Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms
Chronic polysubstance use disorder (PSUD) is associated with cognitive impairments. These impairments affect the quality of life, occupational functioning, and the ability to benefit from therapy. Psychological distress also affects neurocognitive status, and impaired neurocognition characterizes se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of substance abuse treatment 2019-02, Vol.97, p.21-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Journal of substance abuse treatment |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Hagen, Egon Sømhovd, Mikael Hesse, Morten Arnevik, Espen Ajo Erga, Aleksander H. |
description | Chronic polysubstance use disorder (PSUD) is associated with cognitive impairments. These impairments affect the quality of life, occupational functioning, and the ability to benefit from therapy. Psychological distress also affects neurocognitive status, and impaired neurocognition characterizes several psychiatric conditions. Neurocognitive assessment is thus of importance but faces several interpretive challenges. One is disentangling the link between psychological distress and cognitive impairment. This paper investigates the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in young adults with PSUD.
This study included 104 patients with PSUD recruited from the Norwegian Stayer study. Participants completed the MoCA, a self-report measure of executive functioning (EF), the BRIEF-A, and the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, a measure of psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90-R). Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in accordance with previously published cutoff scores for the MoCA and BRIEF-A. Correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between cognitive impairment identified with the MoCA or BRIEF-A and psychological distress.
More than a third (34.6%) of patients scored below the threshold for cognitive impairment on the MoCA. On the BRIEF-A, 63.2% of participants reported executive problems that exceeded what was expected based on previously published norms. SCL-90-R scores were, as expected, elevated when compared with normative scores. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between cognitive impairment identified by the BRIEF-A and scores on the SCL-90-R Global Severity Index (OR = 17.3, 95% CI: 4.4–68.8, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159987314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0740547218304185</els_id><sourcerecordid>2172646014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8093faec5c2364e4924a13de475e4d5167b093aeb50f18f633f3aadfe454e7ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggS2zYJNix8zMSm2HUQqVWSKisLY9z3XGUxMHXKcqOR6jUN-RJ8HQKCxas7uJ-59yrcwh5zVnOGa_ed3mHOuYF403Oec44e0JWvKlFVslGPCUrVkuWlbIuTsgLxI4xVhSseU5OBCvrullXK3J3BRrn4MYbavzN6KK7BeqGSbswwBipG-ni57TV7dxHpD9c3NPJ9wvOO4x6NEBnBNo69KGFcNxf-e2G-kA_fr04O8829NfPe3q9B4ouXbDOPMi8pRMuZu90DM5QXIYp-gFfkmdW9wivHucp-XZ-dr39nF1--XSx3VxmpmQiZg1bC6vBlKYQlQS5LqTmogVZlyDbklf1LhEadiWzvLGVEFZo3VqQpYTaWnFK3h19p-C_z4BRDQ4N9L0ewc-oCl6u1ylLLhP69h-083MY03eJqotKVuyBKo6UCR4xgFVTcIMOi-JMHfpSnTr0pQ59Kc5V6iuJ3jxaz7sB2r-SPwUl4MMRgJTFrYOg0DhI-bUugImq9e5__r8B-IGpYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2172646014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hagen, Egon ; Sømhovd, Mikael ; Hesse, Morten ; Arnevik, Espen Ajo ; Erga, Aleksander H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hagen, Egon ; Sømhovd, Mikael ; Hesse, Morten ; Arnevik, Espen Ajo ; Erga, Aleksander H.</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic polysubstance use disorder (PSUD) is associated with cognitive impairments. These impairments affect the quality of life, occupational functioning, and the ability to benefit from therapy. Psychological distress also affects neurocognitive status, and impaired neurocognition characterizes several psychiatric conditions. Neurocognitive assessment is thus of importance but faces several interpretive challenges. One is disentangling the link between psychological distress and cognitive impairment. This paper investigates the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in young adults with PSUD.
This study included 104 patients with PSUD recruited from the Norwegian Stayer study. Participants completed the MoCA, a self-report measure of executive functioning (EF), the BRIEF-A, and the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, a measure of psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90-R). Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in accordance with previously published cutoff scores for the MoCA and BRIEF-A. Correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between cognitive impairment identified with the MoCA or BRIEF-A and psychological distress.
More than a third (34.6%) of patients scored below the threshold for cognitive impairment on the MoCA. On the BRIEF-A, 63.2% of participants reported executive problems that exceeded what was expected based on previously published norms. SCL-90-R scores were, as expected, elevated when compared with normative scores. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between cognitive impairment identified by the BRIEF-A and scores on the SCL-90-R Global Severity Index (OR = 17.3, 95% CI: 4.4–68.8, p < 0.001) and age (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9, p = 0.003). Cognitive impairment identified by the MoCA was not significantly associated with demographic variables or SCL-90-R GSI score in multiple regression analysis.
Our study indicated that the MoCA is a measure of cognitive impairment that is independent of psychological distress, as measured with the SCL-90-R, whereas the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite is strongly associated with distress. This suggests the need to interpret BRIEF-A results within a broad differential diagnostic context, where the assessment of psychological distress is included. The findings support that performance-based assessment such as the MoCA could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.
•Neurocognition is affected by psychological distress.•We investigate the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools.•BRIEF-A is associated with psychological distress while MoCa is not.•BRIEF-A results should be understood within a broad differential diagnostic context.•The MoCa could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-5472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6483</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30577896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; BRIEF-A ; Cognitive aspects ; Cognitive impairment ; Cognitive screening ; Cognitive therapy ; Correlation analysis ; Cutoff scores ; Executive function ; Medical screening ; MoCA ; Multiple drugs ; Neuropsychology ; Psychiatric symptoms ; Psychological assessment ; Psychological distress ; Quality of life ; Regression analysis ; Self report ; Severity ; Substance use disorder ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2019-02, Vol.97, p.21-27</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8093faec5c2364e4924a13de475e4d5167b093aeb50f18f633f3aadfe454e7ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8093faec5c2364e4924a13de475e4d5167b093aeb50f18f633f3aadfe454e7ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3199-3725 ; 0000-0002-6849-6554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547218304185$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hagen, Egon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sømhovd, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesse, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnevik, Espen Ajo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erga, Aleksander H.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms</title><title>Journal of substance abuse treatment</title><addtitle>J Subst Abuse Treat</addtitle><description>Chronic polysubstance use disorder (PSUD) is associated with cognitive impairments. These impairments affect the quality of life, occupational functioning, and the ability to benefit from therapy. Psychological distress also affects neurocognitive status, and impaired neurocognition characterizes several psychiatric conditions. Neurocognitive assessment is thus of importance but faces several interpretive challenges. One is disentangling the link between psychological distress and cognitive impairment. This paper investigates the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in young adults with PSUD.
This study included 104 patients with PSUD recruited from the Norwegian Stayer study. Participants completed the MoCA, a self-report measure of executive functioning (EF), the BRIEF-A, and the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, a measure of psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90-R). Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in accordance with previously published cutoff scores for the MoCA and BRIEF-A. Correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between cognitive impairment identified with the MoCA or BRIEF-A and psychological distress.
More than a third (34.6%) of patients scored below the threshold for cognitive impairment on the MoCA. On the BRIEF-A, 63.2% of participants reported executive problems that exceeded what was expected based on previously published norms. SCL-90-R scores were, as expected, elevated when compared with normative scores. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between cognitive impairment identified by the BRIEF-A and scores on the SCL-90-R Global Severity Index (OR = 17.3, 95% CI: 4.4–68.8, p < 0.001) and age (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9, p = 0.003). Cognitive impairment identified by the MoCA was not significantly associated with demographic variables or SCL-90-R GSI score in multiple regression analysis.
Our study indicated that the MoCA is a measure of cognitive impairment that is independent of psychological distress, as measured with the SCL-90-R, whereas the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite is strongly associated with distress. This suggests the need to interpret BRIEF-A results within a broad differential diagnostic context, where the assessment of psychological distress is included. The findings support that performance-based assessment such as the MoCA could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.
•Neurocognition is affected by psychological distress.•We investigate the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools.•BRIEF-A is associated with psychological distress while MoCa is not.•BRIEF-A results should be understood within a broad differential diagnostic context.•The MoCa could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>BRIEF-A</subject><subject>Cognitive aspects</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Cognitive screening</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cutoff scores</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>MoCA</subject><subject>Multiple drugs</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Psychiatric symptoms</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Severity</subject><subject>Substance use disorder</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0740-5472</issn><issn>1873-6483</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggS2zYJNix8zMSm2HUQqVWSKisLY9z3XGUxMHXKcqOR6jUN-RJ8HQKCxas7uJ-59yrcwh5zVnOGa_ed3mHOuYF403Oec44e0JWvKlFVslGPCUrVkuWlbIuTsgLxI4xVhSseU5OBCvrullXK3J3BRrn4MYbavzN6KK7BeqGSbswwBipG-ni57TV7dxHpD9c3NPJ9wvOO4x6NEBnBNo69KGFcNxf-e2G-kA_fr04O8829NfPe3q9B4ouXbDOPMi8pRMuZu90DM5QXIYp-gFfkmdW9wivHucp-XZ-dr39nF1--XSx3VxmpmQiZg1bC6vBlKYQlQS5LqTmogVZlyDbklf1LhEadiWzvLGVEFZo3VqQpYTaWnFK3h19p-C_z4BRDQ4N9L0ewc-oCl6u1ylLLhP69h-083MY03eJqotKVuyBKo6UCR4xgFVTcIMOi-JMHfpSnTr0pQ59Kc5V6iuJ3jxaz7sB2r-SPwUl4MMRgJTFrYOg0DhI-bUugImq9e5__r8B-IGpYQ</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Hagen, Egon</creator><creator>Sømhovd, Mikael</creator><creator>Hesse, Morten</creator><creator>Arnevik, Espen Ajo</creator><creator>Erga, Aleksander H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-3725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-6554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms</title><author>Hagen, Egon ; Sømhovd, Mikael ; Hesse, Morten ; Arnevik, Espen Ajo ; Erga, Aleksander H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8093faec5c2364e4924a13de475e4d5167b093aeb50f18f633f3aadfe454e7ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>BRIEF-A</topic><topic>Cognitive aspects</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Cognitive screening</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cutoff scores</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>MoCA</topic><topic>Multiple drugs</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Psychiatric symptoms</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Severity</topic><topic>Substance use disorder</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hagen, Egon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sømhovd, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesse, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnevik, Espen Ajo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erga, Aleksander H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of substance abuse treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hagen, Egon</au><au>Sømhovd, Mikael</au><au>Hesse, Morten</au><au>Arnevik, Espen Ajo</au><au>Erga, Aleksander H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of substance abuse treatment</jtitle><addtitle>J Subst Abuse Treat</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>97</volume><spage>21</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>21-27</pages><issn>0740-5472</issn><eissn>1873-6483</eissn><abstract>Chronic polysubstance use disorder (PSUD) is associated with cognitive impairments. These impairments affect the quality of life, occupational functioning, and the ability to benefit from therapy. Psychological distress also affects neurocognitive status, and impaired neurocognition characterizes several psychiatric conditions. Neurocognitive assessment is thus of importance but faces several interpretive challenges. One is disentangling the link between psychological distress and cognitive impairment. This paper investigates the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in young adults with PSUD.
This study included 104 patients with PSUD recruited from the Norwegian Stayer study. Participants completed the MoCA, a self-report measure of executive functioning (EF), the BRIEF-A, and the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, a measure of psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90-R). Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in accordance with previously published cutoff scores for the MoCA and BRIEF-A. Correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between cognitive impairment identified with the MoCA or BRIEF-A and psychological distress.
More than a third (34.6%) of patients scored below the threshold for cognitive impairment on the MoCA. On the BRIEF-A, 63.2% of participants reported executive problems that exceeded what was expected based on previously published norms. SCL-90-R scores were, as expected, elevated when compared with normative scores. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between cognitive impairment identified by the BRIEF-A and scores on the SCL-90-R Global Severity Index (OR = 17.3, 95% CI: 4.4–68.8, p < 0.001) and age (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9, p = 0.003). Cognitive impairment identified by the MoCA was not significantly associated with demographic variables or SCL-90-R GSI score in multiple regression analysis.
Our study indicated that the MoCA is a measure of cognitive impairment that is independent of psychological distress, as measured with the SCL-90-R, whereas the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite is strongly associated with distress. This suggests the need to interpret BRIEF-A results within a broad differential diagnostic context, where the assessment of psychological distress is included. The findings support that performance-based assessment such as the MoCA could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.
•Neurocognition is affected by psychological distress.•We investigate the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools.•BRIEF-A is associated with psychological distress while MoCa is not.•BRIEF-A results should be understood within a broad differential diagnostic context.•The MoCa could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30577896</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-3725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-6554</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-5472 |
ispartof | Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2019-02, Vol.97, p.21-27 |
issn | 0740-5472 1873-6483 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159987314 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Behavior BRIEF-A Cognitive aspects Cognitive impairment Cognitive screening Cognitive therapy Correlation analysis Cutoff scores Executive function Medical screening MoCA Multiple drugs Neuropsychology Psychiatric symptoms Psychological assessment Psychological distress Quality of life Regression analysis Self report Severity Substance use disorder Young adults |
title | Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A41%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20cognitive%20impairment%20in%20young%20adults%20with%20polysubstance%20use%20disorder%20with%20MoCA%20or%20BRIEF-A%20%E2%80%93%20The%20significance%20of%20psychiatric%20symptoms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20substance%20abuse%20treatment&rft.au=Hagen,%20Egon&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=97&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=21-27&rft.issn=0740-5472&rft.eissn=1873-6483&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2172646014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2172646014&rft_id=info:pmid/30577896&rft_els_id=S0740547218304185&rfr_iscdi=true |