Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience
Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ANZ journal of surgery 2019-03, Vol.89 (3), p.248-254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 254 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 248 |
container_title | ANZ journal of surgery |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Kozman, Mathew A. Tonkin, Darren Eteuati, Jimmy Karatassas, Alex McDonald, Christopher R. |
description | Background
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair.
Methods
Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed.
Results
Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were 10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4).
Conclusion
We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.
Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ans.15071 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183640832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2187352814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EglJYcAFkiQ0sSu04TmJ2FeKnUgUSP-vIcSbUKI2LJ6F0xxE4IychoYUFErOZ0cynp9F7hBxwdsrbGuoKT7lkMd8gPR6GchBwFW-uZx4KsUN2EZ8Z41Gk5DbZESyOVRBHPVLeuczV1ny-f2hEizXk9BWq2uuSTsFXVlMPc209Xdh6SrHxT9a0txng9IxO3YKOae6oramucmo0AkXwFpC6goL25ZLC27zbVAb2yFahS4T9de-Tx8uLh_PrweT2anw-mgyMkIIPOKgwF7wIo1AxpXTBC6EMk0prqWQko8RkeQJc8yTJijhijCkhVSKYhFxngeiT45Xu3LuXBrBOZxYNlKWuwDWYBjwRUcgS0aFHf9Bn1_iq_a6jYiGDpDWwT05WlPEO0UORzr2dab9MOUu7CNI2gvQ7gpY9XCs22QzyX_LH8xYYroCFLWH5v1I6urlfSX4B3FCP1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2187352814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kozman, Mathew A. ; Tonkin, Darren ; Eteuati, Jimmy ; Karatassas, Alex ; McDonald, Christopher R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kozman, Mathew A. ; Tonkin, Darren ; Eteuati, Jimmy ; Karatassas, Alex ; McDonald, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair.
Methods
Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed.
Results
Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were <4 cm wide, 32 were 4–10 cm and three were >10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4).
Conclusion
We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.
Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.15071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30779276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Complications ; Docking ; Early experience ; Female ; Hernia ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New technology ; Pain ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; robotic ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics ; Surgical Mesh ; Sutures ; Treatment Outcome ; ventral hernia</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2019-03, Vol.89 (3), p.248-254</ispartof><rights>2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6020-4588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.15071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.15071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kozman, Mathew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonkin, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eteuati, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatassas, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair.
Methods
Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed.
Results
Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were <4 cm wide, 32 were 4–10 cm and three were >10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4).
Conclusion
We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.
Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Docking</subject><subject>Early experience</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>robotic</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ventral hernia</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EglJYcAFkiQ0sSu04TmJ2FeKnUgUSP-vIcSbUKI2LJ6F0xxE4IychoYUFErOZ0cynp9F7hBxwdsrbGuoKT7lkMd8gPR6GchBwFW-uZx4KsUN2EZ8Z41Gk5DbZESyOVRBHPVLeuczV1ny-f2hEizXk9BWq2uuSTsFXVlMPc209Xdh6SrHxT9a0txng9IxO3YKOae6oramucmo0AkXwFpC6goL25ZLC27zbVAb2yFahS4T9de-Tx8uLh_PrweT2anw-mgyMkIIPOKgwF7wIo1AxpXTBC6EMk0prqWQko8RkeQJc8yTJijhijCkhVSKYhFxngeiT45Xu3LuXBrBOZxYNlKWuwDWYBjwRUcgS0aFHf9Bn1_iq_a6jYiGDpDWwT05WlPEO0UORzr2dab9MOUu7CNI2gvQ7gpY9XCs22QzyX_LH8xYYroCFLWH5v1I6urlfSX4B3FCP1g</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Kozman, Mathew A.</creator><creator>Tonkin, Darren</creator><creator>Eteuati, Jimmy</creator><creator>Karatassas, Alex</creator><creator>McDonald, Christopher R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-4588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</title><author>Kozman, Mathew A. ; Tonkin, Darren ; Eteuati, Jimmy ; Karatassas, Alex ; McDonald, Christopher R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Docking</topic><topic>Early experience</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>robotic</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ventral hernia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kozman, Mathew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonkin, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eteuati, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatassas, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kozman, Mathew A.</au><au>Tonkin, Darren</au><au>Eteuati, Jimmy</au><au>Karatassas, Alex</au><au>McDonald, Christopher R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>248-254</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair.
Methods
Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed.
Results
Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were <4 cm wide, 32 were 4–10 cm and three were >10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4).
Conclusion
We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.
Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>30779276</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.15071</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-4588</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1445-1433 |
ispartof | ANZ journal of surgery, 2019-03, Vol.89 (3), p.248-254 |
issn | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183640832 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Body mass Body mass index Body size Complications Docking Early experience Female Hernia Hernia, Ventral - surgery Hernias Herniorrhaphy - methods Humans Laparoscopy Male Middle Aged New technology Pain Patients Retrospective Studies robotic Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics Surgical Mesh Sutures Treatment Outcome ventral hernia |
title | Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%E2%80%90assisted%20ventral%20hernia%20repair%20with%20surgical%20mesh:%20how%20I%20do%20it%20and%20case%20series%20of%20early%20experience&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kozman,%20Mathew%20A.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=248-254&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.15071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2187352814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2187352814&rft_id=info:pmid/30779276&rfr_iscdi=true |