Radionuclide intake risks in the clinical administration of 223RaCl2

An intake monitoring program covering more than half a year of clinical administration of Radium-223-dichloride for the palliative treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer was carried out in the nuclear medicine department of the university hospital Bonn. Radioactivity in a total of 87 samp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiological protection 2019-06, Vol.39 (2), p.387-398
Hauptverfasser: Scholl, Clemens, Bundschuh, Ralph A, Hirzebruch, Stefan, Glanert, Tim, Wei, Xiao, Kürpig, Stefan, Rödel, Roland, Essler, Markus, Thomas, Lena, Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue 2
container_start_page 387
container_title Journal of radiological protection
container_volume 39
creator Scholl, Clemens
Bundschuh, Ralph A
Hirzebruch, Stefan
Glanert, Tim
Wei, Xiao
Kürpig, Stefan
Rödel, Roland
Essler, Markus
Thomas, Lena
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
description An intake monitoring program covering more than half a year of clinical administration of Radium-223-dichloride for the palliative treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer was carried out in the nuclear medicine department of the university hospital Bonn. Radioactivity in a total of 87 samples of gloves, air filters, faecal bioassays and face masks was measured and evaluated to assess the need for radiation protection measures for the medical staff. The main aim was to quantify or obtain an upper limit for the intake factor. An intake factor of 10−8 was measured when the preparation of patient doses took place in part in a laminar flow cabinet, which indicates an intake factor of 10−7 in more commonplace practice without a cabinet. The intake factor is therefore at the same level as other standard applications of unsealed sources in nuclear medicine. Our findings confirmed that masks are not required under any circumstances. However, the investigation also revealed that contamination risks, especially during the preparation of doses in syringes, should not be neglected.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6498/ab044d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179519559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179519559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1529-f4732d45645e67ebd9c3f8b43cff5bf9efa958a66da1da914a3d96bbf82363d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDtPwzAQgC0EEqWwM3pgYCDU9tmOPaJSHlIlpApmy4ltcJsmIU7-P66KmJju9d3p9CF0Tck9JUotKEhaSK7VwlaEc3eCZn-tUzQjWrCCl1yeo4uUtoQQCcBm6HFjXezaqW6i8zi2o915PMS0S7nA45fHedLG2jbYun3O0jjYMW_gLmDGYGOXDbtEZ8E2yV_9xjn6eFq9L1-K9dvz6_JhXXxSwXQReAnMcSG58LL0ldM1BFVxqEMQVdA-WC2UldJZ6qym3ILTsqqCYiDBAczR7fFuP3Tfk0-j2cdU-6axre-mZBgttaBaCJ3RmyMau95su2lo82NmO_QGtGEGVGl6FzJ29w9GiTk4NQeB5iDQHJ3CDyx0aTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179519559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radionuclide intake risks in the clinical administration of 223RaCl2</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Scholl, Clemens ; Bundschuh, Ralph A ; Hirzebruch, Stefan ; Glanert, Tim ; Wei, Xiao ; Kürpig, Stefan ; Rödel, Roland ; Essler, Markus ; Thomas, Lena ; Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholl, Clemens ; Bundschuh, Ralph A ; Hirzebruch, Stefan ; Glanert, Tim ; Wei, Xiao ; Kürpig, Stefan ; Rödel, Roland ; Essler, Markus ; Thomas, Lena ; Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</creatorcontrib><description>An intake monitoring program covering more than half a year of clinical administration of Radium-223-dichloride for the palliative treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer was carried out in the nuclear medicine department of the university hospital Bonn. Radioactivity in a total of 87 samples of gloves, air filters, faecal bioassays and face masks was measured and evaluated to assess the need for radiation protection measures for the medical staff. The main aim was to quantify or obtain an upper limit for the intake factor. An intake factor of 10−8 was measured when the preparation of patient doses took place in part in a laminar flow cabinet, which indicates an intake factor of 10−7 in more commonplace practice without a cabinet. The intake factor is therefore at the same level as other standard applications of unsealed sources in nuclear medicine. Our findings confirmed that masks are not required under any circumstances. However, the investigation also revealed that contamination risks, especially during the preparation of doses in syringes, should not be neglected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-4746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab044d</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRPREA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>alpha-radiation ; CRPC ; intake factor ; intake risk ; Ra-223 ; Radium-223</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiological protection, 2019-06, Vol.39 (2), p.387-398</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0393-5309</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6498/ab044d/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholl, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bundschuh, Ralph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirzebruch, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanert, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürpig, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rödel, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</creatorcontrib><title>Radionuclide intake risks in the clinical administration of 223RaCl2</title><title>Journal of radiological protection</title><addtitle>JRP</addtitle><addtitle>J. Radiol. Prot</addtitle><description>An intake monitoring program covering more than half a year of clinical administration of Radium-223-dichloride for the palliative treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer was carried out in the nuclear medicine department of the university hospital Bonn. Radioactivity in a total of 87 samples of gloves, air filters, faecal bioassays and face masks was measured and evaluated to assess the need for radiation protection measures for the medical staff. The main aim was to quantify or obtain an upper limit for the intake factor. An intake factor of 10−8 was measured when the preparation of patient doses took place in part in a laminar flow cabinet, which indicates an intake factor of 10−7 in more commonplace practice without a cabinet. The intake factor is therefore at the same level as other standard applications of unsealed sources in nuclear medicine. Our findings confirmed that masks are not required under any circumstances. However, the investigation also revealed that contamination risks, especially during the preparation of doses in syringes, should not be neglected.</description><subject>alpha-radiation</subject><subject>CRPC</subject><subject>intake factor</subject><subject>intake risk</subject><subject>Ra-223</subject><subject>Radium-223</subject><issn>0952-4746</issn><issn>1361-6498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkDtPwzAQgC0EEqWwM3pgYCDU9tmOPaJSHlIlpApmy4ltcJsmIU7-P66KmJju9d3p9CF0Tck9JUotKEhaSK7VwlaEc3eCZn-tUzQjWrCCl1yeo4uUtoQQCcBm6HFjXezaqW6i8zi2o915PMS0S7nA45fHedLG2jbYun3O0jjYMW_gLmDGYGOXDbtEZ8E2yV_9xjn6eFq9L1-K9dvz6_JhXXxSwXQReAnMcSG58LL0ldM1BFVxqEMQVdA-WC2UldJZ6qym3ILTsqqCYiDBAczR7fFuP3Tfk0-j2cdU-6axre-mZBgttaBaCJ3RmyMau95su2lo82NmO_QGtGEGVGl6FzJ29w9GiTk4NQeB5iDQHJ3CDyx0aTk</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Scholl, Clemens</creator><creator>Bundschuh, Ralph A</creator><creator>Hirzebruch, Stefan</creator><creator>Glanert, Tim</creator><creator>Wei, Xiao</creator><creator>Kürpig, Stefan</creator><creator>Rödel, Roland</creator><creator>Essler, Markus</creator><creator>Thomas, Lena</creator><creator>Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-5309</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Radionuclide intake risks in the clinical administration of 223RaCl2</title><author>Scholl, Clemens ; Bundschuh, Ralph A ; Hirzebruch, Stefan ; Glanert, Tim ; Wei, Xiao ; Kürpig, Stefan ; Rödel, Roland ; Essler, Markus ; Thomas, Lena ; Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1529-f4732d45645e67ebd9c3f8b43cff5bf9efa958a66da1da914a3d96bbf82363d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>alpha-radiation</topic><topic>CRPC</topic><topic>intake factor</topic><topic>intake risk</topic><topic>Ra-223</topic><topic>Radium-223</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholl, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bundschuh, Ralph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirzebruch, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanert, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürpig, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rödel, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiological protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholl, Clemens</au><au>Bundschuh, Ralph A</au><au>Hirzebruch, Stefan</au><au>Glanert, Tim</au><au>Wei, Xiao</au><au>Kürpig, Stefan</au><au>Rödel, Roland</au><au>Essler, Markus</au><au>Thomas, Lena</au><au>Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radionuclide intake risks in the clinical administration of 223RaCl2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiological protection</jtitle><stitle>JRP</stitle><addtitle>J. Radiol. Prot</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>387-398</pages><issn>0952-4746</issn><eissn>1361-6498</eissn><coden>JRPREA</coden><abstract>An intake monitoring program covering more than half a year of clinical administration of Radium-223-dichloride for the palliative treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer was carried out in the nuclear medicine department of the university hospital Bonn. Radioactivity in a total of 87 samples of gloves, air filters, faecal bioassays and face masks was measured and evaluated to assess the need for radiation protection measures for the medical staff. The main aim was to quantify or obtain an upper limit for the intake factor. An intake factor of 10−8 was measured when the preparation of patient doses took place in part in a laminar flow cabinet, which indicates an intake factor of 10−7 in more commonplace practice without a cabinet. The intake factor is therefore at the same level as other standard applications of unsealed sources in nuclear medicine. Our findings confirmed that masks are not required under any circumstances. However, the investigation also revealed that contamination risks, especially during the preparation of doses in syringes, should not be neglected.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1361-6498/ab044d</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-5309</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-4746
ispartof Journal of radiological protection, 2019-06, Vol.39 (2), p.387-398
issn 0952-4746
1361-6498
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179519559
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects alpha-radiation
CRPC
intake factor
intake risk
Ra-223
Radium-223
title Radionuclide intake risks in the clinical administration of 223RaCl2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A12%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radionuclide%20intake%20risks%20in%20the%20clinical%20administration%20of%20223RaCl2&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiological%20protection&rft.au=Scholl,%20Clemens&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=387-398&rft.issn=0952-4746&rft.eissn=1361-6498&rft.coden=JRPREA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6498/ab044d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2179519559%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179519559&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true