Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL

Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorben...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 1997-11, Vol.81 (11), p.1236-1240
Hauptverfasser: FIGUEIRA, A. R, DOMIER, L. L, D'ARCY, C. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1240
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1236
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 81
creator FIGUEIRA, A. R
DOMIER, L. L
D'ARCY, C. J
description Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2191007686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17130399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcgeRLxsnUmy2eQo9atSsGDxGrK7Ca5suzXZWvrvTWntURgYmDwzvHkIuUQYIih-N30Yvw9RqXwocYixKBNHpI-KszQXih6TPqDClCrMe-QshC8A4FzIU9JjIAXmVPTJ66idL42vQ7tIWpd0tvxc1N8rGxLX-qSycdDVu7fC-MZuko1tmnadVGvjXfJT-1VIp_cf6XhyTk6caYK92PcBmT09zkYv6eTteTy6n6QlR-xSW8msoobTDJUtmWK5w1JIsAWtMjBIOQrFCicAskLFyBYyK4zLCi4t5mxAbndnl77dBu30vA5lDGUWtl0FTeOnAXIhRURv_kUxRwZMqQjyHVj6NgRvnV76em78RiPorW29ta23trVEjbGi7bh2tb-_Kua2Oiz96Y3A9R4woTSN82ZR1uHAURAopGK_DjqGXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17130399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>FIGUEIRA, A. R ; DOMIER, L. L ; D'ARCY, C. J</creator><creatorcontrib>FIGUEIRA, A. R ; DOMIER, L. L ; D'ARCY, C. J</creatorcontrib><description>Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30861726</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLDIDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>Barley yellow dwarf virus ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control ; Hordeum vulgare ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant viruses and viroids</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 1997-11, Vol.81 (11), p.1236-1240</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3711,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2061689$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861726$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FIGUEIRA, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOMIER, L. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'ARCY, C. J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.</description><subject>Barley yellow dwarf virus</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant viruses and viroids</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcgeRLxsnUmy2eQo9atSsGDxGrK7Ca5suzXZWvrvTWntURgYmDwzvHkIuUQYIih-N30Yvw9RqXwocYixKBNHpI-KszQXih6TPqDClCrMe-QshC8A4FzIU9JjIAXmVPTJ66idL42vQ7tIWpd0tvxc1N8rGxLX-qSycdDVu7fC-MZuko1tmnadVGvjXfJT-1VIp_cf6XhyTk6caYK92PcBmT09zkYv6eTteTy6n6QlR-xSW8msoobTDJUtmWK5w1JIsAWtMjBIOQrFCicAskLFyBYyK4zLCi4t5mxAbndnl77dBu30vA5lDGUWtl0FTeOnAXIhRURv_kUxRwZMqQjyHVj6NgRvnV76em78RiPorW29ta23trVEjbGi7bh2tb-_Kua2Oiz96Y3A9R4woTSN82ZR1uHAURAopGK_DjqGXg</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>FIGUEIRA, A. R</creator><creator>DOMIER, L. L</creator><creator>D'ARCY, C. J</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</title><author>FIGUEIRA, A. R ; DOMIER, L. L ; D'ARCY, C. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Barley yellow dwarf virus</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant viruses and viroids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FIGUEIRA, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOMIER, L. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'ARCY, C. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FIGUEIRA, A. R</au><au>DOMIER, L. L</au><au>D'ARCY, C. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1236</spage><epage>1240</epage><pages>1236-1240</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><coden>PLDIDE</coden><abstract>Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>30861726</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 1997-11, Vol.81 (11), p.1236-1240
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2191007686
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
subjects Barley yellow dwarf virus
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control
Hordeum vulgare
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant viruses and viroids
title Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20techniques%20for%20detection%20of%20barley%20yellow%20dwarf%20virus-PAV-IL&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=FIGUEIRA,%20A.%20R&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1236&rft.epage=1240&rft.pages=1236-1240&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft.coden=PLDIDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17130399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17130399&rft_id=info:pmid/30861726&rfr_iscdi=true