Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology
Abstract Background 3 classes of biologics are now available for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The availability of multiple treatment options has led to questions regarding the appropriateness of each agent for a given patient. We aimed to evaluate physician preferences for the use of speci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Inflammatory bowel diseases 2019-01, Vol.25 (2), p.328-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 328 |
container_title | Inflammatory bowel diseases |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Weizman, Adam V Nguyen, Geoffrey C Seow, Cynthia H Targownik, Laura Murthy, Sanjay K Boland, Karen Afzal, Nooran M Khanna, Reena Jones, Jennifer Afif, Waqqas Halder, Smita Reinglas, Jason Fowler, Sharyle Huang, Vivian Kaplan, Gilaad G Melmed, Gil Y |
description | Abstract
Background
3 classes of biologics are now available for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The availability of multiple treatment options has led to questions regarding the appropriateness of each agent for a given patient. We aimed to evaluate physician preferences for the use of specific biologic agents in a variety of Crohn's disease management scenarios using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.
Methods
A panel consisting of members of the CINERGI group (Canadian IBD Network for Research and Growth in Quality Improvement) was assembled. A literature review was performed on factors identified as influential upon choice of biologic therapy. Clinical scenarios were developed, and panelists rated the appropriateness of biologic therapy classes in each scenario individually and again during a face-to-face meeting after moderated discussion.
Results
Two hundred eighty-eight modifications of 3 clinical scenarios were rated. Factors that influenced biologic choice included perianal disease, antidrug antibody status, extraintestinal manifestations, consideration of potential pregnancy, and history of serious infection or malignancy. Anti-TNF therapy was considered appropriate in the postoperative patient. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were considered appropriate in patients without perianal disease over the age of 65 with a history of malignancy or serious infection. The use of anti-TNF therapy was considered inappropriate in some scenarios whereby drug level was adequate and no antidrug antibody (ADA) was detectable.
Conclusions
We evaluated the appropriateness of the 3 available classes of biologics in a number of scenarios for the treatment of Crohn's disease. History of serious infection and malignancy, particularly in individuals over 65 years, and consideration of future pregnancy were patient-specific variables that impacted treatment decisions. These findings can serve as a guide for providers considering biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.
10.1093/ibd/izy333_video1
izy333.video1
5850922807001 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ibd/izy333 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179220627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ibd/izy333</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2179220627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c5435d7eab07c1f334fb57dc3b3f1779944b34313cf075bbb55233f3ca5a76dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk4v_gGSiyhCXdqXNOuxdv6CTUHcuSRpukXapjbtYf71dnR68CDv8B68Dx--fBE698mtTyKYGplNzdcWAA7Q2GcQenRG6WF_Ez7zSBTNRujEuQ9Cgn6iYzQCAjRkQTRGZVzXja0bI1pdaeewzfGdsYVdG-WwqXC70XgpKrHWpa7a3Ttp7Ka6cnhunBZO45Uz1Rq_xS_z6SpZxPivcanbjc12yu0pOspF4fTZfk_Q6uH-PXnyFq-Pz0m88BQwaD3FKLCMayEJV34OQHPJeKZAQu5zHkWUSqDgg8oJZ1JKxgKAHJRggodZBhN0PXj7JJ-ddm1aGqd0UYhK286lgc-jICBhwHv0ZkBVY51rdJ720UvRbFOfpLt6077edKi3hy_23k6WOvtFf_rsgcsBsF39n-gbrmyDvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179220627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Weizman, Adam V ; Nguyen, Geoffrey C ; Seow, Cynthia H ; Targownik, Laura ; Murthy, Sanjay K ; Boland, Karen ; Afzal, Nooran M ; Khanna, Reena ; Jones, Jennifer ; Afif, Waqqas ; Halder, Smita ; Reinglas, Jason ; Fowler, Sharyle ; Huang, Vivian ; Kaplan, Gilaad G ; Melmed, Gil Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Weizman, Adam V ; Nguyen, Geoffrey C ; Seow, Cynthia H ; Targownik, Laura ; Murthy, Sanjay K ; Boland, Karen ; Afzal, Nooran M ; Khanna, Reena ; Jones, Jennifer ; Afif, Waqqas ; Halder, Smita ; Reinglas, Jason ; Fowler, Sharyle ; Huang, Vivian ; Kaplan, Gilaad G ; Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
3 classes of biologics are now available for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The availability of multiple treatment options has led to questions regarding the appropriateness of each agent for a given patient. We aimed to evaluate physician preferences for the use of specific biologic agents in a variety of Crohn's disease management scenarios using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.
Methods
A panel consisting of members of the CINERGI group (Canadian IBD Network for Research and Growth in Quality Improvement) was assembled. A literature review was performed on factors identified as influential upon choice of biologic therapy. Clinical scenarios were developed, and panelists rated the appropriateness of biologic therapy classes in each scenario individually and again during a face-to-face meeting after moderated discussion.
Results
Two hundred eighty-eight modifications of 3 clinical scenarios were rated. Factors that influenced biologic choice included perianal disease, antidrug antibody status, extraintestinal manifestations, consideration of potential pregnancy, and history of serious infection or malignancy. Anti-TNF therapy was considered appropriate in the postoperative patient. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were considered appropriate in patients without perianal disease over the age of 65 with a history of malignancy or serious infection. The use of anti-TNF therapy was considered inappropriate in some scenarios whereby drug level was adequate and no antidrug antibody (ADA) was detectable.
Conclusions
We evaluated the appropriateness of the 3 available classes of biologics in a number of scenarios for the treatment of Crohn's disease. History of serious infection and malignancy, particularly in individuals over 65 years, and consideration of future pregnancy were patient-specific variables that impacted treatment decisions. These findings can serve as a guide for providers considering biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.
10.1093/ibd/izy333_video1
izy333.video1
5850922807001</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy333</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30346529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological Products - therapeutic use ; Crohn Disease - drug therapy ; Disease Management ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Services Misuse - prevention & control ; Health Services Misuse - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards ; Prognosis ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2019-01, Vol.25 (2), p.328-335</ispartof><rights>2018 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c5435d7eab07c1f334fb57dc3b3f1779944b34313cf075bbb55233f3ca5a76dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c5435d7eab07c1f334fb57dc3b3f1779944b34313cf075bbb55233f3ca5a76dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346529$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weizman, Adam V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Geoffrey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seow, Cynthia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targownik, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sanjay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boland, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afzal, Nooran M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Reena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afif, Waqqas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, Smita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinglas, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Sharyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Gilaad G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><title>Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
3 classes of biologics are now available for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The availability of multiple treatment options has led to questions regarding the appropriateness of each agent for a given patient. We aimed to evaluate physician preferences for the use of specific biologic agents in a variety of Crohn's disease management scenarios using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.
Methods
A panel consisting of members of the CINERGI group (Canadian IBD Network for Research and Growth in Quality Improvement) was assembled. A literature review was performed on factors identified as influential upon choice of biologic therapy. Clinical scenarios were developed, and panelists rated the appropriateness of biologic therapy classes in each scenario individually and again during a face-to-face meeting after moderated discussion.
Results
Two hundred eighty-eight modifications of 3 clinical scenarios were rated. Factors that influenced biologic choice included perianal disease, antidrug antibody status, extraintestinal manifestations, consideration of potential pregnancy, and history of serious infection or malignancy. Anti-TNF therapy was considered appropriate in the postoperative patient. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were considered appropriate in patients without perianal disease over the age of 65 with a history of malignancy or serious infection. The use of anti-TNF therapy was considered inappropriate in some scenarios whereby drug level was adequate and no antidrug antibody (ADA) was detectable.
Conclusions
We evaluated the appropriateness of the 3 available classes of biologics in a number of scenarios for the treatment of Crohn's disease. History of serious infection and malignancy, particularly in individuals over 65 years, and consideration of future pregnancy were patient-specific variables that impacted treatment decisions. These findings can serve as a guide for providers considering biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.
10.1093/ibd/izy333_video1
izy333.video1
5850922807001</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological Products - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Services Misuse - prevention & control</subject><subject>Health Services Misuse - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk4v_gGSiyhCXdqXNOuxdv6CTUHcuSRpukXapjbtYf71dnR68CDv8B68Dx--fBE698mtTyKYGplNzdcWAA7Q2GcQenRG6WF_Ez7zSBTNRujEuQ9Cgn6iYzQCAjRkQTRGZVzXja0bI1pdaeewzfGdsYVdG-WwqXC70XgpKrHWpa7a3Ttp7Ka6cnhunBZO45Uz1Rq_xS_z6SpZxPivcanbjc12yu0pOspF4fTZfk_Q6uH-PXnyFq-Pz0m88BQwaD3FKLCMayEJV34OQHPJeKZAQu5zHkWUSqDgg8oJZ1JKxgKAHJRggodZBhN0PXj7JJ-ddm1aGqd0UYhK286lgc-jICBhwHv0ZkBVY51rdJ720UvRbFOfpLt6077edKi3hy_23k6WOvtFf_rsgcsBsF39n-gbrmyDvQ</recordid><startdate>20190110</startdate><enddate>20190110</enddate><creator>Weizman, Adam V</creator><creator>Nguyen, Geoffrey C</creator><creator>Seow, Cynthia H</creator><creator>Targownik, Laura</creator><creator>Murthy, Sanjay K</creator><creator>Boland, Karen</creator><creator>Afzal, Nooran M</creator><creator>Khanna, Reena</creator><creator>Jones, Jennifer</creator><creator>Afif, Waqqas</creator><creator>Halder, Smita</creator><creator>Reinglas, Jason</creator><creator>Fowler, Sharyle</creator><creator>Huang, Vivian</creator><creator>Kaplan, Gilaad G</creator><creator>Melmed, Gil Y</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190110</creationdate><title>Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology</title><author>Weizman, Adam V ; Nguyen, Geoffrey C ; Seow, Cynthia H ; Targownik, Laura ; Murthy, Sanjay K ; Boland, Karen ; Afzal, Nooran M ; Khanna, Reena ; Jones, Jennifer ; Afif, Waqqas ; Halder, Smita ; Reinglas, Jason ; Fowler, Sharyle ; Huang, Vivian ; Kaplan, Gilaad G ; Melmed, Gil Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-c5435d7eab07c1f334fb57dc3b3f1779944b34313cf075bbb55233f3ca5a76dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological Products - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Services Misuse - prevention & control</topic><topic>Health Services Misuse - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weizman, Adam V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Geoffrey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seow, Cynthia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targownik, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sanjay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boland, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afzal, Nooran M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Reena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afif, Waqqas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, Smita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinglas, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Sharyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Gilaad G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melmed, Gil Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weizman, Adam V</au><au>Nguyen, Geoffrey C</au><au>Seow, Cynthia H</au><au>Targownik, Laura</au><au>Murthy, Sanjay K</au><au>Boland, Karen</au><au>Afzal, Nooran M</au><au>Khanna, Reena</au><au>Jones, Jennifer</au><au>Afif, Waqqas</au><au>Halder, Smita</au><au>Reinglas, Jason</au><au>Fowler, Sharyle</au><au>Huang, Vivian</au><au>Kaplan, Gilaad G</au><au>Melmed, Gil Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2019-01-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>328-335</pages><issn>1078-0998</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
3 classes of biologics are now available for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The availability of multiple treatment options has led to questions regarding the appropriateness of each agent for a given patient. We aimed to evaluate physician preferences for the use of specific biologic agents in a variety of Crohn's disease management scenarios using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.
Methods
A panel consisting of members of the CINERGI group (Canadian IBD Network for Research and Growth in Quality Improvement) was assembled. A literature review was performed on factors identified as influential upon choice of biologic therapy. Clinical scenarios were developed, and panelists rated the appropriateness of biologic therapy classes in each scenario individually and again during a face-to-face meeting after moderated discussion.
Results
Two hundred eighty-eight modifications of 3 clinical scenarios were rated. Factors that influenced biologic choice included perianal disease, antidrug antibody status, extraintestinal manifestations, consideration of potential pregnancy, and history of serious infection or malignancy. Anti-TNF therapy was considered appropriate in the postoperative patient. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were considered appropriate in patients without perianal disease over the age of 65 with a history of malignancy or serious infection. The use of anti-TNF therapy was considered inappropriate in some scenarios whereby drug level was adequate and no antidrug antibody (ADA) was detectable.
Conclusions
We evaluated the appropriateness of the 3 available classes of biologics in a number of scenarios for the treatment of Crohn's disease. History of serious infection and malignancy, particularly in individuals over 65 years, and consideration of future pregnancy were patient-specific variables that impacted treatment decisions. These findings can serve as a guide for providers considering biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.
10.1093/ibd/izy333_video1
izy333.video1
5850922807001</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30346529</pmid><doi>10.1093/ibd/izy333</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0998 |
ispartof | Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2019-01, Vol.25 (2), p.328-335 |
issn | 1078-0998 1536-4844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179220627 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | Aged Biological Products - therapeutic use Crohn Disease - drug therapy Disease Management Female Follow-Up Studies Health Services Misuse - prevention & control Health Services Misuse - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards Prognosis Quality Assurance, Health Care Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T07%3A45%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriateness%20of%20Biologics%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Crohn's%20Disease%20Using%20RAND/UCLA%20Appropriateness%20Methodology&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Weizman,%20Adam%20V&rft.date=2019-01-10&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=328-335&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ibd/izy333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179220627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179220627&rft_id=info:pmid/30346529&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ibd/izy333&rfr_iscdi=true |