Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Wetness Duration in Apple Trees and Its Influence on Performance of a Warning System for Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck

To determine the effect of sensor placement on the performance of a disease-warning system for sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS), we measured leaf wetness duration (LWD) at 12 canopy positions in apple trees, then simulated operation of the disease-warning system using LWD measurements from different...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2008, Vol.92 (1), p.164-170
Hauptverfasser: Batzer, J.C, Gleason, M.L, Taylor, S.E, Koehler, K.J, Monteiro, J.E.B.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 1
container_start_page 164
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 92
creator Batzer, J.C
Gleason, M.L
Taylor, S.E
Koehler, K.J
Monteiro, J.E.B.A
description To determine the effect of sensor placement on the performance of a disease-warning system for sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS), we measured leaf wetness duration (LWD) at 12 canopy positions in apple trees, then simulated operation of the disease-warning system using LWD measurements from different parts of the canopy. LWD sensors were placed in four trees within one Iowa orchard during two growing seasons, and in one tree in each of four orchards during a single growing season. The LWD measurements revealed substantial heterogeneity among sensor locations. In all data sets, the upper, eastern portion of the canopy had the longest mean daily LWD, and was the first site to form dew and the last to dry. The lower, western portion of the canopy averaged about 3 h less LWD per day than the top of the canopy, and was the last zone where dew formed and the first to dry off. On about 25% of nights when dew occurred in the top of the canopy, no dew formed in the lower, western canopy. Intracanopy variability of LWD was more pronounced when dew was the sole source of wetness than on days when rainfall occurred. Daily LWD in the upper, eastern portion of the canopy was slightly less than reference measurements made at a 0.7-m height over turfgrass located near the orchard. When LWD measurements from several canopy positions were input to the SBFS warning system, timing of occurrence of a fungicide-spray threshold varied by as much as 30 days among canopy positions. Under Iowa conditions, placement of an LWD sensor at an unobstructed site over turfgrass was a fairly accurate surrogate for the wettest part of the canopy. Therefore, such an extra-canopy LWD sensor might be substituted for a within-canopy sensor to enhance operational reliability of the SBFS warning system.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/pdis-92-1-0164
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2184526608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20475677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3214e0580464451031bd935c5049e89f1aa396ed38bd0e56ab81fbcf4360d3913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgei2cOUIvlBxSRnHjmMfS0vpSitRKa16tJxkvASSONjJYd-CR8bbXXrkZFnzeayZn5B3DC4YaPF5aruY6TxjGTApXpAV04JnpdT5S7ICplmWa1aekNMYfwKAEFK9JiccSiW5ZCvyp5rs3Nme3uKMwW9xxG7eUe_oBq2jjziPGCO9XkJifqTdSC-nqUd6HxAjtWNL13Ok69H1C44N0mTuMDgfBvt0ddTSRxvGbtzSahdnHGgq0sr79M2X3s_Nj6cuN_0uTtj8ekNeOdtHfHs8z8jDzdf7q9ts8_3b-upykzVphjnjORMIhQIhhSgYcFa3mhdNAUKj0o5Zy7XElqu6BSykrRVzdeMEl9ByzfgZ-XToOwX_e8E4m6GLDfa9HdEv0eRMiSKXElSi5_-nIMpClmWCFwfYBB9jQGem0A027AwDs4_L3F2vK6Nzw8w-rvTg_bHzUg_YPvN_-STw8QhsbGzvQlpqF59dDizNU-jkPhycs97YbUjmodpXAVRRcqX5XwnWpq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20475677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Wetness Duration in Apple Trees and Its Influence on Performance of a Warning System for Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Batzer, J.C ; Gleason, M.L ; Taylor, S.E ; Koehler, K.J ; Monteiro, J.E.B.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Batzer, J.C ; Gleason, M.L ; Taylor, S.E ; Koehler, K.J ; Monteiro, J.E.B.A</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the effect of sensor placement on the performance of a disease-warning system for sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS), we measured leaf wetness duration (LWD) at 12 canopy positions in apple trees, then simulated operation of the disease-warning system using LWD measurements from different parts of the canopy. LWD sensors were placed in four trees within one Iowa orchard during two growing seasons, and in one tree in each of four orchards during a single growing season. The LWD measurements revealed substantial heterogeneity among sensor locations. In all data sets, the upper, eastern portion of the canopy had the longest mean daily LWD, and was the first site to form dew and the last to dry. The lower, western portion of the canopy averaged about 3 h less LWD per day than the top of the canopy, and was the last zone where dew formed and the first to dry off. On about 25% of nights when dew occurred in the top of the canopy, no dew formed in the lower, western canopy. Intracanopy variability of LWD was more pronounced when dew was the sole source of wetness than on days when rainfall occurred. Daily LWD in the upper, eastern portion of the canopy was slightly less than reference measurements made at a 0.7-m height over turfgrass located near the orchard. When LWD measurements from several canopy positions were input to the SBFS warning system, timing of occurrence of a fungicide-spray threshold varied by as much as 30 days among canopy positions. Under Iowa conditions, placement of an LWD sensor at an unobstructed site over turfgrass was a fairly accurate surrogate for the wettest part of the canopy. Therefore, such an extra-canopy LWD sensor might be substituted for a within-canopy sensor to enhance operational reliability of the SBFS warning system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/pdis-92-1-0164</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30786361</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLDIDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>accuracy ; apples ; aspect ; Biological and medical sciences ; canopy ; dew ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungal diseases of plants ; fungicides ; leaves ; Malus ; Malus domestica ; orchards ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; plant pathogenic fungi ; prediction ; rain ; remote sensing ; risk assessment ; spatial variation ; water ; wetness duration</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 2008, Vol.92 (1), p.164-170</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3214e0580464451031bd935c5049e89f1aa396ed38bd0e56ab81fbcf4360d3913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3214e0580464451031bd935c5049e89f1aa396ed38bd0e56ab81fbcf4360d3913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3711,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20136059$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batzer, J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleason, M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, K.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, J.E.B.A</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Wetness Duration in Apple Trees and Its Influence on Performance of a Warning System for Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>To determine the effect of sensor placement on the performance of a disease-warning system for sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS), we measured leaf wetness duration (LWD) at 12 canopy positions in apple trees, then simulated operation of the disease-warning system using LWD measurements from different parts of the canopy. LWD sensors were placed in four trees within one Iowa orchard during two growing seasons, and in one tree in each of four orchards during a single growing season. The LWD measurements revealed substantial heterogeneity among sensor locations. In all data sets, the upper, eastern portion of the canopy had the longest mean daily LWD, and was the first site to form dew and the last to dry. The lower, western portion of the canopy averaged about 3 h less LWD per day than the top of the canopy, and was the last zone where dew formed and the first to dry off. On about 25% of nights when dew occurred in the top of the canopy, no dew formed in the lower, western canopy. Intracanopy variability of LWD was more pronounced when dew was the sole source of wetness than on days when rainfall occurred. Daily LWD in the upper, eastern portion of the canopy was slightly less than reference measurements made at a 0.7-m height over turfgrass located near the orchard. When LWD measurements from several canopy positions were input to the SBFS warning system, timing of occurrence of a fungicide-spray threshold varied by as much as 30 days among canopy positions. Under Iowa conditions, placement of an LWD sensor at an unobstructed site over turfgrass was a fairly accurate surrogate for the wettest part of the canopy. Therefore, such an extra-canopy LWD sensor might be substituted for a within-canopy sensor to enhance operational reliability of the SBFS warning system.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>apples</subject><subject>aspect</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>dew</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungal diseases of plants</subject><subject>fungicides</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>Malus domestica</subject><subject>orchards</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>water</subject><subject>wetness duration</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgei2cOUIvlBxSRnHjmMfS0vpSitRKa16tJxkvASSONjJYd-CR8bbXXrkZFnzeayZn5B3DC4YaPF5aruY6TxjGTApXpAV04JnpdT5S7ICplmWa1aekNMYfwKAEFK9JiccSiW5ZCvyp5rs3Nme3uKMwW9xxG7eUe_oBq2jjziPGCO9XkJifqTdSC-nqUd6HxAjtWNL13Ok69H1C44N0mTuMDgfBvt0ddTSRxvGbtzSahdnHGgq0sr79M2X3s_Nj6cuN_0uTtj8ekNeOdtHfHs8z8jDzdf7q9ts8_3b-upykzVphjnjORMIhQIhhSgYcFa3mhdNAUKj0o5Zy7XElqu6BSykrRVzdeMEl9ByzfgZ-XToOwX_e8E4m6GLDfa9HdEv0eRMiSKXElSi5_-nIMpClmWCFwfYBB9jQGem0A027AwDs4_L3F2vK6Nzw8w-rvTg_bHzUg_YPvN_-STw8QhsbGzvQlpqF59dDizNU-jkPhycs97YbUjmodpXAVRRcqX5XwnWpq0</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Batzer, J.C</creator><creator>Gleason, M.L</creator><creator>Taylor, S.E</creator><creator>Koehler, K.J</creator><creator>Monteiro, J.E.B.A</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Wetness Duration in Apple Trees and Its Influence on Performance of a Warning System for Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck</title><author>Batzer, J.C ; Gleason, M.L ; Taylor, S.E ; Koehler, K.J ; Monteiro, J.E.B.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3214e0580464451031bd935c5049e89f1aa396ed38bd0e56ab81fbcf4360d3913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>apples</topic><topic>aspect</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>dew</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungal diseases of plants</topic><topic>fungicides</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>Malus domestica</topic><topic>orchards</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>water</topic><topic>wetness duration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batzer, J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleason, M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, K.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, J.E.B.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batzer, J.C</au><au>Gleason, M.L</au><au>Taylor, S.E</au><au>Koehler, K.J</au><au>Monteiro, J.E.B.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Wetness Duration in Apple Trees and Its Influence on Performance of a Warning System for Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>164-170</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><coden>PLDIDE</coden><abstract>To determine the effect of sensor placement on the performance of a disease-warning system for sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS), we measured leaf wetness duration (LWD) at 12 canopy positions in apple trees, then simulated operation of the disease-warning system using LWD measurements from different parts of the canopy. LWD sensors were placed in four trees within one Iowa orchard during two growing seasons, and in one tree in each of four orchards during a single growing season. The LWD measurements revealed substantial heterogeneity among sensor locations. In all data sets, the upper, eastern portion of the canopy had the longest mean daily LWD, and was the first site to form dew and the last to dry. The lower, western portion of the canopy averaged about 3 h less LWD per day than the top of the canopy, and was the last zone where dew formed and the first to dry off. On about 25% of nights when dew occurred in the top of the canopy, no dew formed in the lower, western canopy. Intracanopy variability of LWD was more pronounced when dew was the sole source of wetness than on days when rainfall occurred. Daily LWD in the upper, eastern portion of the canopy was slightly less than reference measurements made at a 0.7-m height over turfgrass located near the orchard. When LWD measurements from several canopy positions were input to the SBFS warning system, timing of occurrence of a fungicide-spray threshold varied by as much as 30 days among canopy positions. Under Iowa conditions, placement of an LWD sensor at an unobstructed site over turfgrass was a fairly accurate surrogate for the wettest part of the canopy. Therefore, such an extra-canopy LWD sensor might be substituted for a within-canopy sensor to enhance operational reliability of the SBFS warning system.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>30786361</pmid><doi>10.1094/pdis-92-1-0164</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2008, Vol.92 (1), p.164-170
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2184526608
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
subjects accuracy
apples
aspect
Biological and medical sciences
canopy
dew
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
fungal diseases of plants
fungicides
leaves
Malus
Malus domestica
orchards
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
plant pathogenic fungi
prediction
rain
remote sensing
risk assessment
spatial variation
water
wetness duration
title Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Wetness Duration in Apple Trees and Its Influence on Performance of a Warning System for Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Heterogeneity%20of%20Leaf%20Wetness%20Duration%20in%20Apple%20Trees%20and%20Its%20Influence%20on%20Performance%20of%20a%20Warning%20System%20for%20Sooty%20Blotch%20and%20Flyspeck&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Batzer,%20J.C&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=164-170&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft.coden=PLDIDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/pdis-92-1-0164&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20475677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20475677&rft_id=info:pmid/30786361&rfr_iscdi=true