Rural versus urban women: An examination of anthropometry and body composition

Objective To describe and compare body composition and fat distribution of Australian women 18–44 years from an urban and rural location. Design Cross‐sectional survey and collection of anthropometric and body composition measurements. Setting Newcastle and Tamworth in New South Wales. Participants...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of rural health 2019-02, Vol.27 (1), p.70-77
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Miriam, Brown, Leanne J., Mathews, Kimberly I., Whatnall, Megan C., Hutchesson, Melinda J., MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K., Patterson, Amanda J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title The Australian journal of rural health
container_volume 27
creator Tan, Miriam
Brown, Leanne J.
Mathews, Kimberly I.
Whatnall, Megan C.
Hutchesson, Melinda J.
MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K.
Patterson, Amanda J.
description Objective To describe and compare body composition and fat distribution of Australian women 18–44 years from an urban and rural location. Design Cross‐sectional survey and collection of anthropometric and body composition measurements. Setting Newcastle and Tamworth in New South Wales. Participants Convenience sample of women recruited through media and community. Main outcome measures Weight, height, waist and hip girths, visceral fat area, body fat (kg and %) and skeletal muscle mass. Results Of the total sample (n = 254), 53% resided in an urban area and the mean age was 28.0 (7.6) years. The mean age of rural women was significantly higher than for urban women. The majority of women (66.5%) had a Body Mass Index within the healthy range (18.5–24.9 kg m−2) and there was no significant difference in mean Body Mass Index between rural and urban women. Measures of central fat distribution, waist circumference and waist‐to‐hip ratio were significantly higher in rural residents. Visceral fat area was significantly higher among rural women. After adjustment for age, differences in waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio and visceral fat area were no longer statistically significant. Conclusion While we did not find statistically significant differences in body composition among urban and rural women, these results highlight the dramatic effect of age on measures of central adiposity. Population surveillance needs to incorporate measures of excess central adiposity, particularly visceral fat area, to better investigate changes in body composition among women in their 20s and 30s.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajr.12466
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179450230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2180866805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-6706437eedb3d772c0bcf8c4a2b63db8def98afbb914634ca3a41d7d5586e5b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19AAl70UJc0L029jeErQ2HouSRNih1tM5PW2W9vZqcHwVyehPz48_AH4BSjKxzOVK7cFY4p53tgjClFEWaC7oc7IiJisYhH4Mj7FUIoRZgeghFBPCWpSMfgadk5WcEP43znYeeUbODG1qa5hrMGmk9Zl41sS9tAW0DZtG_OrsN36_rw0lBZ3cPc1mvry606BgeFrLw52c0JeL29eZnfR4vnu4f5bBHlhBEe8QRxShJjtCI6SeIcqbwQOZWx4kQroU2RClkolWLKCc0lkRTrRDMmuGEqJRNwMeSunX3vjG-zuvS5qSrZGNv5LMZJShmKCQr0_A9d2c41YbugBBKcC8SCuhxU7qz3zhTZ2pW1dH2GUbYtOQslZ98lB3u2S-xUbfSv_Gk1gOkANmVl-v-Tstnjcoj8ApMihhY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180866805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural versus urban women: An examination of anthropometry and body composition</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Tan, Miriam ; Brown, Leanne J. ; Mathews, Kimberly I. ; Whatnall, Megan C. ; Hutchesson, Melinda J. ; MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K. ; Patterson, Amanda J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Miriam ; Brown, Leanne J. ; Mathews, Kimberly I. ; Whatnall, Megan C. ; Hutchesson, Melinda J. ; MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K. ; Patterson, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To describe and compare body composition and fat distribution of Australian women 18–44 years from an urban and rural location. Design Cross‐sectional survey and collection of anthropometric and body composition measurements. Setting Newcastle and Tamworth in New South Wales. Participants Convenience sample of women recruited through media and community. Main outcome measures Weight, height, waist and hip girths, visceral fat area, body fat (kg and %) and skeletal muscle mass. Results Of the total sample (n = 254), 53% resided in an urban area and the mean age was 28.0 (7.6) years. The mean age of rural women was significantly higher than for urban women. The majority of women (66.5%) had a Body Mass Index within the healthy range (18.5–24.9 kg m−2) and there was no significant difference in mean Body Mass Index between rural and urban women. Measures of central fat distribution, waist circumference and waist‐to‐hip ratio were significantly higher in rural residents. Visceral fat area was significantly higher among rural women. After adjustment for age, differences in waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio and visceral fat area were no longer statistically significant. Conclusion While we did not find statistically significant differences in body composition among urban and rural women, these results highlight the dramatic effect of age on measures of central adiposity. Population surveillance needs to incorporate measures of excess central adiposity, particularly visceral fat area, to better investigate changes in body composition among women in their 20s and 30s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1038-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12466</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30693989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adipose tissue ; adiposity ; Age ; Age differences ; Age factors ; Anthropometry ; Body composition ; Body fat ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Body measurements ; Body size ; Health risk assessment ; Hip ; Muscles ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; rural health ; Rural populations ; Skeletal muscle ; Statistical analysis ; Surveillance ; Urban areas ; Waist ; Weight ; Women ; women's health ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of rural health, 2019-02, Vol.27 (1), p.70-77</ispartof><rights>2019 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-6706437eedb3d772c0bcf8c4a2b63db8def98afbb914634ca3a41d7d5586e5b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-6706437eedb3d772c0bcf8c4a2b63db8def98afbb914634ca3a41d7d5586e5b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajr.12466$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajr.12466$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Leanne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Kimberly I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whatnall, Megan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchesson, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><title>Rural versus urban women: An examination of anthropometry and body composition</title><title>The Australian journal of rural health</title><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Objective To describe and compare body composition and fat distribution of Australian women 18–44 years from an urban and rural location. Design Cross‐sectional survey and collection of anthropometric and body composition measurements. Setting Newcastle and Tamworth in New South Wales. Participants Convenience sample of women recruited through media and community. Main outcome measures Weight, height, waist and hip girths, visceral fat area, body fat (kg and %) and skeletal muscle mass. Results Of the total sample (n = 254), 53% resided in an urban area and the mean age was 28.0 (7.6) years. The mean age of rural women was significantly higher than for urban women. The majority of women (66.5%) had a Body Mass Index within the healthy range (18.5–24.9 kg m−2) and there was no significant difference in mean Body Mass Index between rural and urban women. Measures of central fat distribution, waist circumference and waist‐to‐hip ratio were significantly higher in rural residents. Visceral fat area was significantly higher among rural women. After adjustment for age, differences in waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio and visceral fat area were no longer statistically significant. Conclusion While we did not find statistically significant differences in body composition among urban and rural women, these results highlight the dramatic effect of age on measures of central adiposity. Population surveillance needs to incorporate measures of excess central adiposity, particularly visceral fat area, to better investigate changes in body composition among women in their 20s and 30s.</description><subject>Adipose tissue</subject><subject>adiposity</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body measurements</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>rural health</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Skeletal muscle</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Waist</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>women's health</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1038-5282</issn><issn>1440-1584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19AAl70UJc0L029jeErQ2HouSRNih1tM5PW2W9vZqcHwVyehPz48_AH4BSjKxzOVK7cFY4p53tgjClFEWaC7oc7IiJisYhH4Mj7FUIoRZgeghFBPCWpSMfgadk5WcEP43znYeeUbODG1qa5hrMGmk9Zl41sS9tAW0DZtG_OrsN36_rw0lBZ3cPc1mvry606BgeFrLw52c0JeL29eZnfR4vnu4f5bBHlhBEe8QRxShJjtCI6SeIcqbwQOZWx4kQroU2RClkolWLKCc0lkRTrRDMmuGEqJRNwMeSunX3vjG-zuvS5qSrZGNv5LMZJShmKCQr0_A9d2c41YbugBBKcC8SCuhxU7qz3zhTZ2pW1dH2GUbYtOQslZ98lB3u2S-xUbfSv_Gk1gOkANmVl-v-Tstnjcoj8ApMihhY</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Tan, Miriam</creator><creator>Brown, Leanne J.</creator><creator>Mathews, Kimberly I.</creator><creator>Whatnall, Megan C.</creator><creator>Hutchesson, Melinda J.</creator><creator>MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K.</creator><creator>Patterson, Amanda J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Rural versus urban women: An examination of anthropometry and body composition</title><author>Tan, Miriam ; Brown, Leanne J. ; Mathews, Kimberly I. ; Whatnall, Megan C. ; Hutchesson, Melinda J. ; MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K. ; Patterson, Amanda J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-6706437eedb3d772c0bcf8c4a2b63db8def98afbb914634ca3a41d7d5586e5b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adipose tissue</topic><topic>adiposity</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body measurements</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>rural health</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Skeletal muscle</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Waist</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>women's health</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Leanne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Kimberly I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whatnall, Megan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchesson, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Miriam</au><au>Brown, Leanne J.</au><au>Mathews, Kimberly I.</au><au>Whatnall, Megan C.</au><au>Hutchesson, Melinda J.</au><au>MacDonald‐Wicks, Lesley K.</au><au>Patterson, Amanda J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural versus urban women: An examination of anthropometry and body composition</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>70-77</pages><issn>1038-5282</issn><eissn>1440-1584</eissn><abstract>Objective To describe and compare body composition and fat distribution of Australian women 18–44 years from an urban and rural location. Design Cross‐sectional survey and collection of anthropometric and body composition measurements. Setting Newcastle and Tamworth in New South Wales. Participants Convenience sample of women recruited through media and community. Main outcome measures Weight, height, waist and hip girths, visceral fat area, body fat (kg and %) and skeletal muscle mass. Results Of the total sample (n = 254), 53% resided in an urban area and the mean age was 28.0 (7.6) years. The mean age of rural women was significantly higher than for urban women. The majority of women (66.5%) had a Body Mass Index within the healthy range (18.5–24.9 kg m−2) and there was no significant difference in mean Body Mass Index between rural and urban women. Measures of central fat distribution, waist circumference and waist‐to‐hip ratio were significantly higher in rural residents. Visceral fat area was significantly higher among rural women. After adjustment for age, differences in waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio and visceral fat area were no longer statistically significant. Conclusion While we did not find statistically significant differences in body composition among urban and rural women, these results highlight the dramatic effect of age on measures of central adiposity. Population surveillance needs to incorporate measures of excess central adiposity, particularly visceral fat area, to better investigate changes in body composition among women in their 20s and 30s.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30693989</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajr.12466</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1038-5282
ispartof The Australian journal of rural health, 2019-02, Vol.27 (1), p.70-77
issn 1038-5282
1440-1584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179450230
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adipose tissue
adiposity
Age
Age differences
Age factors
Anthropometry
Body composition
Body fat
Body mass
Body mass index
Body measurements
Body size
Health risk assessment
Hip
Muscles
Rural areas
Rural communities
rural health
Rural populations
Skeletal muscle
Statistical analysis
Surveillance
Urban areas
Waist
Weight
Women
women's health
Womens health
title Rural versus urban women: An examination of anthropometry and body composition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A36%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%20versus%20urban%20women:%20An%20examination%20of%20anthropometry%20and%20body%20composition&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Tan,%20Miriam&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=70-77&rft.issn=1038-5282&rft.eissn=1440-1584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajr.12466&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180866805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180866805&rft_id=info:pmid/30693989&rfr_iscdi=true