The Language of Generalization

Language provides simple ways of communicating generalizable knowledge to each other (e.g., "Birds fly," "John hikes," and "Fire makes smoke"). Though found in every language and emerging early in development, the language of generalization is philosophically puzzling a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological review 2019-04, Vol.126 (3), p.395-436
Hauptverfasser: Tessler, Michael Henry, Goodman, Noah D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue 3
container_start_page 395
container_title Psychological review
container_volume 126
creator Tessler, Michael Henry
Goodman, Noah D
description Language provides simple ways of communicating generalizable knowledge to each other (e.g., "Birds fly," "John hikes," and "Fire makes smoke"). Though found in every language and emerging early in development, the language of generalization is philosophically puzzling and has resisted precise formalization. Here, we propose the first formal account of generalizations conveyed with language that makes quantitative predictions about human understanding. The basic idea is that the language of generalization expresses that an event or a property occurs relatively often, where what counts as relatively often depends upon one's prior expectations. We formalize this simple idea in a probabilistic model of language understanding, which we test in 3 diverse case studies: generalizations about categories (generic language), events (habitual language), and causes (causal language). We find that the model explains the gradience in human endorsements that has perplexed previous attempts to formalize this swath of linguistic expressions. This work opens the door to understanding precisely how abstract knowledge is learned from language.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/rev0000142
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2197323267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2180115356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-8bd27cc59b5c167988600b9a0b0b4f576ddd37851bdab2f2c5310404d06f35d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9LwzAUB_Agips_Lv4BY-BFxOpLXpM0Rxk6hYGXCd5Cmqazo2tr0grzr7dzU8GD7_IuH77v8SXkjMI1BZQ33r1DPzRme2RIFaqIxpLukyEAYsQUfxmQoxCWX0ipQzJAkIJhwodkNH9145mpFp1ZuHGdj6euct6UxYdpi7o6IQe5KYM73e1j8nx_N588RLOn6ePkdhYZTKCNkjRj0lquUm6pkCpJBECqDKSQxjmXIssylAmnaWZSljPLkUIMcQYiR54JPCYX29zG12-dC61eFcG6sjSVq7ugGVUSGTIhe3r-hy7rzlf9d5oxGishBIN_FU2AUo58c_Zyq6yvQ_Au140vVsavNQW96Vb_dtvj0S6yS1cu-6HfZfbgagtMY3QT1tb4trClC7bz3lXtJkxTJjRqVBw_AZJ1f9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180115356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Language of Generalization</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Tessler, Michael Henry ; Goodman, Noah D</creator><contributor>Holyoak, Keith J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tessler, Michael Henry ; Goodman, Noah D ; Holyoak, Keith J</creatorcontrib><description>Language provides simple ways of communicating generalizable knowledge to each other (e.g., "Birds fly," "John hikes," and "Fire makes smoke"). Though found in every language and emerging early in development, the language of generalization is philosophically puzzling and has resisted precise formalization. Here, we propose the first formal account of generalizations conveyed with language that makes quantitative predictions about human understanding. The basic idea is that the language of generalization expresses that an event or a property occurs relatively often, where what counts as relatively often depends upon one's prior expectations. We formalize this simple idea in a probabilistic model of language understanding, which we test in 3 diverse case studies: generalizations about categories (generic language), events (habitual language), and causes (causal language). We find that the model explains the gradience in human endorsements that has perplexed previous attempts to formalize this swath of linguistic expressions. This work opens the door to understanding precisely how abstract knowledge is learned from language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rev0000142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30762385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Cognitive Generalization ; Comprehension ; Generalization ; Generalizations ; Human ; Interpersonal Communication ; Language ; Language acquisition ; Linguistics ; Prediction ; Probability ; Property ; Psychology of learning ; Semantic Generalization ; Semantics ; Understanding</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2019-04, Vol.126 (3), p.395-436</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-8bd27cc59b5c167988600b9a0b0b4f576ddd37851bdab2f2c5310404d06f35d63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Holyoak, Keith J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tessler, Michael Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Noah D</creatorcontrib><title>The Language of Generalization</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Language provides simple ways of communicating generalizable knowledge to each other (e.g., "Birds fly," "John hikes," and "Fire makes smoke"). Though found in every language and emerging early in development, the language of generalization is philosophically puzzling and has resisted precise formalization. Here, we propose the first formal account of generalizations conveyed with language that makes quantitative predictions about human understanding. The basic idea is that the language of generalization expresses that an event or a property occurs relatively often, where what counts as relatively often depends upon one's prior expectations. We formalize this simple idea in a probabilistic model of language understanding, which we test in 3 diverse case studies: generalizations about categories (generic language), events (habitual language), and causes (causal language). We find that the model explains the gradience in human endorsements that has perplexed previous attempts to formalize this swath of linguistic expressions. This work opens the door to understanding precisely how abstract knowledge is learned from language.</description><subject>Cognitive Generalization</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Generalization</subject><subject>Generalizations</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Interpersonal Communication</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Psychology of learning</subject><subject>Semantic Generalization</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Understanding</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M9LwzAUB_Agips_Lv4BY-BFxOpLXpM0Rxk6hYGXCd5Cmqazo2tr0grzr7dzU8GD7_IuH77v8SXkjMI1BZQ33r1DPzRme2RIFaqIxpLukyEAYsQUfxmQoxCWX0ipQzJAkIJhwodkNH9145mpFp1ZuHGdj6euct6UxYdpi7o6IQe5KYM73e1j8nx_N588RLOn6ePkdhYZTKCNkjRj0lquUm6pkCpJBECqDKSQxjmXIssylAmnaWZSljPLkUIMcQYiR54JPCYX29zG12-dC61eFcG6sjSVq7ugGVUSGTIhe3r-hy7rzlf9d5oxGishBIN_FU2AUo58c_Zyq6yvQ_Au140vVsavNQW96Vb_dtvj0S6yS1cu-6HfZfbgagtMY3QT1tb4trClC7bz3lXtJkxTJjRqVBw_AZJ1f9Q</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Tessler, Michael Henry</creator><creator>Goodman, Noah D</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>The Language of Generalization</title><author>Tessler, Michael Henry ; Goodman, Noah D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-8bd27cc59b5c167988600b9a0b0b4f576ddd37851bdab2f2c5310404d06f35d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Generalization</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Generalization</topic><topic>Generalizations</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Interpersonal Communication</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Psychology of learning</topic><topic>Semantic Generalization</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Understanding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tessler, Michael Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Noah D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tessler, Michael Henry</au><au>Goodman, Noah D</au><au>Holyoak, Keith J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Language of Generalization</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>395-436</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>Language provides simple ways of communicating generalizable knowledge to each other (e.g., "Birds fly," "John hikes," and "Fire makes smoke"). Though found in every language and emerging early in development, the language of generalization is philosophically puzzling and has resisted precise formalization. Here, we propose the first formal account of generalizations conveyed with language that makes quantitative predictions about human understanding. The basic idea is that the language of generalization expresses that an event or a property occurs relatively often, where what counts as relatively often depends upon one's prior expectations. We formalize this simple idea in a probabilistic model of language understanding, which we test in 3 diverse case studies: generalizations about categories (generic language), events (habitual language), and causes (causal language). We find that the model explains the gradience in human endorsements that has perplexed previous attempts to formalize this swath of linguistic expressions. This work opens the door to understanding precisely how abstract knowledge is learned from language.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>30762385</pmid><doi>10.1037/rev0000142</doi><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-295X
ispartof Psychological review, 2019-04, Vol.126 (3), p.395-436
issn 0033-295X
1939-1471
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2197323267
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Cognitive Generalization
Comprehension
Generalization
Generalizations
Human
Interpersonal Communication
Language
Language acquisition
Linguistics
Prediction
Probability
Property
Psychology of learning
Semantic Generalization
Semantics
Understanding
title The Language of Generalization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A57%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Language%20of%20Generalization&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Tessler,%20Michael%20Henry&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=395-436&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rev0000142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180115356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180115356&rft_id=info:pmid/30762385&rfr_iscdi=true