The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for residency programs to incorporate multisource feedback, which may include patient feedback, into resident competency assessments. Program directors face numerous challenges in gathering this feedback. This study assesses the feasibil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic pediatrics 2019-07, Vol.19 (5), p.555-560 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 560 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 555 |
container_title | Academic pediatrics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Mahoney, David Bogetz, Alyssa Hirsch, Amanda Killmond, Katherine Phillips, Elisa Bhavaraju, Vasudha McQueen, Alisa Orlov, Nicola Blankenburg, Rebecca Rassbach, Caroline E. |
description | The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for residency programs to incorporate multisource feedback, which may include patient feedback, into resident competency assessments. Program directors face numerous challenges in gathering this feedback. This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of patient feedback collection in the inpatient and outpatient setting at 3 institutions.
Patient feedback was collected using a modified version of the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Trained research assistants administered the CAT to eligible patients and families in pediatric ward, intensive care, and outpatient settings from July to October 2015. Completion rates and reasons for non-completion were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the CAT was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale.
The CAT was completed by 860/1413 (61%) patients. Completion rates in the pediatric ward and intensive care settings were 45% and 38%, respectively, compared to 91% in the outpatient setting. In inpatient settings, survey non-completion was typically due to participant unavailability; this was rarely a reason in the outpatient setting. A total of 93.4% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with using the CAT. It was found that 6.36 hours of research assistant time would be required to gather a valid quantity of patient feedback for a single resident in the outpatient setting, compared to 10.14 hours in the inpatient setting.
Although collecting feedback using our standardized protocol is acceptable to patients, obtaining sufficient feedback requires overcoming several barriers and a sizable time commitment. Feedback collection in the outpatient setting may be higher yield than in the inpatient setting due to greater patient/family availability. Future work should focus on innovative methods to gather patient feedback in the inpatient setting to provide program directors with a holistic view of their residents’ communication skills. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159986120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1876285918307988</els_id><sourcerecordid>2159986120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-99bfd490c56c5cc37581486720db015937d089fcf420f0d36dba04c5de2b23f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE-P0zAQxS0EYv_AF-CAfOTSMHYax0FcVhW7i7SIFerdcsbjrUuaFNtBWvHlcdXSI6cZzbz3RvNj7J2ASoBQH7eVRbuvJAhdCVkByBfsUuhWLaRW7ctz33QX7CqlLYCqtVav2UUNTatarS_Zn_WG-Gpjh4HGJ0p88vzbPOSQpjki8Vsi11v8-al0NoU-DCE_czs6foNI-2xPk2K7s3lDMYxP_NHmQGM-m7mfIn8kF2yOAfkPSsGVfXrDXnk7JHp7qtdsfftlvbpfPHy_-7q6eVhg3ai86Lreu2UH2ChsEOu20WJZHpTgehBNV7cOdOfRLyV4cLUqR2GJjSPZy9rX1-zDMXYfp18zpWx2ISENgx1pmpORJaPTSkgoUnmUYpxSiuTNPoadjc9GgDkwN1tzYG4OzI2QpjAvpven_LnfkTtb_kEugs9HAZUnfweKJmEBhIVIJMzGTeF_-X8BhpaTsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159986120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mahoney, David ; Bogetz, Alyssa ; Hirsch, Amanda ; Killmond, Katherine ; Phillips, Elisa ; Bhavaraju, Vasudha ; McQueen, Alisa ; Orlov, Nicola ; Blankenburg, Rebecca ; Rassbach, Caroline E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, David ; Bogetz, Alyssa ; Hirsch, Amanda ; Killmond, Katherine ; Phillips, Elisa ; Bhavaraju, Vasudha ; McQueen, Alisa ; Orlov, Nicola ; Blankenburg, Rebecca ; Rassbach, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><description>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for residency programs to incorporate multisource feedback, which may include patient feedback, into resident competency assessments. Program directors face numerous challenges in gathering this feedback. This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of patient feedback collection in the inpatient and outpatient setting at 3 institutions.
Patient feedback was collected using a modified version of the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Trained research assistants administered the CAT to eligible patients and families in pediatric ward, intensive care, and outpatient settings from July to October 2015. Completion rates and reasons for non-completion were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the CAT was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale.
The CAT was completed by 860/1413 (61%) patients. Completion rates in the pediatric ward and intensive care settings were 45% and 38%, respectively, compared to 91% in the outpatient setting. In inpatient settings, survey non-completion was typically due to participant unavailability; this was rarely a reason in the outpatient setting. A total of 93.4% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with using the CAT. It was found that 6.36 hours of research assistant time would be required to gather a valid quantity of patient feedback for a single resident in the outpatient setting, compared to 10.14 hours in the inpatient setting.
Although collecting feedback using our standardized protocol is acceptable to patients, obtaining sufficient feedback requires overcoming several barriers and a sizable time commitment. Feedback collection in the outpatient setting may be higher yield than in the inpatient setting due to greater patient/family availability. Future work should focus on innovative methods to gather patient feedback in the inpatient setting to provide program directors with a holistic view of their residents’ communication skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1876-2859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-2867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30576788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Communication ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Feasibility Studies ; Feedback, Psychological ; graduate medical education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Knowledge of Results, Psychological ; patient feedback ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pediatrics - education ; Physician-Patient Relations ; resident communication skills ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Academic pediatrics, 2019-07, Vol.19 (5), p.555-560</ispartof><rights>2019 Academic Pediatric Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-99bfd490c56c5cc37581486720db015937d089fcf420f0d36dba04c5de2b23f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-99bfd490c56c5cc37581486720db015937d089fcf420f0d36dba04c5de2b23f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3661-5555 ; 0000-0002-9221-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285918307988$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogetz, Alyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killmond, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavaraju, Vasudha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, Alisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlov, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenburg, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassbach, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents</title><title>Academic pediatrics</title><addtitle>Acad Pediatr</addtitle><description>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for residency programs to incorporate multisource feedback, which may include patient feedback, into resident competency assessments. Program directors face numerous challenges in gathering this feedback. This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of patient feedback collection in the inpatient and outpatient setting at 3 institutions.
Patient feedback was collected using a modified version of the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Trained research assistants administered the CAT to eligible patients and families in pediatric ward, intensive care, and outpatient settings from July to October 2015. Completion rates and reasons for non-completion were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the CAT was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale.
The CAT was completed by 860/1413 (61%) patients. Completion rates in the pediatric ward and intensive care settings were 45% and 38%, respectively, compared to 91% in the outpatient setting. In inpatient settings, survey non-completion was typically due to participant unavailability; this was rarely a reason in the outpatient setting. A total of 93.4% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with using the CAT. It was found that 6.36 hours of research assistant time would be required to gather a valid quantity of patient feedback for a single resident in the outpatient setting, compared to 10.14 hours in the inpatient setting.
Although collecting feedback using our standardized protocol is acceptable to patients, obtaining sufficient feedback requires overcoming several barriers and a sizable time commitment. Feedback collection in the outpatient setting may be higher yield than in the inpatient setting due to greater patient/family availability. Future work should focus on innovative methods to gather patient feedback in the inpatient setting to provide program directors with a holistic view of their residents’ communication skills.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Feedback, Psychological</subject><subject>graduate medical education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Knowledge of Results, Psychological</subject><subject>patient feedback</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pediatrics - education</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>resident communication skills</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1876-2859</issn><issn>1876-2867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE-P0zAQxS0EYv_AF-CAfOTSMHYax0FcVhW7i7SIFerdcsbjrUuaFNtBWvHlcdXSI6cZzbz3RvNj7J2ASoBQH7eVRbuvJAhdCVkByBfsUuhWLaRW7ctz33QX7CqlLYCqtVav2UUNTatarS_Zn_WG-Gpjh4HGJ0p88vzbPOSQpjki8Vsi11v8-al0NoU-DCE_czs6foNI-2xPk2K7s3lDMYxP_NHmQGM-m7mfIn8kF2yOAfkPSsGVfXrDXnk7JHp7qtdsfftlvbpfPHy_-7q6eVhg3ai86Lreu2UH2ChsEOu20WJZHpTgehBNV7cOdOfRLyV4cLUqR2GJjSPZy9rX1-zDMXYfp18zpWx2ISENgx1pmpORJaPTSkgoUnmUYpxSiuTNPoadjc9GgDkwN1tzYG4OzI2QpjAvpven_LnfkTtb_kEugs9HAZUnfweKJmEBhIVIJMzGTeF_-X8BhpaTsQ</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Mahoney, David</creator><creator>Bogetz, Alyssa</creator><creator>Hirsch, Amanda</creator><creator>Killmond, Katherine</creator><creator>Phillips, Elisa</creator><creator>Bhavaraju, Vasudha</creator><creator>McQueen, Alisa</creator><creator>Orlov, Nicola</creator><creator>Blankenburg, Rebecca</creator><creator>Rassbach, Caroline E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3661-5555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents</title><author>Mahoney, David ; Bogetz, Alyssa ; Hirsch, Amanda ; Killmond, Katherine ; Phillips, Elisa ; Bhavaraju, Vasudha ; McQueen, Alisa ; Orlov, Nicola ; Blankenburg, Rebecca ; Rassbach, Caroline E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-99bfd490c56c5cc37581486720db015937d089fcf420f0d36dba04c5de2b23f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Feedback, Psychological</topic><topic>graduate medical education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Knowledge of Results, Psychological</topic><topic>patient feedback</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pediatrics - education</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>resident communication skills</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogetz, Alyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killmond, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavaraju, Vasudha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, Alisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlov, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenburg, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassbach, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahoney, David</au><au>Bogetz, Alyssa</au><au>Hirsch, Amanda</au><au>Killmond, Katherine</au><au>Phillips, Elisa</au><au>Bhavaraju, Vasudha</au><au>McQueen, Alisa</au><au>Orlov, Nicola</au><au>Blankenburg, Rebecca</au><au>Rassbach, Caroline E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents</atitle><jtitle>Academic pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Pediatr</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>560</epage><pages>555-560</pages><issn>1876-2859</issn><eissn>1876-2867</eissn><abstract>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for residency programs to incorporate multisource feedback, which may include patient feedback, into resident competency assessments. Program directors face numerous challenges in gathering this feedback. This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of patient feedback collection in the inpatient and outpatient setting at 3 institutions.
Patient feedback was collected using a modified version of the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Trained research assistants administered the CAT to eligible patients and families in pediatric ward, intensive care, and outpatient settings from July to October 2015. Completion rates and reasons for non-completion were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the CAT was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale.
The CAT was completed by 860/1413 (61%) patients. Completion rates in the pediatric ward and intensive care settings were 45% and 38%, respectively, compared to 91% in the outpatient setting. In inpatient settings, survey non-completion was typically due to participant unavailability; this was rarely a reason in the outpatient setting. A total of 93.4% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with using the CAT. It was found that 6.36 hours of research assistant time would be required to gather a valid quantity of patient feedback for a single resident in the outpatient setting, compared to 10.14 hours in the inpatient setting.
Although collecting feedback using our standardized protocol is acceptable to patients, obtaining sufficient feedback requires overcoming several barriers and a sizable time commitment. Feedback collection in the outpatient setting may be higher yield than in the inpatient setting due to greater patient/family availability. Future work should focus on innovative methods to gather patient feedback in the inpatient setting to provide program directors with a holistic view of their residents’ communication skills.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30576788</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3661-5555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-1643</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1876-2859 |
ispartof | Academic pediatrics, 2019-07, Vol.19 (5), p.555-560 |
issn | 1876-2859 1876-2867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159986120 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Clinical Competence Communication Education, Medical, Graduate Feasibility Studies Feedback, Psychological graduate medical education Humans Internship and Residency Knowledge of Results, Psychological patient feedback Patient Satisfaction Pediatrics - education Physician-Patient Relations resident communication skills Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | The Challenges of Multisource Feedback: Feasibility and Acceptability of Gathering Patient Feedback for Pediatric Residents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Challenges%20of%20Multisource%20Feedback:%20Feasibility%20and%20Acceptability%20of%20Gathering%20Patient%20Feedback%20for%20Pediatric%20Residents&rft.jtitle=Academic%20pediatrics&rft.au=Mahoney,%20David&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=560&rft.pages=555-560&rft.issn=1876-2859&rft.eissn=1876-2867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159986120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159986120&rft_id=info:pmid/30576788&rft_els_id=S1876285918307988&rfr_iscdi=true |