A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center cli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of adolescent health 2019-07, Vol.65 (1), p.46-50
Hauptverfasser: Monico, Laura B., Mitchell, Shannon Gwin, Dusek, Kristi, Gryczynski, Jan, Schwartz, Robert P., Oros, Marla, Hosler, Colleen, O'Grady, Kevin E., Brown, Barry S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Journal of adolescent health
container_volume 65
creator Monico, Laura B.
Mitchell, Shannon Gwin
Dusek, Kristi
Gryczynski, Jan
Schwartz, Robert P.
Oros, Marla
Hosler, Colleen
O'Grady, Kevin E.
Brown, Barry S.
description The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits. Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%. Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2189551176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1054139X18308310</els_id><sourcerecordid>2265722602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctqGzEUhkVpaW59hSDopovMVEdzXzqmTQyBlsaL7oQsHSUaZiRXkgN5jzxwZZykkE03kkDf_5_LTwgFVgKD9utYjlL7e5RTui85g74EXjLWvCPH0HdDAUPH3-c3a-oCquH3ETmJcWRZ2gL7SI4q1jesAn5MnhZ06eetDDZ6R72htyogOuvu6M8gVbIKIzU-0IX2E0aFLkVqXf60swyPdCkD0oVJGOhq3k44Z0Am-8brgl4Gi4auXAYfMpKBCyqdpr_QYAhyosnTdUCZ9gZn5IORU8RPz_cpWX__tl5eFzc_rlbLxU2h6oanAkzNjOHVYDpQaqN0C1Ihrys95Pk6Y7SCjimGm1arDiqspVG8NjXvucS-OiVfDrbb4P_sMCYx2zzhNEmHfhcFh35oGoCuzejnN-jod8Hl5gTnbdPlg_FM9QdKBR9jQCO2hzUJYGIfnBjFv-DEPjgBXOTgsvT8ucBuM6N-Fb4klYHLA4B5IQ8Wg4jKolOobUCVhPb2_1X-AlAisNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2265722602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Monico, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; O'Grady, Kevin E. ; Brown, Barry S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monico, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; O'Grady, Kevin E. ; Brown, Barry S.</creatorcontrib><description>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits. Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%. Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-139X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30850312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute services ; Adolescent health ; Adolescents ; Alcohol use ; Brief interventions ; Computerized medical records ; Drug abuse ; Drug use ; Friendship ; Health facilities ; Medical records ; Medical screening ; Medical treatment ; Pediatrics ; Prevention ; Primary care ; SBIRT ; Screening ; Substance abuse ; Substance use ; Teenagers ; Uptake ; Visits</subject><ispartof>Journal of adolescent health, 2019-07, Vol.65 (1), p.46-50</ispartof><rights>2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1504-4968</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X18308310$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monico, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusek, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gryczynski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oros, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosler, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Grady, Kevin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Barry S.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</title><title>Journal of adolescent health</title><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><description>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits. Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%. Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.</description><subject>Acute services</subject><subject>Adolescent health</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Brief interventions</subject><subject>Computerized medical records</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>SBIRT</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Visits</subject><issn>1054-139X</issn><issn>1879-1972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctqGzEUhkVpaW59hSDopovMVEdzXzqmTQyBlsaL7oQsHSUaZiRXkgN5jzxwZZykkE03kkDf_5_LTwgFVgKD9utYjlL7e5RTui85g74EXjLWvCPH0HdDAUPH3-c3a-oCquH3ETmJcWRZ2gL7SI4q1jesAn5MnhZ06eetDDZ6R72htyogOuvu6M8gVbIKIzU-0IX2E0aFLkVqXf60swyPdCkD0oVJGOhq3k44Z0Am-8brgl4Gi4auXAYfMpKBCyqdpr_QYAhyosnTdUCZ9gZn5IORU8RPz_cpWX__tl5eFzc_rlbLxU2h6oanAkzNjOHVYDpQaqN0C1Ihrys95Pk6Y7SCjimGm1arDiqspVG8NjXvucS-OiVfDrbb4P_sMCYx2zzhNEmHfhcFh35oGoCuzejnN-jod8Hl5gTnbdPlg_FM9QdKBR9jQCO2hzUJYGIfnBjFv-DEPjgBXOTgsvT8ucBuM6N-Fb4klYHLA4B5IQ8Wg4jKolOobUCVhPb2_1X-AlAisNw</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Monico, Laura B.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</creator><creator>Dusek, Kristi</creator><creator>Gryczynski, Jan</creator><creator>Schwartz, Robert P.</creator><creator>Oros, Marla</creator><creator>Hosler, Colleen</creator><creator>O'Grady, Kevin E.</creator><creator>Brown, Barry S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1504-4968</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</title><author>Monico, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Shannon Gwin ; Dusek, Kristi ; Gryczynski, Jan ; Schwartz, Robert P. ; Oros, Marla ; Hosler, Colleen ; O'Grady, Kevin E. ; Brown, Barry S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f40ff239f71ccbcd61ace243d90857ffdc170c0eb6dc713e4afc24f4282ae83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acute services</topic><topic>Adolescent health</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Brief interventions</topic><topic>Computerized medical records</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>SBIRT</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Visits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monico, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusek, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gryczynski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oros, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosler, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Grady, Kevin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Barry S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monico, Laura B.</au><au>Mitchell, Shannon Gwin</au><au>Dusek, Kristi</au><au>Gryczynski, Jan</au><au>Schwartz, Robert P.</au><au>Oros, Marla</au><au>Hosler, Colleen</au><au>O'Grady, Kevin E.</au><au>Brown, Barry S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>46-50</pages><issn>1054-139X</issn><eissn>1879-1972</eissn><abstract>The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits. Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12–17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%. Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30850312</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1504-4968</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1054-139X
ispartof Journal of adolescent health, 2019-07, Vol.65 (1), p.46-50
issn 1054-139X
1879-1972
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2189551176
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Acute services
Adolescent health
Adolescents
Alcohol use
Brief interventions
Computerized medical records
Drug abuse
Drug use
Friendship
Health facilities
Medical records
Medical screening
Medical treatment
Pediatrics
Prevention
Primary care
SBIRT
Screening
Substance abuse
Substance use
Teenagers
Uptake
Visits
title A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Screening%20Practices%20for%20Adolescents%20in%20Primary%20Care%20After%20Implementation%20of%20Screening,%20Brief%20Intervention,%20and%20Referral%20to%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adolescent%20health&rft.au=Monico,%20Laura%20B.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=46-50&rft.issn=1054-139X&rft.eissn=1879-1972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2265722602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2265722602&rft_id=info:pmid/30850312&rft_els_id=S1054139X18308310&rfr_iscdi=true