Significant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR: Mechanisms and imaging variables associated with improvement

Background Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Factors associated with MR improvement have not been studied thoroughly. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with TAVR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.36 (4), p.722-731
Hauptverfasser: Chiche, Olivier, Rodés‐Cabau, Josep, Campelo‐Parada, Francisco, Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B., Regueiro, Ander, Chamandi, Chekrallah, Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania, Côté, Mélanie, DeLarochellière, Robert, Paradis, Jean‐Michel, Dumont, Eric, Doyle, Daniel, Mohammadi, Siamak, Bergeron, Sébastien, Pibarot, Philippe, Beaudoin, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 731
container_issue 4
container_start_page 722
container_title Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
container_volume 36
creator Chiche, Olivier
Rodés‐Cabau, Josep
Campelo‐Parada, Francisco
Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B.
Regueiro, Ander
Chamandi, Chekrallah
Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania
Côté, Mélanie
DeLarochellière, Robert
Paradis, Jean‐Michel
Dumont, Eric
Doyle, Daniel
Mohammadi, Siamak
Bergeron, Sébastien
Pibarot, Philippe
Beaudoin, Jonathan
description Background Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Factors associated with MR improvement have not been studied thoroughly. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with TAVR with more than mild MR at baseline. MR evolution was assessed at 1–3 and 6–12 months after intervention. MR severity and mechanisms were assessed by echocardiography. Mitral annulus calcification (MAC) was quantified using preoperative cardiac CT. Results From 674 consecutive TAVR recipients, 78 with more than mild MR had a 6–12 months follow‐up. Following TAVR, MR improved in 34 patients (43%), remained stable in 38 (49%) and worsened in 6 (8%). Patients with MR improvement had greater tenting area (141 ± 56 vs. 99 ± 40 mm2, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/echo.14303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2188205415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2188205415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-cbc183f0a3fccc2f6026c9e3ec900159ef1ff0ecd555c01f6d69b16102303fe73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQQC0Egi3thR-AfERIgRk7zgc3tKIFCYTU0l4jrzMORomztRMQ_Pp6WdpjfbFlP72RH2NHCGeY1jmZx_EMcwlyhy1Q5ZBVWKpdtoAyF5mohDhgn2J8AoASMd9nBxIqmauyXrC3H67zzjqj_cQHNwXd80DdHDo36cmNnjvP1-lEfop89i2FbnS-4w-Xv75f8Ls0W3sXh8i1b7kbdLd5fNbB6VVP6TbG0Tg9Uctf3PSYiHUYn2lIus9sz-o-0peP_ZD9_Hr1sLzObu-_3SwvbzMjRS0zszJYSQtaWmOMsAWIwtQkydQAqGqyaC2QaZVSBtAWbVGvsEAQKYilUh6yk603Tf49U5yawUVDfa89jXNsBFaVAJWjSujpFjVhjDGQbdYh_Sm8NgjNpnWzad28t07w8Yd3Xg3U_kP_xk0AboEX19Prf1TN1fL6fiv9A1ujjC4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188205415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Significant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR: Mechanisms and imaging variables associated with improvement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chiche, Olivier ; Rodés‐Cabau, Josep ; Campelo‐Parada, Francisco ; Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B. ; Regueiro, Ander ; Chamandi, Chekrallah ; Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania ; Côté, Mélanie ; DeLarochellière, Robert ; Paradis, Jean‐Michel ; Dumont, Eric ; Doyle, Daniel ; Mohammadi, Siamak ; Bergeron, Sébastien ; Pibarot, Philippe ; Beaudoin, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiche, Olivier ; Rodés‐Cabau, Josep ; Campelo‐Parada, Francisco ; Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B. ; Regueiro, Ander ; Chamandi, Chekrallah ; Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania ; Côté, Mélanie ; DeLarochellière, Robert ; Paradis, Jean‐Michel ; Dumont, Eric ; Doyle, Daniel ; Mohammadi, Siamak ; Bergeron, Sébastien ; Pibarot, Philippe ; Beaudoin, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Factors associated with MR improvement have not been studied thoroughly. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with TAVR with more than mild MR at baseline. MR evolution was assessed at 1–3 and 6–12 months after intervention. MR severity and mechanisms were assessed by echocardiography. Mitral annulus calcification (MAC) was quantified using preoperative cardiac CT. Results From 674 consecutive TAVR recipients, 78 with more than mild MR had a 6–12 months follow‐up. Following TAVR, MR improved in 34 patients (43%), remained stable in 38 (49%) and worsened in 6 (8%). Patients with MR improvement had greater tenting area (141 ± 56 vs. 99 ± 40 mm2, P &lt; 0.01), tenting height (7.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.6 ± 1.9 mm, P &lt; 0.01) and lower ejection fraction (43 ± 16 vs. 52 ± 14%, P = 0.01). MAC was frequent (87.7% of patients) and a trend in greater MAC was observed in patients without MR improvement (3560 ± 5587 vs. 2053 ± 2800, P = 0.16). In multivariable analysis, tenting area (OR per 10 mm2 increase: 1.012, 95% CI, 1.001–1.024 P = 0.039) and annulus calcifications associated with leaflet restriction (OR = 0.108, 95% CI, 0.012–0.956, P = 0.045) were independently associated with MR outcome after TAVR. Conclusion Larger mitral valve tenting area was associated with more improvement of MR after TAVR whereas extensive MAC associated with leaflet restriction was associated with less improvement. This may help in the clinical decision‐making process of TAVR candidates with concomitant MR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-2822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/echo.14303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30834579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - physiopathology ; aortic valve replacement ; computed tomography ; echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; mitral regurgitation ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.36 (4), p.722-731</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-cbc183f0a3fccc2f6026c9e3ec900159ef1ff0ecd555c01f6d69b16102303fe73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-cbc183f0a3fccc2f6026c9e3ec900159ef1ff0ecd555c01f6d69b16102303fe73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8958-6823 ; 0000-0002-9914-6821</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecho.14303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecho.14303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiche, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodés‐Cabau, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campelo‐Parada, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regueiro, Ander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamandi, Chekrallah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Mélanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLarochellière, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paradis, Jean‐Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Siamak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergeron, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pibarot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Significant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR: Mechanisms and imaging variables associated with improvement</title><title>Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Echocardiography</addtitle><description>Background Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Factors associated with MR improvement have not been studied thoroughly. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with TAVR with more than mild MR at baseline. MR evolution was assessed at 1–3 and 6–12 months after intervention. MR severity and mechanisms were assessed by echocardiography. Mitral annulus calcification (MAC) was quantified using preoperative cardiac CT. Results From 674 consecutive TAVR recipients, 78 with more than mild MR had a 6–12 months follow‐up. Following TAVR, MR improved in 34 patients (43%), remained stable in 38 (49%) and worsened in 6 (8%). Patients with MR improvement had greater tenting area (141 ± 56 vs. 99 ± 40 mm2, P &lt; 0.01), tenting height (7.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.6 ± 1.9 mm, P &lt; 0.01) and lower ejection fraction (43 ± 16 vs. 52 ± 14%, P = 0.01). MAC was frequent (87.7% of patients) and a trend in greater MAC was observed in patients without MR improvement (3560 ± 5587 vs. 2053 ± 2800, P = 0.16). In multivariable analysis, tenting area (OR per 10 mm2 increase: 1.012, 95% CI, 1.001–1.024 P = 0.039) and annulus calcifications associated with leaflet restriction (OR = 0.108, 95% CI, 0.012–0.956, P = 0.045) were independently associated with MR outcome after TAVR. Conclusion Larger mitral valve tenting area was associated with more improvement of MR after TAVR whereas extensive MAC associated with leaflet restriction was associated with less improvement. This may help in the clinical decision‐making process of TAVR candidates with concomitant MR.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</subject><subject>aortic valve replacement</subject><subject>computed tomography</subject><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mitral regurgitation</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0742-2822</issn><issn>1540-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQQC0Egi3thR-AfERIgRk7zgc3tKIFCYTU0l4jrzMORomztRMQ_Pp6WdpjfbFlP72RH2NHCGeY1jmZx_EMcwlyhy1Q5ZBVWKpdtoAyF5mohDhgn2J8AoASMd9nBxIqmauyXrC3H67zzjqj_cQHNwXd80DdHDo36cmNnjvP1-lEfop89i2FbnS-4w-Xv75f8Ls0W3sXh8i1b7kbdLd5fNbB6VVP6TbG0Tg9Uctf3PSYiHUYn2lIus9sz-o-0peP_ZD9_Hr1sLzObu-_3SwvbzMjRS0zszJYSQtaWmOMsAWIwtQkydQAqGqyaC2QaZVSBtAWbVGvsEAQKYilUh6yk603Tf49U5yawUVDfa89jXNsBFaVAJWjSujpFjVhjDGQbdYh_Sm8NgjNpnWzad28t07w8Yd3Xg3U_kP_xk0AboEX19Prf1TN1fL6fiv9A1ujjC4</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Chiche, Olivier</creator><creator>Rodés‐Cabau, Josep</creator><creator>Campelo‐Parada, Francisco</creator><creator>Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B.</creator><creator>Regueiro, Ander</creator><creator>Chamandi, Chekrallah</creator><creator>Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania</creator><creator>Côté, Mélanie</creator><creator>DeLarochellière, Robert</creator><creator>Paradis, Jean‐Michel</creator><creator>Dumont, Eric</creator><creator>Doyle, Daniel</creator><creator>Mohammadi, Siamak</creator><creator>Bergeron, Sébastien</creator><creator>Pibarot, Philippe</creator><creator>Beaudoin, Jonathan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8958-6823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-6821</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Significant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR: Mechanisms and imaging variables associated with improvement</title><author>Chiche, Olivier ; Rodés‐Cabau, Josep ; Campelo‐Parada, Francisco ; Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B. ; Regueiro, Ander ; Chamandi, Chekrallah ; Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania ; Côté, Mélanie ; DeLarochellière, Robert ; Paradis, Jean‐Michel ; Dumont, Eric ; Doyle, Daniel ; Mohammadi, Siamak ; Bergeron, Sébastien ; Pibarot, Philippe ; Beaudoin, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-cbc183f0a3fccc2f6026c9e3ec900159ef1ff0ecd555c01f6d69b16102303fe73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</topic><topic>aortic valve replacement</topic><topic>computed tomography</topic><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mitral regurgitation</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiche, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodés‐Cabau, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campelo‐Parada, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regueiro, Ander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamandi, Chekrallah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Mélanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLarochellière, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paradis, Jean‐Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Siamak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergeron, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pibarot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiche, Olivier</au><au>Rodés‐Cabau, Josep</au><au>Campelo‐Parada, Francisco</au><au>Freitas‐Ferraz, Afonso B.</au><au>Regueiro, Ander</au><au>Chamandi, Chekrallah</au><au>Rodriguez‐Gabella, Tania</au><au>Côté, Mélanie</au><au>DeLarochellière, Robert</au><au>Paradis, Jean‐Michel</au><au>Dumont, Eric</au><au>Doyle, Daniel</au><au>Mohammadi, Siamak</au><au>Bergeron, Sébastien</au><au>Pibarot, Philippe</au><au>Beaudoin, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Significant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR: Mechanisms and imaging variables associated with improvement</atitle><jtitle>Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Echocardiography</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>722-731</pages><issn>0742-2822</issn><eissn>1540-8175</eissn><abstract>Background Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Factors associated with MR improvement have not been studied thoroughly. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with TAVR with more than mild MR at baseline. MR evolution was assessed at 1–3 and 6–12 months after intervention. MR severity and mechanisms were assessed by echocardiography. Mitral annulus calcification (MAC) was quantified using preoperative cardiac CT. Results From 674 consecutive TAVR recipients, 78 with more than mild MR had a 6–12 months follow‐up. Following TAVR, MR improved in 34 patients (43%), remained stable in 38 (49%) and worsened in 6 (8%). Patients with MR improvement had greater tenting area (141 ± 56 vs. 99 ± 40 mm2, P &lt; 0.01), tenting height (7.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.6 ± 1.9 mm, P &lt; 0.01) and lower ejection fraction (43 ± 16 vs. 52 ± 14%, P = 0.01). MAC was frequent (87.7% of patients) and a trend in greater MAC was observed in patients without MR improvement (3560 ± 5587 vs. 2053 ± 2800, P = 0.16). In multivariable analysis, tenting area (OR per 10 mm2 increase: 1.012, 95% CI, 1.001–1.024 P = 0.039) and annulus calcifications associated with leaflet restriction (OR = 0.108, 95% CI, 0.012–0.956, P = 0.045) were independently associated with MR outcome after TAVR. Conclusion Larger mitral valve tenting area was associated with more improvement of MR after TAVR whereas extensive MAC associated with leaflet restriction was associated with less improvement. This may help in the clinical decision‐making process of TAVR candidates with concomitant MR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30834579</pmid><doi>10.1111/echo.14303</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8958-6823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-6821</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-2822
ispartof Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2019-04, Vol.36 (4), p.722-731
issn 0742-2822
1540-8175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2188205415
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - physiopathology
aortic valve replacement
computed tomography
echocardiography
Echocardiography - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
mitral regurgitation
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Complications - physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Treatment Outcome
title Significant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR: Mechanisms and imaging variables associated with improvement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significant%20mitral%20regurgitation%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20TAVR:%20Mechanisms%20and%20imaging%20variables%20associated%20with%20improvement&rft.jtitle=Echocardiography%20(Mount%20Kisco,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Chiche,%20Olivier&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=722-731&rft.issn=0742-2822&rft.eissn=1540-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/echo.14303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2188205415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188205415&rft_id=info:pmid/30834579&rfr_iscdi=true