Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience

Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANZ journal of surgery 2019-03, Vol.89 (3), p.248-254
Hauptverfasser: Kozman, Mathew A., Tonkin, Darren, Eteuati, Jimmy, Karatassas, Alex, McDonald, Christopher R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 254
container_issue 3
container_start_page 248
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 89
creator Kozman, Mathew A.
Tonkin, Darren
Eteuati, Jimmy
Karatassas, Alex
McDonald, Christopher R.
description Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. Methods Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed. Results Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were 10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4). Conclusion We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.15071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183640832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2187352814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EglJYcAFkiQ0sSu04TmJ2FeKnUgUSP-vIcSbUKI2LJ6F0xxE4IychoYUFErOZ0cynp9F7hBxwdsrbGuoKT7lkMd8gPR6GchBwFW-uZx4KsUN2EZ8Z41Gk5DbZESyOVRBHPVLeuczV1ny-f2hEizXk9BWq2uuSTsFXVlMPc209Xdh6SrHxT9a0txng9IxO3YKOae6oramucmo0AkXwFpC6goL25ZLC27zbVAb2yFahS4T9de-Tx8uLh_PrweT2anw-mgyMkIIPOKgwF7wIo1AxpXTBC6EMk0prqWQko8RkeQJc8yTJijhijCkhVSKYhFxngeiT45Xu3LuXBrBOZxYNlKWuwDWYBjwRUcgS0aFHf9Bn1_iq_a6jYiGDpDWwT05WlPEO0UORzr2dab9MOUu7CNI2gvQ7gpY9XCs22QzyX_LH8xYYroCFLWH5v1I6urlfSX4B3FCP1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2187352814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kozman, Mathew A. ; Tonkin, Darren ; Eteuati, Jimmy ; Karatassas, Alex ; McDonald, Christopher R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kozman, Mathew A. ; Tonkin, Darren ; Eteuati, Jimmy ; Karatassas, Alex ; McDonald, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. Methods Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed. Results Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were &lt;4 cm wide, 32 were 4–10 cm and three were &gt;10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4). Conclusion We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.15071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30779276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Complications ; Docking ; Early experience ; Female ; Hernia ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New technology ; Pain ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; robotic ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics ; Surgical Mesh ; Sutures ; Treatment Outcome ; ventral hernia</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2019-03, Vol.89 (3), p.248-254</ispartof><rights>2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6020-4588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.15071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.15071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kozman, Mathew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonkin, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eteuati, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatassas, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. Methods Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed. Results Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were &lt;4 cm wide, 32 were 4–10 cm and three were &gt;10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4). Conclusion We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Docking</subject><subject>Early experience</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>robotic</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ventral hernia</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EglJYcAFkiQ0sSu04TmJ2FeKnUgUSP-vIcSbUKI2LJ6F0xxE4IychoYUFErOZ0cynp9F7hBxwdsrbGuoKT7lkMd8gPR6GchBwFW-uZx4KsUN2EZ8Z41Gk5DbZESyOVRBHPVLeuczV1ny-f2hEizXk9BWq2uuSTsFXVlMPc209Xdh6SrHxT9a0txng9IxO3YKOae6oramucmo0AkXwFpC6goL25ZLC27zbVAb2yFahS4T9de-Tx8uLh_PrweT2anw-mgyMkIIPOKgwF7wIo1AxpXTBC6EMk0prqWQko8RkeQJc8yTJijhijCkhVSKYhFxngeiT45Xu3LuXBrBOZxYNlKWuwDWYBjwRUcgS0aFHf9Bn1_iq_a6jYiGDpDWwT05WlPEO0UORzr2dab9MOUu7CNI2gvQ7gpY9XCs22QzyX_LH8xYYroCFLWH5v1I6urlfSX4B3FCP1g</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Kozman, Mathew A.</creator><creator>Tonkin, Darren</creator><creator>Eteuati, Jimmy</creator><creator>Karatassas, Alex</creator><creator>McDonald, Christopher R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-4588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</title><author>Kozman, Mathew A. ; Tonkin, Darren ; Eteuati, Jimmy ; Karatassas, Alex ; McDonald, Christopher R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-1e94d31f4649099af1f39c059aa5956568cbd8e1a188bf7600093598305edab23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Docking</topic><topic>Early experience</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>robotic</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ventral hernia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kozman, Mathew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonkin, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eteuati, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatassas, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kozman, Mathew A.</au><au>Tonkin, Darren</au><au>Eteuati, Jimmy</au><au>Karatassas, Alex</au><au>McDonald, Christopher R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>248-254</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia‐site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post‐operative pain. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. Methods Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed. Results Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29–34). Forty‐eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty‐seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were &lt;4 cm wide, 32 were 4–10 cm and three were &gt;10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182–252), 5 min (IQR 4–8) and 144 min (IQR 104–174), respectively. No major intra‐operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post‐operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4). Conclusion We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology. Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series of 50 patients and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>30779276</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.15071</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-4588</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2019-03, Vol.89 (3), p.248-254
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183640832
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Body mass
Body mass index
Body size
Complications
Docking
Early experience
Female
Hernia
Hernia, Ventral - surgery
Hernias
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
New technology
Pain
Patients
Retrospective Studies
robotic
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics
Surgical Mesh
Sutures
Treatment Outcome
ventral hernia
title Robotic‐assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%E2%80%90assisted%20ventral%20hernia%20repair%20with%20surgical%20mesh:%20how%20I%20do%20it%20and%20case%20series%20of%20early%20experience&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kozman,%20Mathew%20A.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=248-254&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.15071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2187352814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2187352814&rft_id=info:pmid/30779276&rfr_iscdi=true