Home treatment for acute mental healthcare: randomised controlled trial

Home treatment has been proposed as an alternative to acute in-patient care for mentally ill patients. However, there is only moderate evidence in support of home treatment. To test whether and to what degree home treatment services would enable a reduction (substitution) of hospital use. A total of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of psychiatry 2020-06, Vol.216 (6), p.323-330
Hauptverfasser: Stulz, Niklaus, Wyder, Lea, Maeck, Lienhard, Hilpert, Matthias, Lerzer, Helmut, Zander, Eduard, Kawohl, Wolfram, Grosse Holtforth, Martin, Schnyder, Ulrich, Hepp, Urs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Home treatment has been proposed as an alternative to acute in-patient care for mentally ill patients. However, there is only moderate evidence in support of home treatment. To test whether and to what degree home treatment services would enable a reduction (substitution) of hospital use. A total of 707 consecutively admitted adult patients with a broad spectrum of mental disorders (ICD-10: F2-F6, F8-F9, Z) experiencing crises that necessitated immediate admission to hospital, were randomly allocated to either a service model including a home treatment alternative to hospital care (experimental group) or a conventional service model that lacked a home treatment alternative to in-patient care (control group) (trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02322437). The mean number of hospital days per patient within 24 months after the index crisis necessitating hospital admission (primary outcome) was reduced by 30.4% (mean 41.3 v. 59.3, P
ISSN:0007-1250
1472-1465
DOI:10.1192/bjp.2019.31