Less Than Zero: Can Carbon-Removal Technologies Curb Climate Change?

Most Americans used to think about climate change-to the extent that they thought about it at all-as an abstract threat in a distant future. But more and more are now seeing it for what it is: a costly, human-made disaster unfolding before their very eyes. A wave of increasingly destructive hurrican...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.98 (2), p.142-152
Hauptverfasser: Krupp, Fred, Keohane, Nathaniel, Pooley, Eric
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 2
container_start_page 142
container_title Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 98
creator Krupp, Fred
Keohane, Nathaniel
Pooley, Eric
description Most Americans used to think about climate change-to the extent that they thought about it at all-as an abstract threat in a distant future. But more and more are now seeing it for what it is: a costly, human-made disaster unfolding before their very eyes. A wave of increasingly destructive hurricanes, heat spells, and wildfires has ravaged communities across the United States, and both scientists and citizens are able to connect these extreme events to a warming earth. Seven in ten Americans agree that global warming is happening, according to a 2018 study conducted by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. About six in ten think it is mostly caused by human activity and is already changing the weather. Four in ten say they have personally experienced its impact. And seven in ten say the United States should enact measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, including prices and limits on carbon dioxide pollution, no matter what other countries do.When it comes to generating support for climate policy, a warranted sense of alarm is only half the battle. And the other half-a shared belief that the problem is solvable-is lagging far behind. The newfound sense of urgency is at risk of being swamped by collective despair. A scant six percent of Americans, according to the Yale study, believe that the world "can and will" effectively address climate change. With carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels having risen by an estimated 2.7 percent in 2018 and atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, which will determine the ultimate extent of warming, at their highest level in some three million years, such pessimism may seem justified-especially with a climate change denier in the White House.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2186099162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A574927324</galeid><jstor_id>26798095</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A574927324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g654t-a66afcbac4a1daf81382f13b8e396c75316fd8cafd28120ac10920471c19b2ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0l9LwzAQAPAiCs6p30AY-qJgJX_apHnUoXM4neBU8CVk6bXL6NqtaUG_vZHtYYUhvTwchN_dPdzteR1CCfc5F3Tf6yCEQ59jgg69I2vnyAUTYcc7HYG1vclM5b0vKItj7yBRmYWTTe567w_3k_6jPxoPhv3bkZ-yMKh8xZhK9FTpQOFYJRGmEUkwnUZABdM8pJglcaRVEpPIzVQaI0FQwLHGYkoAaNe7XPddlsWqBlvJhbEaskzlUNRWEhwxJARmxNGLNU1VBtLkSVGVSv9xeRvyQBBOSeCUv0OlkEOpsiKHxLjvhj_f4fXSrOQ2utmB3IthYfTOrleNAmcq-K5SVVsrn16Hre3w7aW9HX-0t8-f7e3doLWNBqP_trGxusgySEG6U-qPm_56y09ra3J3lia3Jp1Vdj2iwc_WfG6ropTL0ixU-SMJ4yJCIqS_7Wflfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>2186099162</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Less Than Zero: Can Carbon-Removal Technologies Curb Climate Change?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Krupp, Fred ; Keohane, Nathaniel ; Pooley, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Krupp, Fred ; Keohane, Nathaniel ; Pooley, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Most Americans used to think about climate change-to the extent that they thought about it at all-as an abstract threat in a distant future. But more and more are now seeing it for what it is: a costly, human-made disaster unfolding before their very eyes. A wave of increasingly destructive hurricanes, heat spells, and wildfires has ravaged communities across the United States, and both scientists and citizens are able to connect these extreme events to a warming earth. Seven in ten Americans agree that global warming is happening, according to a 2018 study conducted by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. About six in ten think it is mostly caused by human activity and is already changing the weather. Four in ten say they have personally experienced its impact. And seven in ten say the United States should enact measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, including prices and limits on carbon dioxide pollution, no matter what other countries do.When it comes to generating support for climate policy, a warranted sense of alarm is only half the battle. And the other half-a shared belief that the problem is solvable-is lagging far behind. The newfound sense of urgency is at risk of being swamped by collective despair. A scant six percent of Americans, according to the Yale study, believe that the world "can and will" effectively address climate change. With carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels having risen by an estimated 2.7 percent in 2018 and atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, which will determine the ultimate extent of warming, at their highest level in some three million years, such pessimism may seem justified-especially with a climate change denier in the White House.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-7120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-7793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Council on Foreign Relations</publisher><subject>Airlines ; Americans ; Analysis ; Atmosphere ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; Climate policy ; Coal fired power plants ; Companies ; Costs ; Denialism ; Earth ; Emissions ; Emissions trading ; Environmental policy ; ESSAYS ; Forecasts and trends ; Forest &amp; brush fires ; Fossil fuels ; Global temperature changes ; Global warming ; Greenhouse gases ; Hopelessness ; Hurricanes ; Industrial plant emissions ; Innovations ; Investments ; Market trend/market analysis ; Methods ; Natural gas ; Pessimism ; Pollution ; Prices ; Scientists ; Technological change ; Technology ; Technology application ; Urgency ; Weather ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.98 (2), p.142-152</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Council on Foreign Relations NY Mar/Apr 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26798095$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26798095$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,803,14658,27865,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krupp, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keohane, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pooley, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Less Than Zero: Can Carbon-Removal Technologies Curb Climate Change?</title><title>Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Foreign Affairs</addtitle><description>Most Americans used to think about climate change-to the extent that they thought about it at all-as an abstract threat in a distant future. But more and more are now seeing it for what it is: a costly, human-made disaster unfolding before their very eyes. A wave of increasingly destructive hurricanes, heat spells, and wildfires has ravaged communities across the United States, and both scientists and citizens are able to connect these extreme events to a warming earth. Seven in ten Americans agree that global warming is happening, according to a 2018 study conducted by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. About six in ten think it is mostly caused by human activity and is already changing the weather. Four in ten say they have personally experienced its impact. And seven in ten say the United States should enact measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, including prices and limits on carbon dioxide pollution, no matter what other countries do.When it comes to generating support for climate policy, a warranted sense of alarm is only half the battle. And the other half-a shared belief that the problem is solvable-is lagging far behind. The newfound sense of urgency is at risk of being swamped by collective despair. A scant six percent of Americans, according to the Yale study, believe that the world "can and will" effectively address climate change. With carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels having risen by an estimated 2.7 percent in 2018 and atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, which will determine the ultimate extent of warming, at their highest level in some three million years, such pessimism may seem justified-especially with a climate change denier in the White House.</description><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Americans</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Coal fired power plants</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Denialism</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>ESSAYS</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Forest &amp; brush fires</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Global temperature changes</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hopelessness</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Market trend/market analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Pessimism</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Urgency</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0015-7120</issn><issn>2327-7793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0l9LwzAQAPAiCs6p30AY-qJgJX_apHnUoXM4neBU8CVk6bXL6NqtaUG_vZHtYYUhvTwchN_dPdzteR1CCfc5F3Tf6yCEQ59jgg69I2vnyAUTYcc7HYG1vclM5b0vKItj7yBRmYWTTe567w_3k_6jPxoPhv3bkZ-yMKh8xZhK9FTpQOFYJRGmEUkwnUZABdM8pJglcaRVEpPIzVQaI0FQwLHGYkoAaNe7XPddlsWqBlvJhbEaskzlUNRWEhwxJARmxNGLNU1VBtLkSVGVSv9xeRvyQBBOSeCUv0OlkEOpsiKHxLjvhj_f4fXSrOQ2utmB3IthYfTOrleNAmcq-K5SVVsrn16Hre3w7aW9HX-0t8-f7e3doLWNBqP_trGxusgySEG6U-qPm_56y09ra3J3lia3Jp1Vdj2iwc_WfG6ropTL0ixU-SMJ4yJCIqS_7Wflfw</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Krupp, Fred</creator><creator>Keohane, Nathaniel</creator><creator>Pooley, Eric</creator><general>Council on Foreign Relations</general><general>Council on Foreign Relations, Inc</general><general>Council on Foreign Relations NY</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Less Than Zero</title><author>Krupp, Fred ; Keohane, Nathaniel ; Pooley, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g654t-a66afcbac4a1daf81382f13b8e396c75316fd8cafd28120ac10920471c19b2ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Americans</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Coal fired power plants</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Denialism</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>ESSAYS</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Forest &amp; brush fires</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Global temperature changes</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hopelessness</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Market trend/market analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Pessimism</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Urgency</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krupp, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keohane, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pooley, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krupp, Fred</au><au>Keohane, Nathaniel</au><au>Pooley, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Less Than Zero: Can Carbon-Removal Technologies Curb Climate Change?</atitle><jtitle>Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Foreign Affairs</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>142-152</pages><issn>0015-7120</issn><eissn>2327-7793</eissn><abstract>Most Americans used to think about climate change-to the extent that they thought about it at all-as an abstract threat in a distant future. But more and more are now seeing it for what it is: a costly, human-made disaster unfolding before their very eyes. A wave of increasingly destructive hurricanes, heat spells, and wildfires has ravaged communities across the United States, and both scientists and citizens are able to connect these extreme events to a warming earth. Seven in ten Americans agree that global warming is happening, according to a 2018 study conducted by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. About six in ten think it is mostly caused by human activity and is already changing the weather. Four in ten say they have personally experienced its impact. And seven in ten say the United States should enact measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, including prices and limits on carbon dioxide pollution, no matter what other countries do.When it comes to generating support for climate policy, a warranted sense of alarm is only half the battle. And the other half-a shared belief that the problem is solvable-is lagging far behind. The newfound sense of urgency is at risk of being swamped by collective despair. A scant six percent of Americans, according to the Yale study, believe that the world "can and will" effectively address climate change. With carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels having risen by an estimated 2.7 percent in 2018 and atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, which will determine the ultimate extent of warming, at their highest level in some three million years, such pessimism may seem justified-especially with a climate change denier in the White House.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Council on Foreign Relations</pub><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-7120
ispartof Foreign affairs (New York, N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.98 (2), p.142-152
issn 0015-7120
2327-7793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2186099162
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Airlines
Americans
Analysis
Atmosphere
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
Climate change
Climate policy
Coal fired power plants
Companies
Costs
Denialism
Earth
Emissions
Emissions trading
Environmental policy
ESSAYS
Forecasts and trends
Forest & brush fires
Fossil fuels
Global temperature changes
Global warming
Greenhouse gases
Hopelessness
Hurricanes
Industrial plant emissions
Innovations
Investments
Market trend/market analysis
Methods
Natural gas
Pessimism
Pollution
Prices
Scientists
Technological change
Technology
Technology application
Urgency
Weather
Wildfires
title Less Than Zero: Can Carbon-Removal Technologies Curb Climate Change?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A18%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Less%20Than%20Zero:%20Can%20Carbon-Removal%20Technologies%20Curb%20Climate%20Change?&rft.jtitle=Foreign%20affairs%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Krupp,%20Fred&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=142-152&rft.issn=0015-7120&rft.eissn=2327-7793&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA574927324%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2186099162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A574927324&rft_jstor_id=26798095&rfr_iscdi=true