The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod
Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator‐mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of animal ecology 2019-04, Vol.88 (4), p.612-623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 612 |
container_title | The Journal of animal ecology |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Lürig, Moritz D. Best, Rebecca J. Svitok, Marek Jokela, Jukka Matthews, Blake |
description | Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator‐mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is useful for understanding the evolution of crypsis.
Previous work suggests that cryptic pigmentation of freshwater isopods (Asellus aquaticus) has evolved in response to predation pressure by fish in habitats with varying macrophyte cover and coloration. However, macrophytes can potentially influence the distribution of pigmentation by altering not only habitat‐specific predation susceptibility, but also dietary resources and abiotic conditions. The goals of this study were to experimentally test how two putative agents of selection, namely macrophytes and fish, affect the pigmentation of A. aquaticus, and to assess whether pigmentation is plastic, using a diet manipulation in a common garden.
We performed two experiments: (a) in an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we investigated how different densities of predatory fish (0/30/60 three‐spined stickleback [Gasterosteus aculeatus] per mesocosm) and macrophytes (presence/absence) affected the abundance, pigmentation and body size structure of isopod populations. (b) In a subsequent laboratory experiment, we reared isopods in a common garden experiment on two different food sources (high/low protein content) to test whether variation in pigmentation of isopods can be explained by diet‐based developmental plasticity.
We found that fish presence strongly reduced isopod densities, particularly in the absence of macrophytes, but had no effect on pigmentation or size structure of the populations. However, we found that isopods showed consistently higher pigmentation in the presence of macrophytes, regardless of fish presence or absence. Our laboratory experiment, in which we manipulated the protein content of the isopods’ diet, revealed strong plasticity of pigmentation and weak plasticity of growth rate.
The combined results of both experiments suggest that pigmentation of A. aquaticus is a developmentally plastic trait and that multiple environmental factors (e.g. macrophytes, diet and predation) might jointly influence the evolution of cryptic pigmentation of A. aquaticus in nature on relatively short time‐scales.
This paper combines laboratory and outdoor experiments, as well as data from previous fieldwork to uncover p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2656.12950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179405832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48579999</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48579999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4350-a9acc6eaed1e599b362b5fd60a10fd70bf176fbd0dfc7cbb6a94275ec5957b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PHDEUxK0IFC4kNVWildKkWXi21_a5RIh8IJQ0JK3l9T6DT3vrxd4F3X8fHwdX0DCNpTe_GVlDyAmFU1p0RrkUNZNCnlKmBbwji_3lgCwAGK2XSsMR-ZDzCgAUA_6eHHGQRVwvyL-bO6xS7LGKvhp7m6fgwrSpwlBNxcGH2M9TiMPWdmkzFrsaw-0ah8k-3QtoK58w3z3aCVMVchxj95Ecettn_PT8HpO_3y9vLn7W139-_Lo4v65dwwXUVlvnJFrsKAqtWy5ZK3wnwVLwnYLWUyV920HnnXJtK61umBLohBaq5Yofk2-73jHF-xnzZNYhO-x7O2Ccs2FU6QbEkrOCfn2FruKchvI7wxg0gjZSiEKd7SiXYs4JvRlTWNu0MRTMdnKzHdhsBzZPk5fEl-feuV1jt-dfNi6A3AGPocfNW33m6vz35Uvz511wlaeY9sFmKZQu4v8BlTiVTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2204514655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lürig, Moritz D. ; Best, Rebecca J. ; Svitok, Marek ; Jokela, Jukka ; Matthews, Blake</creator><contributor>Plaistow, Stewart</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lürig, Moritz D. ; Best, Rebecca J. ; Svitok, Marek ; Jokela, Jukka ; Matthews, Blake ; Plaistow, Stewart</creatorcontrib><description>Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator‐mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is useful for understanding the evolution of crypsis.
Previous work suggests that cryptic pigmentation of freshwater isopods (Asellus aquaticus) has evolved in response to predation pressure by fish in habitats with varying macrophyte cover and coloration. However, macrophytes can potentially influence the distribution of pigmentation by altering not only habitat‐specific predation susceptibility, but also dietary resources and abiotic conditions. The goals of this study were to experimentally test how two putative agents of selection, namely macrophytes and fish, affect the pigmentation of A. aquaticus, and to assess whether pigmentation is plastic, using a diet manipulation in a common garden.
We performed two experiments: (a) in an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we investigated how different densities of predatory fish (0/30/60 three‐spined stickleback [Gasterosteus aculeatus] per mesocosm) and macrophytes (presence/absence) affected the abundance, pigmentation and body size structure of isopod populations. (b) In a subsequent laboratory experiment, we reared isopods in a common garden experiment on two different food sources (high/low protein content) to test whether variation in pigmentation of isopods can be explained by diet‐based developmental plasticity.
We found that fish presence strongly reduced isopod densities, particularly in the absence of macrophytes, but had no effect on pigmentation or size structure of the populations. However, we found that isopods showed consistently higher pigmentation in the presence of macrophytes, regardless of fish presence or absence. Our laboratory experiment, in which we manipulated the protein content of the isopods’ diet, revealed strong plasticity of pigmentation and weak plasticity of growth rate.
The combined results of both experiments suggest that pigmentation of A. aquaticus is a developmentally plastic trait and that multiple environmental factors (e.g. macrophytes, diet and predation) might jointly influence the evolution of cryptic pigmentation of A. aquaticus in nature on relatively short time‐scales.
This paper combines laboratory and outdoor experiments, as well as data from previous fieldwork to uncover phenotypic variation from the individual to the population level. The authors show that differences in plant cover, as well as diet quality, can lead to substantial variation in pigmentation of Asellus aquaticus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30666639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic plants ; Asellus aquaticus ; Body size ; Coloration ; computer vision ; Crypsis ; Developmental plasticity ; Diet ; divergent selection ; Ecosystem ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; Evolution ; Experiments ; Fish ; Food sources ; Fresh Water ; Gardens & gardening ; Growth rate ; Isopoda ; Laboratories ; Macrophytes ; Nutrient content ; phenotypic divergence ; phenotypic plasticity ; Pigmentation ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; Plastics ; Populations ; Predation ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior ; Prey ; Proteins ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; shallow lakes</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2019-04, Vol.88 (4), p.612-623</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4350-a9acc6eaed1e599b362b5fd60a10fd70bf176fbd0dfc7cbb6a94275ec5957b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4350-a9acc6eaed1e599b362b5fd60a10fd70bf176fbd0dfc7cbb6a94275ec5957b373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2103-064X ; 0000-0002-1731-727X ; 0000-0003-2710-8102 ; 0000-0002-8175-6234 ; 0000-0001-9089-704X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2656.12950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2656.12950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,1430,27907,27908,45557,45558,46392,46816</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Plaistow, Stewart</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lürig, Moritz D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svitok, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jokela, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Blake</creatorcontrib><title>The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator‐mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is useful for understanding the evolution of crypsis.
Previous work suggests that cryptic pigmentation of freshwater isopods (Asellus aquaticus) has evolved in response to predation pressure by fish in habitats with varying macrophyte cover and coloration. However, macrophytes can potentially influence the distribution of pigmentation by altering not only habitat‐specific predation susceptibility, but also dietary resources and abiotic conditions. The goals of this study were to experimentally test how two putative agents of selection, namely macrophytes and fish, affect the pigmentation of A. aquaticus, and to assess whether pigmentation is plastic, using a diet manipulation in a common garden.
We performed two experiments: (a) in an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we investigated how different densities of predatory fish (0/30/60 three‐spined stickleback [Gasterosteus aculeatus] per mesocosm) and macrophytes (presence/absence) affected the abundance, pigmentation and body size structure of isopod populations. (b) In a subsequent laboratory experiment, we reared isopods in a common garden experiment on two different food sources (high/low protein content) to test whether variation in pigmentation of isopods can be explained by diet‐based developmental plasticity.
We found that fish presence strongly reduced isopod densities, particularly in the absence of macrophytes, but had no effect on pigmentation or size structure of the populations. However, we found that isopods showed consistently higher pigmentation in the presence of macrophytes, regardless of fish presence or absence. Our laboratory experiment, in which we manipulated the protein content of the isopods’ diet, revealed strong plasticity of pigmentation and weak plasticity of growth rate.
The combined results of both experiments suggest that pigmentation of A. aquaticus is a developmentally plastic trait and that multiple environmental factors (e.g. macrophytes, diet and predation) might jointly influence the evolution of cryptic pigmentation of A. aquaticus in nature on relatively short time‐scales.
This paper combines laboratory and outdoor experiments, as well as data from previous fieldwork to uncover phenotypic variation from the individual to the population level. The authors show that differences in plant cover, as well as diet quality, can lead to substantial variation in pigmentation of Asellus aquaticus.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Asellus aquaticus</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Coloration</subject><subject>computer vision</subject><subject>Crypsis</subject><subject>Developmental plasticity</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>divergent selection</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Gardens & gardening</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Isopoda</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>phenotypic divergence</subject><subject>phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Pigmentation</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>shallow lakes</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PHDEUxK0IFC4kNVWildKkWXi21_a5RIh8IJQ0JK3l9T6DT3vrxd4F3X8fHwdX0DCNpTe_GVlDyAmFU1p0RrkUNZNCnlKmBbwji_3lgCwAGK2XSsMR-ZDzCgAUA_6eHHGQRVwvyL-bO6xS7LGKvhp7m6fgwrSpwlBNxcGH2M9TiMPWdmkzFrsaw-0ah8k-3QtoK58w3z3aCVMVchxj95Ecettn_PT8HpO_3y9vLn7W139-_Lo4v65dwwXUVlvnJFrsKAqtWy5ZK3wnwVLwnYLWUyV920HnnXJtK61umBLohBaq5Yofk2-73jHF-xnzZNYhO-x7O2Ccs2FU6QbEkrOCfn2FruKchvI7wxg0gjZSiEKd7SiXYs4JvRlTWNu0MRTMdnKzHdhsBzZPk5fEl-feuV1jt-dfNi6A3AGPocfNW33m6vz35Uvz511wlaeY9sFmKZQu4v8BlTiVTw</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lürig, Moritz D.</creator><creator>Best, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Svitok, Marek</creator><creator>Jokela, Jukka</creator><creator>Matthews, Blake</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-064X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-727X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-8102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-6234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-704X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod</title><author>Lürig, Moritz D. ; Best, Rebecca J. ; Svitok, Marek ; Jokela, Jukka ; Matthews, Blake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4350-a9acc6eaed1e599b362b5fd60a10fd70bf176fbd0dfc7cbb6a94275ec5957b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Asellus aquaticus</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Coloration</topic><topic>computer vision</topic><topic>Crypsis</topic><topic>Developmental plasticity</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>divergent selection</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Gardens & gardening</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Isopoda</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>phenotypic divergence</topic><topic>phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Pigmentation</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>shallow lakes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lürig, Moritz D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svitok, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jokela, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Blake</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lürig, Moritz D.</au><au>Best, Rebecca J.</au><au>Svitok, Marek</au><au>Jokela, Jukka</au><au>Matthews, Blake</au><au>Plaistow, Stewart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>612</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>612-623</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><abstract>Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator‐mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is useful for understanding the evolution of crypsis.
Previous work suggests that cryptic pigmentation of freshwater isopods (Asellus aquaticus) has evolved in response to predation pressure by fish in habitats with varying macrophyte cover and coloration. However, macrophytes can potentially influence the distribution of pigmentation by altering not only habitat‐specific predation susceptibility, but also dietary resources and abiotic conditions. The goals of this study were to experimentally test how two putative agents of selection, namely macrophytes and fish, affect the pigmentation of A. aquaticus, and to assess whether pigmentation is plastic, using a diet manipulation in a common garden.
We performed two experiments: (a) in an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we investigated how different densities of predatory fish (0/30/60 three‐spined stickleback [Gasterosteus aculeatus] per mesocosm) and macrophytes (presence/absence) affected the abundance, pigmentation and body size structure of isopod populations. (b) In a subsequent laboratory experiment, we reared isopods in a common garden experiment on two different food sources (high/low protein content) to test whether variation in pigmentation of isopods can be explained by diet‐based developmental plasticity.
We found that fish presence strongly reduced isopod densities, particularly in the absence of macrophytes, but had no effect on pigmentation or size structure of the populations. However, we found that isopods showed consistently higher pigmentation in the presence of macrophytes, regardless of fish presence or absence. Our laboratory experiment, in which we manipulated the protein content of the isopods’ diet, revealed strong plasticity of pigmentation and weak plasticity of growth rate.
The combined results of both experiments suggest that pigmentation of A. aquaticus is a developmentally plastic trait and that multiple environmental factors (e.g. macrophytes, diet and predation) might jointly influence the evolution of cryptic pigmentation of A. aquaticus in nature on relatively short time‐scales.
This paper combines laboratory and outdoor experiments, as well as data from previous fieldwork to uncover phenotypic variation from the individual to the population level. The authors show that differences in plant cover, as well as diet quality, can lead to substantial variation in pigmentation of Asellus aquaticus.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>30666639</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.12950</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-064X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-727X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-8102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-6234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-704X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8790 |
ispartof | The Journal of animal ecology, 2019-04, Vol.88 (4), p.612-623 |
issn | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179405832 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Aquatic plants Asellus aquaticus Body size Coloration computer vision Crypsis Developmental plasticity Diet divergent selection Ecosystem Environmental conditions Environmental factors Evolution Experiments Fish Food sources Fresh Water Gardens & gardening Growth rate Isopoda Laboratories Macrophytes Nutrient content phenotypic divergence phenotypic plasticity Pigmentation Plastic properties Plasticity Plastics Populations Predation Predators Predatory Behavior Prey Proteins RESEARCH ARTICLE shallow lakes |
title | The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T05%3A48%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20plasticity%20in%20the%20evolution%20of%20cryptic%20pigmentation%20in%20a%20freshwater%20isopod&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=L%C3%BCrig,%20Moritz%20D.&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=612&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=612-623&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12950&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48579999%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2204514655&rft_id=info:pmid/30666639&rft_jstor_id=48579999&rfr_iscdi=true |