Vonoprazan versus proton‐pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review

Background and Aim Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first‐line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Ja...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1316-1328
Hauptverfasser: Miyazaki, Hirota, Igarashi, Ataru, Takeuchi, Toshihisa, Teng, Lida, Uda, Akihito, Deguchi, Hisato, Higuchi, Kazuhide, Tango, Toshiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1328
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1316
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 34
creator Miyazaki, Hirota
Igarashi, Ataru
Takeuchi, Toshihisa
Teng, Lida
Uda, Akihito
Deguchi, Hisato
Higuchi, Kazuhide
Tango, Toshiro
description Background and Aim Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first‐line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs in healing GERD. Methods We used MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to search the literature. Double‐blind randomized controlled trials for PPIs and/or vonoprazan that were published in English or Japanese and assessed healing effects in adult GERD patients were included. To estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments, we performed a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to assess the consistency assumption. Results Of 4001 articles identified in the database, 42 studies were eligible. One study was hand‐searched and added to the analysis. For the main analysis of healing effects at 8 weeks, odds ratios (ORs) of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) to esomeprazole (20 mg), rabeprazole (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg), and omeprazole (20 mg) were 2.29 (95% credible interval, 0.79–7.06), 3.94 (1.15–14.03), 2.40 (0.90–6.77), and 2.71 (0.98–7.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher ORs for vonoprazan versus most of the comparator PPIs. Conclusions This analysis shows that the GERD healing effect of vonoprazan is higher than that of rabeprazole (20 mg) but not higher than other PPIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that vonoprazan is more effective than most PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgh.14664
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194152812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2194152812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5034-2050c998a88310720916d865e7eed51100514b43eb79c065ae75dc7c45ccb41b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EapfSAy-ALHEph7TjxE4cblVVWlAlLsDVcpzZXS9JnHqStsupj9Bn5EkwbOkBibmMNPPp1_zzM_ZawLFIdbJZrY-FLEv5jC2ElJCJSpbP2QK0UFldiHqfvSTaAICESu2x_QK0LnSpF-z7tzCEMdofduA3GGkmPsYwheHn_cM49yP3w9o3fgqR-DJEvkbb-WHFV5amGJDCuLarNOMRl918x1tPaAnf81NOW5qwt5N3aXnj8fYVe7G0HeHhYz9gXz-cfzm7zK4-X3w8O73KnIJCZjkocHWtbbpRQJVDLcpWlworxFYJAaCEbGSBTVU7KJXFSrWuclI510jRFAfsaKebnFzPSJPpPTnsOjtgmMnkopZC5VrkCX37D7oJcxzSdSbPNWipa6US9W5HuRiIklMzRt_buDUCzO8ETErA_EkgsW8eFeemx_aJ_PvyBJzsgFvf4fb_SubTxeVO8heUUpE9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2280848955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vonoprazan versus proton‐pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Miyazaki, Hirota ; Igarashi, Ataru ; Takeuchi, Toshihisa ; Teng, Lida ; Uda, Akihito ; Deguchi, Hisato ; Higuchi, Kazuhide ; Tango, Toshiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Hirota ; Igarashi, Ataru ; Takeuchi, Toshihisa ; Teng, Lida ; Uda, Akihito ; Deguchi, Hisato ; Higuchi, Kazuhide ; Tango, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aim Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first‐line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs in healing GERD. Methods We used MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to search the literature. Double‐blind randomized controlled trials for PPIs and/or vonoprazan that were published in English or Japanese and assessed healing effects in adult GERD patients were included. To estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments, we performed a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to assess the consistency assumption. Results Of 4001 articles identified in the database, 42 studies were eligible. One study was hand‐searched and added to the analysis. For the main analysis of healing effects at 8 weeks, odds ratios (ORs) of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) to esomeprazole (20 mg), rabeprazole (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg), and omeprazole (20 mg) were 2.29 (95% credible interval, 0.79–7.06), 3.94 (1.15–14.03), 2.40 (0.90–6.77), and 2.71 (0.98–7.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher ORs for vonoprazan versus most of the comparator PPIs. Conclusions This analysis shows that the GERD healing effect of vonoprazan is higher than that of rabeprazole (20 mg) but not higher than other PPIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that vonoprazan is more effective than most PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14664</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30883868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Clinical trials ; Esophagitis ; Esophagitis, Peptic - diagnosis ; Esophagitis, Peptic - drug therapy ; Esophagitis, Peptic - physiopathology ; Esophagus ; gastric secretion ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology ; gastroesophagus reflux disease ; Humans ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Omeprazole ; Patient Selection ; Proton pump inhibitors ; Proton Pump Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Pyrroles - adverse effects ; Pyrroles - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Remission Induction ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sulfonamides - adverse effects ; Sulfonamides - therapeutic use ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1316-1328</ispartof><rights>2019 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2019 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5034-2050c998a88310720916d865e7eed51100514b43eb79c065ae75dc7c45ccb41b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5034-2050c998a88310720916d865e7eed51100514b43eb79c065ae75dc7c45ccb41b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgh.14664$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgh.14664$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Hirota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Ataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Toshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Lida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uda, Akihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguchi, Hisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tango, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><title>Vonoprazan versus proton‐pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aim Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first‐line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs in healing GERD. Methods We used MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to search the literature. Double‐blind randomized controlled trials for PPIs and/or vonoprazan that were published in English or Japanese and assessed healing effects in adult GERD patients were included. To estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments, we performed a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to assess the consistency assumption. Results Of 4001 articles identified in the database, 42 studies were eligible. One study was hand‐searched and added to the analysis. For the main analysis of healing effects at 8 weeks, odds ratios (ORs) of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) to esomeprazole (20 mg), rabeprazole (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg), and omeprazole (20 mg) were 2.29 (95% credible interval, 0.79–7.06), 3.94 (1.15–14.03), 2.40 (0.90–6.77), and 2.71 (0.98–7.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher ORs for vonoprazan versus most of the comparator PPIs. Conclusions This analysis shows that the GERD healing effect of vonoprazan is higher than that of rabeprazole (20 mg) but not higher than other PPIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that vonoprazan is more effective than most PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis.</description><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Esophagitis</subject><subject>Esophagitis, Peptic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophagitis, Peptic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophagitis, Peptic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>gastric secretion</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</subject><subject>gastroesophagus reflux disease</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Omeprazole</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Proton pump inhibitors</subject><subject>Proton Pump Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pyrroles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pyrroles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EapfSAy-ALHEph7TjxE4cblVVWlAlLsDVcpzZXS9JnHqStsupj9Bn5EkwbOkBibmMNPPp1_zzM_ZawLFIdbJZrY-FLEv5jC2ElJCJSpbP2QK0UFldiHqfvSTaAICESu2x_QK0LnSpF-z7tzCEMdofduA3GGkmPsYwheHn_cM49yP3w9o3fgqR-DJEvkbb-WHFV5amGJDCuLarNOMRl918x1tPaAnf81NOW5qwt5N3aXnj8fYVe7G0HeHhYz9gXz-cfzm7zK4-X3w8O73KnIJCZjkocHWtbbpRQJVDLcpWlworxFYJAaCEbGSBTVU7KJXFSrWuclI510jRFAfsaKebnFzPSJPpPTnsOjtgmMnkopZC5VrkCX37D7oJcxzSdSbPNWipa6US9W5HuRiIklMzRt_buDUCzO8ETErA_EkgsW8eFeemx_aJ_PvyBJzsgFvf4fb_SubTxeVO8heUUpE9</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Miyazaki, Hirota</creator><creator>Igarashi, Ataru</creator><creator>Takeuchi, Toshihisa</creator><creator>Teng, Lida</creator><creator>Uda, Akihito</creator><creator>Deguchi, Hisato</creator><creator>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><creator>Tango, Toshiro</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Vonoprazan versus proton‐pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review</title><author>Miyazaki, Hirota ; Igarashi, Ataru ; Takeuchi, Toshihisa ; Teng, Lida ; Uda, Akihito ; Deguchi, Hisato ; Higuchi, Kazuhide ; Tango, Toshiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5034-2050c998a88310720916d865e7eed51100514b43eb79c065ae75dc7c45ccb41b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Esophagitis</topic><topic>Esophagitis, Peptic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophagitis, Peptic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophagitis, Peptic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>gastric secretion</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</topic><topic>gastroesophagus reflux disease</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Omeprazole</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Proton pump inhibitors</topic><topic>Proton Pump Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pyrroles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pyrroles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Hirota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Ataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Toshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Lida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uda, Akihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguchi, Hisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tango, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyazaki, Hirota</au><au>Igarashi, Ataru</au><au>Takeuchi, Toshihisa</au><au>Teng, Lida</au><au>Uda, Akihito</au><au>Deguchi, Hisato</au><au>Higuchi, Kazuhide</au><au>Tango, Toshiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vonoprazan versus proton‐pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1316</spage><epage>1328</epage><pages>1316-1328</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aim Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first‐line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs in healing GERD. Methods We used MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to search the literature. Double‐blind randomized controlled trials for PPIs and/or vonoprazan that were published in English or Japanese and assessed healing effects in adult GERD patients were included. To estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments, we performed a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to assess the consistency assumption. Results Of 4001 articles identified in the database, 42 studies were eligible. One study was hand‐searched and added to the analysis. For the main analysis of healing effects at 8 weeks, odds ratios (ORs) of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) to esomeprazole (20 mg), rabeprazole (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg), and omeprazole (20 mg) were 2.29 (95% credible interval, 0.79–7.06), 3.94 (1.15–14.03), 2.40 (0.90–6.77), and 2.71 (0.98–7.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher ORs for vonoprazan versus most of the comparator PPIs. Conclusions This analysis shows that the GERD healing effect of vonoprazan is higher than that of rabeprazole (20 mg) but not higher than other PPIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that vonoprazan is more effective than most PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30883868</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgh.14664</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1316-1328
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194152812
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Clinical trials
Esophagitis
Esophagitis, Peptic - diagnosis
Esophagitis, Peptic - drug therapy
Esophagitis, Peptic - physiopathology
Esophagus
gastric secretion
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis
Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy
Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology
gastroesophagus reflux disease
Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Omeprazole
Patient Selection
Proton pump inhibitors
Proton Pump Inhibitors - adverse effects
Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Pyrroles - adverse effects
Pyrroles - therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Remission Induction
Severity of Illness Index
Sulfonamides - adverse effects
Sulfonamides - therapeutic use
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing - drug effects
title Vonoprazan versus proton‐pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A10%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vonoprazan%20versus%20proton%E2%80%90pump%20inhibitors%20for%20healing%20gastroesophageal%20reflux%20disease:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Miyazaki,%20Hirota&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1316&rft.epage=1328&rft.pages=1316-1328&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgh.14664&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2194152812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2280848955&rft_id=info:pmid/30883868&rfr_iscdi=true