Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement

Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Radiology 2019-04, Vol.16 (4), p.446-450
Hauptverfasser: Triplette, Matthew, Thayer, J. Hank, Pipavath, Sudhakar N., Crothers, Kristina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 450
container_issue 4
container_start_page 446
container_title Journal of the American College of Radiology
container_volume 16
creator Triplette, Matthew
Thayer, J. Hank
Pipavath, Sudhakar N.
Crothers, Kristina
description Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183650319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144018315837</els_id><sourcerecordid>2183650319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LwzAchoMoTqdfwIP06KU1SZM2FS9S_DMYTHCCt5Cmv4zM9Y9JO_Dbm7Hp0dP7OzzvG_IgdEVwQjDJbtfJWmmXUExEQmgS4gidEc5FnLLi43h3sywmjOEJOvd-jTHNcyFO0STFeZ5nTJyh8rXrXPTeD-oTos5E87FdRaVqNbjoTTuA1raru2jR950bxtYOFnxkQmXW9K7bQgPtcIFOjNp4uDzkFC2fHpflSzxfPM_Kh3msU54NsSpMVVNqKqINrjg2AleYEShUgQ3BRa6oqJjImeG5EQBZxnldMc0F5VTrdIpu9rPh4a8R_CAb6zVsNqqFbvSSEpFmHKekCCjdo9p13jswsne2Ue5bEix37uRa7tzJnTtJqAwRSteH_bFqoP6r_MoKwP0egPDJrQUnvbYQVNXWgR5k3dn_9n8AhkR_zA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183650319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Triplette, Matthew ; Thayer, J. Hank ; Pipavath, Sudhakar N. ; Crothers, Kristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Triplette, Matthew ; Thayer, J. Hank ; Pipavath, Sudhakar N. ; Crothers, Kristina</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30777648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cancer prevention ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Humans ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; thoracic oncology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2019-04, Vol.16 (4), p.446-450</ispartof><rights>2018 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144018315837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Triplette, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, J. Hank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crothers, Kristina</creatorcontrib><title>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.</description><subject>cancer prevention</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>thoracic oncology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LwzAchoMoTqdfwIP06KU1SZM2FS9S_DMYTHCCt5Cmv4zM9Y9JO_Dbm7Hp0dP7OzzvG_IgdEVwQjDJbtfJWmmXUExEQmgS4gidEc5FnLLi43h3sywmjOEJOvd-jTHNcyFO0STFeZ5nTJyh8rXrXPTeD-oTos5E87FdRaVqNbjoTTuA1raru2jR950bxtYOFnxkQmXW9K7bQgPtcIFOjNp4uDzkFC2fHpflSzxfPM_Kh3msU54NsSpMVVNqKqINrjg2AleYEShUgQ3BRa6oqJjImeG5EQBZxnldMc0F5VTrdIpu9rPh4a8R_CAb6zVsNqqFbvSSEpFmHKekCCjdo9p13jswsne2Ue5bEix37uRa7tzJnTtJqAwRSteH_bFqoP6r_MoKwP0egPDJrQUnvbYQVNXWgR5k3dn_9n8AhkR_zA</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Triplette, Matthew</creator><creator>Thayer, J. Hank</creator><creator>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</creator><creator>Crothers, Kristina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</title><author>Triplette, Matthew ; Thayer, J. Hank ; Pipavath, Sudhakar N. ; Crothers, Kristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9fbd22fb1cf0b50f80b041e9a90f1097a28b4874f57f8ee6655db4c58252cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>cancer prevention</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>thoracic oncology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Triplette, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, J. Hank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crothers, Kristina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Triplette, Matthew</au><au>Thayer, J. Hank</au><au>Pipavath, Sudhakar N.</au><au>Crothers, Kristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>446-450</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality among a subset of high-risk current and former smokers. Despite randomized trial evidence and widespread guideline recommendations, uptake of lung cancer screening among currently eligible individuals remains poor. Recent studies estimate that less than 5% of all eligible individuals have undergone screening. Moreover, inappropriate screening of ineligible individuals seems to be common, and among those who have been screened, follow-up may also be poor. In this review, the authors examine recent studies demonstrating the current state of suboptimal implementation of lung cancer screening. The authors also introduce both patient- and provider-facing evidence-based interventions that may improve implementation of screening. These include tailored navigation interventions to overcome patient barriers throughout the screening care continuum and interventions to improve the identification of eligible individuals for providers. Further evidence on best practices around the implementation of lung cancer screening is essential to ensure that recent evidence can be translated into practice to improve the early detection of lung cancer for high-risk individuals.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30777648</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1546-1440
ispartof Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2019-04, Vol.16 (4), p.446-450
issn 1546-1440
1558-349X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183650319
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects cancer prevention
Early Detection of Cancer
Humans
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
thoracic oncology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A51%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poor%20Uptake%20of%20Lung%20Cancer%20Screening:%20Opportunities%20for%20Improvement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Triplette,%20Matthew&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=446-450&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183650319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183650319&rft_id=info:pmid/30777648&rft_els_id=S1546144018315837&rfr_iscdi=true