Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement
Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Radiology 2019-04, Vol.16 (4), p.446-450 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 450 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 446 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Triplette, Matthew Thayer, J. Hank Pipavath, Sudhakar N. Crothers, Kristina |
description | Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183650319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144018315837</els_id><sourcerecordid>2183650319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LwzAchoMoTqdfwIP06KU1SZM2FS9S_DMYTHCCt5Cmv4zM9Y9JO_Dbm7Hp0dP7OzzvG_IgdEVwQjDJbtfJWmmXUExEQmgS4gidEc5FnLLi43h3sywmjOEJOvd-jTHNcyFO0STFeZ5nTJyh8rXrXPTeD-oTos5E87FdRaVqNbjoTTuA1raru2jR950bxtYOFnxkQmXW9K7bQgPtcIFOjNp4uDzkFC2fHpflSzxfPM_Kh3msU54NsSpMVVNqKqINrjg2AleYEShUgQ3BRa6oqJjImeG5EQBZxnldMc0F5VTrdIpu9rPh4a8R_CAb6zVsNqqFbvSSEpFmHKekCCjdo9p13jswsne2Ue5bEix37uRa7tzJnTtJqAwRSteH_bFqoP6r_MoKwP0egPDJrQUnvbYQVNXWgR5k3dn_9n8AhkR_zA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183650319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Triplette, Matthew ; Thayer, J. Hank ; Pipavath, Sudhakar N. ; Crothers, Kristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Triplette, Matthew ; Thayer, J. Hank ; Pipavath, Sudhakar N. ; Crothers, Kristina</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30777648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cancer prevention ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Humans ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; thoracic oncology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2019-04, Vol.16 (4), p.446-450</ispartof><rights>2018 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144018315837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Triplette, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, J. Hank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crothers, Kristina</creatorcontrib><title>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.</description><subject>cancer prevention</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>thoracic oncology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LwzAchoMoTqdfwIP06KU1SZM2FS9S_DMYTHCCt5Cmv4zM9Y9JO_Dbm7Hp0dP7OzzvG_IgdEVwQjDJbtfJWmmXUExEQmgS4gidEc5FnLLi43h3sywmjOEJOvd-jTHNcyFO0STFeZ5nTJyh8rXrXPTeD-oTos5E87FdRaVqNbjoTTuA1raru2jR950bxtYOFnxkQmXW9K7bQgPtcIFOjNp4uDzkFC2fHpflSzxfPM_Kh3msU54NsSpMVVNqKqINrjg2AleYEShUgQ3BRa6oqJjImeG5EQBZxnldMc0F5VTrdIpu9rPh4a8R_CAb6zVsNqqFbvSSEpFmHKekCCjdo9p13jswsne2Ue5bEix37uRa7tzJnTtJqAwRSteH_bFqoP6r_MoKwP0egPDJrQUnvbYQVNXWgR5k3dn_9n8AhkR_zA</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Triplette, Matthew</creator><creator>Thayer, J. Hank</creator><creator>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</creator><creator>Crothers, Kristina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</title><author>Triplette, Matthew ; Thayer, J. Hank ; Pipavath, Sudhakar N. ; Crothers, Kristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>cancer prevention</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>thoracic oncology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Triplette, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, J. Hank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crothers, Kristina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Triplette, Matthew</au><au>Thayer, J. Hank</au><au>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</au><au>Crothers, Kristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>446-450</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30777648</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-1440 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2019-04, Vol.16 (4), p.446-450 |
issn | 1546-1440 1558-349X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183650319 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | cancer prevention Early Detection of Cancer Humans Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Patient Acceptance of Health Care thoracic oncology Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A51%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poor%20Uptake%20of%20Lung%20Cancer%20Screening:%20Opportunities%20for%20Improvement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Triplette,%20Matthew&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=446-450&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183650319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183650319&rft_id=info:pmid/30777648&rft_els_id=S1546144018315837&rfr_iscdi=true |