A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study

AbstractBackgroundA nasal influenza vaccine has been available only in a live attenuated form, which limits the range of recipients to immune-competent individuals. The present study evaluated a newly developed intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2019-03, Vol.37 (14), p.1994-2003
Hauptverfasser: Pan, Sung-Ching, Hsieh, Szu-Min, Lin, Chih-Feng, Hsu, Yu-Shen, Chang, Mingi, Chang, Shan-Chwen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2003
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1994
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 37
creator Pan, Sung-Ching
Hsieh, Szu-Min
Lin, Chih-Feng
Hsu, Yu-Shen
Chang, Mingi
Chang, Shan-Chwen
description AbstractBackgroundA nasal influenza vaccine has been available only in a live attenuated form, which limits the range of recipients to immune-competent individuals. The present study evaluated a newly developed intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)). MethodsThe study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase I trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal vaccine containing the trivalent influenza HA antigen (7.5 µg each of A/California/7/09 (H1N1)-like virus, A/Victoria/210/2009 (H3N2) virus, and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus) in combination with 4 different doses of adjuvant LTh(αK) (7.5, 15, 30 or 45 μg) and 22.5 μg of influenza HA antigen alone (control vaccine). The vaccine was intranasally administered on Days 0 and 7. A safety evaluation commenced for 180 days, and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers and nasal HA-specific IgA titers on Day 0 and Day 28 were assessed to determine whether an immunogenic response was elicited. ResultsFrom November 2012 to September 2013, a total of 36 subjects were enrolled. Twenty-four subjects received an adjuvanted vaccine, and 12 subjects received a control vaccine. The most common adverse event (AE) was mild nasal discomfort, and systemic AEs were mild fatigue and headache. Only two subjects discontinued the study because of an AE (one had grade 3 fever, and one had nodal arrhythmia). In the group with 45 μg of LTh(αK), the seroprotection rates were 100%, 100% and 80%, and the nasal IgA conversion factors were 7.90, 7.46 and 12.27 for the A/H3N2, A/H1N1 and split B strains, respectively. Adjuvant LTh(αK) vaccine showed a significant enhancement in mucosal immunity in split B -specific IgA. ConclusionThe intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine is generally safe, and the LTh(αK)-adjuvanted vaccine is more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted control vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03293732.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2188586011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0264410X19301896</els_id><sourcerecordid>2191829405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b100feeddba915125781f3885ddb18c8c98433a6b18ce03fbc4c025184c5b99e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYkrhEUCW2AwSKXb-arMAVSN-RlRiwSCxsxznhro4drGdos5b8SLwStyonVnMho2te3Tul_iem2VPGV0wyppX28VeaW0cLArKxIIWC0qbe9mM8WWZFzXj97MZLZoqrxj9dpY9inFLKa1LJh5mZyXl5ZIt6Sz7uyJBuc4P5hq6l6TzY2shb61xWGnvUvDWQkc0KkYrS1Iw0-kJ7JUdVQKSNkCi6iEdCJKIGYbR-e-AdoOS71ElBkHKqaisRVc3ICwmCAhGHoLAJfQonbBIqBrX2xHctSKnV5JfJm2wczvuFXrXV5vzP78_vXhNVmS3URHIJYlp7A6Pswe9shGenO559vX9u6uLj_n684fLi9U615WoU94ySnuArmuVYDUr6iVnfcl5jQrjmmvBq7JUzVQALftWV5pOU6103QoB5Tw7P3J3wf8cISY5mKjBWuXAj1EWDGG8oYyh9fkd69aPweHfoUswXogKc5ln9dGlg48xQC93wQwqHCSjckpcbuVpFnJKXNJCYuLY9-xEH9sButuum4jR8PZoABzH3kCQURtwGjoTQCfZefPfT7y5Q7jZhh9wgHj7GiYjNsgv09pNW8dESRkXTfkPwf_ZBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2191829405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Pan, Sung-Ching ; Hsieh, Szu-Min ; Lin, Chih-Feng ; Hsu, Yu-Shen ; Chang, Mingi ; Chang, Shan-Chwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Sung-Ching ; Hsieh, Szu-Min ; Lin, Chih-Feng ; Hsu, Yu-Shen ; Chang, Mingi ; Chang, Shan-Chwen</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractBackgroundA nasal influenza vaccine has been available only in a live attenuated form, which limits the range of recipients to immune-competent individuals. The present study evaluated a newly developed intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)). MethodsThe study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase I trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal vaccine containing the trivalent influenza HA antigen (7.5 µg each of A/California/7/09 (H1N1)-like virus, A/Victoria/210/2009 (H3N2) virus, and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus) in combination with 4 different doses of adjuvant LTh(αK) (7.5, 15, 30 or 45 μg) and 22.5 μg of influenza HA antigen alone (control vaccine). The vaccine was intranasally administered on Days 0 and 7. A safety evaluation commenced for 180 days, and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers and nasal HA-specific IgA titers on Day 0 and Day 28 were assessed to determine whether an immunogenic response was elicited. ResultsFrom November 2012 to September 2013, a total of 36 subjects were enrolled. Twenty-four subjects received an adjuvanted vaccine, and 12 subjects received a control vaccine. The most common adverse event (AE) was mild nasal discomfort, and systemic AEs were mild fatigue and headache. Only two subjects discontinued the study because of an AE (one had grade 3 fever, and one had nodal arrhythmia). In the group with 45 μg of LTh(αK), the seroprotection rates were 100%, 100% and 80%, and the nasal IgA conversion factors were 7.90, 7.46 and 12.27 for the A/H3N2, A/H1N1 and split B strains, respectively. Adjuvant LTh(αK) vaccine showed a significant enhancement in mucosal immunity in split B -specific IgA. ConclusionThe intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine is generally safe, and the LTh(αK)-adjuvanted vaccine is more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted control vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03293732.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30837170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adjuvant ; Adjuvants ; Allergy and Immunology ; Antigens ; Arrhythmia ; Biotechnology ; Clinical trials ; Design ; Double-blind studies ; Drug dosages ; E coli ; Enzymes ; Fever ; Headache ; Health care ; Heat-labile enterotoxin ; Hemagglutination inhibition ; Immunity ; Immunogenicity ; Immunoglobulin A ; Influenza ; Influenza vaccine ; Intranasal ; LTh(αK) ; Mucosal immunity ; Randomization ; Safety ; Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2019-03, Vol.37 (14), p.1994-2003</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b100feeddba915125781f3885ddb18c8c98433a6b18ce03fbc4c025184c5b99e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b100feeddba915125781f3885ddb18c8c98433a6b18ce03fbc4c025184c5b99e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2191829405?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978,64366,64368,64370,72220</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Sung-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Szu-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chih-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Yu-Shen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Mingi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Shan-Chwen</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>AbstractBackgroundA nasal influenza vaccine has been available only in a live attenuated form, which limits the range of recipients to immune-competent individuals. The present study evaluated a newly developed intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)). MethodsThe study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase I trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal vaccine containing the trivalent influenza HA antigen (7.5 µg each of A/California/7/09 (H1N1)-like virus, A/Victoria/210/2009 (H3N2) virus, and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus) in combination with 4 different doses of adjuvant LTh(αK) (7.5, 15, 30 or 45 μg) and 22.5 μg of influenza HA antigen alone (control vaccine). The vaccine was intranasally administered on Days 0 and 7. A safety evaluation commenced for 180 days, and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers and nasal HA-specific IgA titers on Day 0 and Day 28 were assessed to determine whether an immunogenic response was elicited. ResultsFrom November 2012 to September 2013, a total of 36 subjects were enrolled. Twenty-four subjects received an adjuvanted vaccine, and 12 subjects received a control vaccine. The most common adverse event (AE) was mild nasal discomfort, and systemic AEs were mild fatigue and headache. Only two subjects discontinued the study because of an AE (one had grade 3 fever, and one had nodal arrhythmia). In the group with 45 μg of LTh(αK), the seroprotection rates were 100%, 100% and 80%, and the nasal IgA conversion factors were 7.90, 7.46 and 12.27 for the A/H3N2, A/H1N1 and split B strains, respectively. Adjuvant LTh(αK) vaccine showed a significant enhancement in mucosal immunity in split B -specific IgA. ConclusionThe intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine is generally safe, and the LTh(αK)-adjuvanted vaccine is more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted control vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03293732.</description><subject>Adjuvant</subject><subject>Adjuvants</subject><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Arrhythmia</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Heat-labile enterotoxin</subject><subject>Hemagglutination inhibition</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin A</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza vaccine</subject><subject>Intranasal</subject><subject>LTh(αK)</subject><subject>Mucosal immunity</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYkrhEUCW2AwSKXb-arMAVSN-RlRiwSCxsxznhro4drGdos5b8SLwStyonVnMho2te3Tul_iem2VPGV0wyppX28VeaW0cLArKxIIWC0qbe9mM8WWZFzXj97MZLZoqrxj9dpY9inFLKa1LJh5mZyXl5ZIt6Sz7uyJBuc4P5hq6l6TzY2shb61xWGnvUvDWQkc0KkYrS1Iw0-kJ7JUdVQKSNkCi6iEdCJKIGYbR-e-AdoOS71ElBkHKqaisRVc3ICwmCAhGHoLAJfQonbBIqBrX2xHctSKnV5JfJm2wczvuFXrXV5vzP78_vXhNVmS3URHIJYlp7A6Pswe9shGenO559vX9u6uLj_n684fLi9U615WoU94ySnuArmuVYDUr6iVnfcl5jQrjmmvBq7JUzVQALftWV5pOU6103QoB5Tw7P3J3wf8cISY5mKjBWuXAj1EWDGG8oYyh9fkd69aPweHfoUswXogKc5ln9dGlg48xQC93wQwqHCSjckpcbuVpFnJKXNJCYuLY9-xEH9sButuum4jR8PZoABzH3kCQURtwGjoTQCfZefPfT7y5Q7jZhh9wgHj7GiYjNsgv09pNW8dESRkXTfkPwf_ZBg</recordid><startdate>20190328</startdate><enddate>20190328</enddate><creator>Pan, Sung-Ching</creator><creator>Hsieh, Szu-Min</creator><creator>Lin, Chih-Feng</creator><creator>Hsu, Yu-Shen</creator><creator>Chang, Mingi</creator><creator>Chang, Shan-Chwen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190328</creationdate><title>A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study</title><author>Pan, Sung-Ching ; Hsieh, Szu-Min ; Lin, Chih-Feng ; Hsu, Yu-Shen ; Chang, Mingi ; Chang, Shan-Chwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b100feeddba915125781f3885ddb18c8c98433a6b18ce03fbc4c025184c5b99e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant</topic><topic>Adjuvants</topic><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Arrhythmia</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Heat-labile enterotoxin</topic><topic>Hemagglutination inhibition</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin A</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza vaccine</topic><topic>Intranasal</topic><topic>LTh(αK)</topic><topic>Mucosal immunity</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Sung-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Szu-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chih-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Yu-Shen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Mingi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Shan-Chwen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Sung-Ching</au><au>Hsieh, Szu-Min</au><au>Lin, Chih-Feng</au><au>Hsu, Yu-Shen</au><au>Chang, Mingi</au><au>Chang, Shan-Chwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2019-03-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1994</spage><epage>2003</epage><pages>1994-2003</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>AbstractBackgroundA nasal influenza vaccine has been available only in a live attenuated form, which limits the range of recipients to immune-competent individuals. The present study evaluated a newly developed intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)). MethodsThe study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase I trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal vaccine containing the trivalent influenza HA antigen (7.5 µg each of A/California/7/09 (H1N1)-like virus, A/Victoria/210/2009 (H3N2) virus, and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus) in combination with 4 different doses of adjuvant LTh(αK) (7.5, 15, 30 or 45 μg) and 22.5 μg of influenza HA antigen alone (control vaccine). The vaccine was intranasally administered on Days 0 and 7. A safety evaluation commenced for 180 days, and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers and nasal HA-specific IgA titers on Day 0 and Day 28 were assessed to determine whether an immunogenic response was elicited. ResultsFrom November 2012 to September 2013, a total of 36 subjects were enrolled. Twenty-four subjects received an adjuvanted vaccine, and 12 subjects received a control vaccine. The most common adverse event (AE) was mild nasal discomfort, and systemic AEs were mild fatigue and headache. Only two subjects discontinued the study because of an AE (one had grade 3 fever, and one had nodal arrhythmia). In the group with 45 μg of LTh(αK), the seroprotection rates were 100%, 100% and 80%, and the nasal IgA conversion factors were 7.90, 7.46 and 12.27 for the A/H3N2, A/H1N1 and split B strains, respectively. Adjuvant LTh(αK) vaccine showed a significant enhancement in mucosal immunity in split B -specific IgA. ConclusionThe intranasal inactivated influenza vaccine is generally safe, and the LTh(αK)-adjuvanted vaccine is more immunogenic than non-adjuvanted control vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03293732.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30837170</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2019-03, Vol.37 (14), p.1994-2003
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2188586011
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adjuvant
Adjuvants
Allergy and Immunology
Antigens
Arrhythmia
Biotechnology
Clinical trials
Design
Double-blind studies
Drug dosages
E coli
Enzymes
Fever
Headache
Health care
Heat-labile enterotoxin
Hemagglutination inhibition
Immunity
Immunogenicity
Immunoglobulin A
Influenza
Influenza vaccine
Intranasal
LTh(αK)
Mucosal immunity
Randomization
Safety
Vaccines
Viruses
title A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A28%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20controlled%20clinical%20trial%20to%20evaluate%20the%20safety%20and%20immunogenicity%20of%20an%20intranasally%20administered%20trivalent%20inactivated%20influenza%20vaccine%20with%20adjuvant%20LTh(%CE%B1K):%20A%20phase%20I%20study&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Pan,%20Sung-Ching&rft.date=2019-03-28&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1994&rft.epage=2003&rft.pages=1994-2003&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2191829405%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2191829405&rft_id=info:pmid/30837170&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0264410X19301896&rfr_iscdi=true