Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol
A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lesso...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Value in health 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.23-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Value in health |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Stolk, Elly Ludwig, Kristina Rand, Kim van Hout, Ben Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel |
description | A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled.
•In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179383816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301518361643</els_id><sourcerecordid>2179383816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wBzggS1x6aFJ_r4O4VKWFSisVJFqOlj9mRUI2XuxkUa_8cpzdwgFVnMYePe9IMw9CryipKaHqrKu7re1rRqiuiawJJU_QIZVMVGLB-dPyJo2uOKHyAB3l3BFCFGfyOTrgRCmqODlEv262kLYt_DzFt5tgRzjFdgh4CTnHIZdq0wABX6W4xuM3wNfDCGmwYxsH2-PLz5V8X8klvrP9tGvirzF9f4vvIOX5x3Bc7XKPkJ9SHKOP_Qv0bGX7DC8f6jG6vbr8cvGxWt58uL44X1ZeNGKsQDPwrqFOUy_1wkm_kJQ4kForEEpKyZ3jnIsQhBRKB86EJdYxpbxblW2P0cl-7ibFHxPk0azb7KHv7QBxyobRRcM11zv0zT9oF6eydj9TWpZDNoQWiu0pn2LOCVZmk9q1TfeGEjMbMp2ZDZnZkCHSFEMl9Pph9OTWEP5G_igpwLs9AOUWxUwy2bcweAhtAj-aENv_zf8N6xue4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185000901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Stolk, Elly ; Ludwig, Kristina ; Rand, Kim ; van Hout, Ben ; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Stolk, Elly ; Ludwig, Kristina ; Rand, Kim ; van Hout, Ben ; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled.
•In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30661630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cooperative Behavior ; discrete choice experiment ; EQ-5D-5L ; Health ; Health Status Indicators ; health valuation ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Protocol ; Quality of Life ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; time trade-off ; utilities ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.23-30</ispartof><rights>2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30980,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30661630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stolk, Elly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rand, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled.
•In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.</description><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>EQ-5D-5L</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>health valuation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>time trade-off</subject><subject>utilities</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wBzggS1x6aFJ_r4O4VKWFSisVJFqOlj9mRUI2XuxkUa_8cpzdwgFVnMYePe9IMw9CryipKaHqrKu7re1rRqiuiawJJU_QIZVMVGLB-dPyJo2uOKHyAB3l3BFCFGfyOTrgRCmqODlEv262kLYt_DzFt5tgRzjFdgh4CTnHIZdq0wABX6W4xuM3wNfDCGmwYxsH2-PLz5V8X8klvrP9tGvirzF9f4vvIOX5x3Bc7XKPkJ9SHKOP_Qv0bGX7DC8f6jG6vbr8cvGxWt58uL44X1ZeNGKsQDPwrqFOUy_1wkm_kJQ4kForEEpKyZ3jnIsQhBRKB86EJdYxpbxblW2P0cl-7ibFHxPk0azb7KHv7QBxyobRRcM11zv0zT9oF6eydj9TWpZDNoQWiu0pn2LOCVZmk9q1TfeGEjMbMp2ZDZnZkCHSFEMl9Pph9OTWEP5G_igpwLs9AOUWxUwy2bcweAhtAj-aENv_zf8N6xue4Q</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Stolk, Elly</creator><creator>Ludwig, Kristina</creator><creator>Rand, Kim</creator><creator>van Hout, Ben</creator><creator>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</title><author>Stolk, Elly ; Ludwig, Kristina ; Rand, Kim ; van Hout, Ben ; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>EQ-5D-5L</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>health valuation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>time trade-off</topic><topic>utilities</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stolk, Elly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rand, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stolk, Elly</au><au>Ludwig, Kristina</au><au>Rand, Kim</au><au>van Hout, Ben</au><au>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled.
•In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30661630</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3015 |
ispartof | Value in health, 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.23-30 |
issn | 1098-3015 1524-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179383816 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Cooperative Behavior discrete choice experiment EQ-5D-5L Health Health Status Indicators health valuation Humans International Cooperation Predictive Value of Tests Protocol Quality of Life Quality-Adjusted Life Years Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Studies Surveys and Questionnaires time trade-off utilities Valuation |
title | Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview,%20Update,%20and%20Lessons%20Learned%20From%20the%20International%20EQ-5D-5L%20Valuation%20Work:%20Version%202%20of%20the%20EQ-5D-5L%20Valuation%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Stolk,%20Elly&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179383816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185000901&rft_id=info:pmid/30661630&rft_els_id=S1098301518361643&rfr_iscdi=true |