Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction Patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) frequently present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Although combined resection of the primary MNET and liver metastases (NELM) is usually recommended for appropriate surgical candidates, primary tumor resection (PTR) i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2019-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1044-1054
Hauptverfasser: Tsilimigras, Diamantis I., Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis, Kostakis, Ioannis D., Moris, Demetrios, Schizas, Dimitrios, Cloyd, Jordan M., Pawlik, Timothy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1054
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1044
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 23
creator Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis
Kostakis, Ioannis D.
Moris, Demetrios
Schizas, Dimitrios
Cloyd, Jordan M.
Pawlik, Timothy M.
description Introduction Patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) frequently present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Although combined resection of the primary MNET and liver metastases (NELM) is usually recommended for appropriate surgical candidates, primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of extensive, inoperable metastatic disease remains controversial. Methods A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines utilizing Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases until September 30, 2018. Results Among patients with MNET and NELM, 1226 (68.4%; range, 35.5–85.1% per study) underwent PTR, whereas 567 (31.6%; range, 14.9–64.5%) patients did not. Median follow-up ranged from 55 to 90 months. Cytoreductive liver surgery was performed in approximately 15.7% (range, 0–34.8%) of patients. Pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) among the resected group was approximately 73.1% (range, 57–81%) versus 36.6% (range, 21–46%) for the non-resection group. For patients without liver debulking surgery, PTR remained associated with a decreased risk of death at 5 years compared with patients who did not have the primary tumor resected (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79, p  = 0.01; I 2 58%, p  = 0.12). For patients undergoing PTR, 30-day postoperative mortality ranged from 1.43 to 2%. Conclusion PTR was safe with a low peri-operative risk of mortality and was associated with an improved OS for patients with MNET and unresectable NELM. Given the poor quality of evidence, however, strong evidenced-based recommendations cannot be made based on these retrospective single center–derived data. Future well-design randomized controlled trials will be critical in elucidating the optimal treatment strategies for patients with MNET and advanced metastatic disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11605-018-04094-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179486199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179486199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c6a173cb5b74d553d8b6a5290739948fcbccbd044b0cf4fd296054cbf0f548d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJS5cAuPETuITWhUoRVuoyiJxixx7UlwlTvE4rfZd-rB4NwUkDpzG0nzzjTV_lj3n8JoD1G-I8wpkDrzJQYASuXqQHfKmLnNRFdXD9AbF80LK7wfZE6IrAF4n-HF2UEJV8wbgMLs7JXaBhCa6ybOpZ-fBjTps2Zmzl3Nkn3EOE3o7meA8ss08ToGY8-xcR4c-Ert18Qf75sNeorsB2RlGTTH1DVu7GwzsnSPUhOzTTNH1Du1btmJftxRx3FMXeOPwlmlv97P5yuthS46eZo96PRA-u69H2ebD-83xx3z95eT0eLXOTVnLmJtK87o0nexqYaUsbdNVWhYK6lIp0fSmM6azIEQHphe9LVQ6mzBdD70UjS2PsleL9jpMP2ek2I6ODA6D9jjN1Ba8TpqKK5XQl_-gV9Mc0nd3VKUkQNFUiSoWyoSJKGDfXi9XbTm0u-jaJbo2pdHuo2t36hf36rkb0f4Z-Z1VAsoFoNTylxj-7v6P9hfiZaZ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2169500286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis ; Kostakis, Ioannis D. ; Moris, Demetrios ; Schizas, Dimitrios ; Cloyd, Jordan M. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis ; Kostakis, Ioannis D. ; Moris, Demetrios ; Schizas, Dimitrios ; Cloyd, Jordan M. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) frequently present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Although combined resection of the primary MNET and liver metastases (NELM) is usually recommended for appropriate surgical candidates, primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of extensive, inoperable metastatic disease remains controversial. Methods A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines utilizing Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases until September 30, 2018. Results Among patients with MNET and NELM, 1226 (68.4%; range, 35.5–85.1% per study) underwent PTR, whereas 567 (31.6%; range, 14.9–64.5%) patients did not. Median follow-up ranged from 55 to 90 months. Cytoreductive liver surgery was performed in approximately 15.7% (range, 0–34.8%) of patients. Pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) among the resected group was approximately 73.1% (range, 57–81%) versus 36.6% (range, 21–46%) for the non-resection group. For patients without liver debulking surgery, PTR remained associated with a decreased risk of death at 5 years compared with patients who did not have the primary tumor resected (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79, p  = 0.01; I 2 58%, p  = 0.12). For patients undergoing PTR, 30-day postoperative mortality ranged from 1.43 to 2%. Conclusion PTR was safe with a low peri-operative risk of mortality and was associated with an improved OS for patients with MNET and unresectable NELM. Given the poor quality of evidence, however, strong evidenced-based recommendations cannot be made based on these retrospective single center–derived data. Future well-design randomized controlled trials will be critical in elucidating the optimal treatment strategies for patients with MNET and advanced metastatic disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-04094-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30671800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology ; Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Liver diseases ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Metastasis ; Mortality ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - secondary ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery ; Patient Selection ; Retrospective Studies ; Review Article ; Small intestine ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Survival Rate ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2019-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1044-1054</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c6a173cb5b74d553d8b6a5290739948fcbccbd044b0cf4fd296054cbf0f548d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c6a173cb5b74d553d8b6a5290739948fcbccbd044b0cf4fd296054cbf0f548d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4828-8096</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-018-04094-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-018-04094-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Ioannis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moris, Demetrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schizas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloyd, Jordan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) frequently present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Although combined resection of the primary MNET and liver metastases (NELM) is usually recommended for appropriate surgical candidates, primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of extensive, inoperable metastatic disease remains controversial. Methods A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines utilizing Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases until September 30, 2018. Results Among patients with MNET and NELM, 1226 (68.4%; range, 35.5–85.1% per study) underwent PTR, whereas 567 (31.6%; range, 14.9–64.5%) patients did not. Median follow-up ranged from 55 to 90 months. Cytoreductive liver surgery was performed in approximately 15.7% (range, 0–34.8%) of patients. Pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) among the resected group was approximately 73.1% (range, 57–81%) versus 36.6% (range, 21–46%) for the non-resection group. For patients without liver debulking surgery, PTR remained associated with a decreased risk of death at 5 years compared with patients who did not have the primary tumor resected (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79, p  = 0.01; I 2 58%, p  = 0.12). For patients undergoing PTR, 30-day postoperative mortality ranged from 1.43 to 2%. Conclusion PTR was safe with a low peri-operative risk of mortality and was associated with an improved OS for patients with MNET and unresectable NELM. Given the poor quality of evidence, however, strong evidenced-based recommendations cannot be made based on these retrospective single center–derived data. Future well-design randomized controlled trials will be critical in elucidating the optimal treatment strategies for patients with MNET and advanced metastatic disease.</description><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - secondary</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Small intestine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJS5cAuPETuITWhUoRVuoyiJxixx7UlwlTvE4rfZd-rB4NwUkDpzG0nzzjTV_lj3n8JoD1G-I8wpkDrzJQYASuXqQHfKmLnNRFdXD9AbF80LK7wfZE6IrAF4n-HF2UEJV8wbgMLs7JXaBhCa6ybOpZ-fBjTps2Zmzl3Nkn3EOE3o7meA8ss08ToGY8-xcR4c-Ert18Qf75sNeorsB2RlGTTH1DVu7GwzsnSPUhOzTTNH1Du1btmJftxRx3FMXeOPwlmlv97P5yuthS46eZo96PRA-u69H2ebD-83xx3z95eT0eLXOTVnLmJtK87o0nexqYaUsbdNVWhYK6lIp0fSmM6azIEQHphe9LVQ6mzBdD70UjS2PsleL9jpMP2ek2I6ODA6D9jjN1Ba8TpqKK5XQl_-gV9Mc0nd3VKUkQNFUiSoWyoSJKGDfXi9XbTm0u-jaJbo2pdHuo2t36hf36rkb0f4Z-Z1VAsoFoNTylxj-7v6P9hfiZaZ1</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creator><creator>Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis</creator><creator>Kostakis, Ioannis D.</creator><creator>Moris, Demetrios</creator><creator>Schizas, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Cloyd, Jordan M.</creator><creator>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-8096</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis ; Kostakis, Ioannis D. ; Moris, Demetrios ; Schizas, Dimitrios ; Cloyd, Jordan M. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c6a173cb5b74d553d8b6a5290739948fcbccbd044b0cf4fd296054cbf0f548d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - secondary</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Small intestine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Ioannis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moris, Demetrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schizas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloyd, Jordan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</au><au>Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis</au><au>Kostakis, Ioannis D.</au><au>Moris, Demetrios</au><au>Schizas, Dimitrios</au><au>Cloyd, Jordan M.</au><au>Pawlik, Timothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1044</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1044-1054</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Introduction Patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) frequently present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Although combined resection of the primary MNET and liver metastases (NELM) is usually recommended for appropriate surgical candidates, primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of extensive, inoperable metastatic disease remains controversial. Methods A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines utilizing Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases until September 30, 2018. Results Among patients with MNET and NELM, 1226 (68.4%; range, 35.5–85.1% per study) underwent PTR, whereas 567 (31.6%; range, 14.9–64.5%) patients did not. Median follow-up ranged from 55 to 90 months. Cytoreductive liver surgery was performed in approximately 15.7% (range, 0–34.8%) of patients. Pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) among the resected group was approximately 73.1% (range, 57–81%) versus 36.6% (range, 21–46%) for the non-resection group. For patients without liver debulking surgery, PTR remained associated with a decreased risk of death at 5 years compared with patients who did not have the primary tumor resected (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79, p  = 0.01; I 2 58%, p  = 0.12). For patients undergoing PTR, 30-day postoperative mortality ranged from 1.43 to 2%. Conclusion PTR was safe with a low peri-operative risk of mortality and was associated with an improved OS for patients with MNET and unresectable NELM. Given the poor quality of evidence, however, strong evidenced-based recommendations cannot be made based on these retrospective single center–derived data. Future well-design randomized controlled trials will be critical in elucidating the optimal treatment strategies for patients with MNET and advanced metastatic disease.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30671800</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-018-04094-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-8096</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2019-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1044-1054
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179486199
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology
Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery
Liver diseases
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Metastasis
Mortality
Neuroendocrine tumors
Neuroendocrine Tumors - secondary
Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery
Patient Selection
Retrospective Studies
Review Article
Small intestine
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Survival Rate
Systematic review
title Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A32%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Resection%20of%20Primary%20Midgut%20Neuroendocrine%20Tumors%20in%20Patients%20with%20Unresectable%20Metastatic%20Liver%20Disease%20Justified?%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Tsilimigras,%20Diamantis%20I.&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1044&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1044-1054&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-018-04094-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179486199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2169500286&rft_id=info:pmid/30671800&rfr_iscdi=true