Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior
Key Points Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions. In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes. Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2019-03, Vol.93 (4), p.618-619 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 619 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 618 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Cheney, Amy E. Dean, Larry S. |
description | Key Points
Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions.
In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes.
Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.28172 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2190483566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2190483566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9KwzAcB_AgipvTgy8gBS966JYmbZp4kzp1MFBEwVvI8kc62mYm68ZuPoLP6JMY7fQgeMov8OHLly8AxwkcJhCikZRqiGiSox3QTzKE4hyR593tnbCU9MCB93MIISOI7YMehjRjOUr7gDzYmV2WMrovJhfReGWrVdm8RMbZOmrsSlfR0q6FU-HTfLy9l43RrrTuEOwZUXl9tH0H4Ol6_FjcxtO7m0lxOY0lzjCKKctTQmQmWK6lknnoSOiMUWmEMUZRkSoskSSQKq11ihGRucioFkxjGMrjATjrchfOvrbaL3ldeqmrSjTatp6jhMGU4oyQQE__0LltXRPaBUUZSxFEWVDnnZLOeu-04QtX1sJteAL515g8jMm_xwz2ZJvYzmqtfuXPegGMOrAuK735P4kXxVUX-Qk6Fn0D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2189942025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cheney, Amy E. ; Dean, Larry S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Amy E. ; Dean, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions.
In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes.
Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30859724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cohort Studies ; Lesions ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2019-03, Vol.93 (4), p.618-619</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6462-3571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.28172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.28172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Key Points
Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions.
In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes.
Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.</description><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9KwzAcB_AgipvTgy8gBS966JYmbZp4kzp1MFBEwVvI8kc62mYm68ZuPoLP6JMY7fQgeMov8OHLly8AxwkcJhCikZRqiGiSox3QTzKE4hyR593tnbCU9MCB93MIISOI7YMehjRjOUr7gDzYmV2WMrovJhfReGWrVdm8RMbZOmrsSlfR0q6FU-HTfLy9l43RrrTuEOwZUXl9tH0H4Ol6_FjcxtO7m0lxOY0lzjCKKctTQmQmWK6lknnoSOiMUWmEMUZRkSoskSSQKq11ihGRucioFkxjGMrjATjrchfOvrbaL3ldeqmrSjTatp6jhMGU4oyQQE__0LltXRPaBUUZSxFEWVDnnZLOeu-04QtX1sJteAL515g8jMm_xwz2ZJvYzmqtfuXPegGMOrAuK735P4kXxVUX-Qk6Fn0D</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Cheney, Amy E.</creator><creator>Dean, Larry S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-3571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</title><author>Cheney, Amy E. ; Dean, Larry S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-897466c5a97ecdc781768b98cfafffd8a4d3c2c608deee4326c7a58ea9e305223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Larry S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheney, Amy E.</au><au>Dean, Larry S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>618-619</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Key Points
Robotic‐assisted PCI appears to be safe and feasible in both simple and complex lesions.
In this small cohort study, analysis of manual versus robotic PCI suggests comparable clinical outcomes.
Further adequately powered, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to definitively evaluate outcomes in manual versus robotic‐assisted PCI.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30859724</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.28172</doi><tpages>619</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-3571</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2019-03, Vol.93 (4), p.618-619 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2190483566 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Cohort Studies Lesions Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics |
title | Robotic PCI: Evolving from novel toward non‐inferior |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20PCI:%20Evolving%20from%20novel%20toward%20non%E2%80%90inferior&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Cheney,%20Amy%20E.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=618-619&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.28172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2190483566%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2189942025&rft_id=info:pmid/30859724&rfr_iscdi=true |