Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution

The present study evaluated the fatigue behavior of monolithic translucent zirconia polycrystals (TZ) and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) bonded to different substrates. Disc-shaped specimens of ceramic materials TZ and LD were bonded to three substrates with different elastic modulus (E) (fib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2019-03, Vol.91, p.122-130
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha, Graunke, Priscila, Maroli, Angélica, Zucuni, Camila Pauleski, Prochnow, Catina, Valandro, Luiz Felipe, Caldas, Ricardo Armini, Bacchi, Atais
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 130
container_issue
container_start_page 122
container_title Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
container_volume 91
creator Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha
Graunke, Priscila
Maroli, Angélica
Zucuni, Camila Pauleski
Prochnow, Catina
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
Caldas, Ricardo Armini
Bacchi, Atais
description The present study evaluated the fatigue behavior of monolithic translucent zirconia polycrystals (TZ) and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) bonded to different substrates. Disc-shaped specimens of ceramic materials TZ and LD were bonded to three substrates with different elastic modulus (E) (fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) - softest material, E = 14.9 GPa; titanium alloy (Ti) - intermediary properties, E = 115 GPa; and zirconia (Yz) - stiffest material, E = 210 GPa). The surfaces were treated and bonded with resin cement (disc-disc set-up). Fatigue testing followed a step-stress approach (initial maximum load = 200 N for 5000 cycles, incremental step load = 200 N for 10,000 cycles/step). The fatigue failure load and number of cycles until failure were recorded and statistically analyzed. Fractographic and finite element (FEA) analyzes were conducted as well. TZ ceramic depicted higher fatigue failure load, number of cycles until failure, and survival probabilities than LD, irrespective of the substrate. Moreover, TZ and LD presented better fatigue behaviors when bonded to substrates Ti and Yz in comparison to FRC. FEA revealed lower tensile stresses at restorative material when bonded to stiffer substrates. Fractography showed that the fracture origin started at bottom surface of restorative material (except for TZ bonded to Yz, in which crack initiated at load contact point). Translucent zirconia polycrystals present superior mechanical behavior than lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. The substrate type influences the mechanical performance of monolithic dental ceramics (stiffer substrates lead to better fatigue behavior).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159989575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2159989575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9136a83051d8bfd9f0235230bb264eac7691dd23e707b25b1655a03e5c1aa2203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctuFDEQRVsIRELgC5CQlyymG5eN-8EORYQgjcQG1pZfHTxytweXPdLk6_g0PJPHqkqle29V6TTNe6AdUOg_7brdovXSMQpjB6yjQF80lzAOY1sn9GXtBwFtDz1cNG8Qd5T2lI7j6-aCUzFMQKfL5t_W5z--LMR69MEblR25CwqxNS6pxRtyQJKTWjEU49ZM7n0ycfWK7GM4mnTErAISHVfrLMnxlJP9ajLBorEas8Mv5EZlf1ccmZUPJTkSorIbspZFu0TiTMzRBIdkjulJsqn-dPAHFcg5Y0PUakkNdIjnHcnrkn1c3zav5nqBe_dYr5rfN99-Xd-225_ff1x_3baGD5DbCXivxvo32FHPdpop44JxqjXrPztlhn4Caxl3Ax00Exp6IRTlThhQijHKr5qPD7n7FP8Wh1kuHo0LQa0uFpQMxDSNkxhElfIHqUkRMblZ7pNfVDpKoPKETu7kGZ08oZPAZEVXXR8eFxS9OPvseWLF_wMnd5uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159989575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha ; Graunke, Priscila ; Maroli, Angélica ; Zucuni, Camila Pauleski ; Prochnow, Catina ; Valandro, Luiz Felipe ; Caldas, Ricardo Armini ; Bacchi, Atais</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha ; Graunke, Priscila ; Maroli, Angélica ; Zucuni, Camila Pauleski ; Prochnow, Catina ; Valandro, Luiz Felipe ; Caldas, Ricardo Armini ; Bacchi, Atais</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated the fatigue behavior of monolithic translucent zirconia polycrystals (TZ) and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) bonded to different substrates. Disc-shaped specimens of ceramic materials TZ and LD were bonded to three substrates with different elastic modulus (E) (fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) - softest material, E = 14.9 GPa; titanium alloy (Ti) - intermediary properties, E = 115 GPa; and zirconia (Yz) - stiffest material, E = 210 GPa). The surfaces were treated and bonded with resin cement (disc-disc set-up). Fatigue testing followed a step-stress approach (initial maximum load = 200 N for 5000 cycles, incremental step load = 200 N for 10,000 cycles/step). The fatigue failure load and number of cycles until failure were recorded and statistically analyzed. Fractographic and finite element (FEA) analyzes were conducted as well. TZ ceramic depicted higher fatigue failure load, number of cycles until failure, and survival probabilities than LD, irrespective of the substrate. Moreover, TZ and LD presented better fatigue behaviors when bonded to substrates Ti and Yz in comparison to FRC. FEA revealed lower tensile stresses at restorative material when bonded to stiffer substrates. Fractography showed that the fracture origin started at bottom surface of restorative material (except for TZ bonded to Yz, in which crack initiated at load contact point). Translucent zirconia polycrystals present superior mechanical behavior than lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. The substrate type influences the mechanical performance of monolithic dental ceramics (stiffer substrates lead to better fatigue behavior).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-6161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30579109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2019-03, Vol.91, p.122-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9136a83051d8bfd9f0235230bb264eac7691dd23e707b25b1655a03e5c1aa2203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9136a83051d8bfd9f0235230bb264eac7691dd23e707b25b1655a03e5c1aa2203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30579109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graunke, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroli, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucuni, Camila Pauleski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prochnow, Catina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valandro, Luiz Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacchi, Atais</creatorcontrib><title>Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution</title><title>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</title><addtitle>J Mech Behav Biomed Mater</addtitle><description>The present study evaluated the fatigue behavior of monolithic translucent zirconia polycrystals (TZ) and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) bonded to different substrates. Disc-shaped specimens of ceramic materials TZ and LD were bonded to three substrates with different elastic modulus (E) (fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) - softest material, E = 14.9 GPa; titanium alloy (Ti) - intermediary properties, E = 115 GPa; and zirconia (Yz) - stiffest material, E = 210 GPa). The surfaces were treated and bonded with resin cement (disc-disc set-up). Fatigue testing followed a step-stress approach (initial maximum load = 200 N for 5000 cycles, incremental step load = 200 N for 10,000 cycles/step). The fatigue failure load and number of cycles until failure were recorded and statistically analyzed. Fractographic and finite element (FEA) analyzes were conducted as well. TZ ceramic depicted higher fatigue failure load, number of cycles until failure, and survival probabilities than LD, irrespective of the substrate. Moreover, TZ and LD presented better fatigue behaviors when bonded to substrates Ti and Yz in comparison to FRC. FEA revealed lower tensile stresses at restorative material when bonded to stiffer substrates. Fractography showed that the fracture origin started at bottom surface of restorative material (except for TZ bonded to Yz, in which crack initiated at load contact point). Translucent zirconia polycrystals present superior mechanical behavior than lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. The substrate type influences the mechanical performance of monolithic dental ceramics (stiffer substrates lead to better fatigue behavior).</description><issn>1751-6161</issn><issn>1878-0180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kctuFDEQRVsIRELgC5CQlyymG5eN-8EORYQgjcQG1pZfHTxytweXPdLk6_g0PJPHqkqle29V6TTNe6AdUOg_7brdovXSMQpjB6yjQF80lzAOY1sn9GXtBwFtDz1cNG8Qd5T2lI7j6-aCUzFMQKfL5t_W5z--LMR69MEblR25CwqxNS6pxRtyQJKTWjEU49ZM7n0ycfWK7GM4mnTErAISHVfrLMnxlJP9ajLBorEas8Mv5EZlf1ccmZUPJTkSorIbspZFu0TiTMzRBIdkjulJsqn-dPAHFcg5Y0PUakkNdIjnHcnrkn1c3zav5nqBe_dYr5rfN99-Xd-225_ff1x_3baGD5DbCXivxvo32FHPdpop44JxqjXrPztlhn4Caxl3Ax00Exp6IRTlThhQijHKr5qPD7n7FP8Wh1kuHo0LQa0uFpQMxDSNkxhElfIHqUkRMblZ7pNfVDpKoPKETu7kGZ08oZPAZEVXXR8eFxS9OPvseWLF_wMnd5uw</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha</creator><creator>Graunke, Priscila</creator><creator>Maroli, Angélica</creator><creator>Zucuni, Camila Pauleski</creator><creator>Prochnow, Catina</creator><creator>Valandro, Luiz Felipe</creator><creator>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</creator><creator>Bacchi, Atais</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution</title><author>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha ; Graunke, Priscila ; Maroli, Angélica ; Zucuni, Camila Pauleski ; Prochnow, Catina ; Valandro, Luiz Felipe ; Caldas, Ricardo Armini ; Bacchi, Atais</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9136a83051d8bfd9f0235230bb264eac7691dd23e707b25b1655a03e5c1aa2203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graunke, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroli, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucuni, Camila Pauleski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prochnow, Catina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valandro, Luiz Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacchi, Atais</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha</au><au>Graunke, Priscila</au><au>Maroli, Angélica</au><au>Zucuni, Camila Pauleski</au><au>Prochnow, Catina</au><au>Valandro, Luiz Felipe</au><au>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</au><au>Bacchi, Atais</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</jtitle><addtitle>J Mech Behav Biomed Mater</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>122</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>122-130</pages><issn>1751-6161</issn><eissn>1878-0180</eissn><abstract>The present study evaluated the fatigue behavior of monolithic translucent zirconia polycrystals (TZ) and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) bonded to different substrates. Disc-shaped specimens of ceramic materials TZ and LD were bonded to three substrates with different elastic modulus (E) (fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) - softest material, E = 14.9 GPa; titanium alloy (Ti) - intermediary properties, E = 115 GPa; and zirconia (Yz) - stiffest material, E = 210 GPa). The surfaces were treated and bonded with resin cement (disc-disc set-up). Fatigue testing followed a step-stress approach (initial maximum load = 200 N for 5000 cycles, incremental step load = 200 N for 10,000 cycles/step). The fatigue failure load and number of cycles until failure were recorded and statistically analyzed. Fractographic and finite element (FEA) analyzes were conducted as well. TZ ceramic depicted higher fatigue failure load, number of cycles until failure, and survival probabilities than LD, irrespective of the substrate. Moreover, TZ and LD presented better fatigue behaviors when bonded to substrates Ti and Yz in comparison to FRC. FEA revealed lower tensile stresses at restorative material when bonded to stiffer substrates. Fractography showed that the fracture origin started at bottom surface of restorative material (except for TZ bonded to Yz, in which crack initiated at load contact point). Translucent zirconia polycrystals present superior mechanical behavior than lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. The substrate type influences the mechanical performance of monolithic dental ceramics (stiffer substrates lead to better fatigue behavior).</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>30579109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-6161
ispartof Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2019-03, Vol.91, p.122-130
issn 1751-6161
1878-0180
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159989575
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T20%3A28%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lithium%20disilicate%20glass-ceramic%20vs%20translucent%20zirconia%20polycrystals%20bonded%20to%20distinct%20substrates:%20Fatigue%20failure%20load,%20number%20of%20cycles%20for%20failure,%20survival%20rates,%20and%20stress%20distribution&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20mechanical%20behavior%20of%20biomedical%20materials&rft.au=Pereira,%20Gabriel%20Kalil%20Rocha&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=122-130&rft.issn=1751-6161&rft.eissn=1878-0180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159989575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159989575&rft_id=info:pmid/30579109&rfr_iscdi=true