The influence of berry perforation on grape drying kinetics and total phenolic compounds

BACKGROUND Drying is one of the traditional methods used for the conservation of fruits. In recent years, different methods have been developed to obtain higher quality products. Chamber‐drying methods with hot air at controlled temperature are reliable and easy to use. The effect of piercing the st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2019-07, Vol.99 (9), p.4260-4266
Hauptverfasser: Martín‐Gómez, Juan, Ángeles Varo, M, Mérida, Julieta, Serratosa, María P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4266
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4260
container_title Journal of the science of food and agriculture
container_volume 99
creator Martín‐Gómez, Juan
Ángeles Varo, M
Mérida, Julieta
Serratosa, María P
description BACKGROUND Drying is one of the traditional methods used for the conservation of fruits. In recent years, different methods have been developed to obtain higher quality products. Chamber‐drying methods with hot air at controlled temperature are reliable and easy to use. The effect of piercing the structure of grape berries on their drying time was studied experimentally during convective drying within a temperature range of 30–50 °C. Experimental moisture loss results were fitted to different mathematical models, evaluated for goodness of fit by comparing their respective R2, χ2, and root mean square error. RESULTS The Midilli et al. model provided a better prediction to describe the drying of whole grapes than the other models evaluated. However, punched grapes showed a better fit for the two‐term model at 30 and 40 °C, and the approximation of diffusion model at 50 °C. The values of effective moisture diffusivity fluctuated between 8.04 × 10−12 and 7.31 × 10−11 m2 s−1. Activation energy was 56.49 and 54.43 kJ mol−1 for whole and punched grapes, respectively. All the drying processes produced an increase of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in grapes, these increases being higher in whole grape drying. CONCLUSION The drying of punched grapes was faster and the activation energy higher than with drying of whole grapes; however, whole grapes presented more total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jsfa.9657
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2185875466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2237438109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-97b0972c0e34b00c0403be3804e59b05fe37408656f2ea7fbac7e6c6b64abfa03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLHDEUx4O01NX24BeQQC_1MPommUlmjiK1rQgeVOgtJNkXzTqbjMkMZb99s671IBQevMP78X9_foQc1XBaA7CzVXb6tBet3COLGnpZAdTwgSzKjVVt3bB9cpDzCgD6XohPZJ9DB7VkbEF-3z0i9cENMwaLNDpqMKUNHTG5mPTkY6BlHpIekS7TxocH-uQDTt5mqsOSTnHSAx0fMcTBW2rjeoxzWObP5KPTQ8Yvr_uQ3F9-v7v4WV3f_Ph1cX5dWd5yWfXSlMLMAvLGAFhogBvkHTTY9gZah1w20IlWOIZaOqOtRGGFEY02TgM_JN92uWOKzzPmSa19tjgMOmCcs2J113aybYQo6Nd36CrOKZR2irHyhndFXqFOdpRNMeeETo3Jr3XaqBrUVrfa6lZb3YU9fk2czRqXb-Q_vwU42wF__ICb_yepq9vL85fIv1JLib0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2237438109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of berry perforation on grape drying kinetics and total phenolic compounds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Martín‐Gómez, Juan ; Ángeles Varo, M ; Mérida, Julieta ; Serratosa, María P</creator><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Gómez, Juan ; Ángeles Varo, M ; Mérida, Julieta ; Serratosa, María P</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Drying is one of the traditional methods used for the conservation of fruits. In recent years, different methods have been developed to obtain higher quality products. Chamber‐drying methods with hot air at controlled temperature are reliable and easy to use. The effect of piercing the structure of grape berries on their drying time was studied experimentally during convective drying within a temperature range of 30–50 °C. Experimental moisture loss results were fitted to different mathematical models, evaluated for goodness of fit by comparing their respective R2, χ2, and root mean square error. RESULTS The Midilli et al. model provided a better prediction to describe the drying of whole grapes than the other models evaluated. However, punched grapes showed a better fit for the two‐term model at 30 and 40 °C, and the approximation of diffusion model at 50 °C. The values of effective moisture diffusivity fluctuated between 8.04 × 10−12 and 7.31 × 10−11 m2 s−1. Activation energy was 56.49 and 54.43 kJ mol−1 for whole and punched grapes, respectively. All the drying processes produced an increase of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in grapes, these increases being higher in whole grape drying. CONCLUSION The drying of punched grapes was faster and the activation energy higher than with drying of whole grapes; however, whole grapes presented more total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9657</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30801722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Activation energy ; Air temperature ; antioxidant activity ; Antioxidants ; Antioxidants - chemistry ; chamber‐drying ; Chemical activity ; Convective drying ; Desiccation - methods ; Drying ; Food Preservation - methods ; Fruit - chemistry ; Fruits ; Goodness of fit ; grape ; Grapes ; kinetic models ; Kinetics ; Mathematical models ; Moisture ; Organic chemistry ; Perforation ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Phenols - chemistry ; Piercing ; Temperature ; total phenolic compounds ; Vitaceae ; Vitis - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2019-07, Vol.99 (9), p.4260-4266</ispartof><rights>2019 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2019 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-97b0972c0e34b00c0403be3804e59b05fe37408656f2ea7fbac7e6c6b64abfa03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-97b0972c0e34b00c0403be3804e59b05fe37408656f2ea7fbac7e6c6b64abfa03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0244-947X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjsfa.9657$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjsfa.9657$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30801722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Gómez, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ángeles Varo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mérida, Julieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serratosa, María P</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of berry perforation on grape drying kinetics and total phenolic compounds</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Drying is one of the traditional methods used for the conservation of fruits. In recent years, different methods have been developed to obtain higher quality products. Chamber‐drying methods with hot air at controlled temperature are reliable and easy to use. The effect of piercing the structure of grape berries on their drying time was studied experimentally during convective drying within a temperature range of 30–50 °C. Experimental moisture loss results were fitted to different mathematical models, evaluated for goodness of fit by comparing their respective R2, χ2, and root mean square error. RESULTS The Midilli et al. model provided a better prediction to describe the drying of whole grapes than the other models evaluated. However, punched grapes showed a better fit for the two‐term model at 30 and 40 °C, and the approximation of diffusion model at 50 °C. The values of effective moisture diffusivity fluctuated between 8.04 × 10−12 and 7.31 × 10−11 m2 s−1. Activation energy was 56.49 and 54.43 kJ mol−1 for whole and punched grapes, respectively. All the drying processes produced an increase of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in grapes, these increases being higher in whole grape drying. CONCLUSION The drying of punched grapes was faster and the activation energy higher than with drying of whole grapes; however, whole grapes presented more total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Activation energy</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>antioxidant activity</subject><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Antioxidants - chemistry</subject><subject>chamber‐drying</subject><subject>Chemical activity</subject><subject>Convective drying</subject><subject>Desiccation - methods</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Food Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Fruit - chemistry</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Goodness of fit</subject><subject>grape</subject><subject>Grapes</subject><subject>kinetic models</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moisture</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Perforation</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Phenols - chemistry</subject><subject>Piercing</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>total phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Vitis - chemistry</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLHDEUx4O01NX24BeQQC_1MPommUlmjiK1rQgeVOgtJNkXzTqbjMkMZb99s671IBQevMP78X9_foQc1XBaA7CzVXb6tBet3COLGnpZAdTwgSzKjVVt3bB9cpDzCgD6XohPZJ9DB7VkbEF-3z0i9cENMwaLNDpqMKUNHTG5mPTkY6BlHpIekS7TxocH-uQDTt5mqsOSTnHSAx0fMcTBW2rjeoxzWObP5KPTQ8Yvr_uQ3F9-v7v4WV3f_Ph1cX5dWd5yWfXSlMLMAvLGAFhogBvkHTTY9gZah1w20IlWOIZaOqOtRGGFEY02TgM_JN92uWOKzzPmSa19tjgMOmCcs2J113aybYQo6Nd36CrOKZR2irHyhndFXqFOdpRNMeeETo3Jr3XaqBrUVrfa6lZb3YU9fk2czRqXb-Q_vwU42wF__ICb_yepq9vL85fIv1JLib0</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Martín‐Gómez, Juan</creator><creator>Ángeles Varo, M</creator><creator>Mérida, Julieta</creator><creator>Serratosa, María P</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-947X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>The influence of berry perforation on grape drying kinetics and total phenolic compounds</title><author>Martín‐Gómez, Juan ; Ángeles Varo, M ; Mérida, Julieta ; Serratosa, María P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-97b0972c0e34b00c0403be3804e59b05fe37408656f2ea7fbac7e6c6b64abfa03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activation energy</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>antioxidant activity</topic><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Antioxidants - chemistry</topic><topic>chamber‐drying</topic><topic>Chemical activity</topic><topic>Convective drying</topic><topic>Desiccation - methods</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Food Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Fruit - chemistry</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Goodness of fit</topic><topic>grape</topic><topic>Grapes</topic><topic>kinetic models</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moisture</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Perforation</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Phenols - chemistry</topic><topic>Piercing</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>total phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Vitis - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Gómez, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ángeles Varo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mérida, Julieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serratosa, María P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martín‐Gómez, Juan</au><au>Ángeles Varo, M</au><au>Mérida, Julieta</au><au>Serratosa, María P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of berry perforation on grape drying kinetics and total phenolic compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4260</spage><epage>4266</epage><pages>4260-4266</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Drying is one of the traditional methods used for the conservation of fruits. In recent years, different methods have been developed to obtain higher quality products. Chamber‐drying methods with hot air at controlled temperature are reliable and easy to use. The effect of piercing the structure of grape berries on their drying time was studied experimentally during convective drying within a temperature range of 30–50 °C. Experimental moisture loss results were fitted to different mathematical models, evaluated for goodness of fit by comparing their respective R2, χ2, and root mean square error. RESULTS The Midilli et al. model provided a better prediction to describe the drying of whole grapes than the other models evaluated. However, punched grapes showed a better fit for the two‐term model at 30 and 40 °C, and the approximation of diffusion model at 50 °C. The values of effective moisture diffusivity fluctuated between 8.04 × 10−12 and 7.31 × 10−11 m2 s−1. Activation energy was 56.49 and 54.43 kJ mol−1 for whole and punched grapes, respectively. All the drying processes produced an increase of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in grapes, these increases being higher in whole grape drying. CONCLUSION The drying of punched grapes was faster and the activation energy higher than with drying of whole grapes; however, whole grapes presented more total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>30801722</pmid><doi>10.1002/jsfa.9657</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-947X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5142
ispartof Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2019-07, Vol.99 (9), p.4260-4266
issn 0022-5142
1097-0010
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2185875466
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library
subjects Activation energy
Air temperature
antioxidant activity
Antioxidants
Antioxidants - chemistry
chamber‐drying
Chemical activity
Convective drying
Desiccation - methods
Drying
Food Preservation - methods
Fruit - chemistry
Fruits
Goodness of fit
grape
Grapes
kinetic models
Kinetics
Mathematical models
Moisture
Organic chemistry
Perforation
Phenolic compounds
Phenols
Phenols - chemistry
Piercing
Temperature
total phenolic compounds
Vitaceae
Vitis - chemistry
title The influence of berry perforation on grape drying kinetics and total phenolic compounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20berry%20perforation%20on%20grape%20drying%20kinetics%20and%20total%20phenolic%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADn%E2%80%90G%C3%B3mez,%20Juan&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4260&rft.epage=4266&rft.pages=4260-4266&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.9657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2237438109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2237438109&rft_id=info:pmid/30801722&rfr_iscdi=true