CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD
Purpose It is uncertain whether patients with elevated troponin and non-classical presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should receive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A proportion of these patients will have no coronary artery disease (CAD) and would benefit from non-invasive investigations...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emergency radiology 2019-06, Vol.26 (3), p.269-275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Emergency radiology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Nugent, James P. Wang, Jun Louis, Luck J. O’Connell, Tim W. Khosa, Faisal Wong, Graham C. Saw, Jacqueline W. L. Nicolaou, Savvas McLaughlin, Patrick D. |
description | Purpose
It is uncertain whether patients with elevated troponin and non-classical presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should receive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A proportion of these patients will have no coronary artery disease (CAD) and would benefit from non-invasive investigations and expedited discharge. Objectives were to determine most common diagnoses and rate of ACS among patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion of ACS who received CCTA.
Methods
IRB approved retrospective analysis of 491 consecutive patients in a level I trauma center ED referred for CCTA between April 4, 2015 to April 2, 2017. Patients were included if there was an elevated troponin (TnI > 0.045 μg/L) and atypical chest pain within 24 h prior to imaging. One hundred one patients met inclusion criteria; 17 excluded due to technical factors or history. Scans performed on dual-source CT.
Results
Eighty-four patients (47 men, 37 women) with median TnI of 0.11 ± 0.21 μg/L underwent CCTA 8.20 ± 6.41 h after first elevated Tn. Mean age was 53.2 ± 14.6 years. CCTA demonstrated absence of CAD in 39 patients (46.4%; 20 M, 19 F). CAD 50% stenosis was observed in 11 (13.1%; 9 M, 2 F), and non-diagnostic in three (3.6%, 3 M, 0 F). Forty-six (56.8%) were discharged directly from ED with median stay 15.82 ± 6.41 h.
Conclusions
Use of CCTA in ED patients with elevated troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS allowed obstructive CAD to be excluded in 83%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10140-019-01668-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179341614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179341614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a70db47415eb89a461c724c6e05526fbf6679c3cbe08d2152d64621f68feb723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi3Uio-FP9BDZamXXlLGsWMnva1SKJWQegDOluM41Chrp_6Acuw_x8vSVuLQg-WR5plnLL8IvSPwiQCI00iAMKiAdOVw3lZkDx0SRkvBaPOm1CCgogDsAB3FeAcAvOPtPjqgwCnpOnaIfvf99RpbhxeVrHEp4gebfuDFR5vsvcEp-MW70lduxLN_wHq2zmo145jjYrX1Dk8-4HV_9RkrnKOZ8oxHq26dj8lq7Je0ZZLH5pee82iwH2IKWT_r-_WXY_R2UnM0Jy_3Ct2cn133F9Xl96_f-vVlpaloUkWVgHFggpHGDG2nGCda1ExzA01T82mYOBedpnow0I41aeqRM16TibeTGURNV-jjzrsE_zObmOTGRm3mWTnjc5Q1ER1lhJe_W6EPr9A7n4MrrysUbzrOALbCekfp4GMMZpJLsBsVHiUBuQ1I7gKSJSD5HJAkZej9izoPGzP-HfmTSAHoDoil5W5N-Lf7P9on0wmbPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2165964002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nugent, James P. ; Wang, Jun ; Louis, Luck J. ; O’Connell, Tim W. ; Khosa, Faisal ; Wong, Graham C. ; Saw, Jacqueline W. L. ; Nicolaou, Savvas ; McLaughlin, Patrick D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nugent, James P. ; Wang, Jun ; Louis, Luck J. ; O’Connell, Tim W. ; Khosa, Faisal ; Wong, Graham C. ; Saw, Jacqueline W. L. ; Nicolaou, Savvas ; McLaughlin, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
It is uncertain whether patients with elevated troponin and non-classical presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should receive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A proportion of these patients will have no coronary artery disease (CAD) and would benefit from non-invasive investigations and expedited discharge. Objectives were to determine most common diagnoses and rate of ACS among patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion of ACS who received CCTA.
Methods
IRB approved retrospective analysis of 491 consecutive patients in a level I trauma center ED referred for CCTA between April 4, 2015 to April 2, 2017. Patients were included if there was an elevated troponin (TnI > 0.045 μg/L) and atypical chest pain within 24 h prior to imaging. One hundred one patients met inclusion criteria; 17 excluded due to technical factors or history. Scans performed on dual-source CT.
Results
Eighty-four patients (47 men, 37 women) with median TnI of 0.11 ± 0.21 μg/L underwent CCTA 8.20 ± 6.41 h after first elevated Tn. Mean age was 53.2 ± 14.6 years. CCTA demonstrated absence of CAD in 39 patients (46.4%; 20 M, 19 F). CAD < 25% stenosis was observed in 24 (28.6%; 9 M, 15 F). CAD with 25–50% stenosis was observed in seven (8.3%; six M, one F). CAD > 50% stenosis was observed in 11 (13.1%; 9 M, 2 F), and non-diagnostic in three (3.6%, 3 M, 0 F). Forty-six (56.8%) were discharged directly from ED with median stay 15.82 ± 6.41 h.
Conclusions
Use of CCTA in ED patients with elevated troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS allowed obstructive CAD to be excluded in 83%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-3004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-1435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01668-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30631994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Angiography ; Cardiovascular disease ; Coronary artery disease ; Coronary vessels ; Data collection ; Diagnostic systems ; Discharge ; Electrocardiography ; Emergency Medicine ; Imaging ; Ischemia ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Pain ; Patients ; Radiology ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Emergency radiology, 2019-06, Vol.26 (3), p.269-275</ispartof><rights>American Society of Emergency Radiology 2019</rights><rights>Emergency Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a70db47415eb89a461c724c6e05526fbf6679c3cbe08d2152d64621f68feb723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a70db47415eb89a461c724c6e05526fbf6679c3cbe08d2152d64621f68feb723</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9631-8600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10140-019-01668-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10140-019-01668-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nugent, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louis, Luck J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Tim W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosa, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Graham C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saw, Jacqueline W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaou, Savvas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><title>CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD</title><title>Emergency radiology</title><addtitle>Emerg Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Emerg Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
It is uncertain whether patients with elevated troponin and non-classical presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should receive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A proportion of these patients will have no coronary artery disease (CAD) and would benefit from non-invasive investigations and expedited discharge. Objectives were to determine most common diagnoses and rate of ACS among patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion of ACS who received CCTA.
Methods
IRB approved retrospective analysis of 491 consecutive patients in a level I trauma center ED referred for CCTA between April 4, 2015 to April 2, 2017. Patients were included if there was an elevated troponin (TnI > 0.045 μg/L) and atypical chest pain within 24 h prior to imaging. One hundred one patients met inclusion criteria; 17 excluded due to technical factors or history. Scans performed on dual-source CT.
Results
Eighty-four patients (47 men, 37 women) with median TnI of 0.11 ± 0.21 μg/L underwent CCTA 8.20 ± 6.41 h after first elevated Tn. Mean age was 53.2 ± 14.6 years. CCTA demonstrated absence of CAD in 39 patients (46.4%; 20 M, 19 F). CAD < 25% stenosis was observed in 24 (28.6%; 9 M, 15 F). CAD with 25–50% stenosis was observed in seven (8.3%; six M, one F). CAD > 50% stenosis was observed in 11 (13.1%; 9 M, 2 F), and non-diagnostic in three (3.6%, 3 M, 0 F). Forty-six (56.8%) were discharged directly from ED with median stay 15.82 ± 6.41 h.
Conclusions
Use of CCTA in ED patients with elevated troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS allowed obstructive CAD to be excluded in 83%.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>1070-3004</issn><issn>1438-1435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi3Uio-FP9BDZamXXlLGsWMnva1SKJWQegDOluM41Chrp_6Acuw_x8vSVuLQg-WR5plnLL8IvSPwiQCI00iAMKiAdOVw3lZkDx0SRkvBaPOm1CCgogDsAB3FeAcAvOPtPjqgwCnpOnaIfvf99RpbhxeVrHEp4gebfuDFR5vsvcEp-MW70lduxLN_wHq2zmo145jjYrX1Dk8-4HV_9RkrnKOZ8oxHq26dj8lq7Je0ZZLH5pee82iwH2IKWT_r-_WXY_R2UnM0Jy_3Ct2cn133F9Xl96_f-vVlpaloUkWVgHFggpHGDG2nGCda1ExzA01T82mYOBedpnow0I41aeqRM16TibeTGURNV-jjzrsE_zObmOTGRm3mWTnjc5Q1ER1lhJe_W6EPr9A7n4MrrysUbzrOALbCekfp4GMMZpJLsBsVHiUBuQ1I7gKSJSD5HJAkZej9izoPGzP-HfmTSAHoDoil5W5N-Lf7P9on0wmbPw</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Nugent, James P.</creator><creator>Wang, Jun</creator><creator>Louis, Luck J.</creator><creator>O’Connell, Tim W.</creator><creator>Khosa, Faisal</creator><creator>Wong, Graham C.</creator><creator>Saw, Jacqueline W. L.</creator><creator>Nicolaou, Savvas</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Patrick D.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-8600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD</title><author>Nugent, James P. ; Wang, Jun ; Louis, Luck J. ; O’Connell, Tim W. ; Khosa, Faisal ; Wong, Graham C. ; Saw, Jacqueline W. L. ; Nicolaou, Savvas ; McLaughlin, Patrick D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a70db47415eb89a461c724c6e05526fbf6679c3cbe08d2152d64621f68feb723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nugent, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louis, Luck J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Tim W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosa, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Graham C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saw, Jacqueline W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaou, Savvas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emergency radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nugent, James P.</au><au>Wang, Jun</au><au>Louis, Luck J.</au><au>O’Connell, Tim W.</au><au>Khosa, Faisal</au><au>Wong, Graham C.</au><au>Saw, Jacqueline W. L.</au><au>Nicolaou, Savvas</au><au>McLaughlin, Patrick D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD</atitle><jtitle>Emergency radiology</jtitle><stitle>Emerg Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Emerg Radiol</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>269-275</pages><issn>1070-3004</issn><eissn>1438-1435</eissn><abstract>Purpose
It is uncertain whether patients with elevated troponin and non-classical presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should receive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A proportion of these patients will have no coronary artery disease (CAD) and would benefit from non-invasive investigations and expedited discharge. Objectives were to determine most common diagnoses and rate of ACS among patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion of ACS who received CCTA.
Methods
IRB approved retrospective analysis of 491 consecutive patients in a level I trauma center ED referred for CCTA between April 4, 2015 to April 2, 2017. Patients were included if there was an elevated troponin (TnI > 0.045 μg/L) and atypical chest pain within 24 h prior to imaging. One hundred one patients met inclusion criteria; 17 excluded due to technical factors or history. Scans performed on dual-source CT.
Results
Eighty-four patients (47 men, 37 women) with median TnI of 0.11 ± 0.21 μg/L underwent CCTA 8.20 ± 6.41 h after first elevated Tn. Mean age was 53.2 ± 14.6 years. CCTA demonstrated absence of CAD in 39 patients (46.4%; 20 M, 19 F). CAD < 25% stenosis was observed in 24 (28.6%; 9 M, 15 F). CAD with 25–50% stenosis was observed in seven (8.3%; six M, one F). CAD > 50% stenosis was observed in 11 (13.1%; 9 M, 2 F), and non-diagnostic in three (3.6%, 3 M, 0 F). Forty-six (56.8%) were discharged directly from ED with median stay 15.82 ± 6.41 h.
Conclusions
Use of CCTA in ED patients with elevated troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS allowed obstructive CAD to be excluded in 83%.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30631994</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10140-019-01668-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-8600</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-3004 |
ispartof | Emergency radiology, 2019-06, Vol.26 (3), p.269-275 |
issn | 1070-3004 1438-1435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179341614 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acute coronary syndromes Angiography Cardiovascular disease Coronary artery disease Coronary vessels Data collection Diagnostic systems Discharge Electrocardiography Emergency Medicine Imaging Ischemia Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Pain Patients Radiology Tomography |
title | CCTA in patients with positive troponin and low clinical suspicion for ACS: a useful diagnostic option to exclude obstructive CAD |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A59%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CCTA%20in%20patients%20with%20positive%20troponin%20and%20low%20clinical%20suspicion%20for%20ACS:%20a%20useful%20diagnostic%20option%20to%20exclude%20obstructive%20CAD&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20radiology&rft.au=Nugent,%20James%20P.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=269-275&rft.issn=1070-3004&rft.eissn=1438-1435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10140-019-01668-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179341614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2165964002&rft_id=info:pmid/30631994&rfr_iscdi=true |