Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol

A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lesso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: Stolk, Elly, Ludwig, Kristina, Rand, Kim, van Hout, Ben, Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Value in health
container_volume 22
creator Stolk, Elly
Ludwig, Kristina
Rand, Kim
van Hout, Ben
Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel
description A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled. •In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179383816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301518361643</els_id><sourcerecordid>2179383816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wBzggS1x6aFJ_r4O4VKWFSisVJFqOlj9mRUI2XuxkUa_8cpzdwgFVnMYePe9IMw9CryipKaHqrKu7re1rRqiuiawJJU_QIZVMVGLB-dPyJo2uOKHyAB3l3BFCFGfyOTrgRCmqODlEv262kLYt_DzFt5tgRzjFdgh4CTnHIZdq0wABX6W4xuM3wNfDCGmwYxsH2-PLz5V8X8klvrP9tGvirzF9f4vvIOX5x3Bc7XKPkJ9SHKOP_Qv0bGX7DC8f6jG6vbr8cvGxWt58uL44X1ZeNGKsQDPwrqFOUy_1wkm_kJQ4kForEEpKyZ3jnIsQhBRKB86EJdYxpbxblW2P0cl-7ibFHxPk0azb7KHv7QBxyobRRcM11zv0zT9oF6eydj9TWpZDNoQWiu0pn2LOCVZmk9q1TfeGEjMbMp2ZDZnZkCHSFEMl9Pph9OTWEP5G_igpwLs9AOUWxUwy2bcweAhtAj-aENv_zf8N6xue4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185000901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Stolk, Elly ; Ludwig, Kristina ; Rand, Kim ; van Hout, Ben ; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Stolk, Elly ; Ludwig, Kristina ; Rand, Kim ; van Hout, Ben ; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled. •In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30661630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cooperative Behavior ; discrete choice experiment ; EQ-5D-5L ; Health ; Health Status Indicators ; health valuation ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Protocol ; Quality of Life ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; time trade-off ; utilities ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.23-30</ispartof><rights>2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30980,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30661630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stolk, Elly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rand, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled. •In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.</description><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>EQ-5D-5L</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>health valuation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>time trade-off</subject><subject>utilities</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wBzggS1x6aFJ_r4O4VKWFSisVJFqOlj9mRUI2XuxkUa_8cpzdwgFVnMYePe9IMw9CryipKaHqrKu7re1rRqiuiawJJU_QIZVMVGLB-dPyJo2uOKHyAB3l3BFCFGfyOTrgRCmqODlEv262kLYt_DzFt5tgRzjFdgh4CTnHIZdq0wABX6W4xuM3wNfDCGmwYxsH2-PLz5V8X8klvrP9tGvirzF9f4vvIOX5x3Bc7XKPkJ9SHKOP_Qv0bGX7DC8f6jG6vbr8cvGxWt58uL44X1ZeNGKsQDPwrqFOUy_1wkm_kJQ4kForEEpKyZ3jnIsQhBRKB86EJdYxpbxblW2P0cl-7ibFHxPk0azb7KHv7QBxyobRRcM11zv0zT9oF6eydj9TWpZDNoQWiu0pn2LOCVZmk9q1TfeGEjMbMp2ZDZnZkCHSFEMl9Pph9OTWEP5G_igpwLs9AOUWxUwy2bcweAhtAj-aENv_zf8N6xue4Q</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Stolk, Elly</creator><creator>Ludwig, Kristina</creator><creator>Rand, Kim</creator><creator>van Hout, Ben</creator><creator>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</title><author>Stolk, Elly ; Ludwig, Kristina ; Rand, Kim ; van Hout, Ben ; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-e82ecb91b81c587b5c7510be5886e465553bb3334dd45468d324a0ab266cbf163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>EQ-5D-5L</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>health valuation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>time trade-off</topic><topic>utilities</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stolk, Elly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rand, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stolk, Elly</au><au>Ludwig, Kristina</au><au>Rand, Kim</au><au>van Hout, Ben</au><au>Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>A standardized 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuation protocol was first used in national studies in the period 2012 to 2013. A set of problems encountered in this initial wave of valuation studies led to the subsequent refinement of the valuation protocol. To clarify lessons learned and how the protocol was updated when moving from version 1.0 to the current version 2.1 and 2.0, this article will (1) present the challenges faced in EQ-5D-5L valuation since 2012 and how these were resolved and (2) describe in depth a set of new challenges that have become central in currently ongoing research on how EQ-5D-5L health states should be valued and modeled. •In 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies, we have obtained important new insights concerning how respondent behavior and features of the task work together to define the level of precision of composite time trade-off responses.•This motivated the introduction of a quality control process and of new modeling approaches.•The rigorous approach to 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire valuation studies inspires trust in the validity of value sets.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30661630</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.23-30
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179383816
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Cooperative Behavior
discrete choice experiment
EQ-5D-5L
Health
Health Status Indicators
health valuation
Humans
International Cooperation
Predictive Value of Tests
Protocol
Quality of Life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
time trade-off
utilities
Valuation
title Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview,%20Update,%20and%20Lessons%20Learned%20From%20the%20International%20EQ-5D-5L%20Valuation%20Work:%20Version%202%20of%20the%20EQ-5D-5L%20Valuation%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Stolk,%20Elly&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179383816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185000901&rft_id=info:pmid/30661630&rft_els_id=S1098301518361643&rfr_iscdi=true