Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Basilar Thumb Arthritis
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) computer adaptive test was developed to reduce test burden and improve precision. We hypothesized that, in patients with thumb basilar joint arthritis (BJA), (1) PROMIS UE would correlate with established pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 2019-07, Vol.44 (7), p.564-569 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 569 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 564 |
container_title | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Phillips, Jessica L.H. Warrender, William J. Lutsky, Kevin F. Beredjiklian, Pedro K. |
description | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) computer adaptive test was developed to reduce test burden and improve precision. We hypothesized that, in patients with thumb basilar joint arthritis (BJA), (1) PROMIS UE would correlate with established patient-outcomes (PROs), (2) PROMIS UE would require less time and fewer questions than current metrics, (3) there would be no floor or ceiling effects, and (4) PROMIS UE would not correlate with radiographic disease severity.
Patients presenting with a primary diagnosis of thumb BJA completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Thumb Disability Examination (TDX), Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and PROMIS UE. Radiographic disease severity as described by the Eaton scoring system was recorded. The relationships among PROs were described with Spearman correlation coefficients. The presence of a floor or ceiling effect was confirmed if greater than 15% of patients achieved the lowest or the highest possible score, respectively.
One hundred patients with thumb BJA formed the sample for this study. A good to excellent correlation was identified between PROMIS UE and QuickDASH. There were good correlations between PROMIS UE and TDX as well as PRWHE. The PROMIS UE was significantly less time consuming (average: 58.5 seconds vs QuickDASH, 92.2; TDX, 62.6; and PRWHE, 144.7), and required fewer questions than current metrics (average: 4.9 questions vs QuickDASH, 11; TDX, 20; and, 15). In addition, there were no appreciable floor or ceiling effects. Radiographic disease severity did not correlate with PROMIS UE.
The PROMIS UE has a good to excellent correlation with QuickDASH and good correlations with PRWHE and TDX. In addition, PROMIS UE required less time and fewer questions than established PROs. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Used as a single PRO, PROMIS UE may be a practical alternative to legacy scales in patients with thumb BJA.
The PROMIS UE PRO instrument may be a valuable addition in the assessment of patients with basilar thumb arthritis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183648269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363502318307056</els_id><sourcerecordid>2183648269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-14c16b4679150e51f9b13e1a119de07017ac7c3f4db8ac4e629e62dcd540971a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCIbgt_gAPykUuCX5w4G4nLslpKpaKtyhaOlmO_EK_yVdtZ0f_BD65X23Ls4WmkeTMjvTeEfACWAgPxeZ_uW6_SjEGVMkgZ46_IAgoOiShE_posGBc8KVjGz8i593vGoosXb8kZZ2VZ8qpYkH-bg-pmFew40LGhoUV6c7v9cfWT3k0TOrr5Gxz2NjzQ9dhPc4jUyqgp2APSHfpAV3-UHSL-Up01KqChNzENh5Dc4jS6I7Gdgx579NQOz0tPf9vQ0q_K2045umvnvqYrF1png_XvyJtGdR7fP-EFufu22a2_J9fby6v16jrRvBAhgVyDqHNRVlAwLKCpauAICqAyyEoGpdKl5k1u6qXSOYqsimO0KXJWlaD4Bfl0yp3ceD_Ha2RvvcauUwOOs5cZLLnIl5moojQ7SbUbvXfYyMnZXrkHCUwe25B7eWxDHtuQDGRsI5o-PuXPdY_mv-X5_VHw5STAeOXBopNex_doNNahDtKM9qX8R6kUnQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183648269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Basilar Thumb Arthritis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Phillips, Jessica L.H. ; Warrender, William J. ; Lutsky, Kevin F. ; Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jessica L.H. ; Warrender, William J. ; Lutsky, Kevin F. ; Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</creatorcontrib><description>The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) computer adaptive test was developed to reduce test burden and improve precision. We hypothesized that, in patients with thumb basilar joint arthritis (BJA), (1) PROMIS UE would correlate with established patient-outcomes (PROs), (2) PROMIS UE would require less time and fewer questions than current metrics, (3) there would be no floor or ceiling effects, and (4) PROMIS UE would not correlate with radiographic disease severity.
Patients presenting with a primary diagnosis of thumb BJA completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Thumb Disability Examination (TDX), Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and PROMIS UE. Radiographic disease severity as described by the Eaton scoring system was recorded. The relationships among PROs were described with Spearman correlation coefficients. The presence of a floor or ceiling effect was confirmed if greater than 15% of patients achieved the lowest or the highest possible score, respectively.
One hundred patients with thumb BJA formed the sample for this study. A good to excellent correlation was identified between PROMIS UE and QuickDASH. There were good correlations between PROMIS UE and TDX as well as PRWHE. The PROMIS UE was significantly less time consuming (average: 58.5 seconds vs QuickDASH, 92.2; TDX, 62.6; and PRWHE, 144.7), and required fewer questions than current metrics (average: 4.9 questions vs QuickDASH, 11; TDX, 20; and, 15). In addition, there were no appreciable floor or ceiling effects. Radiographic disease severity did not correlate with PROMIS UE.
The PROMIS UE has a good to excellent correlation with QuickDASH and good correlations with PRWHE and TDX. In addition, PROMIS UE required less time and fewer questions than established PROs. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Used as a single PRO, PROMIS UE may be a practical alternative to legacy scales in patients with thumb BJA.
The PROMIS UE PRO instrument may be a valuable addition in the assessment of patients with basilar thumb arthritis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30777395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Basilar thumb arthritis ; patient-reported outcomes ; PROMIS</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2019-07, Vol.44 (7), p.564-569</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-14c16b4679150e51f9b13e1a119de07017ac7c3f4db8ac4e629e62dcd540971a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-14c16b4679150e51f9b13e1a119de07017ac7c3f4db8ac4e629e62dcd540971a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3279-9991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jessica L.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrender, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutsky, Kevin F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Basilar Thumb Arthritis</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><description>The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) computer adaptive test was developed to reduce test burden and improve precision. We hypothesized that, in patients with thumb basilar joint arthritis (BJA), (1) PROMIS UE would correlate with established patient-outcomes (PROs), (2) PROMIS UE would require less time and fewer questions than current metrics, (3) there would be no floor or ceiling effects, and (4) PROMIS UE would not correlate with radiographic disease severity.
Patients presenting with a primary diagnosis of thumb BJA completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Thumb Disability Examination (TDX), Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and PROMIS UE. Radiographic disease severity as described by the Eaton scoring system was recorded. The relationships among PROs were described with Spearman correlation coefficients. The presence of a floor or ceiling effect was confirmed if greater than 15% of patients achieved the lowest or the highest possible score, respectively.
One hundred patients with thumb BJA formed the sample for this study. A good to excellent correlation was identified between PROMIS UE and QuickDASH. There were good correlations between PROMIS UE and TDX as well as PRWHE. The PROMIS UE was significantly less time consuming (average: 58.5 seconds vs QuickDASH, 92.2; TDX, 62.6; and PRWHE, 144.7), and required fewer questions than current metrics (average: 4.9 questions vs QuickDASH, 11; TDX, 20; and, 15). In addition, there were no appreciable floor or ceiling effects. Radiographic disease severity did not correlate with PROMIS UE.
The PROMIS UE has a good to excellent correlation with QuickDASH and good correlations with PRWHE and TDX. In addition, PROMIS UE required less time and fewer questions than established PROs. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Used as a single PRO, PROMIS UE may be a practical alternative to legacy scales in patients with thumb BJA.
The PROMIS UE PRO instrument may be a valuable addition in the assessment of patients with basilar thumb arthritis.</description><subject>Basilar thumb arthritis</subject><subject>patient-reported outcomes</subject><subject>PROMIS</subject><issn>0363-5023</issn><issn>1531-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCIbgt_gAPykUuCX5w4G4nLslpKpaKtyhaOlmO_EK_yVdtZ0f_BD65X23Ls4WmkeTMjvTeEfACWAgPxeZ_uW6_SjEGVMkgZ46_IAgoOiShE_posGBc8KVjGz8i593vGoosXb8kZZ2VZ8qpYkH-bg-pmFew40LGhoUV6c7v9cfWT3k0TOrr5Gxz2NjzQ9dhPc4jUyqgp2APSHfpAV3-UHSL-Up01KqChNzENh5Dc4jS6I7Gdgx579NQOz0tPf9vQ0q_K2045umvnvqYrF1png_XvyJtGdR7fP-EFufu22a2_J9fby6v16jrRvBAhgVyDqHNRVlAwLKCpauAICqAyyEoGpdKl5k1u6qXSOYqsimO0KXJWlaD4Bfl0yp3ceD_Ha2RvvcauUwOOs5cZLLnIl5moojQ7SbUbvXfYyMnZXrkHCUwe25B7eWxDHtuQDGRsI5o-PuXPdY_mv-X5_VHw5STAeOXBopNex_doNNahDtKM9qX8R6kUnQQ</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Phillips, Jessica L.H.</creator><creator>Warrender, William J.</creator><creator>Lutsky, Kevin F.</creator><creator>Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-9991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Basilar Thumb Arthritis</title><author>Phillips, Jessica L.H. ; Warrender, William J. ; Lutsky, Kevin F. ; Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-14c16b4679150e51f9b13e1a119de07017ac7c3f4db8ac4e629e62dcd540971a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Basilar thumb arthritis</topic><topic>patient-reported outcomes</topic><topic>PROMIS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jessica L.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrender, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutsky, Kevin F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Jessica L.H.</au><au>Warrender, William J.</au><au>Lutsky, Kevin F.</au><au>Beredjiklian, Pedro K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Basilar Thumb Arthritis</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>564</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>564-569</pages><issn>0363-5023</issn><eissn>1531-6564</eissn><abstract>The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) computer adaptive test was developed to reduce test burden and improve precision. We hypothesized that, in patients with thumb basilar joint arthritis (BJA), (1) PROMIS UE would correlate with established patient-outcomes (PROs), (2) PROMIS UE would require less time and fewer questions than current metrics, (3) there would be no floor or ceiling effects, and (4) PROMIS UE would not correlate with radiographic disease severity.
Patients presenting with a primary diagnosis of thumb BJA completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Thumb Disability Examination (TDX), Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and PROMIS UE. Radiographic disease severity as described by the Eaton scoring system was recorded. The relationships among PROs were described with Spearman correlation coefficients. The presence of a floor or ceiling effect was confirmed if greater than 15% of patients achieved the lowest or the highest possible score, respectively.
One hundred patients with thumb BJA formed the sample for this study. A good to excellent correlation was identified between PROMIS UE and QuickDASH. There were good correlations between PROMIS UE and TDX as well as PRWHE. The PROMIS UE was significantly less time consuming (average: 58.5 seconds vs QuickDASH, 92.2; TDX, 62.6; and PRWHE, 144.7), and required fewer questions than current metrics (average: 4.9 questions vs QuickDASH, 11; TDX, 20; and, 15). In addition, there were no appreciable floor or ceiling effects. Radiographic disease severity did not correlate with PROMIS UE.
The PROMIS UE has a good to excellent correlation with QuickDASH and good correlations with PRWHE and TDX. In addition, PROMIS UE required less time and fewer questions than established PROs. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Used as a single PRO, PROMIS UE may be a practical alternative to legacy scales in patients with thumb BJA.
The PROMIS UE PRO instrument may be a valuable addition in the assessment of patients with basilar thumb arthritis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30777395</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-9991</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-5023 |
ispartof | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2019-07, Vol.44 (7), p.564-569 |
issn | 0363-5023 1531-6564 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183648269 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Basilar thumb arthritis patient-reported outcomes PROMIS |
title | Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Basilar Thumb Arthritis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20PROMIS%20Upper%20Extremity%20Computer%20Adaptive%20Test%20Against%20Validated%20Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20in%20Patients%20With%20Basilar%20Thumb%20Arthritis&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery%20(American%20ed.)&rft.au=Phillips,%20Jessica%20L.H.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=564&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=564-569&rft.issn=0363-5023&rft.eissn=1531-6564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183648269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183648269&rft_id=info:pmid/30777395&rft_els_id=S0363502318307056&rfr_iscdi=true |