Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla

Primary implant stability is crucial to osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess correlation of preoperative radiologic parameters with intraoperatively obtained biomechanical tests in the maxilla. A total of 259 implants were inserted in the maxilla of 99 patients. Cone-beam computed t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2019-03, Vol.47 (3), p.461-467
Hauptverfasser: Hakim, Samer G., Glanz, Julia, Ofer, Markus, Steller, Daniel, Sieg, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 467
container_issue 3
container_start_page 461
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 47
creator Hakim, Samer G.
Glanz, Julia
Ofer, Markus
Steller, Daniel
Sieg, Peter
description Primary implant stability is crucial to osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess correlation of preoperative radiologic parameters with intraoperatively obtained biomechanical tests in the maxilla. A total of 259 implants were inserted in the maxilla of 99 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived Hounsfield units (HU), voxel grey values and computed tomography mental index (CTMI) performed preoperatively were correlated with insertion torque and Periotest (obtained intraoperatively and 12 weeks later) to assess their prognostic value for primary implant stability. Voxel grey values and insertion torque showed a low correlation (r = 0.329, p = 1.055×10−7 ). Likewise, a low correlation was found between HU measured preoperatively and insertion torque as well as intraoperative Periotest values (r = 0.297, p = 4×10−6 and r = − 0.234, p = 4.35×10−4, respectively). A moderate correlation could, however, be assessed between insertion torque and intraoperative as well as Periotest values 12 weeks later. (r = −0.555, p = 1.022×10−20 and −0.465. p = 1.150×10−13). On contrast, a high correlation was observed between the voxel grey values of CBCT and related HU (r = 0.710, p = 6.486×10−37 ) so that a conversion from grey values into HU could be suggested. According to regression analysis, an intraoperative negative Periotest value could be expected at an insertion torque of 40 N/cm upwards. CBCT-based bone density parameters correlate with each other and allow conversion of grey scales into HU preoperatively. Both insertion torque and Periotest showed a significant correlation which enables regression analysis to predict implant stability for related insertion torque. On contrast, for HU the distribution curves do not allow a reliable assignment into certain Periotest values.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179430753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518218306437</els_id><sourcerecordid>2179430753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb48fcdd3e9560f5c5884f19593dfedeed03245e98d32c43bf2e03bd2a5bab173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS1ERF78AAvkJZtuyna7xy2xQSNeUqRskrXlR7Xiobs92J6QfAp_i5sZWCJZsuW691aVDiFvGLQMWP9-1-7cnFsObGiBtQD8BblgaqOajrHhZX0Dg0Yyxc_JZc47AOhBDa_IuYBeiZ6zC_JrG1PCyZQQFxpH6uKC1KKZ6fau8ZjCI3pq10-PSw7lme5NMjMWTJn-DOWB7lOYTXqmYd5PZik0F2PDtCpNzlhP9VcXmu80LBnTn04lph8HpGbxtZJCLJhLLdPygHQ2T2GazDU5G82U8fXpviL3nz_dbb82N7dfvm0_3jROyL401nZqdN4LHGQPo3RSqW5kgxyEH9EjehC8kzgoL7jrhB05grCeG2mNZRtxRd4dc_cp1ply0XPIDusEC8ZD1pxthk7ARooq5UepSzHnhKM-La8Z6BWJ3ukViV6RaGC6Iqmmt6f8g53R_7P8ZVAFH44CrFs-Bkw6u4CLQx8SuqJ9DP_L_w10vKGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179430753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hakim, Samer G. ; Glanz, Julia ; Ofer, Markus ; Steller, Daniel ; Sieg, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Samer G. ; Glanz, Julia ; Ofer, Markus ; Steller, Daniel ; Sieg, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Primary implant stability is crucial to osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess correlation of preoperative radiologic parameters with intraoperatively obtained biomechanical tests in the maxilla. A total of 259 implants were inserted in the maxilla of 99 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived Hounsfield units (HU), voxel grey values and computed tomography mental index (CTMI) performed preoperatively were correlated with insertion torque and Periotest (obtained intraoperatively and 12 weeks later) to assess their prognostic value for primary implant stability. Voxel grey values and insertion torque showed a low correlation (r = 0.329, p = 1.055×10−7 ). Likewise, a low correlation was found between HU measured preoperatively and insertion torque as well as intraoperative Periotest values (r = 0.297, p = 4×10−6 and r = − 0.234, p = 4.35×10−4, respectively). A moderate correlation could, however, be assessed between insertion torque and intraoperative as well as Periotest values 12 weeks later. (r = −0.555, p = 1.022×10−20 and −0.465. p = 1.150×10−13). On contrast, a high correlation was observed between the voxel grey values of CBCT and related HU (r = 0.710, p = 6.486×10−37 ) so that a conversion from grey values into HU could be suggested. According to regression analysis, an intraoperative negative Periotest value could be expected at an insertion torque of 40 N/cm upwards. CBCT-based bone density parameters correlate with each other and allow conversion of grey scales into HU preoperatively. Both insertion torque and Periotest showed a significant correlation which enables regression analysis to predict implant stability for related insertion torque. On contrast, for HU the distribution curves do not allow a reliable assignment into certain Periotest values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30683621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bone Density ; Bone mineral density ; Cone beam CT ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis Retention ; Humans ; Insertion torque ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Maxilla ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Maxilla - physiology ; Maxilla - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Osseointegration ; Resonance frequency analysis ; Torque</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2019-03, Vol.47 (3), p.461-467</ispartof><rights>2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb48fcdd3e9560f5c5884f19593dfedeed03245e98d32c43bf2e03bd2a5bab173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb48fcdd3e9560f5c5884f19593dfedeed03245e98d32c43bf2e03bd2a5bab173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Samer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanz, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ofer, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Primary implant stability is crucial to osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess correlation of preoperative radiologic parameters with intraoperatively obtained biomechanical tests in the maxilla. A total of 259 implants were inserted in the maxilla of 99 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived Hounsfield units (HU), voxel grey values and computed tomography mental index (CTMI) performed preoperatively were correlated with insertion torque and Periotest (obtained intraoperatively and 12 weeks later) to assess their prognostic value for primary implant stability. Voxel grey values and insertion torque showed a low correlation (r = 0.329, p = 1.055×10−7 ). Likewise, a low correlation was found between HU measured preoperatively and insertion torque as well as intraoperative Periotest values (r = 0.297, p = 4×10−6 and r = − 0.234, p = 4.35×10−4, respectively). A moderate correlation could, however, be assessed between insertion torque and intraoperative as well as Periotest values 12 weeks later. (r = −0.555, p = 1.022×10−20 and −0.465. p = 1.150×10−13). On contrast, a high correlation was observed between the voxel grey values of CBCT and related HU (r = 0.710, p = 6.486×10−37 ) so that a conversion from grey values into HU could be suggested. According to regression analysis, an intraoperative negative Periotest value could be expected at an insertion torque of 40 N/cm upwards. CBCT-based bone density parameters correlate with each other and allow conversion of grey scales into HU preoperatively. Both insertion torque and Periotest showed a significant correlation which enables regression analysis to predict implant stability for related insertion torque. On contrast, for HU the distribution curves do not allow a reliable assignment into certain Periotest values.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Cone beam CT</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insertion torque</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxilla - physiology</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Resonance frequency analysis</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS1ERF78AAvkJZtuyna7xy2xQSNeUqRskrXlR7Xiobs92J6QfAp_i5sZWCJZsuW691aVDiFvGLQMWP9-1-7cnFsObGiBtQD8BblgaqOajrHhZX0Dg0Yyxc_JZc47AOhBDa_IuYBeiZ6zC_JrG1PCyZQQFxpH6uKC1KKZ6fau8ZjCI3pq10-PSw7lme5NMjMWTJn-DOWB7lOYTXqmYd5PZik0F2PDtCpNzlhP9VcXmu80LBnTn04lph8HpGbxtZJCLJhLLdPygHQ2T2GazDU5G82U8fXpviL3nz_dbb82N7dfvm0_3jROyL401nZqdN4LHGQPo3RSqW5kgxyEH9EjehC8kzgoL7jrhB05grCeG2mNZRtxRd4dc_cp1ply0XPIDusEC8ZD1pxthk7ARooq5UepSzHnhKM-La8Z6BWJ3ukViV6RaGC6Iqmmt6f8g53R_7P8ZVAFH44CrFs-Bkw6u4CLQx8SuqJ9DP_L_w10vKGA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Hakim, Samer G.</creator><creator>Glanz, Julia</creator><creator>Ofer, Markus</creator><creator>Steller, Daniel</creator><creator>Sieg, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla</title><author>Hakim, Samer G. ; Glanz, Julia ; Ofer, Markus ; Steller, Daniel ; Sieg, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-bb48fcdd3e9560f5c5884f19593dfedeed03245e98d32c43bf2e03bd2a5bab173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Cone beam CT</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insertion torque</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxilla - physiology</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Resonance frequency analysis</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Samer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanz, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ofer, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hakim, Samer G.</au><au>Glanz, Julia</au><au>Ofer, Markus</au><au>Steller, Daniel</au><au>Sieg, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>461-467</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Primary implant stability is crucial to osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess correlation of preoperative radiologic parameters with intraoperatively obtained biomechanical tests in the maxilla. A total of 259 implants were inserted in the maxilla of 99 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived Hounsfield units (HU), voxel grey values and computed tomography mental index (CTMI) performed preoperatively were correlated with insertion torque and Periotest (obtained intraoperatively and 12 weeks later) to assess their prognostic value for primary implant stability. Voxel grey values and insertion torque showed a low correlation (r = 0.329, p = 1.055×10−7 ). Likewise, a low correlation was found between HU measured preoperatively and insertion torque as well as intraoperative Periotest values (r = 0.297, p = 4×10−6 and r = − 0.234, p = 4.35×10−4, respectively). A moderate correlation could, however, be assessed between insertion torque and intraoperative as well as Periotest values 12 weeks later. (r = −0.555, p = 1.022×10−20 and −0.465. p = 1.150×10−13). On contrast, a high correlation was observed between the voxel grey values of CBCT and related HU (r = 0.710, p = 6.486×10−37 ) so that a conversion from grey values into HU could be suggested. According to regression analysis, an intraoperative negative Periotest value could be expected at an insertion torque of 40 N/cm upwards. CBCT-based bone density parameters correlate with each other and allow conversion of grey scales into HU preoperatively. Both insertion torque and Periotest showed a significant correlation which enables regression analysis to predict implant stability for related insertion torque. On contrast, for HU the distribution curves do not allow a reliable assignment into certain Periotest values.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30683621</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2019-03, Vol.47 (3), p.461-467
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179430753
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Bone Density
Bone mineral density
Cone beam CT
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Prosthesis Retention
Humans
Insertion torque
Mandible - diagnostic imaging
Maxilla
Maxilla - diagnostic imaging
Maxilla - physiology
Maxilla - surgery
Middle Aged
Osseointegration
Resonance frequency analysis
Torque
title Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A51%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20cone%20beam%20CT-derived%20bone%20density%20parameters%20with%20primary%20implant%20stability%20assessed%20by%20peak%20insertion%20torque%20and%20periotest%20in%20the%20maxilla&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Hakim,%20Samer%20G.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=461-467&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179430753%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179430753&rft_id=info:pmid/30683621&rft_els_id=S1010518218306437&rfr_iscdi=true