Meta-Analysis Reveals a Critical Period for Management of Powdery Mildew on Hop Cones

Results of 28 field trials conducted over a 12-year period investigating management of hop powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera macularis were quantitatively summarized by meta-analysis to compare product efficacy and use patterns by mode of action as defined by Fungicide Resistance Action Committee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2015-05, Vol.99 (5), p.632-640
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Mark E, Gent, David H, Grove, Gary G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 640
container_issue 5
container_start_page 632
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 99
creator Nelson, Mark E
Gent, David H
Grove, Gary G
description Results of 28 field trials conducted over a 12-year period investigating management of hop powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera macularis were quantitatively summarized by meta-analysis to compare product efficacy and use patterns by mode of action as defined by Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) groups. Availability of original observations enabled individual participant data meta-analysis. Differences in control of powdery mildew on leaves and cones were apparent among fungicide FRAC groups when individual products were evaluated over the course of a growing season. FRAC groups 13, 3, and U13 provided the most efficacious control of powdery mildew on leaves. Percent disease control on cones was influenced by midseason foliar disease and fungicide mode-of-action. FRAC 13 provided significantly better disease control on cones than all other groups except U13, 3, and premixes of 7 with 11. Disease control on leaves was similar when a rotational program of fungicides was used, independent of the modes of action, but improved on cones if FRAC groups 13 and 3 were both included compared with programs consisting of FRAC groups 11 and 3, 11 and 5, or 3 and 5. Disease control on cones was improved from 32 to 52%, on average, when the fungicide quinoxyfen (FRAC 13) was applied at least once during the early stages of cone development, defined in this analysis as 20 July to 10 August, as compared with all other treatments. Efficacy of disease control on cones by quinoxyfen was moderated by and interacted with the incidence of leaves with powdery mildew. Disease control on cones was further improved if two applications of quinoxyfen were made during this period. Collectively, these findings suggest that disease control during juvenile stages of cone development largely influences the success of fungicide programs and point to the critical importance of focusing management efforts during this stage of development, independent of what actual management strategy is employed.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0396-RE
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179507098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1722165169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-752264bdad72d974bb2558f9b45bf31fc6a5fce05f69186af56c93358a20e8163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOwzAYRi0EgnJ5AQbkkcXgu-OxKoUitaIqMFtO8hsFpXGxU6q-Pa24rEzfcr4zHIQuGb1h1Mrb-d3jM6GSMEmosJosxgdowKwUxGjLD9GAMssIt8ycoNOc3ymlUuriGJ0Iqq3VhRmg1xn0ngw7325zk_ECPsG3GXs8Sk3fVL7Fc0hNrHGICc98599gCV2PY8DzuKkhbfGsaWvY4NjhSVzhUewgn6OjsNPAxc-eodf78ctoQqZPD4-j4ZRUoqA9MYpzLcva14bX1siy5EoVwZZSlUGwUGmvQgVUBW1ZoX1QurJCqMJzCgXT4gxdf3tXKX6sIfdu2eQK2tZ3ENfZcWasooba4l-UGc6ZVkzbHcq_0SrFnBMEt0rN0qetY9Tty7t9eUelY9Lty7vFeHe6-vGvyyXUf5ff1OILKx994A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722165169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-Analysis Reveals a Critical Period for Management of Powdery Mildew on Hop Cones</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Nelson, Mark E ; Gent, David H ; Grove, Gary G</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Mark E ; Gent, David H ; Grove, Gary G</creatorcontrib><description>Results of 28 field trials conducted over a 12-year period investigating management of hop powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera macularis were quantitatively summarized by meta-analysis to compare product efficacy and use patterns by mode of action as defined by Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) groups. Availability of original observations enabled individual participant data meta-analysis. Differences in control of powdery mildew on leaves and cones were apparent among fungicide FRAC groups when individual products were evaluated over the course of a growing season. FRAC groups 13, 3, and U13 provided the most efficacious control of powdery mildew on leaves. Percent disease control on cones was influenced by midseason foliar disease and fungicide mode-of-action. FRAC 13 provided significantly better disease control on cones than all other groups except U13, 3, and premixes of 7 with 11. Disease control on leaves was similar when a rotational program of fungicides was used, independent of the modes of action, but improved on cones if FRAC groups 13 and 3 were both included compared with programs consisting of FRAC groups 11 and 3, 11 and 5, or 3 and 5. Disease control on cones was improved from 32 to 52%, on average, when the fungicide quinoxyfen (FRAC 13) was applied at least once during the early stages of cone development, defined in this analysis as 20 July to 10 August, as compared with all other treatments. Efficacy of disease control on cones by quinoxyfen was moderated by and interacted with the incidence of leaves with powdery mildew. Disease control on cones was further improved if two applications of quinoxyfen were made during this period. Collectively, these findings suggest that disease control during juvenile stages of cone development largely influences the success of fungicide programs and point to the critical importance of focusing management efforts during this stage of development, independent of what actual management strategy is employed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0396-RE</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30699687</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Plant disease, 2015-05, Vol.99 (5), p.632-640</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-752264bdad72d974bb2558f9b45bf31fc6a5fce05f69186af56c93358a20e8163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-752264bdad72d974bb2558f9b45bf31fc6a5fce05f69186af56c93358a20e8163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3722,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30699687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gent, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, Gary G</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-Analysis Reveals a Critical Period for Management of Powdery Mildew on Hop Cones</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Results of 28 field trials conducted over a 12-year period investigating management of hop powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera macularis were quantitatively summarized by meta-analysis to compare product efficacy and use patterns by mode of action as defined by Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) groups. Availability of original observations enabled individual participant data meta-analysis. Differences in control of powdery mildew on leaves and cones were apparent among fungicide FRAC groups when individual products were evaluated over the course of a growing season. FRAC groups 13, 3, and U13 provided the most efficacious control of powdery mildew on leaves. Percent disease control on cones was influenced by midseason foliar disease and fungicide mode-of-action. FRAC 13 provided significantly better disease control on cones than all other groups except U13, 3, and premixes of 7 with 11. Disease control on leaves was similar when a rotational program of fungicides was used, independent of the modes of action, but improved on cones if FRAC groups 13 and 3 were both included compared with programs consisting of FRAC groups 11 and 3, 11 and 5, or 3 and 5. Disease control on cones was improved from 32 to 52%, on average, when the fungicide quinoxyfen (FRAC 13) was applied at least once during the early stages of cone development, defined in this analysis as 20 July to 10 August, as compared with all other treatments. Efficacy of disease control on cones by quinoxyfen was moderated by and interacted with the incidence of leaves with powdery mildew. Disease control on cones was further improved if two applications of quinoxyfen were made during this period. Collectively, these findings suggest that disease control during juvenile stages of cone development largely influences the success of fungicide programs and point to the critical importance of focusing management efforts during this stage of development, independent of what actual management strategy is employed.</description><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLtOwzAYRi0EgnJ5AQbkkcXgu-OxKoUitaIqMFtO8hsFpXGxU6q-Pa24rEzfcr4zHIQuGb1h1Mrb-d3jM6GSMEmosJosxgdowKwUxGjLD9GAMssIt8ycoNOc3ymlUuriGJ0Iqq3VhRmg1xn0ngw7325zk_ECPsG3GXs8Sk3fVL7Fc0hNrHGICc98599gCV2PY8DzuKkhbfGsaWvY4NjhSVzhUewgn6OjsNPAxc-eodf78ctoQqZPD4-j4ZRUoqA9MYpzLcva14bX1siy5EoVwZZSlUGwUGmvQgVUBW1ZoX1QurJCqMJzCgXT4gxdf3tXKX6sIfdu2eQK2tZ3ENfZcWasooba4l-UGc6ZVkzbHcq_0SrFnBMEt0rN0qetY9Tty7t9eUelY9Lty7vFeHe6-vGvyyXUf5ff1OILKx994A</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Nelson, Mark E</creator><creator>Gent, David H</creator><creator>Grove, Gary G</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Meta-Analysis Reveals a Critical Period for Management of Powdery Mildew on Hop Cones</title><author>Nelson, Mark E ; Gent, David H ; Grove, Gary G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-752264bdad72d974bb2558f9b45bf31fc6a5fce05f69186af56c93358a20e8163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gent, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, Gary G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Mark E</au><au>Gent, David H</au><au>Grove, Gary G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-Analysis Reveals a Critical Period for Management of Powdery Mildew on Hop Cones</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>632-640</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><abstract>Results of 28 field trials conducted over a 12-year period investigating management of hop powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera macularis were quantitatively summarized by meta-analysis to compare product efficacy and use patterns by mode of action as defined by Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) groups. Availability of original observations enabled individual participant data meta-analysis. Differences in control of powdery mildew on leaves and cones were apparent among fungicide FRAC groups when individual products were evaluated over the course of a growing season. FRAC groups 13, 3, and U13 provided the most efficacious control of powdery mildew on leaves. Percent disease control on cones was influenced by midseason foliar disease and fungicide mode-of-action. FRAC 13 provided significantly better disease control on cones than all other groups except U13, 3, and premixes of 7 with 11. Disease control on leaves was similar when a rotational program of fungicides was used, independent of the modes of action, but improved on cones if FRAC groups 13 and 3 were both included compared with programs consisting of FRAC groups 11 and 3, 11 and 5, or 3 and 5. Disease control on cones was improved from 32 to 52%, on average, when the fungicide quinoxyfen (FRAC 13) was applied at least once during the early stages of cone development, defined in this analysis as 20 July to 10 August, as compared with all other treatments. Efficacy of disease control on cones by quinoxyfen was moderated by and interacted with the incidence of leaves with powdery mildew. Disease control on cones was further improved if two applications of quinoxyfen were made during this period. Collectively, these findings suggest that disease control during juvenile stages of cone development largely influences the success of fungicide programs and point to the critical importance of focusing management efforts during this stage of development, independent of what actual management strategy is employed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30699687</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0396-RE</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2015-05, Vol.99 (5), p.632-640
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179507098
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
title Meta-Analysis Reveals a Critical Period for Management of Powdery Mildew on Hop Cones
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T11%3A16%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-Analysis%20Reveals%20a%20Critical%20Period%20for%20Management%20of%20Powdery%20Mildew%20on%20Hop%20Cones&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Nelson,%20Mark%20E&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=632-640&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0396-RE&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1722165169%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722165169&rft_id=info:pmid/30699687&rfr_iscdi=true