Optimizing treatment outcomes in adolescents with eating disorders: The potential role of cognitive behavioral therapy

Objective While family‐based treatment (FBT) is the leading psychological therapy for adolescents with eating disorders, it is not universally effective or suitable. This study considered the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioral therapy for eating disorders (CBT‐ED) in adolescent cases where FBT wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of eating disorders 2019-05, Vol.52 (5), p.538-542
Hauptverfasser: Craig, Mirin, Waine, Joanne, Wilson, Scott, Waller, Glenn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 542
container_issue 5
container_start_page 538
container_title The International journal of eating disorders
container_volume 52
creator Craig, Mirin
Waine, Joanne
Wilson, Scott
Waller, Glenn
description Objective While family‐based treatment (FBT) is the leading psychological therapy for adolescents with eating disorders, it is not universally effective or suitable. This study considered the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioral therapy for eating disorders (CBT‐ED) in adolescent cases where FBT was not fully effective or where it was not applicable to the individual case. Method A transdiagnostic case series of 54 adolescents with eating disorders (52% with anorexia nervosa; 31% with atypical anorexia nervosa) were offered CBT‐ED following previous treatment using FBT or following FBT being judged inappropriate. Pre‐post outcomes were assessed using standardized measures of eating attitudes and clinical impairment, and weight change was measured for the patients with anorexia nervosa. Results The rate of attrition was similar to that found in other CBT‐ED studies (38.9% of patients who started CBT‐ED; 59.3% of those offered CBT‐ED). The patients showed positive outcomes on all measures, regardless of whether they had previously been treated with FBT. Effect sizes were moderate to large. Severity and duration of the eating disorder were unrelated to outcomes. Discussion CBT‐ED merits consideration as a second‐line approach for adolescents with eating disorders when FBT has not been effective or could not be applied. There is no evidence that previous failure to benefit from FBT impairs outcome from subsequent CBT‐ED, and severity and duration of the eating disorder did not influence outcome. Treatment matching for adolescents with eating disorders might consider the role of previous treatment outcomes and family availability in determining optimum treatment strategies for individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eat.23067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2187958745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2187958745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4a8554cd6ab55a70841ea232b283c3bf1c7c374bb0f7fc747b2dbd05ecc448803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1LHDEYB_BQLHW1PfQLSMCLHkafvMwk25uILwXByxZ6C0km40ZmJtMks7L99M121UOhp8CTH3-eF4S-ErggAPTS6XxBGTTiA1oQWMqKgPx5gBZARVMxLuQhOkrpGQAaBvUndMhA0iWnZIE2j1P2g__txyecYwka3JhxmLMNg0vYj1i3oXfJlnLCLz6vcUE73foUYuti-oZXa4enkAvxusexeBw6bMPT6LPfOGzcWm98iOUzr13U0_Yz-tjpPrkvr-8x-nF7s7q-rx4e775fXz1UlkkpKq5lXXPbNtrUtRYgOXGaMmqoZJaZjlhhmeDGQCc6K7gwtDUt1M5azqUEdozO9rlTDL9ml7IafJml7_XowpwUJVIsayl4XejpP_Q5zHEs3Sm6Y7IhwIo63ysbQ0rRdWqKftBxqwio3TFUWY_6e4xiT14TZzO49l2-bb-Ayz148b3b_j9J3Vyt9pF_AG6VlUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2218786103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing treatment outcomes in adolescents with eating disorders: The potential role of cognitive behavioral therapy</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Craig, Mirin ; Waine, Joanne ; Wilson, Scott ; Waller, Glenn</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Mirin ; Waine, Joanne ; Wilson, Scott ; Waller, Glenn</creatorcontrib><description>Objective While family‐based treatment (FBT) is the leading psychological therapy for adolescents with eating disorders, it is not universally effective or suitable. This study considered the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioral therapy for eating disorders (CBT‐ED) in adolescent cases where FBT was not fully effective or where it was not applicable to the individual case. Method A transdiagnostic case series of 54 adolescents with eating disorders (52% with anorexia nervosa; 31% with atypical anorexia nervosa) were offered CBT‐ED following previous treatment using FBT or following FBT being judged inappropriate. Pre‐post outcomes were assessed using standardized measures of eating attitudes and clinical impairment, and weight change was measured for the patients with anorexia nervosa. Results The rate of attrition was similar to that found in other CBT‐ED studies (38.9% of patients who started CBT‐ED; 59.3% of those offered CBT‐ED). The patients showed positive outcomes on all measures, regardless of whether they had previously been treated with FBT. Effect sizes were moderate to large. Severity and duration of the eating disorder were unrelated to outcomes. Discussion CBT‐ED merits consideration as a second‐line approach for adolescents with eating disorders when FBT has not been effective or could not be applied. There is no evidence that previous failure to benefit from FBT impairs outcome from subsequent CBT‐ED, and severity and duration of the eating disorder did not influence outcome. Treatment matching for adolescents with eating disorders might consider the role of previous treatment outcomes and family availability in determining optimum treatment strategies for individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-3478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eat.23067</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30829421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>adolescents ; Anorexia ; attrition ; Behavior modification ; Clinical outcomes ; Cognitive behavioral therapy ; Cognitive therapy ; Eating disorders ; effectiveness ; family based treatment ; outcomes ; Teenagers</subject><ispartof>The International journal of eating disorders, 2019-05, Vol.52 (5), p.538-542</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4a8554cd6ab55a70841ea232b283c3bf1c7c374bb0f7fc747b2dbd05ecc448803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4a8554cd6ab55a70841ea232b283c3bf1c7c374bb0f7fc747b2dbd05ecc448803</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7794-9546</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feat.23067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feat.23067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30829421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Mirin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waine, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Glenn</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing treatment outcomes in adolescents with eating disorders: The potential role of cognitive behavioral therapy</title><title>The International journal of eating disorders</title><addtitle>Int J Eat Disord</addtitle><description>Objective While family‐based treatment (FBT) is the leading psychological therapy for adolescents with eating disorders, it is not universally effective or suitable. This study considered the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioral therapy for eating disorders (CBT‐ED) in adolescent cases where FBT was not fully effective or where it was not applicable to the individual case. Method A transdiagnostic case series of 54 adolescents with eating disorders (52% with anorexia nervosa; 31% with atypical anorexia nervosa) were offered CBT‐ED following previous treatment using FBT or following FBT being judged inappropriate. Pre‐post outcomes were assessed using standardized measures of eating attitudes and clinical impairment, and weight change was measured for the patients with anorexia nervosa. Results The rate of attrition was similar to that found in other CBT‐ED studies (38.9% of patients who started CBT‐ED; 59.3% of those offered CBT‐ED). The patients showed positive outcomes on all measures, regardless of whether they had previously been treated with FBT. Effect sizes were moderate to large. Severity and duration of the eating disorder were unrelated to outcomes. Discussion CBT‐ED merits consideration as a second‐line approach for adolescents with eating disorders when FBT has not been effective or could not be applied. There is no evidence that previous failure to benefit from FBT impairs outcome from subsequent CBT‐ED, and severity and duration of the eating disorder did not influence outcome. Treatment matching for adolescents with eating disorders might consider the role of previous treatment outcomes and family availability in determining optimum treatment strategies for individuals.</description><subject>adolescents</subject><subject>Anorexia</subject><subject>attrition</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cognitive behavioral therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>effectiveness</subject><subject>family based treatment</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><issn>0276-3478</issn><issn>1098-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10U1LHDEYB_BQLHW1PfQLSMCLHkafvMwk25uILwXByxZ6C0km40ZmJtMks7L99M121UOhp8CTH3-eF4S-ErggAPTS6XxBGTTiA1oQWMqKgPx5gBZARVMxLuQhOkrpGQAaBvUndMhA0iWnZIE2j1P2g__txyecYwka3JhxmLMNg0vYj1i3oXfJlnLCLz6vcUE73foUYuti-oZXa4enkAvxusexeBw6bMPT6LPfOGzcWm98iOUzr13U0_Yz-tjpPrkvr-8x-nF7s7q-rx4e775fXz1UlkkpKq5lXXPbNtrUtRYgOXGaMmqoZJaZjlhhmeDGQCc6K7gwtDUt1M5azqUEdozO9rlTDL9ml7IafJml7_XowpwUJVIsayl4XejpP_Q5zHEs3Sm6Y7IhwIo63ysbQ0rRdWqKftBxqwio3TFUWY_6e4xiT14TZzO49l2-bb-Ayz148b3b_j9J3Vyt9pF_AG6VlUs</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Craig, Mirin</creator><creator>Waine, Joanne</creator><creator>Wilson, Scott</creator><creator>Waller, Glenn</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7794-9546</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Optimizing treatment outcomes in adolescents with eating disorders: The potential role of cognitive behavioral therapy</title><author>Craig, Mirin ; Waine, Joanne ; Wilson, Scott ; Waller, Glenn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4a8554cd6ab55a70841ea232b283c3bf1c7c374bb0f7fc747b2dbd05ecc448803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>adolescents</topic><topic>Anorexia</topic><topic>attrition</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cognitive behavioral therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>effectiveness</topic><topic>family based treatment</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Mirin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waine, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Glenn</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of eating disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Mirin</au><au>Waine, Joanne</au><au>Wilson, Scott</au><au>Waller, Glenn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing treatment outcomes in adolescents with eating disorders: The potential role of cognitive behavioral therapy</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of eating disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Eat Disord</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>538</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>538-542</pages><issn>0276-3478</issn><eissn>1098-108X</eissn><abstract>Objective While family‐based treatment (FBT) is the leading psychological therapy for adolescents with eating disorders, it is not universally effective or suitable. This study considered the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioral therapy for eating disorders (CBT‐ED) in adolescent cases where FBT was not fully effective or where it was not applicable to the individual case. Method A transdiagnostic case series of 54 adolescents with eating disorders (52% with anorexia nervosa; 31% with atypical anorexia nervosa) were offered CBT‐ED following previous treatment using FBT or following FBT being judged inappropriate. Pre‐post outcomes were assessed using standardized measures of eating attitudes and clinical impairment, and weight change was measured for the patients with anorexia nervosa. Results The rate of attrition was similar to that found in other CBT‐ED studies (38.9% of patients who started CBT‐ED; 59.3% of those offered CBT‐ED). The patients showed positive outcomes on all measures, regardless of whether they had previously been treated with FBT. Effect sizes were moderate to large. Severity and duration of the eating disorder were unrelated to outcomes. Discussion CBT‐ED merits consideration as a second‐line approach for adolescents with eating disorders when FBT has not been effective or could not be applied. There is no evidence that previous failure to benefit from FBT impairs outcome from subsequent CBT‐ED, and severity and duration of the eating disorder did not influence outcome. Treatment matching for adolescents with eating disorders might consider the role of previous treatment outcomes and family availability in determining optimum treatment strategies for individuals.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30829421</pmid><doi>10.1002/eat.23067</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7794-9546</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-3478
ispartof The International journal of eating disorders, 2019-05, Vol.52 (5), p.538-542
issn 0276-3478
1098-108X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2187958745
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects adolescents
Anorexia
attrition
Behavior modification
Clinical outcomes
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive therapy
Eating disorders
effectiveness
family based treatment
outcomes
Teenagers
title Optimizing treatment outcomes in adolescents with eating disorders: The potential role of cognitive behavioral therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20treatment%20outcomes%20in%20adolescents%20with%20eating%20disorders:%20The%20potential%20role%20of%20cognitive%20behavioral%20therapy&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20eating%20disorders&rft.au=Craig,%20Mirin&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=538&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=538-542&rft.issn=0276-3478&rft.eissn=1098-108X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eat.23067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2187958745%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2218786103&rft_id=info:pmid/30829421&rfr_iscdi=true