Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers
The short-term corrosion and micromechanical behavior of 32 unique head-neck taper design/material/assembly conditions was tested using an incremental cyclic fretting corrosion (ICFC) test method previously developed. Seven materials, design, and simulated surgical parameters were evaluated, each be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2019-05, Vol.34 (5), p.991-1002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1002 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 991 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ouellette, Eric S. Mali, Sachin A. Kim, Jua Grostefon, Justin Gilbert, Jeremy L. |
description | The short-term corrosion and micromechanical behavior of 32 unique head-neck taper design/material/assembly conditions was tested using an incremental cyclic fretting corrosion (ICFC) test method previously developed.
Seven materials, design, and simulated surgical parameters were evaluated, each being assigned 2 conditions for testing, using a 27-2 (7 factor, quarter factorial) design of experiments test matrix. The factors explored were (1) seating load, (2) head-neck offset, (3) material combination, (4) taper diameter, (5) taper roughness, (6) angular mismatch/engagement, and (7) taper length. Each sample underwent assembly, ICFC testing, pull off.
Low seating load and high head offset correlated with increased fretting corrosion (P < .05). High head offset also contributed to a lower onset load for fretting current and higher micromotion (P < .05). Head subsidence measured over the ICFC test for samples seated at 100 N was significantly higher than samples seated at 4000 N. Micromotion for 12-mm head offsets was statistically higher than samples with a 1.5-mm head offset. A number of interactive effects were observed. For example, samples seated at 4000 N were less sensitive to head offset than samples seated at 100 N in terms of the resulting fretting current.
Taper locking position, material combination, taper engagement length, taper roughness, and taper dimensions all had weak or no correlation with fretting current and taper micromotion. This test method and experimental design is a versatile means of assessing potential new taper designs in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2187956250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540319300889</els_id><sourcerecordid>2187956250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-58f816bf88dea5c38b12c7bf9d740333abd033578c8a4ebf47ed6511c884c8573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFuEzEURS1U1IbSH2CBvOyiM9jj8diR2KDQ0kppQaKwtTz2c3E6GafPEyT-hm_pl-GQliWrt3jnXukeQt5wVnPGu3er2uL0o24Yn9eM16wVL8iMS9FUumXdAZkxrUUlWyaOyKucV4xxLmV7SI4E041SXM0IfoQc78Yzem0nwGiHM2pHT7-CneJ4R5fJenoeArgp0zTSq_Hx9_c4YaIXCNNfZJEQU47l-QUwJFzb0QFNgV4nvx0s0kuwvroBd09v7QYwvyYvgx0ynDzdY_Lt4vx2cVktP3-6WnxYVk7IbqqkDpp3fdDag5VO6J43TvVh7lVZJITtfTlSaadtC31oFfhOcu60bp2WShyT033vBtPDFvJk1jE7GAY7Qtpm03Ct5rJrJCtos0ddmZIRgtlgXFv8ZTgzO9dmZXauzc61YdwU1yX09ql_26_B_4s8yy3A-z0AZeXPCGiyi1Ds-IhFqPEp_q__D8jhkJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2187956250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ouellette, Eric S. ; Mali, Sachin A. ; Kim, Jua ; Grostefon, Justin ; Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ouellette, Eric S. ; Mali, Sachin A. ; Kim, Jua ; Grostefon, Justin ; Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><description>The short-term corrosion and micromechanical behavior of 32 unique head-neck taper design/material/assembly conditions was tested using an incremental cyclic fretting corrosion (ICFC) test method previously developed.
Seven materials, design, and simulated surgical parameters were evaluated, each being assigned 2 conditions for testing, using a 27-2 (7 factor, quarter factorial) design of experiments test matrix. The factors explored were (1) seating load, (2) head-neck offset, (3) material combination, (4) taper diameter, (5) taper roughness, (6) angular mismatch/engagement, and (7) taper length. Each sample underwent assembly, ICFC testing, pull off.
Low seating load and high head offset correlated with increased fretting corrosion (P < .05). High head offset also contributed to a lower onset load for fretting current and higher micromotion (P < .05). Head subsidence measured over the ICFC test for samples seated at 100 N was significantly higher than samples seated at 4000 N. Micromotion for 12-mm head offsets was statistically higher than samples with a 1.5-mm head offset. A number of interactive effects were observed. For example, samples seated at 4000 N were less sensitive to head offset than samples seated at 100 N in terms of the resulting fretting current.
Taper locking position, material combination, taper engagement length, taper roughness, and taper dimensions all had weak or no correlation with fretting current and taper micromotion. This test method and experimental design is a versatile means of assessing potential new taper designs in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30827717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation ; Corrosion ; electrochemistry ; fretting ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; In Vitro Techniques ; MACC ; micromotion ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Stress, Mechanical ; THA</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-05, Vol.34 (5), p.991-1002</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-58f816bf88dea5c38b12c7bf9d740333abd033578c8a4ebf47ed6511c884c8573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-58f816bf88dea5c38b12c7bf9d740333abd033578c8a4ebf47ed6511c884c8573</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7428-2851</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ouellette, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mali, Sachin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grostefon, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>The short-term corrosion and micromechanical behavior of 32 unique head-neck taper design/material/assembly conditions was tested using an incremental cyclic fretting corrosion (ICFC) test method previously developed.
Seven materials, design, and simulated surgical parameters were evaluated, each being assigned 2 conditions for testing, using a 27-2 (7 factor, quarter factorial) design of experiments test matrix. The factors explored were (1) seating load, (2) head-neck offset, (3) material combination, (4) taper diameter, (5) taper roughness, (6) angular mismatch/engagement, and (7) taper length. Each sample underwent assembly, ICFC testing, pull off.
Low seating load and high head offset correlated with increased fretting corrosion (P < .05). High head offset also contributed to a lower onset load for fretting current and higher micromotion (P < .05). Head subsidence measured over the ICFC test for samples seated at 100 N was significantly higher than samples seated at 4000 N. Micromotion for 12-mm head offsets was statistically higher than samples with a 1.5-mm head offset. A number of interactive effects were observed. For example, samples seated at 4000 N were less sensitive to head offset than samples seated at 100 N in terms of the resulting fretting current.
Taper locking position, material combination, taper engagement length, taper roughness, and taper dimensions all had weak or no correlation with fretting current and taper micromotion. This test method and experimental design is a versatile means of assessing potential new taper designs in the future.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>electrochemistry</subject><subject>fretting</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>MACC</subject><subject>micromotion</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>THA</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFuEzEURS1U1IbSH2CBvOyiM9jj8diR2KDQ0kppQaKwtTz2c3E6GafPEyT-hm_pl-GQliWrt3jnXukeQt5wVnPGu3er2uL0o24Yn9eM16wVL8iMS9FUumXdAZkxrUUlWyaOyKucV4xxLmV7SI4E041SXM0IfoQc78Yzem0nwGiHM2pHT7-CneJ4R5fJenoeArgp0zTSq_Hx9_c4YaIXCNNfZJEQU47l-QUwJFzb0QFNgV4nvx0s0kuwvroBd09v7QYwvyYvgx0ynDzdY_Lt4vx2cVktP3-6WnxYVk7IbqqkDpp3fdDag5VO6J43TvVh7lVZJITtfTlSaadtC31oFfhOcu60bp2WShyT033vBtPDFvJk1jE7GAY7Qtpm03Ct5rJrJCtos0ddmZIRgtlgXFv8ZTgzO9dmZXauzc61YdwU1yX09ql_26_B_4s8yy3A-z0AZeXPCGiyi1Ds-IhFqPEp_q__D8jhkJI</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Ouellette, Eric S.</creator><creator>Mali, Sachin A.</creator><creator>Kim, Jua</creator><creator>Grostefon, Justin</creator><creator>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7428-2851</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers</title><author>Ouellette, Eric S. ; Mali, Sachin A. ; Kim, Jua ; Grostefon, Justin ; Gilbert, Jeremy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-58f816bf88dea5c38b12c7bf9d740333abd033578c8a4ebf47ed6511c884c8573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>electrochemistry</topic><topic>fretting</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>MACC</topic><topic>micromotion</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>THA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ouellette, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mali, Sachin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grostefon, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ouellette, Eric S.</au><au>Mali, Sachin A.</au><au>Kim, Jua</au><au>Grostefon, Justin</au><au>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>991</spage><epage>1002</epage><pages>991-1002</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>The short-term corrosion and micromechanical behavior of 32 unique head-neck taper design/material/assembly conditions was tested using an incremental cyclic fretting corrosion (ICFC) test method previously developed.
Seven materials, design, and simulated surgical parameters were evaluated, each being assigned 2 conditions for testing, using a 27-2 (7 factor, quarter factorial) design of experiments test matrix. The factors explored were (1) seating load, (2) head-neck offset, (3) material combination, (4) taper diameter, (5) taper roughness, (6) angular mismatch/engagement, and (7) taper length. Each sample underwent assembly, ICFC testing, pull off.
Low seating load and high head offset correlated with increased fretting corrosion (P < .05). High head offset also contributed to a lower onset load for fretting current and higher micromotion (P < .05). Head subsidence measured over the ICFC test for samples seated at 100 N was significantly higher than samples seated at 4000 N. Micromotion for 12-mm head offsets was statistically higher than samples with a 1.5-mm head offset. A number of interactive effects were observed. For example, samples seated at 4000 N were less sensitive to head offset than samples seated at 100 N in terms of the resulting fretting current.
Taper locking position, material combination, taper engagement length, taper roughness, and taper dimensions all had weak or no correlation with fretting current and taper micromotion. This test method and experimental design is a versatile means of assessing potential new taper designs in the future.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30827717</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.043</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7428-2851</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-05, Vol.34 (5), p.991-1002 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2187956250 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation Corrosion electrochemistry fretting Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects In Vitro Techniques MACC micromotion Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Failure Stress, Mechanical THA |
title | Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A15%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design,%20Material,%20and%20Seating%20Load%20Effects%20on%20In%C2%A0Vitro%20Fretting%20Corrosion%20Performance%20of%20Modular%20Head-Neck%20Tapers&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Ouellette,%20Eric%20S.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=991&rft.epage=1002&rft.pages=991-1002&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2187956250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2187956250&rft_id=info:pmid/30827717&rft_els_id=S0883540319300889&rfr_iscdi=true |