Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review
Introduction Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2019-07, Vol.63 (6), p.814-818 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 818 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 814 |
container_title | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Johansen, Jes R. Perner, Anders Brodtkorb, Julie H. Møller, Morten H. |
description | Introduction
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier.
Methods
We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Discussion
With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aas.13345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193603353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2193603353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_Agis6Xg19AAl70UJc0tmm8DfENhAnqOSTtE1bplpmndfbbm9npQTCXkPDLPw9_Qo45u-BxjY3BCy7EZbZFRlwoleSZzLfJiDHGk4zLdI_sI77Fo7hUapfsCVYUaaHkiExfEah3dNZXwX_20M76hmJrQjmj9YIiLLFGGgBhfXVFn4Jvfekb6nyghmKPLcxNW5fRfNSwOiQ7zjQIR5v9gLze3rxc3yeP07uH68ljUopMZInJWZWzVFpgeRyWWSE5sFKVqa1YbiVTlRK5kC7irLAOnDXMOaWUdVaAEgfkbMhdBv_eAbZ6XmMJTWMW4DvUKY_vmYifRXr6h775LizidDpNY7zMZJFGdT6oMnjEAE4vQz03odec6XXLOrasv1uO9mST2Nk5VL_yp9YIxgNY1Q30_yfpyeR5iPwCZf6FoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2235575782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Johansen, Jes R. ; Perner, Anders ; Brodtkorb, Julie H. ; Møller, Morten H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jes R. ; Perner, Anders ; Brodtkorb, Julie H. ; Møller, Morten H.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier.
Methods
We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Discussion
With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aas.13345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30882897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Animals ; Bleeding ; Clinical Protocols ; Clinical trials ; Drug development ; Evaluation ; Fluid Therapy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Hydroxyethyl starch ; hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects ; Kidneys ; Medical research ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Mortality ; Quality ; Randomization ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - therapy ; Side effects ; Starch ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2019-07, Vol.63 (6), p.814-818</ispartof><rights>2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6378-9673 ; 0000-0002-4668-0123 ; 0000-0002-7868-046X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faas.13345$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faas.13345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30882897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jes R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perner, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Morten H.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier.
Methods
We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Discussion
With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl starch</subject><subject>hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - therapy</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_Agis6Xg19AAl70UJc0tmm8DfENhAnqOSTtE1bplpmndfbbm9npQTCXkPDLPw9_Qo45u-BxjY3BCy7EZbZFRlwoleSZzLfJiDHGk4zLdI_sI77Fo7hUapfsCVYUaaHkiExfEah3dNZXwX_20M76hmJrQjmj9YIiLLFGGgBhfXVFn4Jvfekb6nyghmKPLcxNW5fRfNSwOiQ7zjQIR5v9gLze3rxc3yeP07uH68ljUopMZInJWZWzVFpgeRyWWSE5sFKVqa1YbiVTlRK5kC7irLAOnDXMOaWUdVaAEgfkbMhdBv_eAbZ6XmMJTWMW4DvUKY_vmYifRXr6h775LizidDpNY7zMZJFGdT6oMnjEAE4vQz03odec6XXLOrasv1uO9mST2Nk5VL_yp9YIxgNY1Q30_yfpyeR5iPwCZf6FoA</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Johansen, Jes R.</creator><creator>Perner, Anders</creator><creator>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</creator><creator>Møller, Morten H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-9673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-0123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-046X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</title><author>Johansen, Jes R. ; Perner, Anders ; Brodtkorb, Julie H. ; Møller, Morten H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl starch</topic><topic>hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - therapy</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jes R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perner, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Morten H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johansen, Jes R.</au><au>Perner, Anders</au><au>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</au><au>Møller, Morten H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>814</spage><epage>818</epage><pages>814-818</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier.
Methods
We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Discussion
With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30882897</pmid><doi>10.1111/aas.13345</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-9673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-0123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-046X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-5172 |
ispartof | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2019-07, Vol.63 (6), p.814-818 |
issn | 0001-5172 1399-6576 1399-6576 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193603353 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | adverse effects Animals Bleeding Clinical Protocols Clinical trials Drug development Evaluation Fluid Therapy - adverse effects Humans Hydroxyethyl starch hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects Kidneys Medical research Meta-Analysis as Topic Mortality Quality Randomization Sepsis Sepsis - therapy Side effects Starch Systematic review Systematic Reviews as Topic |
title | Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A28%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20hydroxyethyl%20starch%20in%20sepsis%20research:%20Protocol%20for%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Johansen,%20Jes%20R.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=814&rft.epage=818&rft.pages=814-818&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aas.13345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193603353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2235575782&rft_id=info:pmid/30882897&rfr_iscdi=true |