The High Price of Efficiency

In his 1776 work The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith showed that a clever division of labor could make a commercial enterprise vastly more productive than if each worker took personal charge of constructing a finished product. In 'On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation', David R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Harvard business review 2019-01
1. Verfasser: Martin, Roger L
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Harvard business review
container_volume
creator Martin, Roger L
description In his 1776 work The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith showed that a clever division of labor could make a commercial enterprise vastly more productive than if each worker took personal charge of constructing a finished product. In 'On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation', David Ricardo took the argument further with his theory of comparative advantage, asserting that because it is more efficient for Portuguese workers to make wine and English workers to make cloth, each group would be better off focusing on its area of advantage and trading with the other. The insights both reflected and drove the Industrial Revolution, which was as much about process innovations that reduced waste and increased productivity as it was about the application of new technologies. The notions that the way we organize work can influence productivity more than individual effort can and that specialization creates commercial advantage underlie the study of management to this day.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2171176804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2171176804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g150t-7f07b7255b21f0b7f2af20b1b35057af20c01a8d7def26333f808bc8632120273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjLFuwjAQQD1QqTT0DxgyskS6O-OcV4RoUwmpHdIZxcaXGAUCOBn6923VvuW96c3UHAC5sID0qJ5SOsEPJdu5WtZdyKvYdvnHPfqQD5LvRKKP4eK_FupBmj6F539n6vNlV2-rYv_--rbd7IsWDYwFC7BjMsYRCjgWaoTAodMGDP-2B2zskY9BqNRaiwXrvC01IQGxztTq73u9D7cppPFwjsmHvm8uYZjSgZARubSw1t_yvzdK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>2171176804</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>The High Price of Efficiency</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Martin, Roger L</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Roger L</creatorcontrib><description>In his 1776 work The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith showed that a clever division of labor could make a commercial enterprise vastly more productive than if each worker took personal charge of constructing a finished product. In 'On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation', David Ricardo took the argument further with his theory of comparative advantage, asserting that because it is more efficient for Portuguese workers to make wine and English workers to make cloth, each group would be better off focusing on its area of advantage and trading with the other. The insights both reflected and drove the Industrial Revolution, which was as much about process innovations that reduced waste and increased productivity as it was about the application of new technologies. The notions that the way we organize work can influence productivity more than individual effort can and that specialization creates commercial advantage underlie the study of management to this day.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Harvard Business Review</publisher><subject>Comparative advantage ; Industrial Revolution ; Productivity ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Harvard business review, 2019-01</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard Business Review Jan/Feb 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Roger L</creatorcontrib><title>The High Price of Efficiency</title><title>Harvard business review</title><description>In his 1776 work The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith showed that a clever division of labor could make a commercial enterprise vastly more productive than if each worker took personal charge of constructing a finished product. In 'On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation', David Ricardo took the argument further with his theory of comparative advantage, asserting that because it is more efficient for Portuguese workers to make wine and English workers to make cloth, each group would be better off focusing on its area of advantage and trading with the other. The insights both reflected and drove the Industrial Revolution, which was as much about process innovations that reduced waste and increased productivity as it was about the application of new technologies. The notions that the way we organize work can influence productivity more than individual effort can and that specialization creates commercial advantage underlie the study of management to this day.</description><subject>Comparative advantage</subject><subject>Industrial Revolution</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0017-8012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjLFuwjAQQD1QqTT0DxgyskS6O-OcV4RoUwmpHdIZxcaXGAUCOBn6923VvuW96c3UHAC5sID0qJ5SOsEPJdu5WtZdyKvYdvnHPfqQD5LvRKKP4eK_FupBmj6F539n6vNlV2-rYv_--rbd7IsWDYwFC7BjMsYRCjgWaoTAodMGDP-2B2zskY9BqNRaiwXrvC01IQGxztTq73u9D7cppPFwjsmHvm8uYZjSgZARubSw1t_yvzdK</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Martin, Roger L</creator><general>Harvard Business Review</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>The High Price of Efficiency</title><author>Martin, Roger L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g150t-7f07b7255b21f0b7f2af20b1b35057af20c01a8d7def26333f808bc8632120273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Comparative advantage</topic><topic>Industrial Revolution</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Roger L</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Roger L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The High Price of Efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issn>0017-8012</issn><abstract>In his 1776 work The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith showed that a clever division of labor could make a commercial enterprise vastly more productive than if each worker took personal charge of constructing a finished product. In 'On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation', David Ricardo took the argument further with his theory of comparative advantage, asserting that because it is more efficient for Portuguese workers to make wine and English workers to make cloth, each group would be better off focusing on its area of advantage and trading with the other. The insights both reflected and drove the Industrial Revolution, which was as much about process innovations that reduced waste and increased productivity as it was about the application of new technologies. The notions that the way we organize work can influence productivity more than individual effort can and that specialization creates commercial advantage underlie the study of management to this day.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Harvard Business Review</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-8012
ispartof Harvard business review, 2019-01
issn 0017-8012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2171176804
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Comparative advantage
Industrial Revolution
Productivity
Workforce
title The High Price of Efficiency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20High%20Price%20of%20Efficiency&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20business%20review&rft.au=Martin,%20Roger%20L&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.issn=0017-8012&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2171176804%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171176804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true