The relationships between compensatory stepping thresholds and measures of gait, standing postural control, strength, and balance confidence in older women

•Older age was associated with lower (worse) stepping thresholds in women.•Women with better strength and balance generally had higher stepping thresholds.•Age combined with fall-risk assessments only partially infer stepping thresholds.•Stepping thresholds may offer unique information on stability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2018-09, Vol.65, p.74-80
Hauptverfasser: Crenshaw, Jeremy R., Bernhardt, Kathie A., Atkinson, Elizabeth J., Khosla, Sundeep, Kaufman, Kenton R., Amin, Shreyasee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue
container_start_page 74
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 65
creator Crenshaw, Jeremy R.
Bernhardt, Kathie A.
Atkinson, Elizabeth J.
Khosla, Sundeep
Kaufman, Kenton R.
Amin, Shreyasee
description •Older age was associated with lower (worse) stepping thresholds in women.•Women with better strength and balance generally had higher stepping thresholds.•Age combined with fall-risk assessments only partially infer stepping thresholds.•Stepping thresholds may offer unique information on stability maintenance. Compensatory stepping thresholds evaluate the response to postural disturbances. Although such fall-recovery measures are a promising indicator of fall risk, the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measures used to predict falls are not well established. We sought to quantify the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measurements used to assess fall risk in older women, a population at high risk for falls and related injuries, including fractures. We studied 112 ambulatory, community-dwelling women, age 65 years or older. Using a treadmill to deliver standing postural disturbances, we determined anterior and posterior single-stepping and multiple-stepping thresholds. These thresholds represented the magnitude of the disturbance that elicited one step or more than one step, respectively. We also assessed balance confidence, functional reach, unipedal stance time, isometric strength, obstacle crossing, postural sway, and gait kinematics. Outcomes were normalized to body size. After accounting for age, stepping thresholds were, at most, moderately correlated (Pearson partial correlation coefficients r = 0.20 to 0.40 and r = -0.21 to -0.31) to several assessments of gait, postural control, and strength. Approximately 24–52% of the variance in stepping thresholds was explained by a combination of age and other fall risk assessments, which frequently consisted of balance confidence, unipedal stance time, obstacle crossing, the Romberg ratio of postural sway, and/or strength. Our results suggest that anteroposterior fall-recovery ability, as assessed by stepping thresholds, can only be partially inferred from age and a combination of assessments of sway, strength, unipedal tasks, and balance confidence. Compensatory stepping thresholds may provide information on stability maintenance unique from other assessments of fall risk. Further investigation would be necessary to determine whether stepping thresholds are better predictors of falls in older women.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158248361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636218308464</els_id><sourcerecordid>2158248361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a7329a2bea472fdc9f020b243b1a589f73c41df50f2b4e4d81e5124e29ade89d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u3SAQhVHVqLlN-goRyy5ilx9fbO9aRemPFKmbZI2wGa65ssEF3CjP0pct5CbddgWa-c7MgYPQFSU1JVR8OtYHZdPqY6oZoV1NRE1p-wbtaNf2FWO0f4t2pBeiElywc_Q-xiMhpOEde4fOOSGsJ7zdoT_3E-AAs0rWuzjZNeIB0iOAw6NfVnBRJR-ecEywrtYdcJoCxMnPOmLlNF5AxS1XsDe4OLrOZK4XspjbgprzIJeCn0srgDuk6fpZOqhZuRFK21gN5WodzpMh4Ee_gLtEZ0bNET68nBfo4evt_c336u7ntx83X-6qsaEiVarlrFdsANW0zOixN4SRgTV8oGrf9ablmdNmTwwbGmh0R2FPWQNZpKHrNb9AH09z1-B_bRCTXGwcYc72wG9RMrrvWNNxQTMqTugYfIwBjFyDXVR4kpTIEow8ytdgZAlGEiFzMFl49bJjGxbQ_2SvSWTg8wmA_NLfFoKMoy2fom2AMUnt7f92_AVfkadd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158248361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationships between compensatory stepping thresholds and measures of gait, standing postural control, strength, and balance confidence in older women</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Crenshaw, Jeremy R. ; Bernhardt, Kathie A. ; Atkinson, Elizabeth J. ; Khosla, Sundeep ; Kaufman, Kenton R. ; Amin, Shreyasee</creator><creatorcontrib>Crenshaw, Jeremy R. ; Bernhardt, Kathie A. ; Atkinson, Elizabeth J. ; Khosla, Sundeep ; Kaufman, Kenton R. ; Amin, Shreyasee</creatorcontrib><description>•Older age was associated with lower (worse) stepping thresholds in women.•Women with better strength and balance generally had higher stepping thresholds.•Age combined with fall-risk assessments only partially infer stepping thresholds.•Stepping thresholds may offer unique information on stability maintenance. Compensatory stepping thresholds evaluate the response to postural disturbances. Although such fall-recovery measures are a promising indicator of fall risk, the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measures used to predict falls are not well established. We sought to quantify the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measurements used to assess fall risk in older women, a population at high risk for falls and related injuries, including fractures. We studied 112 ambulatory, community-dwelling women, age 65 years or older. Using a treadmill to deliver standing postural disturbances, we determined anterior and posterior single-stepping and multiple-stepping thresholds. These thresholds represented the magnitude of the disturbance that elicited one step or more than one step, respectively. We also assessed balance confidence, functional reach, unipedal stance time, isometric strength, obstacle crossing, postural sway, and gait kinematics. Outcomes were normalized to body size. After accounting for age, stepping thresholds were, at most, moderately correlated (Pearson partial correlation coefficients r = 0.20 to 0.40 and r = -0.21 to -0.31) to several assessments of gait, postural control, and strength. Approximately 24–52% of the variance in stepping thresholds was explained by a combination of age and other fall risk assessments, which frequently consisted of balance confidence, unipedal stance time, obstacle crossing, the Romberg ratio of postural sway, and/or strength. Our results suggest that anteroposterior fall-recovery ability, as assessed by stepping thresholds, can only be partially inferred from age and a combination of assessments of sway, strength, unipedal tasks, and balance confidence. Compensatory stepping thresholds may provide information on stability maintenance unique from other assessments of fall risk. Further investigation would be necessary to determine whether stepping thresholds are better predictors of falls in older women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30029037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aging ; Balance ; Falls ; Gait ; Postural control</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2018-09, Vol.65, p.74-80</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a7329a2bea472fdc9f020b243b1a589f73c41df50f2b4e4d81e5124e29ade89d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a7329a2bea472fdc9f020b243b1a589f73c41df50f2b4e4d81e5124e29ade89d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636218308464$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30029037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crenshaw, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Kathie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosla, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Kenton R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin, Shreyasee</creatorcontrib><title>The relationships between compensatory stepping thresholds and measures of gait, standing postural control, strength, and balance confidence in older women</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>•Older age was associated with lower (worse) stepping thresholds in women.•Women with better strength and balance generally had higher stepping thresholds.•Age combined with fall-risk assessments only partially infer stepping thresholds.•Stepping thresholds may offer unique information on stability maintenance. Compensatory stepping thresholds evaluate the response to postural disturbances. Although such fall-recovery measures are a promising indicator of fall risk, the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measures used to predict falls are not well established. We sought to quantify the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measurements used to assess fall risk in older women, a population at high risk for falls and related injuries, including fractures. We studied 112 ambulatory, community-dwelling women, age 65 years or older. Using a treadmill to deliver standing postural disturbances, we determined anterior and posterior single-stepping and multiple-stepping thresholds. These thresholds represented the magnitude of the disturbance that elicited one step or more than one step, respectively. We also assessed balance confidence, functional reach, unipedal stance time, isometric strength, obstacle crossing, postural sway, and gait kinematics. Outcomes were normalized to body size. After accounting for age, stepping thresholds were, at most, moderately correlated (Pearson partial correlation coefficients r = 0.20 to 0.40 and r = -0.21 to -0.31) to several assessments of gait, postural control, and strength. Approximately 24–52% of the variance in stepping thresholds was explained by a combination of age and other fall risk assessments, which frequently consisted of balance confidence, unipedal stance time, obstacle crossing, the Romberg ratio of postural sway, and/or strength. Our results suggest that anteroposterior fall-recovery ability, as assessed by stepping thresholds, can only be partially inferred from age and a combination of assessments of sway, strength, unipedal tasks, and balance confidence. Compensatory stepping thresholds may provide information on stability maintenance unique from other assessments of fall risk. Further investigation would be necessary to determine whether stepping thresholds are better predictors of falls in older women.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Postural control</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u3SAQhVHVqLlN-goRyy5ilx9fbO9aRemPFKmbZI2wGa65ssEF3CjP0pct5CbddgWa-c7MgYPQFSU1JVR8OtYHZdPqY6oZoV1NRE1p-wbtaNf2FWO0f4t2pBeiElywc_Q-xiMhpOEde4fOOSGsJ7zdoT_3E-AAs0rWuzjZNeIB0iOAw6NfVnBRJR-ecEywrtYdcJoCxMnPOmLlNF5AxS1XsDe4OLrOZK4XspjbgprzIJeCn0srgDuk6fpZOqhZuRFK21gN5WodzpMh4Ee_gLtEZ0bNET68nBfo4evt_c336u7ntx83X-6qsaEiVarlrFdsANW0zOixN4SRgTV8oGrf9ablmdNmTwwbGmh0R2FPWQNZpKHrNb9AH09z1-B_bRCTXGwcYc72wG9RMrrvWNNxQTMqTugYfIwBjFyDXVR4kpTIEow8ytdgZAlGEiFzMFl49bJjGxbQ_2SvSWTg8wmA_NLfFoKMoy2fom2AMUnt7f92_AVfkadd</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Crenshaw, Jeremy R.</creator><creator>Bernhardt, Kathie A.</creator><creator>Atkinson, Elizabeth J.</creator><creator>Khosla, Sundeep</creator><creator>Kaufman, Kenton R.</creator><creator>Amin, Shreyasee</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>The relationships between compensatory stepping thresholds and measures of gait, standing postural control, strength, and balance confidence in older women</title><author>Crenshaw, Jeremy R. ; Bernhardt, Kathie A. ; Atkinson, Elizabeth J. ; Khosla, Sundeep ; Kaufman, Kenton R. ; Amin, Shreyasee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a7329a2bea472fdc9f020b243b1a589f73c41df50f2b4e4d81e5124e29ade89d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Postural control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crenshaw, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Kathie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosla, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Kenton R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin, Shreyasee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crenshaw, Jeremy R.</au><au>Bernhardt, Kathie A.</au><au>Atkinson, Elizabeth J.</au><au>Khosla, Sundeep</au><au>Kaufman, Kenton R.</au><au>Amin, Shreyasee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationships between compensatory stepping thresholds and measures of gait, standing postural control, strength, and balance confidence in older women</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>65</volume><spage>74</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>74-80</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>•Older age was associated with lower (worse) stepping thresholds in women.•Women with better strength and balance generally had higher stepping thresholds.•Age combined with fall-risk assessments only partially infer stepping thresholds.•Stepping thresholds may offer unique information on stability maintenance. Compensatory stepping thresholds evaluate the response to postural disturbances. Although such fall-recovery measures are a promising indicator of fall risk, the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measures used to predict falls are not well established. We sought to quantify the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measurements used to assess fall risk in older women, a population at high risk for falls and related injuries, including fractures. We studied 112 ambulatory, community-dwelling women, age 65 years or older. Using a treadmill to deliver standing postural disturbances, we determined anterior and posterior single-stepping and multiple-stepping thresholds. These thresholds represented the magnitude of the disturbance that elicited one step or more than one step, respectively. We also assessed balance confidence, functional reach, unipedal stance time, isometric strength, obstacle crossing, postural sway, and gait kinematics. Outcomes were normalized to body size. After accounting for age, stepping thresholds were, at most, moderately correlated (Pearson partial correlation coefficients r = 0.20 to 0.40 and r = -0.21 to -0.31) to several assessments of gait, postural control, and strength. Approximately 24–52% of the variance in stepping thresholds was explained by a combination of age and other fall risk assessments, which frequently consisted of balance confidence, unipedal stance time, obstacle crossing, the Romberg ratio of postural sway, and/or strength. Our results suggest that anteroposterior fall-recovery ability, as assessed by stepping thresholds, can only be partially inferred from age and a combination of assessments of sway, strength, unipedal tasks, and balance confidence. Compensatory stepping thresholds may provide information on stability maintenance unique from other assessments of fall risk. Further investigation would be necessary to determine whether stepping thresholds are better predictors of falls in older women.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30029037</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.117</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2018-09, Vol.65, p.74-80
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158248361
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aging
Balance
Falls
Gait
Postural control
title The relationships between compensatory stepping thresholds and measures of gait, standing postural control, strength, and balance confidence in older women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationships%20between%20compensatory%20stepping%20thresholds%20and%20measures%20of%20gait,%20standing%20postural%20control,%20strength,%20and%20balance%20confidence%20in%20older%20women&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Crenshaw,%20Jeremy%20R.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=65&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=74-80&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2158248361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158248361&rft_id=info:pmid/30029037&rft_els_id=S0966636218308464&rfr_iscdi=true