A research agenda for fear of cancer recurrence: A Delphi study conducted in Australia

Objective Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common, debilitating, and costly to the health system. While there has been a rising trajectory in FCR‐related research, there remain many unanswered questions. A research agenda is required to clarify priorities and ensure that research dollars and effor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2019-05, Vol.28 (5), p.989-996
Hauptverfasser: Butow, Phyllis, Shaw, Joanne, Vaccaro, Lisa, Sharpe, Louise, Dhillon, Haryana, Smith, Ben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common, debilitating, and costly to the health system. While there has been a rising trajectory in FCR‐related research, there remain many unanswered questions. A research agenda is required to clarify priorities and ensure that research dollars and effort are expended wisely. This study aimed to elicit research topics and priorities from clinical and academic experts in FCR. Methods Phase 1 consisted of elicitation by survey of prioritised FCR research topics from 20 members of the Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) FCR special interest group, followed by a focus group discussion with 28 clinicians, researchers, and cancer survivors, at which survey results were presented and further reflection was encouraged. This resulted in 28 research topics that were then subjected to a Delphi process to establish consensus (phase 2). Results Thirty‐one participants completed round 1 of the Delphi process and 23 round 2, after which satisfactory consensus was reached. Five broad areas of research were identified as priorities. In rank order, they were (1) intervention models; (2) definition, predictors, and outcomes of FCR; (3) detection and screening; (4) training for health professionals; and (5) reaching specific populations. Conclusions It is hoped that the current findings will guide FCR researchers towards clinically relevant, significant research that will move the field forward. Experts nominated intervention research as the top priority, specifically exploring optimal formats of delivery including stepped care and blended models incorporating online or phone elements to increase accessibility.
ISSN:1057-9249
1099-1611
DOI:10.1002/pon.5048