Needle-free delivery of influenza vaccine using the Med-Jet® H4 is efficient and elicits the same humoral and cellular responses as standard IM injection: A randomized trial
Needle-free vaccine delivery systems have many potential advantages including increased vaccine compliance and decreased risk of needlestick injuries and syringe reuse. The Med-Jet® H4 is a gas-powered, auto-disabling disposable syringe jet injector. The Med-Jet family of products are currently bein...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2019-02, Vol.37 (10), p.1332-1339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1332 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Shapiro, Janna R. Hodgins, Breanna Hendin, Hilary E. Patel, Aakash Menassa, Karim Menassa, Celine Menassa, Maurice Pereira, Jennifer A. Ward, Brian J. |
description | Needle-free vaccine delivery systems have many potential advantages including increased vaccine compliance and decreased risk of needlestick injuries and syringe reuse. The Med-Jet® H4 is a gas-powered, auto-disabling disposable syringe jet injector. The Med-Jet family of products are currently being used in dermatology, podiatry, pain management and veterinary practices. The objectives of this study were to assess patient attitudes, time-efficiency, safety and immunogenicity of the seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by Med-Jet compared to the traditional needle-and-syringe.
A total of 80 patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive a commercial trivalent vaccine by Med-Jet or needle injection from a single-dose or multi-dose vial. Patient attitudes were assessed pre-randomization and post-immunization. Safety data were collected for 21 days post-immunization. Efficiency of vaccine administration was measured through a time-and-motion study. Humoral and cellular responses were assessed on Days 0 and 21.
Overall, the participants readily accepted Med-Jet vaccination despite greater frequency of transient local reactions (eg: redness, swelling) immediately following immunization. Vaccine administration took slightly longer with the Med-Jet, but this difference decreased over time. Geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers, seroconversion and seroprotection rates in the Med-Jet and needle groups were equivalent for all influenza strains in the vaccine. Microneutralization responses were also essentially identical. There were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of functional CD4 + T cells, memory subset distribution or poly-functionality.
These data suggest that the Med-Jet is an acceptable means of delivering seasonal influenza vaccine. The system was attractive to subjects, rapidly learned by skilled vaccine nurses and elicited both humoral and cellular responses that were indistinguishable from those elicited with needle injection. While other studies have assessed the humoral response to jet injection of influenza vaccine, to our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the cellular aspect of this response. (ClinTrials.gov-NCT03150537). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179525866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X19301033</els_id><sourcerecordid>2180827941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1913360eafa0f65e9313e4ee3658524c9b1cf9018cd46c32822c299cd8144c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUBXYtNNgn_iJGaDqgpoUQsbkNhZrn1NPUriwU5Gah-qD8GT4ekMLNiwsuT73XOuziHkJaM1o6x9s663xtowYc0pUzVlNRXqEVmxvhMVl6x_TFaUt03VMPr9iDzLeU0plYKpp-RI0I6qjssVuf-M6AasfEIEh0PYYrqF6CFMflhwujNw8IElh-kHzDcIV-iqTzj_uofzBkIG9D7YgNMMZnJQRGyY8wOZzYhws4wxmeFhaHEYlsEkSJg3ccqYwWTIc5mZ5ODiqhiv0c4hTm_hFFL5j2O4QwdzCmZ4Tp54M2R8cXiPybcP77-enVeXXz5enJ1eVlYoMVdMMSFaisYb6luJSjCBDaJoZS95Y9U1s15R1lvXtFbwnnPLlbKuZ01jpRLH5GSvu0nx54J51mPIu9vNhHHJmrNOSS77ti3o63_QdVzSVK4rVE973qmGFUruKZtizgm93qQwmnSrGdW7QvVaH4LWu0I1ZboUWvZeHdSX6xHd360_DRbg3R7AEsc2YNJ5V4VFF1LJUbsY_mPxG23std0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180827941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Needle-free delivery of influenza vaccine using the Med-Jet® H4 is efficient and elicits the same humoral and cellular responses as standard IM injection: A randomized trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Shapiro, Janna R. ; Hodgins, Breanna ; Hendin, Hilary E. ; Patel, Aakash ; Menassa, Karim ; Menassa, Celine ; Menassa, Maurice ; Pereira, Jennifer A. ; Ward, Brian J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Janna R. ; Hodgins, Breanna ; Hendin, Hilary E. ; Patel, Aakash ; Menassa, Karim ; Menassa, Celine ; Menassa, Maurice ; Pereira, Jennifer A. ; Ward, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><description>Needle-free vaccine delivery systems have many potential advantages including increased vaccine compliance and decreased risk of needlestick injuries and syringe reuse. The Med-Jet® H4 is a gas-powered, auto-disabling disposable syringe jet injector. The Med-Jet family of products are currently being used in dermatology, podiatry, pain management and veterinary practices. The objectives of this study were to assess patient attitudes, time-efficiency, safety and immunogenicity of the seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by Med-Jet compared to the traditional needle-and-syringe.
A total of 80 patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive a commercial trivalent vaccine by Med-Jet or needle injection from a single-dose or multi-dose vial. Patient attitudes were assessed pre-randomization and post-immunization. Safety data were collected for 21 days post-immunization. Efficiency of vaccine administration was measured through a time-and-motion study. Humoral and cellular responses were assessed on Days 0 and 21.
Overall, the participants readily accepted Med-Jet vaccination despite greater frequency of transient local reactions (eg: redness, swelling) immediately following immunization. Vaccine administration took slightly longer with the Med-Jet, but this difference decreased over time. Geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers, seroconversion and seroprotection rates in the Med-Jet and needle groups were equivalent for all influenza strains in the vaccine. Microneutralization responses were also essentially identical. There were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of functional CD4 + T cells, memory subset distribution or poly-functionality.
These data suggest that the Med-Jet is an acceptable means of delivering seasonal influenza vaccine. The system was attractive to subjects, rapidly learned by skilled vaccine nurses and elicited both humoral and cellular responses that were indistinguishable from those elicited with needle injection. While other studies have assessed the humoral response to jet injection of influenza vaccine, to our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the cellular aspect of this response. (ClinTrials.gov-NCT03150537).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30709725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; CD4 antigen ; Cell-mediated immunity ; Demographics ; Dermatology ; Drug delivery systems ; Experiments ; Flow cytometry ; Hemagglutination inhibition ; Humoral immunity ; Immune response (humoral) ; Immunization ; Immunogenicity ; Immunological memory ; Influenza ; Influenza vaccine ; Injection ; ISO standards ; Jet injector ; Learning ; Lymphocytes ; Lymphocytes T ; Memory cells ; Needle-free immunization ; Pain ; Patients ; Public health ; Risk reduction ; Safety ; Seroconversion ; Set theory ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2019-02, Vol.37 (10), p.1332-1339</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 28, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1913360eafa0f65e9313e4ee3658524c9b1cf9018cd46c32822c299cd8144c593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1913360eafa0f65e9313e4ee3658524c9b1cf9018cd46c32822c299cd8144c593</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3251-958X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2180827941?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Janna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Breanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendin, Hilary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Aakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menassa, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menassa, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menassa, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Needle-free delivery of influenza vaccine using the Med-Jet® H4 is efficient and elicits the same humoral and cellular responses as standard IM injection: A randomized trial</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Needle-free vaccine delivery systems have many potential advantages including increased vaccine compliance and decreased risk of needlestick injuries and syringe reuse. The Med-Jet® H4 is a gas-powered, auto-disabling disposable syringe jet injector. The Med-Jet family of products are currently being used in dermatology, podiatry, pain management and veterinary practices. The objectives of this study were to assess patient attitudes, time-efficiency, safety and immunogenicity of the seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by Med-Jet compared to the traditional needle-and-syringe.
A total of 80 patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive a commercial trivalent vaccine by Med-Jet or needle injection from a single-dose or multi-dose vial. Patient attitudes were assessed pre-randomization and post-immunization. Safety data were collected for 21 days post-immunization. Efficiency of vaccine administration was measured through a time-and-motion study. Humoral and cellular responses were assessed on Days 0 and 21.
Overall, the participants readily accepted Med-Jet vaccination despite greater frequency of transient local reactions (eg: redness, swelling) immediately following immunization. Vaccine administration took slightly longer with the Med-Jet, but this difference decreased over time. Geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers, seroconversion and seroprotection rates in the Med-Jet and needle groups were equivalent for all influenza strains in the vaccine. Microneutralization responses were also essentially identical. There were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of functional CD4 + T cells, memory subset distribution or poly-functionality.
These data suggest that the Med-Jet is an acceptable means of delivering seasonal influenza vaccine. The system was attractive to subjects, rapidly learned by skilled vaccine nurses and elicited both humoral and cellular responses that were indistinguishable from those elicited with needle injection. While other studies have assessed the humoral response to jet injection of influenza vaccine, to our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the cellular aspect of this response. (ClinTrials.gov-NCT03150537).</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>CD4 antigen</subject><subject>Cell-mediated immunity</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Hemagglutination inhibition</subject><subject>Humoral immunity</subject><subject>Immune response (humoral)</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Immunological memory</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza vaccine</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>ISO standards</subject><subject>Jet injector</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Memory cells</subject><subject>Needle-free immunization</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Seroconversion</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUBXYtNNgn_iJGaDqgpoUQsbkNhZrn1NPUriwU5Gah-qD8GT4ekMLNiwsuT73XOuziHkJaM1o6x9s663xtowYc0pUzVlNRXqEVmxvhMVl6x_TFaUt03VMPr9iDzLeU0plYKpp-RI0I6qjssVuf-M6AasfEIEh0PYYrqF6CFMflhwujNw8IElh-kHzDcIV-iqTzj_uofzBkIG9D7YgNMMZnJQRGyY8wOZzYhws4wxmeFhaHEYlsEkSJg3ccqYwWTIc5mZ5ODiqhiv0c4hTm_hFFL5j2O4QwdzCmZ4Tp54M2R8cXiPybcP77-enVeXXz5enJ1eVlYoMVdMMSFaisYb6luJSjCBDaJoZS95Y9U1s15R1lvXtFbwnnPLlbKuZ01jpRLH5GSvu0nx54J51mPIu9vNhHHJmrNOSS77ti3o63_QdVzSVK4rVE973qmGFUruKZtizgm93qQwmnSrGdW7QvVaH4LWu0I1ZboUWvZeHdSX6xHd360_DRbg3R7AEsc2YNJ5V4VFF1LJUbsY_mPxG23std0</recordid><startdate>20190228</startdate><enddate>20190228</enddate><creator>Shapiro, Janna R.</creator><creator>Hodgins, Breanna</creator><creator>Hendin, Hilary E.</creator><creator>Patel, Aakash</creator><creator>Menassa, Karim</creator><creator>Menassa, Celine</creator><creator>Menassa, Maurice</creator><creator>Pereira, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Ward, Brian J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-958X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190228</creationdate><title>Needle-free delivery of influenza vaccine using the Med-Jet® H4 is efficient and elicits the same humoral and cellular responses as standard IM injection: A randomized trial</title><author>Shapiro, Janna R. ; Hodgins, Breanna ; Hendin, Hilary E. ; Patel, Aakash ; Menassa, Karim ; Menassa, Celine ; Menassa, Maurice ; Pereira, Jennifer A. ; Ward, Brian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1913360eafa0f65e9313e4ee3658524c9b1cf9018cd46c32822c299cd8144c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>CD4 antigen</topic><topic>Cell-mediated immunity</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Hemagglutination inhibition</topic><topic>Humoral immunity</topic><topic>Immune response (humoral)</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Immunological memory</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza vaccine</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>ISO standards</topic><topic>Jet injector</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Memory cells</topic><topic>Needle-free immunization</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Seroconversion</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Janna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Breanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendin, Hilary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Aakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menassa, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menassa, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menassa, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapiro, Janna R.</au><au>Hodgins, Breanna</au><au>Hendin, Hilary E.</au><au>Patel, Aakash</au><au>Menassa, Karim</au><au>Menassa, Celine</au><au>Menassa, Maurice</au><au>Pereira, Jennifer A.</au><au>Ward, Brian J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Needle-free delivery of influenza vaccine using the Med-Jet® H4 is efficient and elicits the same humoral and cellular responses as standard IM injection: A randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2019-02-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1332</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1332-1339</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Needle-free vaccine delivery systems have many potential advantages including increased vaccine compliance and decreased risk of needlestick injuries and syringe reuse. The Med-Jet® H4 is a gas-powered, auto-disabling disposable syringe jet injector. The Med-Jet family of products are currently being used in dermatology, podiatry, pain management and veterinary practices. The objectives of this study were to assess patient attitudes, time-efficiency, safety and immunogenicity of the seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by Med-Jet compared to the traditional needle-and-syringe.
A total of 80 patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive a commercial trivalent vaccine by Med-Jet or needle injection from a single-dose or multi-dose vial. Patient attitudes were assessed pre-randomization and post-immunization. Safety data were collected for 21 days post-immunization. Efficiency of vaccine administration was measured through a time-and-motion study. Humoral and cellular responses were assessed on Days 0 and 21.
Overall, the participants readily accepted Med-Jet vaccination despite greater frequency of transient local reactions (eg: redness, swelling) immediately following immunization. Vaccine administration took slightly longer with the Med-Jet, but this difference decreased over time. Geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers, seroconversion and seroprotection rates in the Med-Jet and needle groups were equivalent for all influenza strains in the vaccine. Microneutralization responses were also essentially identical. There were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of functional CD4 + T cells, memory subset distribution or poly-functionality.
These data suggest that the Med-Jet is an acceptable means of delivering seasonal influenza vaccine. The system was attractive to subjects, rapidly learned by skilled vaccine nurses and elicited both humoral and cellular responses that were indistinguishable from those elicited with needle injection. While other studies have assessed the humoral response to jet injection of influenza vaccine, to our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the cellular aspect of this response. (ClinTrials.gov-NCT03150537).</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30709725</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.039</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-958X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2019-02, Vol.37 (10), p.1332-1339 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179525866 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Attitudes CD4 antigen Cell-mediated immunity Demographics Dermatology Drug delivery systems Experiments Flow cytometry Hemagglutination inhibition Humoral immunity Immune response (humoral) Immunization Immunogenicity Immunological memory Influenza Influenza vaccine Injection ISO standards Jet injector Learning Lymphocytes Lymphocytes T Memory cells Needle-free immunization Pain Patients Public health Risk reduction Safety Seroconversion Set theory Vaccination Vaccines |
title | Needle-free delivery of influenza vaccine using the Med-Jet® H4 is efficient and elicits the same humoral and cellular responses as standard IM injection: A randomized trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Needle-free%20delivery%20of%20influenza%20vaccine%20using%20the%20Med-Jet%C2%AE%20H4%20is%20efficient%20and%20elicits%20the%20same%20humoral%20and%20cellular%20responses%20as%20standard%20IM%20injection:%20A%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Shapiro,%20Janna%20R.&rft.date=2019-02-28&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1332&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1332-1339&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180827941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180827941&rft_id=info:pmid/30709725&rft_els_id=S0264410X19301033&rfr_iscdi=true |