Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives
The road to legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) across Canada has largely focused on legislative details such as eligibility and establishment of regulatory clinical practice standards. Details on how to implement high-quality, person-centered MAID programs at the institutional level...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Palliative & supportive care 2019-10, Vol.17 (5), p.590-595 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 595 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 590 |
container_title | Palliative & supportive care |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Hales, Brigette M. Bean, Sally Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie Ford, Bill Selby, Debbie |
description | The road to legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) across Canada has largely focused on legislative details such as eligibility and establishment of regulatory clinical practice standards. Details on how to implement high-quality, person-centered MAID programs at the institutional level are lacking. This study seeks to understand what improvement opportunities exist in the delivery of the MAID process from the family caregiver perspective.
This multi-methods study design used structured surveys, focus groups, and unstructured e-mail/phone conversations to gather experiential feedback from family caregivers of patients who underwent MAID between July 2016 and June 2017 at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data were combined and a qualitative, descriptive approach used to derive themes within family perspectives.
Improvement themes identified through the narrative data (48% response rate) were grouped in two categories: operational and experiential aspects of MAID. Operational themes included: process clarity, scheduling challenges and the 10-day period of reflection. Experiential themes included clinician objection/judgment, patient and family privacy, and bereavement resources.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that family caregivers' perspectives on the quality of the MAID process have been explored. Although practice standards have been made available to ensure all legislated components of the MAID process are completed, detailed guidance for how to best implement patient and family centered MAID programs at the institutional level remain limited. This study provides guidance for ways in which we can enhance the quality of MAID from the perspective of family caregivers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S147895151900004X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194152667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S147895151900004X</cupid><sourcerecordid>2307378850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-27a6e0e0fb7db536760803ae48af798e35736009ac702ff34730bc04a065a2563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtPwzAMxyME4v0BuKBIXOAwcJomablN4zUJxAGQuFVp6o6gPkbSIu3bk2pjSCB8sWX__LdlE3LE4JwBUxdPLFZJKphgKQSLXzfI7pAapSLim-uYiR2y5_07QBRxUNtkh0OSqJTLXdJM67lrP20zo90b0gcsrNEVHXtvfacbg9Q29Gox1E8fxtOrMxpwg95f0jH96HVlO93ZT6S-64sFbUta6tpWC2q0w1koODpH5-doBsofkK1SVx4PV36fvNxcP0_uRvePt9PJ-H5kuOLdKFJaIiCUuSpywaWSkADXGCe6VGmCXCguAVJtFERlyWPFITcQa5BCR0LyfXK61A3bfvTou6y23mBV6Qbb3mcRS2MmIilVQE9-oe9t75qwXTZci6skERAotqSMa713WGZzZ2vtFhmDbHhG9ucZoed4pdznNRbrju_rB4CvRHWdO1vM8Gf2_7JfJ_SSqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307378850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hales, Brigette M. ; Bean, Sally ; Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie ; Ford, Bill ; Selby, Debbie</creator><creatorcontrib>Hales, Brigette M. ; Bean, Sally ; Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie ; Ford, Bill ; Selby, Debbie</creatorcontrib><description>The road to legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) across Canada has largely focused on legislative details such as eligibility and establishment of regulatory clinical practice standards. Details on how to implement high-quality, person-centered MAID programs at the institutional level are lacking. This study seeks to understand what improvement opportunities exist in the delivery of the MAID process from the family caregiver perspective.
This multi-methods study design used structured surveys, focus groups, and unstructured e-mail/phone conversations to gather experiential feedback from family caregivers of patients who underwent MAID between July 2016 and June 2017 at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data were combined and a qualitative, descriptive approach used to derive themes within family perspectives.
Improvement themes identified through the narrative data (48% response rate) were grouped in two categories: operational and experiential aspects of MAID. Operational themes included: process clarity, scheduling challenges and the 10-day period of reflection. Experiential themes included clinician objection/judgment, patient and family privacy, and bereavement resources.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that family caregivers' perspectives on the quality of the MAID process have been explored. Although practice standards have been made available to ensure all legislated components of the MAID process are completed, detailed guidance for how to best implement patient and family centered MAID programs at the institutional level remain limited. This study provides guidance for ways in which we can enhance the quality of MAID from the perspective of family caregivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-9515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S147895151900004X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30887936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Assisted suicide ; Caregivers ; Electronic mail systems ; Health sciences ; Hospitals ; Original Article ; Patient-centered care ; Patients ; Qualitative research ; Quality ; Quality control ; Quality improvement</subject><ispartof>Palliative & supportive care, 2019-10, Vol.17 (5), p.590-595</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-27a6e0e0fb7db536760803ae48af798e35736009ac702ff34730bc04a065a2563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-27a6e0e0fb7db536760803ae48af798e35736009ac702ff34730bc04a065a2563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S147895151900004X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hales, Brigette M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bean, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby, Debbie</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives</title><title>Palliative & supportive care</title><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><description>The road to legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) across Canada has largely focused on legislative details such as eligibility and establishment of regulatory clinical practice standards. Details on how to implement high-quality, person-centered MAID programs at the institutional level are lacking. This study seeks to understand what improvement opportunities exist in the delivery of the MAID process from the family caregiver perspective.
This multi-methods study design used structured surveys, focus groups, and unstructured e-mail/phone conversations to gather experiential feedback from family caregivers of patients who underwent MAID between July 2016 and June 2017 at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data were combined and a qualitative, descriptive approach used to derive themes within family perspectives.
Improvement themes identified through the narrative data (48% response rate) were grouped in two categories: operational and experiential aspects of MAID. Operational themes included: process clarity, scheduling challenges and the 10-day period of reflection. Experiential themes included clinician objection/judgment, patient and family privacy, and bereavement resources.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that family caregivers' perspectives on the quality of the MAID process have been explored. Although practice standards have been made available to ensure all legislated components of the MAID process are completed, detailed guidance for how to best implement patient and family centered MAID programs at the institutional level remain limited. This study provides guidance for ways in which we can enhance the quality of MAID from the perspective of family caregivers.</description><subject>Assisted suicide</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Electronic mail systems</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><issn>1478-9515</issn><issn>1478-9523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtPwzAMxyME4v0BuKBIXOAwcJomablN4zUJxAGQuFVp6o6gPkbSIu3bk2pjSCB8sWX__LdlE3LE4JwBUxdPLFZJKphgKQSLXzfI7pAapSLim-uYiR2y5_07QBRxUNtkh0OSqJTLXdJM67lrP20zo90b0gcsrNEVHXtvfacbg9Q29Gox1E8fxtOrMxpwg95f0jH96HVlO93ZT6S-64sFbUta6tpWC2q0w1koODpH5-doBsofkK1SVx4PV36fvNxcP0_uRvePt9PJ-H5kuOLdKFJaIiCUuSpywaWSkADXGCe6VGmCXCguAVJtFERlyWPFITcQa5BCR0LyfXK61A3bfvTou6y23mBV6Qbb3mcRS2MmIilVQE9-oe9t75qwXTZci6skERAotqSMa713WGZzZ2vtFhmDbHhG9ucZoed4pdznNRbrju_rB4CvRHWdO1vM8Gf2_7JfJ_SSqQ</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Hales, Brigette M.</creator><creator>Bean, Sally</creator><creator>Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie</creator><creator>Ford, Bill</creator><creator>Selby, Debbie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives</title><author>Hales, Brigette M. ; Bean, Sally ; Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie ; Ford, Bill ; Selby, Debbie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-27a6e0e0fb7db536760803ae48af798e35736009ac702ff34730bc04a065a2563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assisted suicide</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Electronic mail systems</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hales, Brigette M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bean, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby, Debbie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Palliative & supportive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hales, Brigette M.</au><au>Bean, Sally</au><au>Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie</au><au>Ford, Bill</au><au>Selby, Debbie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Palliative & supportive care</jtitle><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>590-595</pages><issn>1478-9515</issn><eissn>1478-9523</eissn><abstract>The road to legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) across Canada has largely focused on legislative details such as eligibility and establishment of regulatory clinical practice standards. Details on how to implement high-quality, person-centered MAID programs at the institutional level are lacking. This study seeks to understand what improvement opportunities exist in the delivery of the MAID process from the family caregiver perspective.
This multi-methods study design used structured surveys, focus groups, and unstructured e-mail/phone conversations to gather experiential feedback from family caregivers of patients who underwent MAID between July 2016 and June 2017 at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data were combined and a qualitative, descriptive approach used to derive themes within family perspectives.
Improvement themes identified through the narrative data (48% response rate) were grouped in two categories: operational and experiential aspects of MAID. Operational themes included: process clarity, scheduling challenges and the 10-day period of reflection. Experiential themes included clinician objection/judgment, patient and family privacy, and bereavement resources.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that family caregivers' perspectives on the quality of the MAID process have been explored. Although practice standards have been made available to ensure all legislated components of the MAID process are completed, detailed guidance for how to best implement patient and family centered MAID programs at the institutional level remain limited. This study provides guidance for ways in which we can enhance the quality of MAID from the perspective of family caregivers.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30887936</pmid><doi>10.1017/S147895151900004X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-9515 |
ispartof | Palliative & supportive care, 2019-10, Vol.17 (5), p.590-595 |
issn | 1478-9515 1478-9523 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194152667 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Assisted suicide Caregivers Electronic mail systems Health sciences Hospitals Original Article Patient-centered care Patients Qualitative research Quality Quality control Quality improvement |
title | Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T20%3A58%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20Medical%20Assistance%20in%20Dying%20(MAID)%20process:%20A%20qualitative%20study%20of%20family%20caregiver%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20&%20supportive%20care&rft.au=Hales,%20Brigette%20M.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=590-595&rft.issn=1478-9515&rft.eissn=1478-9523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S147895151900004X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307378850%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307378850&rft_id=info:pmid/30887936&rft_cupid=10_1017_S147895151900004X&rfr_iscdi=true |