Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora

Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2016-08, Vol.100 (8), p.1651-1659
Hauptverfasser: Elena, Georgina, Luque, Jordi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1659
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1651
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 100
creator Elena, Georgina
Luque, Jordi
description Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179477713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827918707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhBVggL1kw4J8Z_yyrNG0jVSJqQCxHNx4PMXLswZ6hCo_FE-JJC1tWVz4657tXPgi9oeQDJbr-uLlabytKKtpUlCpR3a-eoQXVNa-k0Ow5WhCqacU0lWfoPOfvhJC6FuolOuNEKMFos0C_txZyDODxdsrGDqPbOe_GI449vkkw2J8uWLxJU3DhG_4ap9BlDKHDSyj6MvoY3C8YXQzYhSKOMCvwHm8HKMJ19D4-zNHLNLreGVc2rUNvzSny4MY9vnKDj50DnG1yBXDCb_Zg46GgrPeAzd7D4djFPMQEr9CLHny2r5_mBfpyvfq8vK3uPt2sl5d3leFcjFXPieyAU60I3VnTcwWyMU0NBGzDeNMrRQgXO0upMIYYLrRlTOmOMyKksPwCvXvkDin-mGwe24MrX1TuCTZOuWVU6lpKSfl_rVQxqamSRBYre7SaFHNOtm-H5A6Qji0l7VxrO9d6ejTtXGt7vyqht0_8aXew3b_I3x75H1FkoZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827918707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Elena, Georgina ; Luque, Jordi</creator><creatorcontrib>Elena, Georgina ; Luque, Jordi</creatorcontrib><description>Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30686215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Diplodia ; Phaeomoniella chlamydospora ; Seriata ; Vitaceae</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 2016-08, Vol.100 (8), p.1651-1659</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3728,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elena, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luque, Jordi</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.</description><subject>Diplodia</subject><subject>Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</subject><subject>Seriata</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhBVggL1kw4J8Z_yyrNG0jVSJqQCxHNx4PMXLswZ6hCo_FE-JJC1tWVz4657tXPgi9oeQDJbr-uLlabytKKtpUlCpR3a-eoQXVNa-k0Ow5WhCqacU0lWfoPOfvhJC6FuolOuNEKMFos0C_txZyDODxdsrGDqPbOe_GI449vkkw2J8uWLxJU3DhG_4ap9BlDKHDSyj6MvoY3C8YXQzYhSKOMCvwHm8HKMJ19D4-zNHLNLreGVc2rUNvzSny4MY9vnKDj50DnG1yBXDCb_Zg46GgrPeAzd7D4djFPMQEr9CLHny2r5_mBfpyvfq8vK3uPt2sl5d3leFcjFXPieyAU60I3VnTcwWyMU0NBGzDeNMrRQgXO0upMIYYLrRlTOmOMyKksPwCvXvkDin-mGwe24MrX1TuCTZOuWVU6lpKSfl_rVQxqamSRBYre7SaFHNOtm-H5A6Qji0l7VxrO9d6ejTtXGt7vyqht0_8aXew3b_I3x75H1FkoZg</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Elena, Georgina</creator><creator>Luque, Jordi</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</title><author>Elena, Georgina ; Luque, Jordi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f307da319801becf38a75c54a0ae5235f880036be116cc0c369e2289d320676e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Diplodia</topic><topic>Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</topic><topic>Seriata</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elena, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luque, Jordi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elena, Georgina</au><au>Luque, Jordi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1651</spage><epage>1659</epage><pages>1651-1659</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><abstract>Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are two fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the period during which grapevine pruning wounds remain susceptible to fungal infection and to describe the colonization of canes artificially inoculated with these pathogens. In the first experiment, pruning wounds made in either fall or winter were separately inoculated with each pathogen at different times after pruning. Wound susceptibility to both pathogens decreased as the period between pruning and inoculation increased, from high percentages recorded in the first inoculation round (D. seriata, 97.5% and P. chlamydospora, 75%) down to approximately 10% 12 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds remained more susceptible to D. seriata after a late pruning in winter whereas no overall seasonal changes in wound susceptibility were detected for P. chlamydospora. In the second experiment, canes were pruned by leaving two different lengths between the top node and the pruning wound before inoculations. Pathogens were recovered at different incubation periods and from different sites along the canes to estimate fungal cane colonization. A longer pruned internode made cane colonization by P. chlamydospora difficult, as indicated by fungal recoveries lower than 10% at the lowest recovery site, whereas D. seriata was less inhibited.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30686215</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2016-08, Vol.100 (8), p.1651-1659
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179477713
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
subjects Diplodia
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
Seriata
Vitaceae
title Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T07%3A01%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Susceptibility%20of%20Grapevine%20Pruning%20Wounds%20and%20Cane%20Colonization%20in%20Catalonia,%20Spain%20Following%20Artificial%20Infection%20with%20Diplodia%20seriata%20and%20Phaeomoniella%20chlamydospora&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Elena,%20Georgina&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1651&rft.epage=1659&rft.pages=1651-1659&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1186-RE&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827918707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827918707&rft_id=info:pmid/30686215&rfr_iscdi=true