Combination versus sequential paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized phase II study

Paclitaxel (T) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active concomitant combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of sequential administration of these two drugs is unclear. This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of T and G administere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of B.U. ON. 2018-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1583-1590
Hauptverfasser: Shao, Bin, Song, Guohong, Li, Huiping, Dil, Lijun, Jiang, Hanfang, Liang, Xu, Yan, Ying, Zhang, Ruyan, Ran, Ran, Wang, Jing, Liu, Xiaoran, You, Miaoning
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1590
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1583
container_title Journal of B.U. ON.
container_volume 23
creator Shao, Bin
Song, Guohong
Li, Huiping
Dil, Lijun
Jiang, Hanfang
Liang, Xu
Yan, Ying
Zhang, Ruyan
Ran, Ran
Wang, Jing
Liu, Xiaoran
You, Miaoning
description Paclitaxel (T) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active concomitant combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of sequential administration of these two drugs is unclear. This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of T and G administered either as a concomitant or as a sequential regimen in patients with MBC. Patients with MBC (n=66) were randomized to either receive 6 cycles of concomitant T and G or 4 cycles of T followed by 4 cycles of G, as first line chemotherapy. With no progression, the arms would switch to maintenance with paclitaxel. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. In total, 33 patients were randomized to the concomitant or sequential arms. Patient characteristics were well balanced. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 for the concomitant arm and 8 for the sequential arm. No significant difference was observed in terms of PFS, ORR, and OS. Only 13 (39.4%) patients progressed in the sequential arm. Although there was no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.056),the sequential arm had a remarkable trend of longer PFS than the concomitant arm. Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms.The incidence of neutropenia was significantly higher in the concomitant arm (90.9%) than in the sequential arm (60.6%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Concomitant and sequential treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine had no significant difference in terms of PFS.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2164103935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2164103935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-c91b768a51d2d9e60fb644b3c8ab35bf4cdd20a4cd9fec6fa18a21450f4d93fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMtOwzAQzAFEq9JfQHvkEsnOw024oYpHJSQucI429poYxUmwnZbyP_wnRpS9zKxm9qE5S5acs03KRFYukrX37yyWYFzU1UWyyJmIasWXyfd2tK0ZMJhxgD05P3vw9DHTEAz2MKHsTcBPirSP0htZGfs4QYAetHE-pP1vJzuyY-jI4XQEPTo4jJYGOJjQgaWAPsQbElpHkYLEQZK7AYTJjX4iGcyewOGgRmu-SMHUoSfY7cCHWR0vk3ONvaf1CVfJ6_3dy_YxfXp-2G1vn9Ip4zyksubtRlRYcpWpmgTTrSiKNpcVtnnZ6kIqlTGMUGuSQiOvMONFyXSh6lxTvkqu__bGr2IGPjTWeEl9jwONs28yLgrO8jovo_XqZJ1bS6qZnLHojs1_tPkPPyR6iQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164103935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination versus sequential paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized phase II study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shao, Bin ; Song, Guohong ; Li, Huiping ; Dil, Lijun ; Jiang, Hanfang ; Liang, Xu ; Yan, Ying ; Zhang, Ruyan ; Ran, Ran ; Wang, Jing ; Liu, Xiaoran ; You, Miaoning</creator><creatorcontrib>Shao, Bin ; Song, Guohong ; Li, Huiping ; Dil, Lijun ; Jiang, Hanfang ; Liang, Xu ; Yan, Ying ; Zhang, Ruyan ; Ran, Ran ; Wang, Jing ; Liu, Xiaoran ; You, Miaoning</creatorcontrib><description>Paclitaxel (T) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active concomitant combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of sequential administration of these two drugs is unclear. This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of T and G administered either as a concomitant or as a sequential regimen in patients with MBC. Patients with MBC (n=66) were randomized to either receive 6 cycles of concomitant T and G or 4 cycles of T followed by 4 cycles of G, as first line chemotherapy. With no progression, the arms would switch to maintenance with paclitaxel. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. In total, 33 patients were randomized to the concomitant or sequential arms. Patient characteristics were well balanced. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 for the concomitant arm and 8 for the sequential arm. No significant difference was observed in terms of PFS, ORR, and OS. Only 13 (39.4%) patients progressed in the sequential arm. Although there was no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.056),the sequential arm had a remarkable trend of longer PFS than the concomitant arm. Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms.The incidence of neutropenia was significantly higher in the concomitant arm (90.9%) than in the sequential arm (60.6%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Concomitant and sequential treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine had no significant difference in terms of PFS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1107-0625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30610781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary ; Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary ; Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Paclitaxel - administration &amp; dosage ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of B.U. ON., 2018-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1583-1590</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30610781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shao, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dil, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Hanfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Miaoning</creatorcontrib><title>Combination versus sequential paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized phase II study</title><title>Journal of B.U. ON.</title><addtitle>J BUON</addtitle><description>Paclitaxel (T) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active concomitant combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of sequential administration of these two drugs is unclear. This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of T and G administered either as a concomitant or as a sequential regimen in patients with MBC. Patients with MBC (n=66) were randomized to either receive 6 cycles of concomitant T and G or 4 cycles of T followed by 4 cycles of G, as first line chemotherapy. With no progression, the arms would switch to maintenance with paclitaxel. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. In total, 33 patients were randomized to the concomitant or sequential arms. Patient characteristics were well balanced. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 for the concomitant arm and 8 for the sequential arm. No significant difference was observed in terms of PFS, ORR, and OS. Only 13 (39.4%) patients progressed in the sequential arm. Although there was no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.056),the sequential arm had a remarkable trend of longer PFS than the concomitant arm. Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms.The incidence of neutropenia was significantly higher in the concomitant arm (90.9%) than in the sequential arm (60.6%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Concomitant and sequential treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine had no significant difference in terms of PFS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Paclitaxel - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>1107-0625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UMtOwzAQzAFEq9JfQHvkEsnOw024oYpHJSQucI429poYxUmwnZbyP_wnRpS9zKxm9qE5S5acs03KRFYukrX37yyWYFzU1UWyyJmIasWXyfd2tK0ZMJhxgD05P3vw9DHTEAz2MKHsTcBPirSP0htZGfs4QYAetHE-pP1vJzuyY-jI4XQEPTo4jJYGOJjQgaWAPsQbElpHkYLEQZK7AYTJjX4iGcyewOGgRmu-SMHUoSfY7cCHWR0vk3ONvaf1CVfJ6_3dy_YxfXp-2G1vn9Ip4zyksubtRlRYcpWpmgTTrSiKNpcVtnnZ6kIqlTGMUGuSQiOvMONFyXSh6lxTvkqu__bGr2IGPjTWeEl9jwONs28yLgrO8jovo_XqZJ1bS6qZnLHojs1_tPkPPyR6iQ</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Shao, Bin</creator><creator>Song, Guohong</creator><creator>Li, Huiping</creator><creator>Dil, Lijun</creator><creator>Jiang, Hanfang</creator><creator>Liang, Xu</creator><creator>Yan, Ying</creator><creator>Zhang, Ruyan</creator><creator>Ran, Ran</creator><creator>Wang, Jing</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaoran</creator><creator>You, Miaoning</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Combination versus sequential paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized phase II study</title><author>Shao, Bin ; Song, Guohong ; Li, Huiping ; Dil, Lijun ; Jiang, Hanfang ; Liang, Xu ; Yan, Ying ; Zhang, Ruyan ; Ran, Ran ; Wang, Jing ; Liu, Xiaoran ; You, Miaoning</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-c91b768a51d2d9e60fb644b3c8ab35bf4cdd20a4cd9fec6fa18a21450f4d93fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Paclitaxel - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shao, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dil, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Hanfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Miaoning</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of B.U. ON.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shao, Bin</au><au>Song, Guohong</au><au>Li, Huiping</au><au>Dil, Lijun</au><au>Jiang, Hanfang</au><au>Liang, Xu</au><au>Yan, Ying</au><au>Zhang, Ruyan</au><au>Ran, Ran</au><au>Wang, Jing</au><au>Liu, Xiaoran</au><au>You, Miaoning</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination versus sequential paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized phase II study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of B.U. ON.</jtitle><addtitle>J BUON</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1583</spage><epage>1590</epage><pages>1583-1590</pages><issn>1107-0625</issn><abstract>Paclitaxel (T) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active concomitant combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of sequential administration of these two drugs is unclear. This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of T and G administered either as a concomitant or as a sequential regimen in patients with MBC. Patients with MBC (n=66) were randomized to either receive 6 cycles of concomitant T and G or 4 cycles of T followed by 4 cycles of G, as first line chemotherapy. With no progression, the arms would switch to maintenance with paclitaxel. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. In total, 33 patients were randomized to the concomitant or sequential arms. Patient characteristics were well balanced. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 for the concomitant arm and 8 for the sequential arm. No significant difference was observed in terms of PFS, ORR, and OS. Only 13 (39.4%) patients progressed in the sequential arm. Although there was no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.056),the sequential arm had a remarkable trend of longer PFS than the concomitant arm. Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms.The incidence of neutropenia was significantly higher in the concomitant arm (90.9%) than in the sequential arm (60.6%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Concomitant and sequential treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine had no significant difference in terms of PFS.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pmid>30610781</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1107-0625
ispartof Journal of B.U. ON., 2018-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1583-1590
issn 1107-0625
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2164103935
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary
Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary
Deoxycytidine - administration & dosage
Deoxycytidine - analogs & derivatives
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Survival Rate
title Combination versus sequential paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized phase II study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T22%3A16%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20versus%20sequential%20paclitaxel%20plus%20gemcitabine%20as%20first-line%20chemotherapy%20for%20women%20with%20metastatic%20breast%20cancer:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20phase%20II%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20B.U.%20ON.&rft.au=Shao,%20Bin&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1583&rft.epage=1590&rft.pages=1583-1590&rft.issn=1107-0625&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2164103935%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164103935&rft_id=info:pmid/30610781&rfr_iscdi=true