A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety

Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rehabilitation 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.943-956
Hauptverfasser: Steel, Joanne, Georgiou, Andrew, Balandin, Susan, Hill, Sophie, Worrall, Linda, Hemsley, Bronwyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 956
container_issue 5
container_start_page 943
container_title Clinical rehabilitation
container_volume 33
creator Steel, Joanne
Georgiou, Andrew
Balandin, Susan
Hill, Sophie
Worrall, Linda
Hemsley, Bronwyn
description Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0269215518819717
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2162777920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0269215518819717</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2213083501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVpabZp7z0VQS89xIlGsjVWbyH0IxDoJT0bWZa3Cra09ciHPfcfr8ymLQQKAsHM770n9Bh7C-ISAPFKSG0kNA20LRgEfMZ2UCNWokX1nO22dbXtz9grogchRCtreMnOlGiMQYQd-3XNXYrZx8xttNORAvE08iG5dS5Dm0OKvByX5nmNwZ0GQyDbhynkIw-R_0h0CNlO_LCk_eKJeEzZ08eC2X1MxfKCj2t0m_SixAz8UGy2SLKjz8fX7MVoJ_JvHu9z9v3zp_ubr9Xdty-3N9d3lasV5Mr1TjiNrfVWKdSqb5vGKKutVsa3WtYjoMde1bUxfuwb6XszCBTN4PQItVbn7MPJt7zz5-opd3Mg56fJRp9W6iRoiYhGioK-f4I-pHUpH1QoCUq0qhFQKHGi3JKIFj92hyXMdjl2ILqtoO5pQUXy7tF47Wc__BX8aaQA1Qkgu_f_Uv9r-BsKL5mT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213083501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269215518819717</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30599771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Australia ; Chart reviews ; Communication ; Communication Disorders - complications ; Content analysis ; Disability ; Documentation ; Documentation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Male ; Meaning ; Medical Audit ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; Multidisciplinary teams ; Patient admissions ; Patient communication ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; Qualitative research ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety measures</subject><ispartof>Clinical rehabilitation, 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.943-956</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5478-5865</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269215518819717$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215518819717$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30599771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steel, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balandin, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrall, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemsley, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><title>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</title><title>Clinical rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Chart reviews</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Documentation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary teams</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Patient communication</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety measures</subject><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVpabZp7z0VQS89xIlGsjVWbyH0IxDoJT0bWZa3Cra09ciHPfcfr8ymLQQKAsHM770n9Bh7C-ISAPFKSG0kNA20LRgEfMZ2UCNWokX1nO22dbXtz9grogchRCtreMnOlGiMQYQd-3XNXYrZx8xttNORAvE08iG5dS5Dm0OKvByX5nmNwZ0GQyDbhynkIw-R_0h0CNlO_LCk_eKJeEzZ08eC2X1MxfKCj2t0m_SixAz8UGy2SLKjz8fX7MVoJ_JvHu9z9v3zp_ubr9Xdty-3N9d3lasV5Mr1TjiNrfVWKdSqb5vGKKutVsa3WtYjoMde1bUxfuwb6XszCBTN4PQItVbn7MPJt7zz5-opd3Mg56fJRp9W6iRoiYhGioK-f4I-pHUpH1QoCUq0qhFQKHGi3JKIFj92hyXMdjl2ILqtoO5pQUXy7tF47Wc__BX8aaQA1Qkgu_f_Uv9r-BsKL5mT</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Steel, Joanne</creator><creator>Georgiou, Andrew</creator><creator>Balandin, Susan</creator><creator>Hill, Sophie</creator><creator>Worrall, Linda</creator><creator>Hemsley, Bronwyn</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-5865</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</title><author>Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-cbc0c678aea33763b85593a6a639e8624f17e7b34499efb52eb9d0705dc6f1463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Chart reviews</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Documentation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary teams</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Patient communication</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety measures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steel, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balandin, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrall, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemsley, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steel, Joanne</au><au>Georgiou, Andrew</au><au>Balandin, Susan</au><au>Hill, Sophie</au><au>Worrall, Linda</au><au>Hemsley, Bronwyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>943</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>943-956</pages><issn>0269-2155</issn><eissn>1477-0873</eissn><abstract>Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30599771</pmid><doi>10.1177/0269215518819717</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-5865</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2155
ispartof Clinical rehabilitation, 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.943-956
issn 0269-2155
1477-0873
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2162777920
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Australia
Chart reviews
Communication
Communication Disorders - complications
Content analysis
Disability
Documentation
Documentation - statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Interdisciplinary aspects
Male
Meaning
Medical Audit
Medical diagnosis
Medical records
Middle Aged
Multidisciplinary teams
Patient admissions
Patient communication
Patient Safety
Patients
Qualitative research
Rehabilitation
Retrospective Studies
Safety measures
title A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A33%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20content%20analysis%20of%20documentation%20on%20communication%20disability%20in%20hospital%20progress%20notes:%20diagnosis,%20function,%20and%20patient%20safety&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Steel,%20Joanne&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=943&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=943-956&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.eissn=1477-0873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269215518819717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2213083501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213083501&rft_id=info:pmid/30599771&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0269215518819717&rfr_iscdi=true