Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior

Key Points Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions. In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes. Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2019-03, Vol.93 (4), p.618-619
Hauptverfasser: Cheney, Amy E., Dean, Larry S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 619
container_issue 4
container_start_page 618
container_title Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 93
creator Cheney, Amy E.
Dean, Larry S.
description Key Points Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions. In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes. Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.28172
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2190483566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2190483566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9KwzAcB_AgipvTgy8gBS966JYmbZp4kzp1MFBEwVvI8kc62mYm68ZuPoLP6JMY7fQgeMov8OHLly8AxwkcJhCikZRqiGiSox3QTzKE4hyR593tnbCU9MCB93MIISOI7YMehjRjOUr7gDzYmV2WMrovJhfReGWrVdm8RMbZOmrsSlfR0q6FU-HTfLy9l43RrrTuEOwZUXl9tH0H4Ol6_FjcxtO7m0lxOY0lzjCKKctTQmQmWK6lknnoSOiMUWmEMUZRkSoskSSQKq11ihGRucioFkxjGMrjATjrchfOvrbaL3ldeqmrSjTatp6jhMGU4oyQQE__0LltXRPaBUUZSxFEWVDnnZLOeu-04QtX1sJteAL515g8jMm_xwz2ZJvYzmqtfuXPegGMOrAuK735P4kXxVUX-Qk6Fn0D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2189942025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cheney, Amy E. ; Dean, Larry S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Amy E. ; Dean, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions. In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes. Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30859724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cohort Studies ; Lesions ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2019-03, Vol.93 (4), p.618-619</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6462-3571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.28172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.28172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Key Points Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions. In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes. Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.</description><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9KwzAcB_AgipvTgy8gBS966JYmbZp4kzp1MFBEwVvI8kc62mYm68ZuPoLP6JMY7fQgeMov8OHLly8AxwkcJhCikZRqiGiSox3QTzKE4hyR593tnbCU9MCB93MIISOI7YMehjRjOUr7gDzYmV2WMrovJhfReGWrVdm8RMbZOmrsSlfR0q6FU-HTfLy9l43RrrTuEOwZUXl9tH0H4Ol6_FjcxtO7m0lxOY0lzjCKKctTQmQmWK6lknnoSOiMUWmEMUZRkSoskSSQKq11ihGRucioFkxjGMrjATjrchfOvrbaL3ldeqmrSjTatp6jhMGU4oyQQE__0LltXRPaBUUZSxFEWVDnnZLOeu-04QtX1sJteAL515g8jMm_xwz2ZJvYzmqtfuXPegGMOrAuK735P4kXxVUX-Qk6Fn0D</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Cheney, Amy E.</creator><creator>Dean, Larry S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-3571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</title><author>Cheney, Amy E. ; Dean, Larry S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheney, Amy E.</au><au>Dean, Larry S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>618-619</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Key Points Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions. In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes. Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30859724</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.28172</doi><tpages>619</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-3571</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-1946
ispartof Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2019-03, Vol.93 (4), p.618-619
issn 1522-1946
1522-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2190483566
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cohort Studies
Lesions
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics
title Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20PCI:%20Evolving%20from%20novel%20toward%20non%E2%80%90inferior&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Cheney,%20Amy%20E.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=618-619&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.28172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2190483566%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2189942025&rft_id=info:pmid/30859724&rfr_iscdi=true