Resistance of Geneva and other apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora

When vigorously growing shoots of 49 different apple rootstocks grown in a greenhouse were inoculated with different strains of Erwinia amylovora, Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Ottawa 3, Malling 9, and Malling 26 were the most fire blight susceptible rootstocks and Geneva 11, Geneva 65, Geneva 16, Geneva 30,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2003, Vol.87 (1), p.26-32
Hauptverfasser: NORELLI, J. L, HOLLERAN, H. T, JOHNSON, W. C, ROBINSON, T. L, ALDWINCKLE, H. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 87
creator NORELLI, J. L
HOLLERAN, H. T
JOHNSON, W. C
ROBINSON, T. L
ALDWINCKLE, H. S
description When vigorously growing shoots of 49 different apple rootstocks grown in a greenhouse were inoculated with different strains of Erwinia amylovora, Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Ottawa 3, Malling 9, and Malling 26 were the most fire blight susceptible rootstocks and Geneva 11, Geneva 65, Geneva 16, Geneva 30, Pillnitzer Au51-11, Malling 7, and several breeding selections were the most resistant. Significant strain-rootstock interactions were observed in the amount of fire blight that resulted from inoculation. Field-grown fruiting 'Royal Gala' trees on Geneva 16 and Geneva 30 rootstocks were highly resistant to rootstock infection (no tree mortality) when trees sustained severe blossom infection with E. amylovora, compared with Malling 9 and Malling 26 rootstock clones, which were highly susceptible to infection (36 to 100% tree mortality). In contrast to potted own-rooted B.9 plants inoculated in a greenhouse, B.9 rootstocks of orchard trees appeared resistant to rootstock infection (0% tree mortality). Orchard trees on Geneva 11 were moderately resistant to rootstock infection (25% tree mortality). There was general agreement in the evaluation of resistance under orchard conditions when rootstock resistance was evaluated in relation to controlled blossom inoculation or to natural blossom infection.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.26
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2187025707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2187025707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34ebc2ed9a1d40a0d0da3cf69f3232ccc139f347e2d715fb84c4a6c2991a47cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouq7-AC9SBMVLa2aS5uMofoOg-HEO2TTFardZk67iv7eLq4IHTzOH531h5iFkB2gBVPOj29Or-wIpZYWSBRQoVsgINGe5FBpXyYiChhw1yA2ymdIzpZRzodbJBqMKUOhyRE7vfGpSbzvns1BnF77zbzazXZWF_snHzM5mrc9iCH3qg3tJWR-ys_jedM1ATT_a8Bai3SJrtW2T317OMXk8P3s4ucyvby6uTo6vc8eU7HPG_cShr7SFilNLK1pZ5mqha4YMnXPAhpVLj5WEsp4o7rgVDrUGy6WbsDE5_OqdxfA696k30yY537a282GeDIKSFEtJ5YAe_IuCEqIUJQ7g3h_wOcxjN5xhELVSuHjomMAX5GJIKfrazGIztfHDADULFWahwixUGCUNGBRDZndZPJ9MffWT-P79AOwvAZucbes4SGjSbzMXJQjF2Cerl5Ca</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229882194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance of Geneva and other apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora</title><source>American Phytopathological Society Current</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>NORELLI, J. L ; HOLLERAN, H. T ; JOHNSON, W. C ; ROBINSON, T. L ; ALDWINCKLE, H. S</creator><creatorcontrib>NORELLI, J. L ; HOLLERAN, H. T ; JOHNSON, W. C ; ROBINSON, T. L ; ALDWINCKLE, H. S</creatorcontrib><description>When vigorously growing shoots of 49 different apple rootstocks grown in a greenhouse were inoculated with different strains of Erwinia amylovora, Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Ottawa 3, Malling 9, and Malling 26 were the most fire blight susceptible rootstocks and Geneva 11, Geneva 65, Geneva 16, Geneva 30, Pillnitzer Au51-11, Malling 7, and several breeding selections were the most resistant. Significant strain-rootstock interactions were observed in the amount of fire blight that resulted from inoculation. Field-grown fruiting 'Royal Gala' trees on Geneva 16 and Geneva 30 rootstocks were highly resistant to rootstock infection (no tree mortality) when trees sustained severe blossom infection with E. amylovora, compared with Malling 9 and Malling 26 rootstock clones, which were highly susceptible to infection (36 to 100% tree mortality). In contrast to potted own-rooted B.9 plants inoculated in a greenhouse, B.9 rootstocks of orchard trees appeared resistant to rootstock infection (0% tree mortality). Orchard trees on Geneva 11 were moderately resistant to rootstock infection (25% tree mortality). There was general agreement in the evaluation of resistance under orchard conditions when rootstock resistance was evaluated in relation to controlled blossom inoculation or to natural blossom infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.26</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30812695</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLDIDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Bacterial plant pathogens ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Pest resistance ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant pathogens ; Systematics. Structure, properties and multiplication. Genetics ; Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 2003, Vol.87 (1), p.26-32</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Phytopathological Society Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34ebc2ed9a1d40a0d0da3cf69f3232ccc139f347e2d715fb84c4a6c2991a47cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34ebc2ed9a1d40a0d0da3cf69f3232ccc139f347e2d715fb84c4a6c2991a47cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3724,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14651683$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30812695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NORELLI, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLERAN, H. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, W. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, T. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALDWINCKLE, H. S</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance of Geneva and other apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>When vigorously growing shoots of 49 different apple rootstocks grown in a greenhouse were inoculated with different strains of Erwinia amylovora, Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Ottawa 3, Malling 9, and Malling 26 were the most fire blight susceptible rootstocks and Geneva 11, Geneva 65, Geneva 16, Geneva 30, Pillnitzer Au51-11, Malling 7, and several breeding selections were the most resistant. Significant strain-rootstock interactions were observed in the amount of fire blight that resulted from inoculation. Field-grown fruiting 'Royal Gala' trees on Geneva 16 and Geneva 30 rootstocks were highly resistant to rootstock infection (no tree mortality) when trees sustained severe blossom infection with E. amylovora, compared with Malling 9 and Malling 26 rootstock clones, which were highly susceptible to infection (36 to 100% tree mortality). In contrast to potted own-rooted B.9 plants inoculated in a greenhouse, B.9 rootstocks of orchard trees appeared resistant to rootstock infection (0% tree mortality). Orchard trees on Geneva 11 were moderately resistant to rootstock infection (25% tree mortality). There was general agreement in the evaluation of resistance under orchard conditions when rootstock resistance was evaluated in relation to controlled blossom inoculation or to natural blossom infection.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Bacterial plant pathogens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant pathogens</subject><subject>Systematics. Structure, properties and multiplication. Genetics</subject><subject>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouq7-AC9SBMVLa2aS5uMofoOg-HEO2TTFardZk67iv7eLq4IHTzOH531h5iFkB2gBVPOj29Or-wIpZYWSBRQoVsgINGe5FBpXyYiChhw1yA2ymdIzpZRzodbJBqMKUOhyRE7vfGpSbzvns1BnF77zbzazXZWF_snHzM5mrc9iCH3qg3tJWR-ys_jedM1ATT_a8Bai3SJrtW2T317OMXk8P3s4ucyvby6uTo6vc8eU7HPG_cShr7SFilNLK1pZ5mqha4YMnXPAhpVLj5WEsp4o7rgVDrUGy6WbsDE5_OqdxfA696k30yY537a282GeDIKSFEtJ5YAe_IuCEqIUJQ7g3h_wOcxjN5xhELVSuHjomMAX5GJIKfrazGIztfHDADULFWahwixUGCUNGBRDZndZPJ9MffWT-P79AOwvAZucbes4SGjSbzMXJQjF2Cerl5Ca</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>NORELLI, J. L</creator><creator>HOLLERAN, H. T</creator><creator>JOHNSON, W. C</creator><creator>ROBINSON, T. L</creator><creator>ALDWINCKLE, H. S</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Resistance of Geneva and other apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora</title><author>NORELLI, J. L ; HOLLERAN, H. T ; JOHNSON, W. C ; ROBINSON, T. L ; ALDWINCKLE, H. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34ebc2ed9a1d40a0d0da3cf69f3232ccc139f347e2d715fb84c4a6c2991a47cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Bacterial plant pathogens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant pathogens</topic><topic>Systematics. Structure, properties and multiplication. Genetics</topic><topic>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NORELLI, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLERAN, H. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, W. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, T. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALDWINCKLE, H. S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NORELLI, J. L</au><au>HOLLERAN, H. T</au><au>JOHNSON, W. C</au><au>ROBINSON, T. L</au><au>ALDWINCKLE, H. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance of Geneva and other apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>26-32</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><coden>PLDIDE</coden><abstract>When vigorously growing shoots of 49 different apple rootstocks grown in a greenhouse were inoculated with different strains of Erwinia amylovora, Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Ottawa 3, Malling 9, and Malling 26 were the most fire blight susceptible rootstocks and Geneva 11, Geneva 65, Geneva 16, Geneva 30, Pillnitzer Au51-11, Malling 7, and several breeding selections were the most resistant. Significant strain-rootstock interactions were observed in the amount of fire blight that resulted from inoculation. Field-grown fruiting 'Royal Gala' trees on Geneva 16 and Geneva 30 rootstocks were highly resistant to rootstock infection (no tree mortality) when trees sustained severe blossom infection with E. amylovora, compared with Malling 9 and Malling 26 rootstock clones, which were highly susceptible to infection (36 to 100% tree mortality). In contrast to potted own-rooted B.9 plants inoculated in a greenhouse, B.9 rootstocks of orchard trees appeared resistant to rootstock infection (0% tree mortality). Orchard trees on Geneva 11 were moderately resistant to rootstock infection (25% tree mortality). There was general agreement in the evaluation of resistance under orchard conditions when rootstock resistance was evaluated in relation to controlled blossom inoculation or to natural blossom infection.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>30812695</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.26</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2003, Vol.87 (1), p.26-32
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2187025707
source American Phytopathological Society Current; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Bacterial plant pathogens
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
Pest resistance
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant pathogens
Systematics. Structure, properties and multiplication. Genetics
Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims
title Resistance of Geneva and other apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T00%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20of%20Geneva%20and%20other%20apple%20rootstocks%20to%20Erwinia%20amylovora&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=NORELLI,%20J.%20L&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=26-32&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft.coden=PLDIDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.26&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2187025707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229882194&rft_id=info:pmid/30812695&rfr_iscdi=true