Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale
The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia research 2019-04, Vol.206, p.43-51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 51 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Schizophrenia research |
container_volume | 206 |
creator | Christensen, Alexander P. Gross, Georgina M. Golino, Hudson F. Silvia, Paul J. Kwapil, Thomas R. |
description | The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159985160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920996418307059</els_id><sourcerecordid>2159985160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwBgj1yKXFTputuSChaQwkEAfgHGWpq2XqlpJ0iPL0ZNrgyMH6LfuzLf-MXSJkCDi-WWXBLD2FjAOWGfIsyhEbopjkKRcgj9kQJIdUynExYGchrAAABUxO2SCHSBUghmw6-2ob53XnfJ_MvW6Xyd1GN32wIXF10i0ped42na3smjbButhLXs3Sfruub_uY6obO2Umtm0AXBx2x9_vZ2_QhfXqZP07vnlJTQNmlNUfQIkchUOYgEeQiFzEWsS64mZQGeVnUVAAvJa94gWZRFXVtUBspc8pH7Hq_t_XuY0uhU2sbDDWN3pDbBsVRSFkKHENEiz1qvAvBU61ab9fa9wpB7exTK7W3T-3sU8hVlDh2dbiwXayp-hv69SsCt3uA4p-flnzcYmljqLKeTKcqZ_-_8AP36oHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159985160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Christensen, Alexander P. ; Gross, Georgina M. ; Golino, Hudson F. ; Silvia, Paul J. ; Kwapil, Thomas R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Alexander P. ; Gross, Georgina M. ; Golino, Hudson F. ; Silvia, Paul J. ; Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30573405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anhedonia ; Exploratory Graph Analysis ; Factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Network analysis ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychometrics ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology ; Schizotypy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2019-04, Vol.206, p.43-51</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9798-7037</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996418307059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Georgina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golino, Hudson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvia, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anhedonia</subject><subject>Exploratory Graph Analysis</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Schizotypy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwBgj1yKXFTputuSChaQwkEAfgHGWpq2XqlpJ0iPL0ZNrgyMH6LfuzLf-MXSJkCDi-WWXBLD2FjAOWGfIsyhEbopjkKRcgj9kQJIdUynExYGchrAAABUxO2SCHSBUghmw6-2ob53XnfJ_MvW6Xyd1GN32wIXF10i0ped42na3smjbButhLXs3Sfruub_uY6obO2Umtm0AXBx2x9_vZ2_QhfXqZP07vnlJTQNmlNUfQIkchUOYgEeQiFzEWsS64mZQGeVnUVAAvJa94gWZRFXVtUBspc8pH7Hq_t_XuY0uhU2sbDDWN3pDbBsVRSFkKHENEiz1qvAvBU61ab9fa9wpB7exTK7W3T-3sU8hVlDh2dbiwXayp-hv69SsCt3uA4p-flnzcYmljqLKeTKcqZ_-_8AP36oHk</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Christensen, Alexander P.</creator><creator>Gross, Georgina M.</creator><creator>Golino, Hudson F.</creator><creator>Silvia, Paul J.</creator><creator>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-7037</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</title><author>Christensen, Alexander P. ; Gross, Georgina M. ; Golino, Hudson F. ; Silvia, Paul J. ; Kwapil, Thomas R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f210a5315519309109b359b3b21052c78c1284fe402892d241cbd4ffc1ac993e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anhedonia</topic><topic>Exploratory Graph Analysis</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Schizotypy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Georgina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golino, Hudson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvia, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Alexander P.</au><au>Gross, Georgina M.</au><au>Golino, Hudson F.</au><au>Silvia, Paul J.</au><au>Kwapil, Thomas R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>206</volume><spage>43</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>43-51</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>The present study examined the dimensional structure underlying the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) and its brief version (MSS-B). We used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to evaluate their dimensional structure in two large, independent samples (n = 6265 and n = 1000). We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to compare the fit of the theoretical dimensions with the EGA dimensions. For the MSS, EGA identified four dimensions: positive schizotypy, two dimensions of negative schizotypy (affective and social anhedonia), and disorganized schizotypy. For the MSS-B, EGA identified three dimensions, which corresponded to the theorized positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. Based on the MSS's EGA dimensions, we also estimated a four-factor model for the MSS-B. The CFA comparison found that the four-factor model fit significantly better than the theoretical three-factor model for both the MSS and MSS-B, providing support for the theoretical model and offering a more nuanced interpretation of the negative schizotypy factor. In addition, EGA also revealed that the positive and negative schizotypy dimensions of the MSS and MSS-B might be mediated by the disorganized dimension. Our findings offer new implications for future research on the MSS and MSS-B dimensions that may provide differential associations with interview and questionnaire measures.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30573405</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-7037</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-9964 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia research, 2019-04, Vol.206, p.43-51 |
issn | 0920-9964 1573-2509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2159985160 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Anhedonia Exploratory Graph Analysis Factor analysis Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Humans Male Network analysis Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychometrics Psychotic Disorders - psychology Schizophrenia Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders Schizophrenic Psychology Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology Schizotypy Young Adult |
title | Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploratory%20Graph%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Multidimensional%20Schizotypy%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Christensen,%20Alexander%20P.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=206&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=43-51&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159985160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159985160&rft_id=info:pmid/30573405&rft_els_id=S0920996418307059&rfr_iscdi=true |