Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review

Introduction Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2019-07, Vol.63 (6), p.814-818
Hauptverfasser: Johansen, Jes R., Perner, Anders, Brodtkorb, Julie H., Møller, Morten H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 818
container_issue 6
container_start_page 814
container_title Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
container_volume 63
creator Johansen, Jes R.
Perner, Anders
Brodtkorb, Julie H.
Møller, Morten H.
description Introduction Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier. Methods We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Discussion With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aas.13345
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193603353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2193603353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_Agis6Xg19AAl70UJc0tmm8DfENhAnqOSTtE1bplpmndfbbm9npQTCXkPDLPw9_Qo45u-BxjY3BCy7EZbZFRlwoleSZzLfJiDHGk4zLdI_sI77Fo7hUapfsCVYUaaHkiExfEah3dNZXwX_20M76hmJrQjmj9YIiLLFGGgBhfXVFn4Jvfekb6nyghmKPLcxNW5fRfNSwOiQ7zjQIR5v9gLze3rxc3yeP07uH68ljUopMZInJWZWzVFpgeRyWWSE5sFKVqa1YbiVTlRK5kC7irLAOnDXMOaWUdVaAEgfkbMhdBv_eAbZ6XmMJTWMW4DvUKY_vmYifRXr6h775LizidDpNY7zMZJFGdT6oMnjEAE4vQz03odec6XXLOrasv1uO9mST2Nk5VL_yp9YIxgNY1Q30_yfpyeR5iPwCZf6FoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2235575782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Johansen, Jes R. ; Perner, Anders ; Brodtkorb, Julie H. ; Møller, Morten H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jes R. ; Perner, Anders ; Brodtkorb, Julie H. ; Møller, Morten H.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier. Methods We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Discussion With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aas.13345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30882897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Animals ; Bleeding ; Clinical Protocols ; Clinical trials ; Drug development ; Evaluation ; Fluid Therapy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Hydroxyethyl starch ; hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects ; Kidneys ; Medical research ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Mortality ; Quality ; Randomization ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - therapy ; Side effects ; Starch ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2019-07, Vol.63 (6), p.814-818</ispartof><rights>2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6378-9673 ; 0000-0002-4668-0123 ; 0000-0002-7868-046X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faas.13345$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faas.13345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30882897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jes R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perner, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Morten H.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier. Methods We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Discussion With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl starch</subject><subject>hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - therapy</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_Agis6Xg19AAl70UJc0tmm8DfENhAnqOSTtE1bplpmndfbbm9npQTCXkPDLPw9_Qo45u-BxjY3BCy7EZbZFRlwoleSZzLfJiDHGk4zLdI_sI77Fo7hUapfsCVYUaaHkiExfEah3dNZXwX_20M76hmJrQjmj9YIiLLFGGgBhfXVFn4Jvfekb6nyghmKPLcxNW5fRfNSwOiQ7zjQIR5v9gLze3rxc3yeP07uH68ljUopMZInJWZWzVFpgeRyWWSE5sFKVqa1YbiVTlRK5kC7irLAOnDXMOaWUdVaAEgfkbMhdBv_eAbZ6XmMJTWMW4DvUKY_vmYifRXr6h775LizidDpNY7zMZJFGdT6oMnjEAE4vQz03odec6XXLOrasv1uO9mST2Nk5VL_yp9YIxgNY1Q30_yfpyeR5iPwCZf6FoA</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Johansen, Jes R.</creator><creator>Perner, Anders</creator><creator>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</creator><creator>Møller, Morten H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-9673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-0123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-046X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</title><author>Johansen, Jes R. ; Perner, Anders ; Brodtkorb, Julie H. ; Møller, Morten H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-a60d6027be066570b371e0c9c2bd06b709d93637f53558bfefba0ff999bfb3e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl starch</topic><topic>hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - therapy</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jes R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perner, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Morten H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johansen, Jes R.</au><au>Perner, Anders</au><au>Brodtkorb, Julie H.</au><au>Møller, Morten H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>814</spage><epage>818</epage><pages>814-818</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><abstract>Introduction Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45 is a synthetic colloid, which has been on the market since 1999. In recent years, concern about the use of HES has been raised because of serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, bleeding and even increased mortality with its use. In the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess if the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 in patients with sepsis could have been discovered earlier. Methods We will conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials in animals and patients and observational studies in patients comparing HES 130/0.38‐0.45 vs any crystalloid in sepsis. The primary outcome will be all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. We will systematically search EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statements and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Discussion With the outlined systematic review, we aim to assess whether the adverse effects of HES 130/0.38‐0.45 could have been discovered earlier by comparing summary effect estimates of harm from observational studies in patients and randomised trials in animals and patients. The results may have implications for future drug development and approval processes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30882897</pmid><doi>10.1111/aas.13345</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-9673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-0123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-046X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5172
ispartof Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2019-07, Vol.63 (6), p.814-818
issn 0001-5172
1399-6576
1399-6576
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193603353
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects adverse effects
Animals
Bleeding
Clinical Protocols
Clinical trials
Drug development
Evaluation
Fluid Therapy - adverse effects
Humans
Hydroxyethyl starch
hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.38‐0.45
Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects
Kidneys
Medical research
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Mortality
Quality
Randomization
Sepsis
Sepsis - therapy
Side effects
Starch
Systematic review
Systematic Reviews as Topic
title Use of hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis research: Protocol for a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A28%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20hydroxyethyl%20starch%20in%20sepsis%20research:%20Protocol%20for%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Johansen,%20Jes%20R.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=814&rft.epage=818&rft.pages=814-818&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aas.13345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193603353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2235575782&rft_id=info:pmid/30882897&rfr_iscdi=true