A comparative perspective on the evolution of mammalian reactions to dead conspecifics

In a variety of mammalian species, mothers and others care for and/or carry deceased newborns, and sometimes other conspecifics. The rationale for such behavior remains elusive. Based upon field observations of olive baboon ( Papio anubis ), African elephant ( Loxodonta africana ), and Thornicroft’s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Primates 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.21-28
1. Verfasser: Bercovitch, Fred B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Primates
container_volume 61
creator Bercovitch, Fred B.
description In a variety of mammalian species, mothers and others care for and/or carry deceased newborns, and sometimes other conspecifics. The rationale for such behavior remains elusive. Based upon field observations of olive baboon ( Papio anubis ), African elephant ( Loxodonta africana ), and Thornicroft’s giraffe ( Giraffa camelopardalis ) responses to recently dead conspecifics, combined with reports in the literature, a hypothesis is proposed to account for this activity. Among female mammals, lifetime reproductive success is more dependent upon rearing, than production, of offspring. The successful nurturing of progeny is associated with a strong maternal–offspring bond. One of the most important chemicals involved in both lactation and mother–infant bonding is oxytocin, a tiny molecule that has a lengthy evolutionary history and is implicated in the formation of social bonds across mammals. Evolution has extended the impact of oxytocin by adopting it beyond the original mother–infant bond to the establishment of social bonds that are required among group-living animals. Hence, sociality is a consequence of the same fundamental biological mediator of mother–offspring bonding, and this intricate connection between physiology and behavior has produced a situation where sometimes animals will care for or carry dead companions. Ways to test this hypothesis, as well as a potential way to refute it, are proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10329-019-00722-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2195255907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2194434668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a8c6b1c5a4980eaeaf5637609759893f9dcd671bf4236d6a3c58b177a39507d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozjj6B1xIwI2bah5N0iyHwRcMuBnchjRNtUPb1KQd8N-bTkcFFy4uuTf3OyfhAHCJ0S1GSNwFjCiRCcKxkCAkoUdgjjlGiaCcHYM5ivsko5TMwFkIW4QI5oKcghlFmWQppnPwuoTGNZ32uq92FnbWh86afe9a2L9baHeuHvoqTq6EjW4aXVe6hd5qM94G2DtYWF1En3bUVmVlwjk4KXUd7MXhXIDNw_1m9ZSsXx6fV8t1YlKe9YnODM-xYTqVGbLa6pJxKjiSgslM0lIWpuAC52VKKC-4poZlORZCU8mQKOgC3Ey2nXcfgw29aqpgbF3r1rohKIIlI4xJJCJ6_QfdusG38XMjlaY05TyLFJko410I3paq81Wj_afCSI2hqyl0FUNX-9AVjaKrg_WQN7b4kXynHAE6ASGu2jfrf9_-x_YLtEaMRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194434668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative perspective on the evolution of mammalian reactions to dead conspecifics</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bercovitch, Fred B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bercovitch, Fred B.</creatorcontrib><description>In a variety of mammalian species, mothers and others care for and/or carry deceased newborns, and sometimes other conspecifics. The rationale for such behavior remains elusive. Based upon field observations of olive baboon ( Papio anubis ), African elephant ( Loxodonta africana ), and Thornicroft’s giraffe ( Giraffa camelopardalis ) responses to recently dead conspecifics, combined with reports in the literature, a hypothesis is proposed to account for this activity. Among female mammals, lifetime reproductive success is more dependent upon rearing, than production, of offspring. The successful nurturing of progeny is associated with a strong maternal–offspring bond. One of the most important chemicals involved in both lactation and mother–infant bonding is oxytocin, a tiny molecule that has a lengthy evolutionary history and is implicated in the formation of social bonds across mammals. Evolution has extended the impact of oxytocin by adopting it beyond the original mother–infant bond to the establishment of social bonds that are required among group-living animals. Hence, sociality is a consequence of the same fundamental biological mediator of mother–offspring bonding, and this intricate connection between physiology and behavior has produced a situation where sometimes animals will care for or carry dead companions. Ways to test this hypothesis, as well as a potential way to refute it, are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-8332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1610-7365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10329-019-00722-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30895413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animals ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Breeding success ; Conspecifics ; Evolution ; Evolutionary Biology ; Giraffa camelopardalis ; Hypotheses ; Infants ; Lactation ; Life Sciences ; Loxodonta africana ; Mammals ; Neonates ; Offspring ; Organic chemistry ; Oxytocin ; Papio anubis ; Progeny ; Reproduction ; Social bonds ; Special Feature: Review Article ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Primates, 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.21-28</ispartof><rights>Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Primates is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a8c6b1c5a4980eaeaf5637609759893f9dcd671bf4236d6a3c58b177a39507d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a8c6b1c5a4980eaeaf5637609759893f9dcd671bf4236d6a3c58b177a39507d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10329-019-00722-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10329-019-00722-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bercovitch, Fred B.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative perspective on the evolution of mammalian reactions to dead conspecifics</title><title>Primates</title><addtitle>Primates</addtitle><addtitle>Primates</addtitle><description>In a variety of mammalian species, mothers and others care for and/or carry deceased newborns, and sometimes other conspecifics. The rationale for such behavior remains elusive. Based upon field observations of olive baboon ( Papio anubis ), African elephant ( Loxodonta africana ), and Thornicroft’s giraffe ( Giraffa camelopardalis ) responses to recently dead conspecifics, combined with reports in the literature, a hypothesis is proposed to account for this activity. Among female mammals, lifetime reproductive success is more dependent upon rearing, than production, of offspring. The successful nurturing of progeny is associated with a strong maternal–offspring bond. One of the most important chemicals involved in both lactation and mother–infant bonding is oxytocin, a tiny molecule that has a lengthy evolutionary history and is implicated in the formation of social bonds across mammals. Evolution has extended the impact of oxytocin by adopting it beyond the original mother–infant bond to the establishment of social bonds that are required among group-living animals. Hence, sociality is a consequence of the same fundamental biological mediator of mother–offspring bonding, and this intricate connection between physiology and behavior has produced a situation where sometimes animals will care for or carry dead companions. Ways to test this hypothesis, as well as a potential way to refute it, are proposed.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Giraffa camelopardalis</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Loxodonta africana</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Oxytocin</subject><subject>Papio anubis</subject><subject>Progeny</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Social bonds</subject><subject>Special Feature: Review Article</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0032-8332</issn><issn>1610-7365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozjj6B1xIwI2bah5N0iyHwRcMuBnchjRNtUPb1KQd8N-bTkcFFy4uuTf3OyfhAHCJ0S1GSNwFjCiRCcKxkCAkoUdgjjlGiaCcHYM5ivsko5TMwFkIW4QI5oKcghlFmWQppnPwuoTGNZ32uq92FnbWh86afe9a2L9baHeuHvoqTq6EjW4aXVe6hd5qM94G2DtYWF1En3bUVmVlwjk4KXUd7MXhXIDNw_1m9ZSsXx6fV8t1YlKe9YnODM-xYTqVGbLa6pJxKjiSgslM0lIWpuAC52VKKC-4poZlORZCU8mQKOgC3Ey2nXcfgw29aqpgbF3r1rohKIIlI4xJJCJ6_QfdusG38XMjlaY05TyLFJko410I3paq81Wj_afCSI2hqyl0FUNX-9AVjaKrg_WQN7b4kXynHAE6ASGu2jfrf9_-x_YLtEaMRQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Bercovitch, Fred B.</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>A comparative perspective on the evolution of mammalian reactions to dead conspecifics</title><author>Bercovitch, Fred B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a8c6b1c5a4980eaeaf5637609759893f9dcd671bf4236d6a3c58b177a39507d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Giraffa camelopardalis</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Loxodonta africana</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Oxytocin</topic><topic>Papio anubis</topic><topic>Progeny</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Social bonds</topic><topic>Special Feature: Review Article</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bercovitch, Fred B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primates</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bercovitch, Fred B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative perspective on the evolution of mammalian reactions to dead conspecifics</atitle><jtitle>Primates</jtitle><stitle>Primates</stitle><addtitle>Primates</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>21-28</pages><issn>0032-8332</issn><eissn>1610-7365</eissn><abstract>In a variety of mammalian species, mothers and others care for and/or carry deceased newborns, and sometimes other conspecifics. The rationale for such behavior remains elusive. Based upon field observations of olive baboon ( Papio anubis ), African elephant ( Loxodonta africana ), and Thornicroft’s giraffe ( Giraffa camelopardalis ) responses to recently dead conspecifics, combined with reports in the literature, a hypothesis is proposed to account for this activity. Among female mammals, lifetime reproductive success is more dependent upon rearing, than production, of offspring. The successful nurturing of progeny is associated with a strong maternal–offspring bond. One of the most important chemicals involved in both lactation and mother–infant bonding is oxytocin, a tiny molecule that has a lengthy evolutionary history and is implicated in the formation of social bonds across mammals. Evolution has extended the impact of oxytocin by adopting it beyond the original mother–infant bond to the establishment of social bonds that are required among group-living animals. Hence, sociality is a consequence of the same fundamental biological mediator of mother–offspring bonding, and this intricate connection between physiology and behavior has produced a situation where sometimes animals will care for or carry dead companions. Ways to test this hypothesis, as well as a potential way to refute it, are proposed.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>30895413</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10329-019-00722-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-8332
ispartof Primates, 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.21-28
issn 0032-8332
1610-7365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2195255907
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animal Ecology
Animals
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Breeding success
Conspecifics
Evolution
Evolutionary Biology
Giraffa camelopardalis
Hypotheses
Infants
Lactation
Life Sciences
Loxodonta africana
Mammals
Neonates
Offspring
Organic chemistry
Oxytocin
Papio anubis
Progeny
Reproduction
Social bonds
Special Feature: Review Article
Zoology
title A comparative perspective on the evolution of mammalian reactions to dead conspecifics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T07%3A28%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20perspective%20on%20the%20evolution%20of%20mammalian%20reactions%20to%20dead%20conspecifics&rft.jtitle=Primates&rft.au=Bercovitch,%20Fred%20B.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=21-28&rft.issn=0032-8332&rft.eissn=1610-7365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10329-019-00722-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2194434668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194434668&rft_id=info:pmid/30895413&rfr_iscdi=true