Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the developed world and the primary cause of adult disability. The most common site of stroke is the middle cerebral artery (MCA), an artery that supplies a range of areas involved in both language and motor function. As a consequence, many stroke patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2019-03, Vol.33 (3), p.167-178
Hauptverfasser: Anderlini, Deanna, Wallis, Guy, Marinovic, Welber
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 3
container_start_page 167
container_title Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
container_volume 33
creator Anderlini, Deanna
Wallis, Guy
Marinovic, Welber
description Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the developed world and the primary cause of adult disability. The most common site of stroke is the middle cerebral artery (MCA), an artery that supplies a range of areas involved in both language and motor function. As a consequence, many stroke patients experience a combination of language and motor deficits. Indeed, those suffering from Broca’s aphasia have an 80% chance of also suffering hemiplegia. Despite the prevalence of multifaceted disability in patients, the current trend in both clinical trials and clinical practice is toward compartmentalization of dysfunction. In this article, we review evidence that aphasia and hemiplegia do not just coexist, but that they interact. We review a number of clinical reports describing how therapies for one type of deficit can improve recovery in the other and vice versa. We go on to describe how language deficits should be seen as a warning to clinicians that the patient is likely to experience motor impairment and slower motor recovery, aiding clinicians to optimize their choice of therapy. We explore these findings and offer a tentative link between language and arm function through their shared need for sequential action, which we term fluency. We propose that area BA44 (part of Broca’s area) acts as a hub for fluency in both movement and language, both in terms of production and comprehension.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1545968319829454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193162275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1545968319829454</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2193162275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-eacd5519e18c2efca3b26602159adca37a3341c56052d12e709808c79ec19d333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UDtPwzAQthCIQmFnQh5ZAn7EccxWVVCQikBQ5ujqXNqUtC52gtR_j6sWBiSme3wP3X2EXHB2zbnWN1ylymS55CYXJlXpATnhSokky9P0cNunKtniPXIawoIxIXPDjklPMq20UeKEzMawmnUwQwqBAn3xWNa2dZ66ij65bfOK1n2h39zSyRzpEALSKq4hwh7pqHFTaOhgvfYO7Jy2jr613n1g1M1hWjd1C23tVmfkqIIm4Pm-9sn7_d1k-JCMn0ePw8E4sVKbNkGwpVLcIM-twMqCnIosY4IrA2WcNEiZcqsypkTJBWpmcpZbbdByU0op--Rq5xvv-ewwtMWyDhabBlboulAIbiTPhNAqUtmOar0LwWNVrH29BL8pOCu28RZ_442Sy717N11i-Sv4yTMSkh0hxEiLhev8Kn77v-E3lLOBAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193162275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Anderlini, Deanna ; Wallis, Guy ; Marinovic, Welber</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderlini, Deanna ; Wallis, Guy ; Marinovic, Welber</creatorcontrib><description>Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the developed world and the primary cause of adult disability. The most common site of stroke is the middle cerebral artery (MCA), an artery that supplies a range of areas involved in both language and motor function. As a consequence, many stroke patients experience a combination of language and motor deficits. Indeed, those suffering from Broca’s aphasia have an 80% chance of also suffering hemiplegia. Despite the prevalence of multifaceted disability in patients, the current trend in both clinical trials and clinical practice is toward compartmentalization of dysfunction. In this article, we review evidence that aphasia and hemiplegia do not just coexist, but that they interact. We review a number of clinical reports describing how therapies for one type of deficit can improve recovery in the other and vice versa. We go on to describe how language deficits should be seen as a warning to clinicians that the patient is likely to experience motor impairment and slower motor recovery, aiding clinicians to optimize their choice of therapy. We explore these findings and offer a tentative link between language and arm function through their shared need for sequential action, which we term fluency. We propose that area BA44 (part of Broca’s area) acts as a hub for fluency in both movement and language, both in terms of production and comprehension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1545968319829454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30757952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2019-03, Vol.33 (3), p.167-178</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-eacd5519e18c2efca3b26602159adca37a3341c56052d12e709808c79ec19d333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-eacd5519e18c2efca3b26602159adca37a3341c56052d12e709808c79ec19d333</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4594-2125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1545968319829454$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1545968319829454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30757952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderlini, Deanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinovic, Welber</creatorcontrib><title>Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</title><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the developed world and the primary cause of adult disability. The most common site of stroke is the middle cerebral artery (MCA), an artery that supplies a range of areas involved in both language and motor function. As a consequence, many stroke patients experience a combination of language and motor deficits. Indeed, those suffering from Broca’s aphasia have an 80% chance of also suffering hemiplegia. Despite the prevalence of multifaceted disability in patients, the current trend in both clinical trials and clinical practice is toward compartmentalization of dysfunction. In this article, we review evidence that aphasia and hemiplegia do not just coexist, but that they interact. We review a number of clinical reports describing how therapies for one type of deficit can improve recovery in the other and vice versa. We go on to describe how language deficits should be seen as a warning to clinicians that the patient is likely to experience motor impairment and slower motor recovery, aiding clinicians to optimize their choice of therapy. We explore these findings and offer a tentative link between language and arm function through their shared need for sequential action, which we term fluency. We propose that area BA44 (part of Broca’s area) acts as a hub for fluency in both movement and language, both in terms of production and comprehension.</description><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UDtPwzAQthCIQmFnQh5ZAn7EccxWVVCQikBQ5ujqXNqUtC52gtR_j6sWBiSme3wP3X2EXHB2zbnWN1ylymS55CYXJlXpATnhSokky9P0cNunKtniPXIawoIxIXPDjklPMq20UeKEzMawmnUwQwqBAn3xWNa2dZ66ij65bfOK1n2h39zSyRzpEALSKq4hwh7pqHFTaOhgvfYO7Jy2jr613n1g1M1hWjd1C23tVmfkqIIm4Pm-9sn7_d1k-JCMn0ePw8E4sVKbNkGwpVLcIM-twMqCnIosY4IrA2WcNEiZcqsypkTJBWpmcpZbbdByU0op--Rq5xvv-ewwtMWyDhabBlboulAIbiTPhNAqUtmOar0LwWNVrH29BL8pOCu28RZ_442Sy717N11i-Sv4yTMSkh0hxEiLhev8Kn77v-E3lLOBAg</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Anderlini, Deanna</creator><creator>Wallis, Guy</creator><creator>Marinovic, Welber</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-2125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation</title><author>Anderlini, Deanna ; Wallis, Guy ; Marinovic, Welber</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-eacd5519e18c2efca3b26602159adca37a3341c56052d12e709808c79ec19d333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderlini, Deanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinovic, Welber</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderlini, Deanna</au><au>Wallis, Guy</au><au>Marinovic, Welber</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>167-178</pages><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the developed world and the primary cause of adult disability. The most common site of stroke is the middle cerebral artery (MCA), an artery that supplies a range of areas involved in both language and motor function. As a consequence, many stroke patients experience a combination of language and motor deficits. Indeed, those suffering from Broca’s aphasia have an 80% chance of also suffering hemiplegia. Despite the prevalence of multifaceted disability in patients, the current trend in both clinical trials and clinical practice is toward compartmentalization of dysfunction. In this article, we review evidence that aphasia and hemiplegia do not just coexist, but that they interact. We review a number of clinical reports describing how therapies for one type of deficit can improve recovery in the other and vice versa. We go on to describe how language deficits should be seen as a warning to clinicians that the patient is likely to experience motor impairment and slower motor recovery, aiding clinicians to optimize their choice of therapy. We explore these findings and offer a tentative link between language and arm function through their shared need for sequential action, which we term fluency. We propose that area BA44 (part of Broca’s area) acts as a hub for fluency in both movement and language, both in terms of production and comprehension.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30757952</pmid><doi>10.1177/1545968319829454</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-2125</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-9683
ispartof Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2019-03, Vol.33 (3), p.167-178
issn 1545-9683
1552-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193162275
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Language%20as%20a%20Predictor%20of%20Motor%20Recovery:%20The%20Case%20for%20a%20More%20Global%20Approach%20to%20Stroke%20Rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20neural%20repair&rft.au=Anderlini,%20Deanna&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=167-178&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1545968319829454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193162275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193162275&rft_id=info:pmid/30757952&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1545968319829454&rfr_iscdi=true