Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery

No consensus exists for defining chronic preoperative opioid use. Most spine studies rely solely on opioid duration to stratify patients into preoperative risk categories. The purpose of this study is to compare established opioid definitions that contain both duration and dosage to opioid models th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2019-06, Vol.19 (6), p.984-994
Hauptverfasser: Oleisky, Emily R., Pennings, Jacquelyn S., Hills, Jeffrey, Sivaganesan, Ahilan, Khan, Inamullah, Call, Richard, Devin, Clinton J., Archer, Kristin R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 994
container_issue 6
container_start_page 984
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 19
creator Oleisky, Emily R.
Pennings, Jacquelyn S.
Hills, Jeffrey
Sivaganesan, Ahilan
Khan, Inamullah
Call, Richard
Devin, Clinton J.
Archer, Kristin R.
description No consensus exists for defining chronic preoperative opioid use. Most spine studies rely solely on opioid duration to stratify patients into preoperative risk categories. The purpose of this study is to compare established opioid definitions that contain both duration and dosage to opioid models that rely solely on duration, including the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, in patients undergoing spine surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study that used opioid data from the Tennessee Controlled Substance Monitoring Database and prospective clinical data from a single-center academic spine registry. The study cohort consisted of 2,373 patients who underwent elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions between January 2011 and February 2017 and who completed a follow-up assessment at 12 months after surgery. Postoperative opioid use and patient-reported satisfaction (NASS Satisfaction Scale), disability (Oswestry/Neck Disability Index), and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) at 12 month follow-up. Six different chronic preoperative opioid use variables were created based on the number of times a prescription was filled and/or daily morphine milligram equivalent for the one year before surgery. These variables defined chronic opioid use as 1) most days for > 3 months (CDC), 2) continuous use for ≥ 6 months (Schoenfeld), 3) >4,500 mg for at least 9 months (Svendsen wide), 4) >9,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen intermediary), 5) >18,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen strict), 6) low-dose chronic (1-36 mg for >91 days), medium-dose chronic (36-120 mg for >91 days), and high-dose chronic (>120 mg for >91 days) (Edlund). Multivariable regression models yielding C-index and R2 values were used to compare chronic preoperative opioid use definitions by postoperative outcomes, adjusting for type of surgery. Chronic preoperative opioid use was reported in 470 to 725 (19.8% to 30.6%) patients, depending on definition. The Edlund definition, accounting for duration and dosage, had the highest predictive ability for postoperative opioid use (77.5%), followed by Schoenfeld (75.7%), CDC (72.6%), and Svendsen (59.9% to 72.5%) definitions. A combined Edlund and Schoenfeld duration and dosage definition in post-hoc analysis, that included 3 and 6 month duration cut-offs, performed the best overall with a C-index of 78.4%. Both Edlund and Schoenfeld definitions explained similar amounts of variance in satisfaction, disability, and pain (4.2% to 8.5%). Svendse
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2164554389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943019300014</els_id><sourcerecordid>2164554389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2b6bc2b11ca80be02e38849eee88d7d0a76605db52665ef91d8ae6da991208aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwh5ySbB4ySus0FCFS-pEhtYW449AVeNHeykUv-eQIElq5nFufM4hFwAy4GBuF7nqXceMecMZA48Z1AekDnIhcxAFPxw6iteZ3VZsBk5SWnNGJML4MdkVjABIGU9J2oZul5H59-odW2LEf1AzXsM3hnaRww9Rj24LdLQu-AsHRNSi63zbnDBJxo8DeNgQoeJ6nbASL_PommMbxh3Z-So1ZuE5z_1lLze370sH7PV88PT8naVmULwIeONaAxvAIyWrEHGsZCyrBFRSruwTC-EYJVtKi5EhW0NVmoUVtc1cCa1Lk7J1X5uH8PHiGlQnUsGNxvtMYxJcRBlVZWFrCe03KMmhpQitqqPrtNxp4CpL7VqrfZq1ZdaBVxNaqfY5c-GsenQ_oV-XU7AzR7A6c-tw6iScegNWhfRDMoG9_-GT6iFjnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164554389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Oleisky, Emily R. ; Pennings, Jacquelyn S. ; Hills, Jeffrey ; Sivaganesan, Ahilan ; Khan, Inamullah ; Call, Richard ; Devin, Clinton J. ; Archer, Kristin R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oleisky, Emily R. ; Pennings, Jacquelyn S. ; Hills, Jeffrey ; Sivaganesan, Ahilan ; Khan, Inamullah ; Call, Richard ; Devin, Clinton J. ; Archer, Kristin R.</creatorcontrib><description>No consensus exists for defining chronic preoperative opioid use. Most spine studies rely solely on opioid duration to stratify patients into preoperative risk categories. The purpose of this study is to compare established opioid definitions that contain both duration and dosage to opioid models that rely solely on duration, including the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, in patients undergoing spine surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study that used opioid data from the Tennessee Controlled Substance Monitoring Database and prospective clinical data from a single-center academic spine registry. The study cohort consisted of 2,373 patients who underwent elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions between January 2011 and February 2017 and who completed a follow-up assessment at 12 months after surgery. Postoperative opioid use and patient-reported satisfaction (NASS Satisfaction Scale), disability (Oswestry/Neck Disability Index), and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) at 12 month follow-up. Six different chronic preoperative opioid use variables were created based on the number of times a prescription was filled and/or daily morphine milligram equivalent for the one year before surgery. These variables defined chronic opioid use as 1) most days for &gt; 3 months (CDC), 2) continuous use for ≥ 6 months (Schoenfeld), 3) &gt;4,500 mg for at least 9 months (Svendsen wide), 4) &gt;9,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen intermediary), 5) &gt;18,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen strict), 6) low-dose chronic (1-36 mg for &gt;91 days), medium-dose chronic (36-120 mg for &gt;91 days), and high-dose chronic (&gt;120 mg for &gt;91 days) (Edlund). Multivariable regression models yielding C-index and R2 values were used to compare chronic preoperative opioid use definitions by postoperative outcomes, adjusting for type of surgery. Chronic preoperative opioid use was reported in 470 to 725 (19.8% to 30.6%) patients, depending on definition. The Edlund definition, accounting for duration and dosage, had the highest predictive ability for postoperative opioid use (77.5%), followed by Schoenfeld (75.7%), CDC (72.6%), and Svendsen (59.9% to 72.5%) definitions. A combined Edlund and Schoenfeld duration and dosage definition in post-hoc analysis, that included 3 and 6 month duration cut-offs, performed the best overall with a C-index of 78.4%. Both Edlund and Schoenfeld definitions explained similar amounts of variance in satisfaction, disability, and pain (4.2% to 8.5%). Svendsen and CDC definitions demonstrated poorer performance for patient-reported outcomes (1.4% to 7.2%). The Edlund definition is recommended for identifying patients at highest risk for postoperative opioid use. When opioid dosage is unavailable, the Schoenfeld definition is a reasonable choice with similar predictive ability. For patient-reported outcomes, either the Edlund or Schoenfeld definition is recommended. Future work should consider combing dosage and duration, with 3 and 6 month cutoffs, into chronic opioid use definitions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30611889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Chronic pain ; Drug Utilization ; Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Opioid use ; Opioid-Related Disorders - epidemiology ; Opioid-Related Disorders - etiology ; Opioid-Related Disorders - prevention &amp; control ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Preoperative Period ; Registries ; Spinal disorders ; Spine - surgery</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2019-06, Vol.19 (6), p.984-994</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2b6bc2b11ca80be02e38849eee88d7d0a76605db52665ef91d8ae6da991208aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2b6bc2b11ca80be02e38849eee88d7d0a76605db52665ef91d8ae6da991208aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0433-1942</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943019300014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30611889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oleisky, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennings, Jacquelyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hills, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaganesan, Ahilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Inamullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Call, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devin, Clinton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Kristin R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>No consensus exists for defining chronic preoperative opioid use. Most spine studies rely solely on opioid duration to stratify patients into preoperative risk categories. The purpose of this study is to compare established opioid definitions that contain both duration and dosage to opioid models that rely solely on duration, including the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, in patients undergoing spine surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study that used opioid data from the Tennessee Controlled Substance Monitoring Database and prospective clinical data from a single-center academic spine registry. The study cohort consisted of 2,373 patients who underwent elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions between January 2011 and February 2017 and who completed a follow-up assessment at 12 months after surgery. Postoperative opioid use and patient-reported satisfaction (NASS Satisfaction Scale), disability (Oswestry/Neck Disability Index), and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) at 12 month follow-up. Six different chronic preoperative opioid use variables were created based on the number of times a prescription was filled and/or daily morphine milligram equivalent for the one year before surgery. These variables defined chronic opioid use as 1) most days for &gt; 3 months (CDC), 2) continuous use for ≥ 6 months (Schoenfeld), 3) &gt;4,500 mg for at least 9 months (Svendsen wide), 4) &gt;9,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen intermediary), 5) &gt;18,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen strict), 6) low-dose chronic (1-36 mg for &gt;91 days), medium-dose chronic (36-120 mg for &gt;91 days), and high-dose chronic (&gt;120 mg for &gt;91 days) (Edlund). Multivariable regression models yielding C-index and R2 values were used to compare chronic preoperative opioid use definitions by postoperative outcomes, adjusting for type of surgery. Chronic preoperative opioid use was reported in 470 to 725 (19.8% to 30.6%) patients, depending on definition. The Edlund definition, accounting for duration and dosage, had the highest predictive ability for postoperative opioid use (77.5%), followed by Schoenfeld (75.7%), CDC (72.6%), and Svendsen (59.9% to 72.5%) definitions. A combined Edlund and Schoenfeld duration and dosage definition in post-hoc analysis, that included 3 and 6 month duration cut-offs, performed the best overall with a C-index of 78.4%. Both Edlund and Schoenfeld definitions explained similar amounts of variance in satisfaction, disability, and pain (4.2% to 8.5%). Svendsen and CDC definitions demonstrated poorer performance for patient-reported outcomes (1.4% to 7.2%). The Edlund definition is recommended for identifying patients at highest risk for postoperative opioid use. When opioid dosage is unavailable, the Schoenfeld definition is a reasonable choice with similar predictive ability. For patient-reported outcomes, either the Edlund or Schoenfeld definition is recommended. Future work should consider combing dosage and duration, with 3 and 6 month cutoffs, into chronic opioid use definitions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Drug Utilization</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Opioid use</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Preoperative Period</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Spinal disorders</subject><subject>Spine - surgery</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwh5ySbB4ySus0FCFS-pEhtYW449AVeNHeykUv-eQIElq5nFufM4hFwAy4GBuF7nqXceMecMZA48Z1AekDnIhcxAFPxw6iteZ3VZsBk5SWnNGJML4MdkVjABIGU9J2oZul5H59-odW2LEf1AzXsM3hnaRww9Rj24LdLQu-AsHRNSi63zbnDBJxo8DeNgQoeJ6nbASL_PommMbxh3Z-So1ZuE5z_1lLze370sH7PV88PT8naVmULwIeONaAxvAIyWrEHGsZCyrBFRSruwTC-EYJVtKi5EhW0NVmoUVtc1cCa1Lk7J1X5uH8PHiGlQnUsGNxvtMYxJcRBlVZWFrCe03KMmhpQitqqPrtNxp4CpL7VqrfZq1ZdaBVxNaqfY5c-GsenQ_oV-XU7AzR7A6c-tw6iScegNWhfRDMoG9_-GT6iFjnA</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Oleisky, Emily R.</creator><creator>Pennings, Jacquelyn S.</creator><creator>Hills, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Sivaganesan, Ahilan</creator><creator>Khan, Inamullah</creator><creator>Call, Richard</creator><creator>Devin, Clinton J.</creator><creator>Archer, Kristin R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0433-1942</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery</title><author>Oleisky, Emily R. ; Pennings, Jacquelyn S. ; Hills, Jeffrey ; Sivaganesan, Ahilan ; Khan, Inamullah ; Call, Richard ; Devin, Clinton J. ; Archer, Kristin R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2b6bc2b11ca80be02e38849eee88d7d0a76605db52665ef91d8ae6da991208aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Drug Utilization</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Opioid use</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Preoperative Period</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Spinal disorders</topic><topic>Spine - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oleisky, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennings, Jacquelyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hills, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaganesan, Ahilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Inamullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Call, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devin, Clinton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Kristin R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oleisky, Emily R.</au><au>Pennings, Jacquelyn S.</au><au>Hills, Jeffrey</au><au>Sivaganesan, Ahilan</au><au>Khan, Inamullah</au><au>Call, Richard</au><au>Devin, Clinton J.</au><au>Archer, Kristin R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>984</spage><epage>994</epage><pages>984-994</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>No consensus exists for defining chronic preoperative opioid use. Most spine studies rely solely on opioid duration to stratify patients into preoperative risk categories. The purpose of this study is to compare established opioid definitions that contain both duration and dosage to opioid models that rely solely on duration, including the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, in patients undergoing spine surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study that used opioid data from the Tennessee Controlled Substance Monitoring Database and prospective clinical data from a single-center academic spine registry. The study cohort consisted of 2,373 patients who underwent elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions between January 2011 and February 2017 and who completed a follow-up assessment at 12 months after surgery. Postoperative opioid use and patient-reported satisfaction (NASS Satisfaction Scale), disability (Oswestry/Neck Disability Index), and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) at 12 month follow-up. Six different chronic preoperative opioid use variables were created based on the number of times a prescription was filled and/or daily morphine milligram equivalent for the one year before surgery. These variables defined chronic opioid use as 1) most days for &gt; 3 months (CDC), 2) continuous use for ≥ 6 months (Schoenfeld), 3) &gt;4,500 mg for at least 9 months (Svendsen wide), 4) &gt;9,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen intermediary), 5) &gt;18,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen strict), 6) low-dose chronic (1-36 mg for &gt;91 days), medium-dose chronic (36-120 mg for &gt;91 days), and high-dose chronic (&gt;120 mg for &gt;91 days) (Edlund). Multivariable regression models yielding C-index and R2 values were used to compare chronic preoperative opioid use definitions by postoperative outcomes, adjusting for type of surgery. Chronic preoperative opioid use was reported in 470 to 725 (19.8% to 30.6%) patients, depending on definition. The Edlund definition, accounting for duration and dosage, had the highest predictive ability for postoperative opioid use (77.5%), followed by Schoenfeld (75.7%), CDC (72.6%), and Svendsen (59.9% to 72.5%) definitions. A combined Edlund and Schoenfeld duration and dosage definition in post-hoc analysis, that included 3 and 6 month duration cut-offs, performed the best overall with a C-index of 78.4%. Both Edlund and Schoenfeld definitions explained similar amounts of variance in satisfaction, disability, and pain (4.2% to 8.5%). Svendsen and CDC definitions demonstrated poorer performance for patient-reported outcomes (1.4% to 7.2%). The Edlund definition is recommended for identifying patients at highest risk for postoperative opioid use. When opioid dosage is unavailable, the Schoenfeld definition is a reasonable choice with similar predictive ability. For patient-reported outcomes, either the Edlund or Schoenfeld definition is recommended. Future work should consider combing dosage and duration, with 3 and 6 month cutoffs, into chronic opioid use definitions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30611889</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.014</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0433-1942</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2019-06, Vol.19 (6), p.984-994
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2164554389
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Chronic pain
Drug Utilization
Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Elective Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Opioid use
Opioid-Related Disorders - epidemiology
Opioid-Related Disorders - etiology
Opioid-Related Disorders - prevention & control
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Preoperative Period
Registries
Spinal disorders
Spine - surgery
title Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A37%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20different%20chronic%20preoperative%20opioid%20use%20definitions%20on%20outcomes%20after%20spine%20surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Oleisky,%20Emily%20R.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=984&rft.epage=994&rft.pages=984-994&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2164554389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164554389&rft_id=info:pmid/30611889&rft_els_id=S1529943019300014&rfr_iscdi=true