Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study
Abstract Background Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall par...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Military medicine 2019-03, Vol.184 (Supplement_1), p.155-159 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 159 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Supplement_1 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Military medicine |
| container_volume | 184 |
| creator | Mesley, Matthew S Edelman, Kathryn Sharpless, Jane Borrasso, Allison Billigen, Julia B Puffer, Ross Williams, Dana Benso, Steven Puccio, Ava M Schneider, Walt Soose, Ryan Beers, Sue Kontos, Anthony Collins, Michael Okonkwo, David O |
| description | Abstract
Background
Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach.
Methods
Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30).
Results
A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point.”
Conclusions
The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/milmed/usy386 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2196515950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/milmed/usy386</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2196515950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-898c49b264cc17ec011c5b03c2d75312c38dc9ae89d6c8570eae5419c1296d183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtPwzAUhS0EglIYWZElFpZQ3zgvs5VQoFIrEASJLXIdVxglcbCdof-DH4xDQUgsLH7c892jax-EToBcAGF00qi6kdWktxuaJTtoBIySIAH6sotGhIRJEJE0PkCH1r4RAhHLYB8dUML8OYUR-pg3HRcO6zVe9rVTwbWyQnW1arnZ4JwbiXlb4dwXlOA1zjUXr37VpvKI08Zi3eIHbpzybbx1-Ik7ZdfeU3lh6H2UTrZfN9Xi4mr-a1YYxWt7iae4mE2XwaA9ub7aHKG9tRfk8fc-Rs83syK_Cxb3t_N8uggEjZgLMpaJiK3CJBICUikIgIhXhIqwSmMKoaBZJRiXGasSkcUpkVzGETABIUsqyOgYnW99O6Pfe2ld2fjXy7rmrdS9LUNgSQwxi4lHz_6gb7o3rZ-uDCNKgISQJp4KtpQw2loj12VnVON_sgRSDnGV27jKbVyeP_127VdD-Yf-yed3Qt13_3h9AvjRoAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430102176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Mesley, Matthew S ; Edelman, Kathryn ; Sharpless, Jane ; Borrasso, Allison ; Billigen, Julia B ; Puffer, Ross ; Williams, Dana ; Benso, Steven ; Puccio, Ava M ; Schneider, Walt ; Soose, Ryan ; Beers, Sue ; Kontos, Anthony ; Collins, Michael ; Okonkwo, David O</creator><creatorcontrib>Mesley, Matthew S ; Edelman, Kathryn ; Sharpless, Jane ; Borrasso, Allison ; Billigen, Julia B ; Puffer, Ross ; Williams, Dana ; Benso, Steven ; Puccio, Ava M ; Schneider, Walt ; Soose, Ryan ; Beers, Sue ; Kontos, Anthony ; Collins, Michael ; Okonkwo, David O</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach.
Methods
Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30).
Results
A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point.”
Conclusions
The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30901471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Clinical Trials as Topic - standards ; Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Patient Selection ; Personal Satisfaction ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Research Subjects - psychology ; Research Subjects - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2019-03, Vol.184 (Supplement_1), p.155-159</ispartof><rights>The Author 2019. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States]. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2019</rights><rights>The Author 2019. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States]. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>The Author 2019. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States]. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-898c49b264cc17ec011c5b03c2d75312c38dc9ae89d6c8570eae5419c1296d183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mesley, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelman, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpless, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrasso, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billigen, Julia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puffer, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benso, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puccio, Ava M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Walt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soose, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontos, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okonkwo, David O</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach.
Methods
Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30).
Results
A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point.”
Conclusions
The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Research Subjects - psychology</subject><subject>Research Subjects - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtPwzAUhS0EglIYWZElFpZQ3zgvs5VQoFIrEASJLXIdVxglcbCdof-DH4xDQUgsLH7c892jax-EToBcAGF00qi6kdWktxuaJTtoBIySIAH6sotGhIRJEJE0PkCH1r4RAhHLYB8dUML8OYUR-pg3HRcO6zVe9rVTwbWyQnW1arnZ4JwbiXlb4dwXlOA1zjUXr37VpvKI08Zi3eIHbpzybbx1-Ik7ZdfeU3lh6H2UTrZfN9Xi4mr-a1YYxWt7iae4mE2XwaA9ub7aHKG9tRfk8fc-Rs83syK_Cxb3t_N8uggEjZgLMpaJiK3CJBICUikIgIhXhIqwSmMKoaBZJRiXGasSkcUpkVzGETABIUsqyOgYnW99O6Pfe2ld2fjXy7rmrdS9LUNgSQwxi4lHz_6gb7o3rZ-uDCNKgISQJp4KtpQw2loj12VnVON_sgRSDnGV27jKbVyeP_127VdD-Yf-yed3Qt13_3h9AvjRoAA</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Mesley, Matthew S</creator><creator>Edelman, Kathryn</creator><creator>Sharpless, Jane</creator><creator>Borrasso, Allison</creator><creator>Billigen, Julia B</creator><creator>Puffer, Ross</creator><creator>Williams, Dana</creator><creator>Benso, Steven</creator><creator>Puccio, Ava M</creator><creator>Schneider, Walt</creator><creator>Soose, Ryan</creator><creator>Beers, Sue</creator><creator>Kontos, Anthony</creator><creator>Collins, Michael</creator><creator>Okonkwo, David O</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study</title><author>Mesley, Matthew S ; Edelman, Kathryn ; Sharpless, Jane ; Borrasso, Allison ; Billigen, Julia B ; Puffer, Ross ; Williams, Dana ; Benso, Steven ; Puccio, Ava M ; Schneider, Walt ; Soose, Ryan ; Beers, Sue ; Kontos, Anthony ; Collins, Michael ; Okonkwo, David O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-898c49b264cc17ec011c5b03c2d75312c38dc9ae89d6c8570eae5419c1296d183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Research Subjects - psychology</topic><topic>Research Subjects - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mesley, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelman, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpless, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrasso, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billigen, Julia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puffer, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benso, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puccio, Ava M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Walt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soose, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontos, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okonkwo, David O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mesley, Matthew S</au><au>Edelman, Kathryn</au><au>Sharpless, Jane</au><au>Borrasso, Allison</au><au>Billigen, Julia B</au><au>Puffer, Ross</au><au>Williams, Dana</au><au>Benso, Steven</au><au>Puccio, Ava M</au><au>Schneider, Walt</au><au>Soose, Ryan</au><au>Beers, Sue</au><au>Kontos, Anthony</au><au>Collins, Michael</au><au>Okonkwo, David O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>184</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>155-159</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach.
Methods
Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30).
Results
A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point.”
Conclusions
The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30901471</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/usy386</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0026-4075 |
| ispartof | Military medicine, 2019-03, Vol.184 (Supplement_1), p.155-159 |
| issn | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2196515950 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Adult Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - methods Clinical Trials as Topic - standards Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Male Patient Selection Personal Satisfaction Quality of Health Care - standards Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Research Subjects - psychology Research Subjects - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Traumatic brain injury |
| title | Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A21%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Multi-Disciplinary%20Care%20and%20Clinical%20Coach%20Coordinators%20on%20Participant%20Satisfaction%20and%20Retention%20in%20TBI%20Clinical%20Trials:%20A%20TEAM-TBI%20Study&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Mesley,%20Matthew%20S&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=155-159&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/usy386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2196515950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430102176&rft_id=info:pmid/30901471&rft_oup_id=10.1093/milmed/usy386&rfr_iscdi=true |