Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology
Clinical registries in ophthalmology. In recent years, advancements in digital technology and increasing use of electronic medical records in health systems have led to the dramatic growth in large clinical data sets. Clinical data registries are organized systems that collect data on patients diagn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2019-05, Vol.126 (5), p.655-662 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 662 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 655 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Tan, Jeremy C.K. Ferdi, Alexander C. Gillies, Mark C. Watson, Stephanie L. |
description | Clinical registries in ophthalmology.
In recent years, advancements in digital technology and increasing use of electronic medical records in health systems have led to the dramatic growth in large clinical data sets. Clinical data registries are organized systems that collect data on patients diagnosed with a disease or condition or who undergo a certain procedure.
A search of the PUBMED database was conducted in January 2018 for clinical registries in ophthalmology.
Ninety-seven clinical eye registries were found, with significant growth in numbers in the last 4 decades. The most common conditions captured were blindness or low vision, corneal transplantation, glaucoma, and cataract surgery. Most registries originate in the European region, North America, and Australia. Nine registries had multinational coverage, whereas 48 were national registries. As the numbers and scope of clinical registries have expanded, valuable observational data have been used to study real-world clinical outcomes in healthcare quality measurement and improvement and to develop new guidelines and standards. Pertinent areas of its use include studying treatments and outcomes in cataract surgery, corneal transplantation, and macular degeneration.
The use of clinical registries for quality improvement and research has grown significantly in the last few decades, and this trend will continue as information technology infrastructures develop. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159989190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642018318633</els_id><sourcerecordid>2159989190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8a1b7e7a8e85713fb1196512c6dca448825d369ed5691f53dee6c29aeea0e9273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqv_QKQHD152zWSTbHIRpPgFhYLoOaTZ2TZlP2qyFfrv3brVo6e5PPO-Mw8hV0BToCDv1mm7WXUrmzIKKgWW0owekREIrhOeQ3ZMRj0GieSMnpHzGNeUUikzfkrOMipyRnM5IjfTyjfe2Wryhksfu-AxTnwzmf9kV3VbtcvdBTkpbRXx8jDH5OPp8X36kszmz6_Th1niOFVdoiwscsytQiX6A8oFgJYCmJOFs5wrxUSRSY2FkBpKkRWI0jFtES1FzfJsTG6H3E1oP7cYO1P76LCqbIPtNhoGQmulQdMe5QPqQhtjwNJsgq9t2BmgZu_HrM3gx-z9GGCm99OvXR8atosai7-lXyE9cD8A2P_55TGY6Dw2Dgsf0HWmaP3_Dd-19ncE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159989190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tan, Jeremy C.K. ; Ferdi, Alexander C. ; Gillies, Mark C. ; Watson, Stephanie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jeremy C.K. ; Ferdi, Alexander C. ; Gillies, Mark C. ; Watson, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical registries in ophthalmology.
In recent years, advancements in digital technology and increasing use of electronic medical records in health systems have led to the dramatic growth in large clinical data sets. Clinical data registries are organized systems that collect data on patients diagnosed with a disease or condition or who undergo a certain procedure.
A search of the PUBMED database was conducted in January 2018 for clinical registries in ophthalmology.
Ninety-seven clinical eye registries were found, with significant growth in numbers in the last 4 decades. The most common conditions captured were blindness or low vision, corneal transplantation, glaucoma, and cataract surgery. Most registries originate in the European region, North America, and Australia. Nine registries had multinational coverage, whereas 48 were national registries. As the numbers and scope of clinical registries have expanded, valuable observational data have been used to study real-world clinical outcomes in healthcare quality measurement and improvement and to develop new guidelines and standards. Pertinent areas of its use include studying treatments and outcomes in cataract surgery, corneal transplantation, and macular degeneration.
The use of clinical registries for quality improvement and research has grown significantly in the last few decades, and this trend will continue as information technology infrastructures develop.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30572076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - methods ; Databases, Factual ; Eye Diseases - classification ; Humans ; Ophthalmology - standards ; Quality Improvement ; Registries - standards</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2019-05, Vol.126 (5), p.655-662</ispartof><rights>2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8a1b7e7a8e85713fb1196512c6dca448825d369ed5691f53dee6c29aeea0e9273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8a1b7e7a8e85713fb1196512c6dca448825d369ed5691f53dee6c29aeea0e9273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2895-3087</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jeremy C.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferdi, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillies, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Clinical registries in ophthalmology.
In recent years, advancements in digital technology and increasing use of electronic medical records in health systems have led to the dramatic growth in large clinical data sets. Clinical data registries are organized systems that collect data on patients diagnosed with a disease or condition or who undergo a certain procedure.
A search of the PUBMED database was conducted in January 2018 for clinical registries in ophthalmology.
Ninety-seven clinical eye registries were found, with significant growth in numbers in the last 4 decades. The most common conditions captured were blindness or low vision, corneal transplantation, glaucoma, and cataract surgery. Most registries originate in the European region, North America, and Australia. Nine registries had multinational coverage, whereas 48 were national registries. As the numbers and scope of clinical registries have expanded, valuable observational data have been used to study real-world clinical outcomes in healthcare quality measurement and improvement and to develop new guidelines and standards. Pertinent areas of its use include studying treatments and outcomes in cataract surgery, corneal transplantation, and macular degeneration.
The use of clinical registries for quality improvement and research has grown significantly in the last few decades, and this trend will continue as information technology infrastructures develop.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Eye Diseases - classification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ophthalmology - standards</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Registries - standards</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqv_QKQHD152zWSTbHIRpPgFhYLoOaTZ2TZlP2qyFfrv3brVo6e5PPO-Mw8hV0BToCDv1mm7WXUrmzIKKgWW0owekREIrhOeQ3ZMRj0GieSMnpHzGNeUUikzfkrOMipyRnM5IjfTyjfe2Wryhksfu-AxTnwzmf9kV3VbtcvdBTkpbRXx8jDH5OPp8X36kszmz6_Th1niOFVdoiwscsytQiX6A8oFgJYCmJOFs5wrxUSRSY2FkBpKkRWI0jFtES1FzfJsTG6H3E1oP7cYO1P76LCqbIPtNhoGQmulQdMe5QPqQhtjwNJsgq9t2BmgZu_HrM3gx-z9GGCm99OvXR8atosai7-lXyE9cD8A2P_55TGY6Dw2Dgsf0HWmaP3_Dd-19ncE</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Tan, Jeremy C.K.</creator><creator>Ferdi, Alexander C.</creator><creator>Gillies, Mark C.</creator><creator>Watson, Stephanie L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-3087</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology</title><author>Tan, Jeremy C.K. ; Ferdi, Alexander C. ; Gillies, Mark C. ; Watson, Stephanie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8a1b7e7a8e85713fb1196512c6dca448825d369ed5691f53dee6c29aeea0e9273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Eye Diseases - classification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ophthalmology - standards</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Registries - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jeremy C.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferdi, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillies, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Jeremy C.K.</au><au>Ferdi, Alexander C.</au><au>Gillies, Mark C.</au><au>Watson, Stephanie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>662</epage><pages>655-662</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>Clinical registries in ophthalmology.
In recent years, advancements in digital technology and increasing use of electronic medical records in health systems have led to the dramatic growth in large clinical data sets. Clinical data registries are organized systems that collect data on patients diagnosed with a disease or condition or who undergo a certain procedure.
A search of the PUBMED database was conducted in January 2018 for clinical registries in ophthalmology.
Ninety-seven clinical eye registries were found, with significant growth in numbers in the last 4 decades. The most common conditions captured were blindness or low vision, corneal transplantation, glaucoma, and cataract surgery. Most registries originate in the European region, North America, and Australia. Nine registries had multinational coverage, whereas 48 were national registries. As the numbers and scope of clinical registries have expanded, valuable observational data have been used to study real-world clinical outcomes in healthcare quality measurement and improvement and to develop new guidelines and standards. Pertinent areas of its use include studying treatments and outcomes in cataract surgery, corneal transplantation, and macular degeneration.
The use of clinical registries for quality improvement and research has grown significantly in the last few decades, and this trend will continue as information technology infrastructures develop.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30572076</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.030</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-3087</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2019-05, Vol.126 (5), p.655-662 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159989190 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biomedical Research - methods Databases, Factual Eye Diseases - classification Humans Ophthalmology - standards Quality Improvement Registries - standards |
title | Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A35%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Registries%20in%20Ophthalmology&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Tan,%20Jeremy%20C.K.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=662&rft.pages=655-662&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159989190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159989190&rft_id=info:pmid/30572076&rft_els_id=S0161642018318633&rfr_iscdi=true |