% CI −14.3 to 0.30). In the non-specialist setting, DCS scores decreased more for PDA users (25.5 points) than controls (10.5 points; adjusted MD −15.1, 95% CI −25.6 to −4.55); the MD was negligible in the specialist setting.
The main limitation is the highly educated, high-income nature of our sample.
Evaluation of an online PDA for antidepressant use in pregnancy with national recruitment is feasible. Pilot results suggest that the tool is acceptable and reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting. Evaluation of the PDA's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2198565312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165032718328611</els_id><sourcerecordid>2198565312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-adeaae717d40985a9b40b3ba062140c0ebf214e986cf0c52ca195138013a78803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtuFDEQRS1ElAwhH8AGecmmm6r2uB-wiiJeUqSwgCWyqu1q5FGPPdieSOHrcTSBJau6JZ26Uh0hXiG0CNi_3bU7cm0HOLWALWh8JjaoB9V0GofnYlMZ3YDqhgvxIucdAPTTAOfiQsGEajt0G_HjWh6oeA5FOrY--xgkeSeXmCSF4h0fEudcozxmlj7Iuv8MFOzDO_nVr7HIRMHFvf_NTtoYSorrWmNJntaX4myhNfPV07wU3z9--Hbzubm9-_Tl5vq2sUqr0pBjIh5wcFuYRk3TvIVZzQR9h1uwwPNSA09jbxewurOEk0Y1AioaxhHUpXhz6j2k-OvIuZi9z5bXlQLHYzYd1tpeK-wqiifUpphz4sUckt9TejAI5tGq2Zlq1TxaNYCmWq03r5_qj_Oe3b-Lvxor8P4EcH3y3nMy2Vanlp1PbItx0f-n_g-IKof0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2198565312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vigod, Simone N. ; Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha ; Stewart, Donna E. ; Grigoriadis, Sophie ; Metcalfe, Kelly ; Oberlander, Tim F. ; Schram, Carrie ; Taylor, Valerie H. ; Dennis, Cindy-Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Vigod, Simone N. ; Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha ; Stewart, Donna E. ; Grigoriadis, Sophie ; Metcalfe, Kelly ; Oberlander, Tim F. ; Schram, Carrie ; Taylor, Valerie H. ; Dennis, Cindy-Lee</creatorcontrib><description>•Evaluation of an online patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy across Canada is feasible.•The patient decision aid is acceptable to women.•The patient decision aid reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting.•Evaluation of the patient decision aid's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.
Decisions about antidepressant use in pregnancy are complex. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility of a trial protocol for an online patient decision aid (PDA) for women deciding about antidepressant use in pregnancy.
96 preconception and pregnant Canadian women recruited from specialist (n = 51) and non-specialist (n = 45) settings with Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS, range 0–100) score of ≥25 signifying moderate-to-high decisional conflict were randomly allocated to either the PDA or a control condition that guided participants to publicly available resources for advice around antidepressants and pregnancy. Follow-up data were collected at 4 weeks post-randomization.
About 88.9% of eligible participants consented to participate. Women's views of the tool were positive; 88.7% of participants provided follow-up data. At follow-up, mean DCS score had decreased by 19.9 points in the PDA group vs. 13.3 in controls (adjusted mean difference, MD, 7.01, 95% CI −14.3 to 0.30). In the non-specialist setting, DCS scores decreased more for PDA users (25.5 points) than controls (10.5 points; adjusted MD −15.1, 95% CI −25.6 to −4.55); the MD was negligible in the specialist setting.
The main limitation is the highly educated, high-income nature of our sample.
Evaluation of an online PDA for antidepressant use in pregnancy with national recruitment is feasible. Pilot results suggest that the tool is acceptable and reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting. Evaluation of the PDA's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30913472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antidepressive agents ; Patient decision aid ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2019-05, Vol.251, p.91-99</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-adeaae717d40985a9b40b3ba062140c0ebf214e986cf0c52ca195138013a78803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-adeaae717d40985a9b40b3ba062140c0ebf214e986cf0c52ca195138013a78803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0135-7242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032718328611$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30913472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vigod, Simone N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Donna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigoriadis, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlander, Tim F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schram, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Valerie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Cindy-Lee</creatorcontrib><title>A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>•Evaluation of an online patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy across Canada is feasible.•The patient decision aid is acceptable to women.•The patient decision aid reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting.•Evaluation of the patient decision aid's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.
Decisions about antidepressant use in pregnancy are complex. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility of a trial protocol for an online patient decision aid (PDA) for women deciding about antidepressant use in pregnancy.
96 preconception and pregnant Canadian women recruited from specialist (n = 51) and non-specialist (n = 45) settings with Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS, range 0–100) score of ≥25 signifying moderate-to-high decisional conflict were randomly allocated to either the PDA or a control condition that guided participants to publicly available resources for advice around antidepressants and pregnancy. Follow-up data were collected at 4 weeks post-randomization.
About 88.9% of eligible participants consented to participate. Women's views of the tool were positive; 88.7% of participants provided follow-up data. At follow-up, mean DCS score had decreased by 19.9 points in the PDA group vs. 13.3 in controls (adjusted mean difference, MD, 7.01, 95% CI −14.3 to 0.30). In the non-specialist setting, DCS scores decreased more for PDA users (25.5 points) than controls (10.5 points; adjusted MD −15.1, 95% CI −25.6 to −4.55); the MD was negligible in the specialist setting.
The main limitation is the highly educated, high-income nature of our sample.
Evaluation of an online PDA for antidepressant use in pregnancy with national recruitment is feasible. Pilot results suggest that the tool is acceptable and reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting. Evaluation of the PDA's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.</description><subject>Antidepressive agents</subject><subject>Patient decision aid</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtuFDEQRS1ElAwhH8AGecmmm6r2uB-wiiJeUqSwgCWyqu1q5FGPPdieSOHrcTSBJau6JZ26Uh0hXiG0CNi_3bU7cm0HOLWALWh8JjaoB9V0GofnYlMZ3YDqhgvxIucdAPTTAOfiQsGEajt0G_HjWh6oeA5FOrY--xgkeSeXmCSF4h0fEudcozxmlj7Iuv8MFOzDO_nVr7HIRMHFvf_NTtoYSorrWmNJntaX4myhNfPV07wU3z9--Hbzubm9-_Tl5vq2sUqr0pBjIh5wcFuYRk3TvIVZzQR9h1uwwPNSA09jbxewurOEk0Y1AioaxhHUpXhz6j2k-OvIuZi9z5bXlQLHYzYd1tpeK-wqiifUpphz4sUckt9TejAI5tGq2Zlq1TxaNYCmWq03r5_qj_Oe3b-Lvxor8P4EcH3y3nMy2Vanlp1PbItx0f-n_g-IKof0</recordid><startdate>20190515</startdate><enddate>20190515</enddate><creator>Vigod, Simone N.</creator><creator>Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha</creator><creator>Stewart, Donna E.</creator><creator>Grigoriadis, Sophie</creator><creator>Metcalfe, Kelly</creator><creator>Oberlander, Tim F.</creator><creator>Schram, Carrie</creator><creator>Taylor, Valerie H.</creator><creator>Dennis, Cindy-Lee</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-7242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190515</creationdate><title>A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial</title><author>Vigod, Simone N. ; Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha ; Stewart, Donna E. ; Grigoriadis, Sophie ; Metcalfe, Kelly ; Oberlander, Tim F. ; Schram, Carrie ; Taylor, Valerie H. ; Dennis, Cindy-Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-adeaae717d40985a9b40b3ba062140c0ebf214e986cf0c52ca195138013a78803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antidepressive agents</topic><topic>Patient decision aid</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vigod, Simone N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Donna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigoriadis, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlander, Tim F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schram, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Valerie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Cindy-Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vigod, Simone N.</au><au>Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha</au><au>Stewart, Donna E.</au><au>Grigoriadis, Sophie</au><au>Metcalfe, Kelly</au><au>Oberlander, Tim F.</au><au>Schram, Carrie</au><au>Taylor, Valerie H.</au><au>Dennis, Cindy-Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2019-05-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>251</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>91-99</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><abstract>•Evaluation of an online patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy across Canada is feasible.•The patient decision aid is acceptable to women.•The patient decision aid reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting.•Evaluation of the patient decision aid's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.
Decisions about antidepressant use in pregnancy are complex. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility of a trial protocol for an online patient decision aid (PDA) for women deciding about antidepressant use in pregnancy.
96 preconception and pregnant Canadian women recruited from specialist (n = 51) and non-specialist (n = 45) settings with Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS, range 0–100) score of ≥25 signifying moderate-to-high decisional conflict were randomly allocated to either the PDA or a control condition that guided participants to publicly available resources for advice around antidepressants and pregnancy. Follow-up data were collected at 4 weeks post-randomization.
About 88.9% of eligible participants consented to participate. Women's views of the tool were positive; 88.7% of participants provided follow-up data. At follow-up, mean DCS score had decreased by 19.9 points in the PDA group vs. 13.3 in controls (adjusted mean difference, MD, 7.01, 95% CI −14.3 to 0.30). In the non-specialist setting, DCS scores decreased more for PDA users (25.5 points) than controls (10.5 points; adjusted MD −15.1, 95% CI −25.6 to −4.55); the MD was negligible in the specialist setting.
The main limitation is the highly educated, high-income nature of our sample.
Evaluation of an online PDA for antidepressant use in pregnancy with national recruitment is feasible. Pilot results suggest that the tool is acceptable and reduces decisional conflict more than clinical care alone in a non-specialist setting. Evaluation of the PDA's impact on longer-term maternal and child clinical outcomes is a key next step.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30913472</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.051</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-7242</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0327 |
ispartof | Journal of affective disorders, 2019-05, Vol.251, p.91-99 |
issn | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2198565312 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Antidepressive agents Patient decision aid Pregnancy |
title | A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20patient%20decision%20aid%20for%20antidepressant%20use%20in%20pregnancy:%20Pilot%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Vigod,%20Simone%20N.&rft.date=2019-05-15&rft.volume=251&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=91-99&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2198565312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2198565312&rft_id=info:pmid/30913472&rft_els_id=S0165032718328611&rfr_iscdi=true |