Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant disease 2016-08, Vol.100 (8), p.1651-1659 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1659 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1651 |
container_title | Plant disease |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Elena, Georgina Luque, Jordi |
description | Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179477713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827918707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhBVggL1kw4J8Z_yyrNG0jVSJqQCxHNx4PMXLswZ6hCo_FE-JJC1tWVz4657tXPgi9oeQDJbr-uLlabytKKtpUlCpR3a-eoQXVNa-k0Ow5WhCqacU0lWfoPOfvhJC6FuolOuNEKMFos0C_txZyDODxdsrGDqPbOe_GI449vkkw2J8uWLxJU3DhG_4ap9BlDKHDSyj6MvoY3C8YXQzYhSKOMCvwHm8HKMJ19D4-zNHLNLreGVc2rUNvzSny4MY9vnKDj50DnG1yBXDCb_Zg46GgrPeAzd7D4djFPMQEr9CLHny2r5_mBfpyvfq8vK3uPt2sl5d3leFcjFXPieyAU60I3VnTcwWyMU0NBGzDeNMrRQgXO0upMIYYLrRlTOmOMyKksPwCvXvkDin-mGwe24MrX1TuCTZOuWVU6lpKSfl_rVQxqamSRBYre7SaFHNOtm-H5A6Qji0l7VxrO9d6ejTtXGt7vyqht0_8aXew3b_I3x75H1FkoZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827918707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Elena, Georgina ; Luque, Jordi</creator><creatorcontrib>Elena, Georgina ; Luque, Jordi</creatorcontrib><description>Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30686215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Diplodia ; Phaeomoniella chlamydospora ; Seriata ; Vitaceae</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 2016-08, Vol.100 (8), p.1651-1659</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3728,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elena, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luque, Jordi</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.</description><subject>Diplodia</subject><subject>Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</subject><subject>Seriata</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhBVggL1kw4J8Z_yyrNG0jVSJqQCxHNx4PMXLswZ6hCo_FE-JJC1tWVz4657tXPgi9oeQDJbr-uLlabytKKtpUlCpR3a-eoQXVNa-k0Ow5WhCqacU0lWfoPOfvhJC6FuolOuNEKMFos0C_txZyDODxdsrGDqPbOe_GI449vkkw2J8uWLxJU3DhG_4ap9BlDKHDSyj6MvoY3C8YXQzYhSKOMCvwHm8HKMJ19D4-zNHLNLreGVc2rUNvzSny4MY9vnKDj50DnG1yBXDCb_Zg46GgrPeAzd7D4djFPMQEr9CLHny2r5_mBfpyvfq8vK3uPt2sl5d3leFcjFXPieyAU60I3VnTcwWyMU0NBGzDeNMrRQgXO0upMIYYLrRlTOmOMyKksPwCvXvkDin-mGwe24MrX1TuCTZOuWVU6lpKSfl_rVQxqamSRBYre7SaFHNOtm-H5A6Qji0l7VxrO9d6ejTtXGt7vyqht0_8aXew3b_I3x75H1FkoZg</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Elena, Georgina</creator><creator>Luque, Jordi</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</title><author>Elena, Georgina ; Luque, Jordi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Diplodia</topic><topic>Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</topic><topic>Seriata</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elena, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luque, Jordi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elena, Georgina</au><au>Luque, Jordi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1651</spage><epage>1659</epage><pages>1651-1659</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><abstract>Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30686215</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0191-2917 |
ispartof | Plant disease, 2016-08, Vol.100 (8), p.1651-1659 |
issn | 0191-2917 1943-7692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179477713 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues |
subjects | Diplodia Phaeomoniella chlamydospora Seriata Vitaceae |
title | Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T07%3A01%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Susceptibility%20of%20Grapevine%20Pruning%20Wounds%20and%20Cane%20Colonization%20in%20Catalonia,%20Spain%20Following%20Artificial%20Infection%20with%20Diplodia%20seriata%20and%20Phaeomoniella%20chlamydospora&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Elena,%20Georgina&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1651&rft.epage=1659&rft.pages=1651-1659&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827918707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827918707&rft_id=info:pmid/30686215&rfr_iscdi=true |