The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe

The vast increase of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Zimbabwe coupled with a severe energy crisis have made waste-to-energy technology more attractive and necessary. Coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW though hydrothermal carbonization can play a critical role to improve both wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2019-06, Vol.668, p.743-759
Hauptverfasser: Maqhuzu, Andile B., Yoshikawa, Kunio, Takahashi, Fumitake
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 759
container_issue
container_start_page 743
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 668
creator Maqhuzu, Andile B.
Yoshikawa, Kunio
Takahashi, Fumitake
description The vast increase of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Zimbabwe coupled with a severe energy crisis have made waste-to-energy technology more attractive and necessary. Coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW though hydrothermal carbonization can play a critical role to improve both waste management and energy supply. Moreover, MSW conversion to a carbon neutral solid fuel that can be burnt in existing coal-fired power stations might reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions despite GHG releases from waste collection, waste conversion to fuel, and fuel transportation processes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate present MSW generation in Zimbabwe, its characteristics as a fuel source, and the impact of coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW using hydrothermal carbonization technology on GHG and other air pollutant emissions. Four different scenarios based on the balance between fuel supply and demand were tested in this paper. The results suggest 0.54 ± 0.14 kg/capita/day of MSW generation in Zimbabwe and about 1051.7 ± 270.7 Gg of annual MSW generation from the current urban population. 289.3 Gg of coal-alternative solid fuel production was expected from domestic MSW collectable in urban areas. The model predicted that co-burning of alternative fuel in coal-fired power plants could reduce the methane potential of household waste from 62,200 to 15,800 Mg CH4 per year. Under the best possible scenario, it could reduce SOx emissions by 4.2%, CH4 emissions by 4.5%, CO2 emissions by 3.1%, and Global Warming Potential by 2.2%. On the other hand, NOx emissions would increase by 18%. If without additional installation of air pollutant control devices in power plants, waste-to-energy generates a trade-off between global warming and acid rain. In addition, geological locations generate a large demand/supply gap of alternative fuel and regulate maximum available consumption of alternative fuel. [Display omitted] •Effects of waste-to-energy on air pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe were assessed.•289,300 Mg of coal-alternative fuel can be produced from collected household wastes.•>2.2% and 4.2% reductions in greenhouse gas and SOx are possible.•Waste-to-energy increases NOx emission by 18% for specific power generation scenarios.•Waste-to-energy will be promising only when appropriate investments are done.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2191351958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969719310289</els_id><sourcerecordid>2191351958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f51be20aadeac051db8d14fcbc44a027a73c7490d42e1a1a44abbb56be635c663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuOFCEUhonROO3oKyhLN1VCVVGX5WTiLZnEzbhxQw7UwaZDQQlUT9rX8IWl0-NsJSQknO_8B_IR8o6zmjPefzjUSdscMvpj3TA-1aytmWDPyI6Pw1Rx1vTPyY6xbqymfhquyKuUDqysYeQvyVXLxl5MTOzIn_s9UjQGdabBUB3AUXAZo4dsj0jNho6aGBa6bN5qu5Z6Cs7O9AFSxkRxWV04Wf-T7k9zDHmPcSmMhqiCt79LSvC0bMhLSGupWk3X4NyWwefSbVMqRKLW0x92UaAe8DV5YcAlfPN4XpPvnz7e336p7r59_np7c1fpjotcGcEVNgxgRtBM8FmNM--MVrrrgDUDDK0euonNXYMcOJRbpZToFfat0H3fXpP3l9w1hl8bpizLazQ6Bx7DlmTDJ94KPomxoMMF1TGkFNHINdoF4klyJs9G5EE-GZFnI5K1shgpnW8fh2xqwfmp75-CAtxcACxfPVqM5yD0GmcbixU5B_vfIX8B6KGm9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2191351958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Maqhuzu, Andile B. ; Yoshikawa, Kunio ; Takahashi, Fumitake</creator><creatorcontrib>Maqhuzu, Andile B. ; Yoshikawa, Kunio ; Takahashi, Fumitake</creatorcontrib><description>The vast increase of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Zimbabwe coupled with a severe energy crisis have made waste-to-energy technology more attractive and necessary. Coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW though hydrothermal carbonization can play a critical role to improve both waste management and energy supply. Moreover, MSW conversion to a carbon neutral solid fuel that can be burnt in existing coal-fired power stations might reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions despite GHG releases from waste collection, waste conversion to fuel, and fuel transportation processes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate present MSW generation in Zimbabwe, its characteristics as a fuel source, and the impact of coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW using hydrothermal carbonization technology on GHG and other air pollutant emissions. Four different scenarios based on the balance between fuel supply and demand were tested in this paper. The results suggest 0.54 ± 0.14 kg/capita/day of MSW generation in Zimbabwe and about 1051.7 ± 270.7 Gg of annual MSW generation from the current urban population. 289.3 Gg of coal-alternative solid fuel production was expected from domestic MSW collectable in urban areas. The model predicted that co-burning of alternative fuel in coal-fired power plants could reduce the methane potential of household waste from 62,200 to 15,800 Mg CH4 per year. Under the best possible scenario, it could reduce SOx emissions by 4.2%, CH4 emissions by 4.5%, CO2 emissions by 3.1%, and Global Warming Potential by 2.2%. On the other hand, NOx emissions would increase by 18%. If without additional installation of air pollutant control devices in power plants, waste-to-energy generates a trade-off between global warming and acid rain. In addition, geological locations generate a large demand/supply gap of alternative fuel and regulate maximum available consumption of alternative fuel. [Display omitted] •Effects of waste-to-energy on air pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe were assessed.•289,300 Mg of coal-alternative fuel can be produced from collected household wastes.•&gt;2.2% and 4.2% reductions in greenhouse gas and SOx are possible.•Waste-to-energy increases NOx emission by 18% for specific power generation scenarios.•Waste-to-energy will be promising only when appropriate investments are done.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30865905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Atmospheric pollutant emission ; Hydrothermal carbonization ; Municipal solid wastes ; Waste to energy ; Zimbabwe</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2019-06, Vol.668, p.743-759</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f51be20aadeac051db8d14fcbc44a027a73c7490d42e1a1a44abbb56be635c663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f51be20aadeac051db8d14fcbc44a027a73c7490d42e1a1a44abbb56be635c663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30865905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maqhuzu, Andile B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, Kunio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Fumitake</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The vast increase of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Zimbabwe coupled with a severe energy crisis have made waste-to-energy technology more attractive and necessary. Coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW though hydrothermal carbonization can play a critical role to improve both waste management and energy supply. Moreover, MSW conversion to a carbon neutral solid fuel that can be burnt in existing coal-fired power stations might reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions despite GHG releases from waste collection, waste conversion to fuel, and fuel transportation processes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate present MSW generation in Zimbabwe, its characteristics as a fuel source, and the impact of coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW using hydrothermal carbonization technology on GHG and other air pollutant emissions. Four different scenarios based on the balance between fuel supply and demand were tested in this paper. The results suggest 0.54 ± 0.14 kg/capita/day of MSW generation in Zimbabwe and about 1051.7 ± 270.7 Gg of annual MSW generation from the current urban population. 289.3 Gg of coal-alternative solid fuel production was expected from domestic MSW collectable in urban areas. The model predicted that co-burning of alternative fuel in coal-fired power plants could reduce the methane potential of household waste from 62,200 to 15,800 Mg CH4 per year. Under the best possible scenario, it could reduce SOx emissions by 4.2%, CH4 emissions by 4.5%, CO2 emissions by 3.1%, and Global Warming Potential by 2.2%. On the other hand, NOx emissions would increase by 18%. If without additional installation of air pollutant control devices in power plants, waste-to-energy generates a trade-off between global warming and acid rain. In addition, geological locations generate a large demand/supply gap of alternative fuel and regulate maximum available consumption of alternative fuel. [Display omitted] •Effects of waste-to-energy on air pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe were assessed.•289,300 Mg of coal-alternative fuel can be produced from collected household wastes.•&gt;2.2% and 4.2% reductions in greenhouse gas and SOx are possible.•Waste-to-energy increases NOx emission by 18% for specific power generation scenarios.•Waste-to-energy will be promising only when appropriate investments are done.</description><subject>Atmospheric pollutant emission</subject><subject>Hydrothermal carbonization</subject><subject>Municipal solid wastes</subject><subject>Waste to energy</subject><subject>Zimbabwe</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcuOFCEUhonROO3oKyhLN1VCVVGX5WTiLZnEzbhxQw7UwaZDQQlUT9rX8IWl0-NsJSQknO_8B_IR8o6zmjPefzjUSdscMvpj3TA-1aytmWDPyI6Pw1Rx1vTPyY6xbqymfhquyKuUDqysYeQvyVXLxl5MTOzIn_s9UjQGdabBUB3AUXAZo4dsj0jNho6aGBa6bN5qu5Z6Cs7O9AFSxkRxWV04Wf-T7k9zDHmPcSmMhqiCt79LSvC0bMhLSGupWk3X4NyWwefSbVMqRKLW0x92UaAe8DV5YcAlfPN4XpPvnz7e336p7r59_np7c1fpjotcGcEVNgxgRtBM8FmNM--MVrrrgDUDDK0euonNXYMcOJRbpZToFfat0H3fXpP3l9w1hl8bpizLazQ6Bx7DlmTDJ94KPomxoMMF1TGkFNHINdoF4klyJs9G5EE-GZFnI5K1shgpnW8fh2xqwfmp75-CAtxcACxfPVqM5yD0GmcbixU5B_vfIX8B6KGm9A</recordid><startdate>20190610</startdate><enddate>20190610</enddate><creator>Maqhuzu, Andile B.</creator><creator>Yoshikawa, Kunio</creator><creator>Takahashi, Fumitake</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190610</creationdate><title>The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe</title><author>Maqhuzu, Andile B. ; Yoshikawa, Kunio ; Takahashi, Fumitake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f51be20aadeac051db8d14fcbc44a027a73c7490d42e1a1a44abbb56be635c663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric pollutant emission</topic><topic>Hydrothermal carbonization</topic><topic>Municipal solid wastes</topic><topic>Waste to energy</topic><topic>Zimbabwe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maqhuzu, Andile B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, Kunio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Fumitake</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maqhuzu, Andile B.</au><au>Yoshikawa, Kunio</au><au>Takahashi, Fumitake</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2019-06-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>668</volume><spage>743</spage><epage>759</epage><pages>743-759</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The vast increase of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Zimbabwe coupled with a severe energy crisis have made waste-to-energy technology more attractive and necessary. Coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW though hydrothermal carbonization can play a critical role to improve both waste management and energy supply. Moreover, MSW conversion to a carbon neutral solid fuel that can be burnt in existing coal-fired power stations might reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions despite GHG releases from waste collection, waste conversion to fuel, and fuel transportation processes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate present MSW generation in Zimbabwe, its characteristics as a fuel source, and the impact of coal-alternative solid fuel production from MSW using hydrothermal carbonization technology on GHG and other air pollutant emissions. Four different scenarios based on the balance between fuel supply and demand were tested in this paper. The results suggest 0.54 ± 0.14 kg/capita/day of MSW generation in Zimbabwe and about 1051.7 ± 270.7 Gg of annual MSW generation from the current urban population. 289.3 Gg of coal-alternative solid fuel production was expected from domestic MSW collectable in urban areas. The model predicted that co-burning of alternative fuel in coal-fired power plants could reduce the methane potential of household waste from 62,200 to 15,800 Mg CH4 per year. Under the best possible scenario, it could reduce SOx emissions by 4.2%, CH4 emissions by 4.5%, CO2 emissions by 3.1%, and Global Warming Potential by 2.2%. On the other hand, NOx emissions would increase by 18%. If without additional installation of air pollutant control devices in power plants, waste-to-energy generates a trade-off between global warming and acid rain. In addition, geological locations generate a large demand/supply gap of alternative fuel and regulate maximum available consumption of alternative fuel. [Display omitted] •Effects of waste-to-energy on air pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe were assessed.•289,300 Mg of coal-alternative fuel can be produced from collected household wastes.•&gt;2.2% and 4.2% reductions in greenhouse gas and SOx are possible.•Waste-to-energy increases NOx emission by 18% for specific power generation scenarios.•Waste-to-energy will be promising only when appropriate investments are done.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30865905</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.050</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2019-06, Vol.668, p.743-759
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2191351958
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Atmospheric pollutant emission
Hydrothermal carbonization
Municipal solid wastes
Waste to energy
Zimbabwe
title The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A29%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20coal%20alternative%20fuel%20from%20municipal%20solid%20wastes%20employing%20hydrothermal%20carbonization%20on%20atmospheric%20pollutant%20emissions%20in%20Zimbabwe&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Maqhuzu,%20Andile%20B.&rft.date=2019-06-10&rft.volume=668&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=759&rft.pages=743-759&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2191351958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2191351958&rft_id=info:pmid/30865905&rft_els_id=S0048969719310289&rfr_iscdi=true