Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL
Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorben...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant disease 1997-11, Vol.81 (11), p.1236-1240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1236 |
container_title | Plant disease |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | FIGUEIRA, A. R DOMIER, L. L D'ARCY, C. J |
description | Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2191007686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17130399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcgeRLxsnUmy2eQo9atSsGDxGrK7Ca5suzXZWvrvTWntURgYmDwzvHkIuUQYIih-N30Yvw9RqXwocYixKBNHpI-KszQXih6TPqDClCrMe-QshC8A4FzIU9JjIAXmVPTJ66idL42vQ7tIWpd0tvxc1N8rGxLX-qSycdDVu7fC-MZuko1tmnadVGvjXfJT-1VIp_cf6XhyTk6caYK92PcBmT09zkYv6eTteTy6n6QlR-xSW8msoobTDJUtmWK5w1JIsAWtMjBIOQrFCicAskLFyBYyK4zLCi4t5mxAbndnl77dBu30vA5lDGUWtl0FTeOnAXIhRURv_kUxRwZMqQjyHVj6NgRvnV76em78RiPorW29ta23trVEjbGi7bh2tb-_Kua2Oiz96Y3A9R4woTSN82ZR1uHAURAopGK_DjqGXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17130399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>FIGUEIRA, A. R ; DOMIER, L. L ; D'ARCY, C. J</creator><creatorcontrib>FIGUEIRA, A. R ; DOMIER, L. L ; D'ARCY, C. J</creatorcontrib><description>Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30861726</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLDIDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>Barley yellow dwarf virus ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control ; Hordeum vulgare ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant viruses and viroids</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 1997-11, Vol.81 (11), p.1236-1240</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3711,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2061689$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861726$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FIGUEIRA, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOMIER, L. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'ARCY, C. J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.</description><subject>Barley yellow dwarf virus</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant viruses and viroids</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcgeRLxsnUmy2eQo9atSsGDxGrK7Ca5suzXZWvrvTWntURgYmDwzvHkIuUQYIih-N30Yvw9RqXwocYixKBNHpI-KszQXih6TPqDClCrMe-QshC8A4FzIU9JjIAXmVPTJ66idL42vQ7tIWpd0tvxc1N8rGxLX-qSycdDVu7fC-MZuko1tmnadVGvjXfJT-1VIp_cf6XhyTk6caYK92PcBmT09zkYv6eTteTy6n6QlR-xSW8msoobTDJUtmWK5w1JIsAWtMjBIOQrFCicAskLFyBYyK4zLCi4t5mxAbndnl77dBu30vA5lDGUWtl0FTeOnAXIhRURv_kUxRwZMqQjyHVj6NgRvnV76em78RiPorW29ta23trVEjbGi7bh2tb-_Kua2Oiz96Y3A9R4woTSN82ZR1uHAURAopGK_DjqGXg</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>FIGUEIRA, A. R</creator><creator>DOMIER, L. L</creator><creator>D'ARCY, C. J</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</title><author>FIGUEIRA, A. R ; DOMIER, L. L ; D'ARCY, C. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ed85d2a42519ec3937f1c680eb2d50a1241693bf6005b9004e05e6af5b48e173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Barley yellow dwarf virus</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant viruses and viroids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FIGUEIRA, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOMIER, L. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'ARCY, C. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FIGUEIRA, A. R</au><au>DOMIER, L. L</au><au>D'ARCY, C. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1236</spage><epage>1240</epage><pages>1236-1240</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><coden>PLDIDE</coden><abstract>Detection of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-PAV-IL by an improved nucleic acid hybridization technique, using a nonradioactive probe with chromogenic and chemiluminescent substrates, was compared with detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antibodies, and triple antibody sandwich ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Each method was used to detect purified virus and virus in sap extracts from infected oat leaves. The detection limits for both ELISA procedures were 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL and the equivalent of 78 ng of infected tissue. Nucleic acid hybridization with either chemiluminescent or chromogenic substrates also detected as little as 1 ng of purified BYDV-PAV-IL, but it was slightly more sensitive at detecting virus in tissue extracts (25 ng of infected tissue). The most sensitive detection technique was PCR amplification, which could detect as little as 0.1 pg of RNA extracted from purified virus and detected viral RNA in the equivalent of 0.5 pg of infected leaf tissue.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>30861726</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0191-2917 |
ispartof | Plant disease, 1997-11, Vol.81 (11), p.1236-1240 |
issn | 0191-2917 1943-7692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2191007686 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues |
subjects | Barley yellow dwarf virus Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control Hordeum vulgare Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant viruses and viroids |
title | Comparison of techniques for detection of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV-IL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20techniques%20for%20detection%20of%20barley%20yellow%20dwarf%20virus-PAV-IL&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=FIGUEIRA,%20A.%20R&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1236&rft.epage=1240&rft.pages=1236-1240&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft.coden=PLDIDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.11.1236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17130399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17130399&rft_id=info:pmid/30861726&rfr_iscdi=true |