Difference in Core temperature in response to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia and sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia
Hypothermia following the induction of anesthesia is caused by core to peripheral redistribution of body heat. It has been reported that propofol causes more severe hypothermia than sevoflurane by inhibiting thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during surgical procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Korean journal of anesthesiology 2009-12, Vol.57 (6), p.704-708 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 708 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | Korean journal of anesthesiology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Im, Ui Jae Lee, Dong Jun Kim, Mun Cheol Lee, Jeong Seok Lee, Sang Jun |
description | Hypothermia following the induction of anesthesia is caused by core to peripheral redistribution of body heat. It has been reported that propofol causes more severe hypothermia than sevoflurane by inhibiting thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during surgical procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the induction and maintenance of anesthesia with intravenous propofol to determine if it causes more core hypothermia than inhaled sevoflurane.
Forty-five patients who underwent hysterectomy were divided into two groups randomly, a propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia group and a sevoflurane-remifentanil (SR) anesthesia group. Each group was subjected to anesthetic induction with either 1.5 mg/kg propofol or inhalation of 5% sevoflurane, respectively. Anesthesia in the former group was maintained with propofol while it was maintained with sevoflurane in the latter group. Specifically, 6-10 mg/kg/hr propofol, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2, and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used in the PR group for maintenance, while 1.5 vol% sevoflurane, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2 and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used for maintenance in the SR group. We measured the core temperature 8 times, prior to induction and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after induction.
Core temperatures decreased in both the PR and SR group during surgical operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Anesthesia induced and maintained by propofol did not cause a greater degree of hypothermia than sevoflurane. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4097/kjae.2009.57.6.704 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179322000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179322000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1494-c04db361bbbe3bfbc424ab6f4970074615ae63142d763fbe828918b8c361df723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ULtOxDAQtJAQdzruByhQSpoEv2LHJQpP6SQaqCM7WQsfSRzs5CT-HgNHyTazO5rdHQ1CFwQXHCt5_b7XUFCMVVHKQhQS8xO0TnOZy1KwFdrGuMepGMNY0DO0YglKVdI1Otw6ayHA2ELmxqz2AbIZhgmCnpfwwwWIkx9j4n02BT956_s8wOAsjLMeXZ_pEeL8BtHp1HZZhIO3_RIS_Z_uHJ1a3UfYHnGDXu_vXurHfPf88FTf7PKWcMXzFvPOMEGMMcCMNS2nXBthuZIYSy5IqUEwwmknBbMGKlopUpmqTTudlZRt0NXv3WT8Y0nfm8HFFvo-WfFLbCiRilH6nc0GXR6lixmga6bgBh0-m7-s2BcoWG2z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179322000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference in Core temperature in response to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia and sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><creator>Im, Ui Jae ; Lee, Dong Jun ; Kim, Mun Cheol ; Lee, Jeong Seok ; Lee, Sang Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Im, Ui Jae ; Lee, Dong Jun ; Kim, Mun Cheol ; Lee, Jeong Seok ; Lee, Sang Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Hypothermia following the induction of anesthesia is caused by core to peripheral redistribution of body heat. It has been reported that propofol causes more severe hypothermia than sevoflurane by inhibiting thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during surgical procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the induction and maintenance of anesthesia with intravenous propofol to determine if it causes more core hypothermia than inhaled sevoflurane.
Forty-five patients who underwent hysterectomy were divided into two groups randomly, a propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia group and a sevoflurane-remifentanil (SR) anesthesia group. Each group was subjected to anesthetic induction with either 1.5 mg/kg propofol or inhalation of 5% sevoflurane, respectively. Anesthesia in the former group was maintained with propofol while it was maintained with sevoflurane in the latter group. Specifically, 6-10 mg/kg/hr propofol, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2, and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used in the PR group for maintenance, while 1.5 vol% sevoflurane, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2 and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used for maintenance in the SR group. We measured the core temperature 8 times, prior to induction and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after induction.
Core temperatures decreased in both the PR and SR group during surgical operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Anesthesia induced and maintained by propofol did not cause a greater degree of hypothermia than sevoflurane.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2005-7563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2009.57.6.704</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30625952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South)</publisher><ispartof>Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2009-12, Vol.57 (6), p.704-708</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1494-c04db361bbbe3bfbc424ab6f4970074615ae63142d763fbe828918b8c361df723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30625952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Im, Ui Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Mun Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Difference in Core temperature in response to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia and sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia</title><title>Korean journal of anesthesiology</title><addtitle>Korean J Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Hypothermia following the induction of anesthesia is caused by core to peripheral redistribution of body heat. It has been reported that propofol causes more severe hypothermia than sevoflurane by inhibiting thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during surgical procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the induction and maintenance of anesthesia with intravenous propofol to determine if it causes more core hypothermia than inhaled sevoflurane.
Forty-five patients who underwent hysterectomy were divided into two groups randomly, a propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia group and a sevoflurane-remifentanil (SR) anesthesia group. Each group was subjected to anesthetic induction with either 1.5 mg/kg propofol or inhalation of 5% sevoflurane, respectively. Anesthesia in the former group was maintained with propofol while it was maintained with sevoflurane in the latter group. Specifically, 6-10 mg/kg/hr propofol, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2, and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used in the PR group for maintenance, while 1.5 vol% sevoflurane, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2 and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used for maintenance in the SR group. We measured the core temperature 8 times, prior to induction and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after induction.
Core temperatures decreased in both the PR and SR group during surgical operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Anesthesia induced and maintained by propofol did not cause a greater degree of hypothermia than sevoflurane.</description><issn>2005-7563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ULtOxDAQtJAQdzruByhQSpoEv2LHJQpP6SQaqCM7WQsfSRzs5CT-HgNHyTazO5rdHQ1CFwQXHCt5_b7XUFCMVVHKQhQS8xO0TnOZy1KwFdrGuMepGMNY0DO0YglKVdI1Otw6ayHA2ELmxqz2AbIZhgmCnpfwwwWIkx9j4n02BT956_s8wOAsjLMeXZ_pEeL8BtHp1HZZhIO3_RIS_Z_uHJ1a3UfYHnGDXu_vXurHfPf88FTf7PKWcMXzFvPOMEGMMcCMNS2nXBthuZIYSy5IqUEwwmknBbMGKlopUpmqTTudlZRt0NXv3WT8Y0nfm8HFFvo-WfFLbCiRilH6nc0GXR6lixmga6bgBh0-m7-s2BcoWG2z</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Im, Ui Jae</creator><creator>Lee, Dong Jun</creator><creator>Kim, Mun Cheol</creator><creator>Lee, Jeong Seok</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Jun</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Difference in Core temperature in response to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia and sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia</title><author>Im, Ui Jae ; Lee, Dong Jun ; Kim, Mun Cheol ; Lee, Jeong Seok ; Lee, Sang Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1494-c04db361bbbe3bfbc424ab6f4970074615ae63142d763fbe828918b8c361df723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Im, Ui Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Mun Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Korean journal of anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Im, Ui Jae</au><au>Lee, Dong Jun</au><au>Kim, Mun Cheol</au><au>Lee, Jeong Seok</au><au>Lee, Sang Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference in Core temperature in response to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia and sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Korean journal of anesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Korean J Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>704-708</pages><eissn>2005-7563</eissn><abstract>Hypothermia following the induction of anesthesia is caused by core to peripheral redistribution of body heat. It has been reported that propofol causes more severe hypothermia than sevoflurane by inhibiting thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during surgical procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the induction and maintenance of anesthesia with intravenous propofol to determine if it causes more core hypothermia than inhaled sevoflurane.
Forty-five patients who underwent hysterectomy were divided into two groups randomly, a propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia group and a sevoflurane-remifentanil (SR) anesthesia group. Each group was subjected to anesthetic induction with either 1.5 mg/kg propofol or inhalation of 5% sevoflurane, respectively. Anesthesia in the former group was maintained with propofol while it was maintained with sevoflurane in the latter group. Specifically, 6-10 mg/kg/hr propofol, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2, and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used in the PR group for maintenance, while 1.5 vol% sevoflurane, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2 and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used for maintenance in the SR group. We measured the core temperature 8 times, prior to induction and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after induction.
Core temperatures decreased in both the PR and SR group during surgical operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Anesthesia induced and maintained by propofol did not cause a greater degree of hypothermia than sevoflurane.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pmid>30625952</pmid><doi>10.4097/kjae.2009.57.6.704</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2005-7563 |
ispartof | Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2009-12, Vol.57 (6), p.704-708 |
issn | 2005-7563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179322000 |
source | KoreaMed Synapse; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; KoreaMed Open Access |
title | Difference in Core temperature in response to propofol-remifentanil anesthesia and sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A47%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20in%20Core%20temperature%20in%20response%20to%20propofol-remifentanil%20anesthesia%20and%20sevoflurane-remifentanil%20anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Korean%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Im,%20Ui%20Jae&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=704-708&rft.eissn=2005-7563&rft_id=info:doi/10.4097/kjae.2009.57.6.704&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2179322000%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179322000&rft_id=info:pmid/30625952&rfr_iscdi=true |