A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center cli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of adolescent health 2019-07, Vol.65 (1), p.46-50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 50 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | Journal of adolescent health |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Monico, Laura B. Mitchell, Shannon Gwin Dusek, Kristi Gryczynski, Jan Schwartz, Robert P. Oros, Marla Hosler, Colleen O'Grady, Kevin E. Brown, Barry S. |
description | The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits.
As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits.
Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%.
Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2189551176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1054139X18308310</els_id><sourcerecordid>2265722602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctqGzEUhkVpaW59hSDopovMVEdzXzqmTQyBlsaL7oQsHSUaZiRXkgN5jzxwZZykkE03kkDf_5_LTwgFVgKD9utYjlL7e5RTui85g74EXjLWvCPH0HdDAUPH3-c3a-oCquH3ETmJcWRZ2gL7SI4q1jesAn5MnhZ06eetDDZ6R72htyogOuvu6M8gVbIKIzU-0IX2E0aFLkVqXf60swyPdCkD0oVJGOhq3k44Z0Am-8brgl4Gi4auXAYfMpKBCyqdpr_QYAhyosnTdUCZ9gZn5IORU8RPz_cpWX__tl5eFzc_rlbLxU2h6oanAkzNjOHVYDpQaqN0C1Ihrys95Pk6Y7SCjimGm1arDiqspVG8NjXvucS-OiVfDrbb4P_sMCYx2zzhNEmHfhcFh35oGoCuzejnN-jod8Hl5gTnbdPlg_FM9QdKBR9jQCO2hzUJYGIfnBjFv-DEPjgBXOTgsvT8ucBuM6N-Fb4klYHLA4B5IQ8Wg4jKolOobUCVhPb2_1X-AlAisNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2265722602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Monico, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; O'Grady, Kevin E. ; Brown, Barry S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monico, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; O'Grady, Kevin E. ; Brown, Barry S.</creatorcontrib><description>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits.
As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits.
Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%.
Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-139X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30850312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute services ; Adolescent health ; Adolescents ; Alcohol use ; Brief interventions ; Computerized medical records ; Drug abuse ; Drug use ; Friendship ; Health facilities ; Medical records ; Medical screening ; Medical treatment ; Pediatrics ; Prevention ; Primary care ; SBIRT ; Screening ; Substance abuse ; Substance use ; Teenagers ; Uptake ; Visits</subject><ispartof>Journal of adolescent health, 2019-07, Vol.65 (1), p.46-50</ispartof><rights>2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1504-4968</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X18308310$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monico, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusek, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gryczynski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oros, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosler, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Grady, Kevin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Barry S.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</title><title>Journal of adolescent health</title><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><description>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits.
As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits.
Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%.
Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.</description><subject>Acute services</subject><subject>Adolescent health</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Brief interventions</subject><subject>Computerized medical records</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>SBIRT</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Visits</subject><issn>1054-139X</issn><issn>1879-1972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctqGzEUhkVpaW59hSDopovMVEdzXzqmTQyBlsaL7oQsHSUaZiRXkgN5jzxwZZykkE03kkDf_5_LTwgFVgKD9utYjlL7e5RTui85g74EXjLWvCPH0HdDAUPH3-c3a-oCquH3ETmJcWRZ2gL7SI4q1jesAn5MnhZ06eetDDZ6R72htyogOuvu6M8gVbIKIzU-0IX2E0aFLkVqXf60swyPdCkD0oVJGOhq3k44Z0Am-8brgl4Gi4auXAYfMpKBCyqdpr_QYAhyosnTdUCZ9gZn5IORU8RPz_cpWX__tl5eFzc_rlbLxU2h6oanAkzNjOHVYDpQaqN0C1Ihrys95Pk6Y7SCjimGm1arDiqspVG8NjXvucS-OiVfDrbb4P_sMCYx2zzhNEmHfhcFh35oGoCuzejnN-jod8Hl5gTnbdPlg_FM9QdKBR9jQCO2hzUJYGIfnBjFv-DEPjgBXOTgsvT8ucBuM6N-Fb4klYHLA4B5IQ8Wg4jKolOobUCVhPb2_1X-AlAisNw</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Monico, Laura B.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</creator><creator>Dusek, Kristi</creator><creator>Gryczynski, Jan</creator><creator>Schwartz, Robert P.</creator><creator>Oros, Marla</creator><creator>Hosler, Colleen</creator><creator>O'Grady, Kevin E.</creator><creator>Brown, Barry S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1504-4968</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</title><author>Monico, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; O'Grady, Kevin E. ; Brown, Barry S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acute services</topic><topic>Adolescent health</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Brief interventions</topic><topic>Computerized medical records</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>SBIRT</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Visits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monico, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusek, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gryczynski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oros, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosler, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Grady, Kevin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Barry S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monico, Laura B.</au><au>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</au><au>Dusek, Kristi</au><au>Gryczynski, Jan</au><au>Schwartz, Robert P.</au><au>Oros, Marla</au><au>Hosler, Colleen</au><au>O'Grady, Kevin E.</au><au>Brown, Barry S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>46-50</pages><issn>1054-139X</issn><eissn>1879-1972</eissn><abstract>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits.
As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits.
Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%.
Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30850312</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1504-4968</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1054-139X |
ispartof | Journal of adolescent health, 2019-07, Vol.65 (1), p.46-50 |
issn | 1054-139X 1879-1972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2189551176 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Acute services Adolescent health Adolescents Alcohol use Brief interventions Computerized medical records Drug abuse Drug use Friendship Health facilities Medical records Medical screening Medical treatment Pediatrics Prevention Primary care SBIRT Screening Substance abuse Substance use Teenagers Uptake Visits |
title | A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Screening%20Practices%20for%20Adolescents%20in%20Primary%20Care%20After%20Implementation%20of%20Screening,%20Brief%20Intervention,%20and%20Referral%20to%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adolescent%20health&rft.au=Monico,%20Laura%20B.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=46-50&rft.issn=1054-139X&rft.eissn=1879-1972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2265722602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2265722602&rft_id=info:pmid/30850312&rft_els_id=S1054139X18308310&rfr_iscdi=true |