A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety
Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rehabilitation 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.943-956 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 956 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 943 |
container_title | Clinical rehabilitation |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Steel, Joanne Georgiou, Andrew Balandin, Susan Hill, Sophie Worrall, Linda Hemsley, Bronwyn |
description | Objective:
To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety.
Design:
Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes.
Setting:
Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia.
Participants:
Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital.
Methods:
In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content.
Results:
Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking.
Conclusion:
The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0269215518819717 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2162777920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0269215518819717</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2213083501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVpabZp7z0VQS89xIlGsjVWbyH0IxDoJT0bWZa3Cra09ciHPfcfr8ymLQQKAsHM770n9Bh7C-ISAPFKSG0kNA20LRgEfMZ2UCNWokX1nO22dbXtz9grogchRCtreMnOlGiMQYQd-3XNXYrZx8xttNORAvE08iG5dS5Dm0OKvByX5nmNwZ0GQyDbhynkIw-R_0h0CNlO_LCk_eKJeEzZ08eC2X1MxfKCj2t0m_SixAz8UGy2SLKjz8fX7MVoJ_JvHu9z9v3zp_ubr9Xdty-3N9d3lasV5Mr1TjiNrfVWKdSqb5vGKKutVsa3WtYjoMde1bUxfuwb6XszCBTN4PQItVbn7MPJt7zz5-opd3Mg56fJRp9W6iRoiYhGioK-f4I-pHUpH1QoCUq0qhFQKHGi3JKIFj92hyXMdjl2ILqtoO5pQUXy7tF47Wc__BX8aaQA1Qkgu_f_Uv9r-BsKL5mT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213083501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety.
Design:
Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes.
Setting:
Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia.
Participants:
Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital.
Methods:
In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content.
Results:
Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking.
Conclusion:
The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269215518819717</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30599771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Australia ; Chart reviews ; Communication ; Communication Disorders - complications ; Content analysis ; Disability ; Documentation ; Documentation - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Male ; Meaning ; Medical Audit ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; Multidisciplinary teams ; Patient admissions ; Patient communication ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; Qualitative research ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety measures</subject><ispartof>Clinical rehabilitation, 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.943-956</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5478-5865</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269215518819717$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215518819717$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30599771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steel, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balandin, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrall, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemsley, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><title>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</title><title>Clinical rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective:
To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety.
Design:
Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes.
Setting:
Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia.
Participants:
Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital.
Methods:
In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content.
Results:
Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking.
Conclusion:
The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Chart reviews</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Documentation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary teams</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Patient communication</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety measures</subject><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVpabZp7z0VQS89xIlGsjVWbyH0IxDoJT0bWZa3Cra09ciHPfcfr8ymLQQKAsHM770n9Bh7C-ISAPFKSG0kNA20LRgEfMZ2UCNWokX1nO22dbXtz9grogchRCtreMnOlGiMQYQd-3XNXYrZx8xttNORAvE08iG5dS5Dm0OKvByX5nmNwZ0GQyDbhynkIw-R_0h0CNlO_LCk_eKJeEzZ08eC2X1MxfKCj2t0m_SixAz8UGy2SLKjz8fX7MVoJ_JvHu9z9v3zp_ubr9Xdty-3N9d3lasV5Mr1TjiNrfVWKdSqb5vGKKutVsa3WtYjoMde1bUxfuwb6XszCBTN4PQItVbn7MPJt7zz5-opd3Mg56fJRp9W6iRoiYhGioK-f4I-pHUpH1QoCUq0qhFQKHGi3JKIFj92hyXMdjl2ILqtoO5pQUXy7tF47Wc__BX8aaQA1Qkgu_f_Uv9r-BsKL5mT</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Steel, Joanne</creator><creator>Georgiou, Andrew</creator><creator>Balandin, Susan</creator><creator>Hill, Sophie</creator><creator>Worrall, Linda</creator><creator>Hemsley, Bronwyn</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-5865</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</title><author>Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Chart reviews</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Documentation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary teams</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Patient communication</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety measures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steel, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balandin, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrall, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemsley, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steel, Joanne</au><au>Georgiou, Andrew</au><au>Balandin, Susan</au><au>Hill, Sophie</au><au>Worrall, Linda</au><au>Hemsley, Bronwyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>943</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>943-956</pages><issn>0269-2155</issn><eissn>1477-0873</eissn><abstract>Objective:
To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety.
Design:
Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes.
Setting:
Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia.
Participants:
Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital.
Methods:
In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content.
Results:
Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking.
Conclusion:
The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30599771</pmid><doi>10.1177/0269215518819717</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-5865</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-2155 |
ispartof | Clinical rehabilitation, 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.943-956 |
issn | 0269-2155 1477-0873 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2162777920 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Aged Australia Chart reviews Communication Communication Disorders - complications Content analysis Disability Documentation Documentation - statistics & numerical data Female Hospitalization Humans Interdisciplinary aspects Male Meaning Medical Audit Medical diagnosis Medical records Middle Aged Multidisciplinary teams Patient admissions Patient communication Patient Safety Patients Qualitative research Rehabilitation Retrospective Studies Safety measures |
title | A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A33%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20content%20analysis%20of%20documentation%20on%20communication%20disability%20in%20hospital%20progress%20notes:%20diagnosis,%20function,%20and%20patient%20safety&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Steel,%20Joanne&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=943&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=943-956&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.eissn=1477-0873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269215518819717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2213083501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213083501&rft_id=info:pmid/30599771&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0269215518819717&rfr_iscdi=true |