Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale

The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia research 2019-04, Vol.206, p.43-51
Hauptverfasser: Christensen, Alexander P., Gross, Georgina M., Golino, Hudson F., Silvia, Paul J., Kwapil, Thomas R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue
container_start_page 43
container_title Schizophrenia research
container_volume 206
creator Christensen, Alexander P.
Gross, Georgina M.
Golino, Hudson F.
Silvia, Paul J.
Kwapil, Thomas R.
description The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159985160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920996418307059</els_id><sourcerecordid>2159985160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwBgj1yKXFTputuSChaQwkEAfgHGWpq2XqlpJ0iPL0ZNrgyMH6LfuzLf-MXSJkCDi-WWXBLD2FjAOWGfIsyhEbopjkKRcgj9kQJIdUynExYGchrAAABUxO2SCHSBUghmw6-2ob53XnfJ_MvW6Xyd1GN32wIXF10i0ped42na3smjbButhLXs3Sfruub_uY6obO2Umtm0AXBx2x9_vZ2_QhfXqZP07vnlJTQNmlNUfQIkchUOYgEeQiFzEWsS64mZQGeVnUVAAvJa94gWZRFXVtUBspc8pH7Hq_t_XuY0uhU2sbDDWN3pDbBsVRSFkKHENEiz1qvAvBU61ab9fa9wpB7exTK7W3T-3sU8hVlDh2dbiwXayp-hv69SsCt3uA4p-flnzcYmljqLKeTKcqZ_-_8AP36oHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159985160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Christensen, Alexander P. ; Gross, Georgina M. ; Golino, Hudson F. ; Silvia, Paul J. ; Kwapil, Thomas R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Alexander P. ; Gross, Georgina M. ; Golino, Hudson F. ; Silvia, Paul J. ; Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30573405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anhedonia ; Exploratory Graph Analysis ; Factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Network analysis ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychometrics ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology ; Schizotypy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2019-04, Vol.206, p.43-51</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9798-7037</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996418307059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Georgina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golino, Hudson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvia, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anhedonia</subject><subject>Exploratory Graph Analysis</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Schizotypy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwBgj1yKXFTputuSChaQwkEAfgHGWpq2XqlpJ0iPL0ZNrgyMH6LfuzLf-MXSJkCDi-WWXBLD2FjAOWGfIsyhEbopjkKRcgj9kQJIdUynExYGchrAAABUxO2SCHSBUghmw6-2ob53XnfJ_MvW6Xyd1GN32wIXF10i0ped42na3smjbButhLXs3Sfruub_uY6obO2Umtm0AXBx2x9_vZ2_QhfXqZP07vnlJTQNmlNUfQIkchUOYgEeQiFzEWsS64mZQGeVnUVAAvJa94gWZRFXVtUBspc8pH7Hq_t_XuY0uhU2sbDDWN3pDbBsVRSFkKHENEiz1qvAvBU61ab9fa9wpB7exTK7W3T-3sU8hVlDh2dbiwXayp-hv69SsCt3uA4p-flnzcYmljqLKeTKcqZ_-_8AP36oHk</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Christensen, Alexander P.</creator><creator>Gross, Georgina M.</creator><creator>Golino, Hudson F.</creator><creator>Silvia, Paul J.</creator><creator>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-7037</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</title><author>Christensen, Alexander P. ; Gross, Georgina M. ; Golino, Hudson F. ; Silvia, Paul J. ; Kwapil, Thomas R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anhedonia</topic><topic>Exploratory Graph Analysis</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Schizotypy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Georgina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golino, Hudson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvia, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Alexander P.</au><au>Gross, Georgina M.</au><au>Golino, Hudson F.</au><au>Silvia, Paul J.</au><au>Kwapil, Thomas R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>206</volume><spage>43</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>43-51</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30573405</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-7037</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-9964
ispartof Schizophrenia research, 2019-04, Vol.206, p.43-51
issn 0920-9964
1573-2509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159985160
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anhedonia
Exploratory Graph Analysis
Factor analysis
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Male
Network analysis
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychometrics
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders
Schizophrenic Psychology
Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology
Schizotypy
Young Adult
title Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploratory%20Graph%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Multidimensional%20Schizotypy%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Christensen,%20Alexander%20P.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=206&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=43-51&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159985160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159985160&rft_id=info:pmid/30573405&rft_els_id=S0920996418307059&rfr_iscdi=true