High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication
Introduction Total femoral replacement (TFR) is a limb salvage procedure performed for large bony defects. However, it is often associated with major complications and reduced function. Data on limb preservation rates and functional outcomes after TFR are limited. The primary objective of this study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2019-07, Vol.139 (7), p.913-920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 920 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 913 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 139 |
creator | Graulich, T. Steimer, D. Zhang, D. Omar, M. Weber-Spickschen, S. Krettek, C. Panzica, M. |
description | Introduction
Total femoral replacement (TFR) is a limb salvage procedure performed for large bony defects. However, it is often associated with major complications and reduced function. Data on limb preservation rates and functional outcomes after TFR are limited. The primary objective of this study is to assess indications, functional outcomes, and complications after TFR.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively analyzed all patients after TFR between 2006 and 2016. All patients received a modular mega endoprosthesis (MUTARS
®
). Patients were grouped according to their initial indication for TFR: (1) fracture, (2) tumor, or (3) infection. We evaluated (i) patient survival, (ii) postoperative function with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), knee strength, range of motion, and (iii) complications.
Results
Between 2006 and 2016, TFR was performed in 22 patients with a mean age of 64 +/−17 years. Indications for TFR were tumor (
n
= 6), infection (
n
= 8) and fracture (
n
= 8). The mean follow-up (f/up) was 18 months. At final follow-up, mean MSTS was 24%. Mean knee flexion strength was reduced 63% compared to the contralateral leg (
p
= 0.004). At time of final f/up, 5 patients (22%) died, 5 (22%) underwent secondary hip exarticulation, and 12 (54%) suffered a major complication. At f/up, 11 patients had infections. Of these 11 patients, 5 died, 4 were treated with debridement, and 5 were treated with hip exarticulation. Fifteen patients survived with preserved limbs at f/up.
Conclusion
TFR is a salvage procedure with limited functional outcome and high complication rates. Nevertheless, the majority of our cohort could be treated successfully with limb salvage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-019-03130-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179441735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258162493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df21ed85f2c57cd4bacc7924a66c99df2ba8498ad036d763e185750f9c3db6173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2OFSEQhYnRONfRF3BhSNy4sJW_bsCdmahjMokbXXe4UFyZdEML9EzmRXxeufb1Jy5cFZX6zingIPSUkleUEPm6ECII6wjVHeGUk-72HtpRwUXHNR3uox3RfOgU6ekZelTKNSGUKU0eojNOBiWVZDv0_TIcvmKb5mUK1tSQIjbR4Qw3oRybbCoUbHyFjGuqZsIe5pRbzbBMxsIMsb7BprU1p7KAreEGcAnxMAG2bdiEJprproSCk8chutOil9iv0W6n486_L_EYPfBmKvDkVM_Rl_fvPl9cdlefPny8eHvVWS772jnPKDjVe2Z7aZ3YG2ulZsIMg9W6TfdGCa2MI3xwcuBAVS974rXlbj9Qyc_Ri813yenbCqWOcygWpslESGsZGZVaiAb2DX3-D3qd1txe1ijWKzowoXmj2EbZ9hslgx-XHGaT70ZKxmNq45ba2FIbf6Y23jbRs5P1up_B_Zb8iqkBfANKG8UD5D-7_2P7Az5Ppjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258162493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Graulich, T. ; Steimer, D. ; Zhang, D. ; Omar, M. ; Weber-Spickschen, S. ; Krettek, C. ; Panzica, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Graulich, T. ; Steimer, D. ; Zhang, D. ; Omar, M. ; Weber-Spickschen, S. ; Krettek, C. ; Panzica, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Total femoral replacement (TFR) is a limb salvage procedure performed for large bony defects. However, it is often associated with major complications and reduced function. Data on limb preservation rates and functional outcomes after TFR are limited. The primary objective of this study is to assess indications, functional outcomes, and complications after TFR.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively analyzed all patients after TFR between 2006 and 2016. All patients received a modular mega endoprosthesis (MUTARS
®
). Patients were grouped according to their initial indication for TFR: (1) fracture, (2) tumor, or (3) infection. We evaluated (i) patient survival, (ii) postoperative function with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), knee strength, range of motion, and (iii) complications.
Results
Between 2006 and 2016, TFR was performed in 22 patients with a mean age of 64 +/−17 years. Indications for TFR were tumor (
n
= 6), infection (
n
= 8) and fracture (
n
= 8). The mean follow-up (f/up) was 18 months. At final follow-up, mean MSTS was 24%. Mean knee flexion strength was reduced 63% compared to the contralateral leg (
p
= 0.004). At time of final f/up, 5 patients (22%) died, 5 (22%) underwent secondary hip exarticulation, and 12 (54%) suffered a major complication. At f/up, 11 patients had infections. Of these 11 patients, 5 died, 4 were treated with debridement, and 5 were treated with hip exarticulation. Fifteen patients survived with preserved limbs at f/up.
Conclusion
TFR is a salvage procedure with limited functional outcome and high complication rates. Nevertheless, the majority of our cohort could be treated successfully with limb salvage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03130-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30687872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Amputation ; Defects ; Fractures ; Infections ; Joint surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Orthopedics ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Salvage ; Surgery ; Trauma ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2019-07, Vol.139 (7), p.913-920</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df21ed85f2c57cd4bacc7924a66c99df2ba8498ad036d763e185750f9c3db6173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df21ed85f2c57cd4bacc7924a66c99df2ba8498ad036d763e185750f9c3db6173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1896-1945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-019-03130-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-019-03130-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graulich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steimer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber-Spickschen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krettek, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, M.</creatorcontrib><title>High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
Total femoral replacement (TFR) is a limb salvage procedure performed for large bony defects. However, it is often associated with major complications and reduced function. Data on limb preservation rates and functional outcomes after TFR are limited. The primary objective of this study is to assess indications, functional outcomes, and complications after TFR.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively analyzed all patients after TFR between 2006 and 2016. All patients received a modular mega endoprosthesis (MUTARS
®
). Patients were grouped according to their initial indication for TFR: (1) fracture, (2) tumor, or (3) infection. We evaluated (i) patient survival, (ii) postoperative function with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), knee strength, range of motion, and (iii) complications.
Results
Between 2006 and 2016, TFR was performed in 22 patients with a mean age of 64 +/−17 years. Indications for TFR were tumor (
n
= 6), infection (
n
= 8) and fracture (
n
= 8). The mean follow-up (f/up) was 18 months. At final follow-up, mean MSTS was 24%. Mean knee flexion strength was reduced 63% compared to the contralateral leg (
p
= 0.004). At time of final f/up, 5 patients (22%) died, 5 (22%) underwent secondary hip exarticulation, and 12 (54%) suffered a major complication. At f/up, 11 patients had infections. Of these 11 patients, 5 died, 4 were treated with debridement, and 5 were treated with hip exarticulation. Fifteen patients survived with preserved limbs at f/up.
Conclusion
TFR is a salvage procedure with limited functional outcome and high complication rates. Nevertheless, the majority of our cohort could be treated successfully with limb salvage.</description><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Salvage</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2OFSEQhYnRONfRF3BhSNy4sJW_bsCdmahjMokbXXe4UFyZdEML9EzmRXxeufb1Jy5cFZX6zingIPSUkleUEPm6ECII6wjVHeGUk-72HtpRwUXHNR3uox3RfOgU6ekZelTKNSGUKU0eojNOBiWVZDv0_TIcvmKb5mUK1tSQIjbR4Qw3oRybbCoUbHyFjGuqZsIe5pRbzbBMxsIMsb7BprU1p7KAreEGcAnxMAG2bdiEJprproSCk8chutOil9iv0W6n486_L_EYPfBmKvDkVM_Rl_fvPl9cdlefPny8eHvVWS772jnPKDjVe2Z7aZ3YG2ulZsIMg9W6TfdGCa2MI3xwcuBAVS974rXlbj9Qyc_Ri813yenbCqWOcygWpslESGsZGZVaiAb2DX3-D3qd1txe1ijWKzowoXmj2EbZ9hslgx-XHGaT70ZKxmNq45ba2FIbf6Y23jbRs5P1up_B_Zb8iqkBfANKG8UD5D-7_2P7Az5Ppjw</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Graulich, T.</creator><creator>Steimer, D.</creator><creator>Zhang, D.</creator><creator>Omar, M.</creator><creator>Weber-Spickschen, S.</creator><creator>Krettek, C.</creator><creator>Panzica, M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-1945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication</title><author>Graulich, T. ; Steimer, D. ; Zhang, D. ; Omar, M. ; Weber-Spickschen, S. ; Krettek, C. ; Panzica, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df21ed85f2c57cd4bacc7924a66c99df2ba8498ad036d763e185750f9c3db6173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Salvage</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graulich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steimer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber-Spickschen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krettek, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graulich, T.</au><au>Steimer, D.</au><au>Zhang, D.</au><au>Omar, M.</au><au>Weber-Spickschen, S.</au><au>Krettek, C.</au><au>Panzica, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>913-920</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Total femoral replacement (TFR) is a limb salvage procedure performed for large bony defects. However, it is often associated with major complications and reduced function. Data on limb preservation rates and functional outcomes after TFR are limited. The primary objective of this study is to assess indications, functional outcomes, and complications after TFR.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively analyzed all patients after TFR between 2006 and 2016. All patients received a modular mega endoprosthesis (MUTARS
®
). Patients were grouped according to their initial indication for TFR: (1) fracture, (2) tumor, or (3) infection. We evaluated (i) patient survival, (ii) postoperative function with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), knee strength, range of motion, and (iii) complications.
Results
Between 2006 and 2016, TFR was performed in 22 patients with a mean age of 64 +/−17 years. Indications for TFR were tumor (
n
= 6), infection (
n
= 8) and fracture (
n
= 8). The mean follow-up (f/up) was 18 months. At final follow-up, mean MSTS was 24%. Mean knee flexion strength was reduced 63% compared to the contralateral leg (
p
= 0.004). At time of final f/up, 5 patients (22%) died, 5 (22%) underwent secondary hip exarticulation, and 12 (54%) suffered a major complication. At f/up, 11 patients had infections. Of these 11 patients, 5 died, 4 were treated with debridement, and 5 were treated with hip exarticulation. Fifteen patients survived with preserved limbs at f/up.
Conclusion
TFR is a salvage procedure with limited functional outcome and high complication rates. Nevertheless, the majority of our cohort could be treated successfully with limb salvage.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30687872</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-019-03130-w</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-1945</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2019-07, Vol.139 (7), p.913-920 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179441735 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Amputation Defects Fractures Infections Joint surgery Medicine Medicine & Public Health Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopedics Patients Prostheses Salvage Surgery Trauma Tumors |
title | High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20complication%20and%20revision%20rates%20after%20total%20femoral%20replacement:%20a%20retrospective%20single%20center%20analysis%20of%20indication,%20function,%20and%20complication&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Graulich,%20T.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=913-920&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-019-03130-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2258162493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258162493&rft_id=info:pmid/30687872&rfr_iscdi=true |