Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial
Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. A single academic medical center. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetamin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2019-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1584-1591 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1591 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1584 |
container_title | Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Wilson, Sylvia H Wolf, Bethany J Robinson, Stefanie M Nelson, Cecil Hebbar, Latha |
description | Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen.
Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial.
A single academic medical center.
Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.
This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects.
Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group.
Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/pm/pny253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158245497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607349473</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607349473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rFEEQhgdRTIwe_APS4CUeNunv3vE2rF-BQEDiyUNT01MdO8x0j92zC-uvt8OuiiJ1qKJ46qWq3qZ5yegFo624nKfLOe65Eo-aU6a4XkktzONjzYVRJ82zUu4pZVquxdPmRFClmaHytPl6FZcMO4xpW8iukJsMI-kcLjCFmOZvGIlPmXQRxjssAUjnF8xkgwUyQiTvcAw7zPu3pCOfIQ5pCj9wILc5wPi8eeJhLPjimM-aLx_e324-ra5vPl5tuuuVE2u6rLRmQirVg9RoZGsc97SXRksGAjmX69Z5SUHI3g9onHEKWQ8gJbRS9WwQZ835QXfO6fsWy2KnUByOI0SsZ1nO1JpLVaUr-vof9D5tcz2uUkJLzgRl_A91ByPaEH2qP3IPorbT1AjZSiMqdfEfqsaAU3Apog-1_9fAm8OAy6mUjN7OOUyQ95ZR-2CknSd7MLKyr46LbvsJh9_kL-fET9psls4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2364213012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilson, Sylvia H ; Wolf, Bethany J ; Robinson, Stefanie M ; Nelson, Cecil ; Hebbar, Latha</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sylvia H ; Wolf, Bethany J ; Robinson, Stefanie M ; Nelson, Cecil ; Hebbar, Latha</creatorcontrib><description>Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen.
Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial.
A single academic medical center.
Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.
This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects.
Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group.
Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-2375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30561704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acetaminophen ; Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Analysis ; Cesarean section ; Clinical trials ; Intravenous administration ; Medical centers ; Medical colleges ; Morphine ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Product development</subject><ispartof>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1584-1591</ispartof><rights>2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30561704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sylvia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Bethany J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stefanie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Cecil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebbar, Latha</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</title><title>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><description>Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen.
Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial.
A single academic medical center.
Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.
This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects.
Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group.
Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.</description><subject>Acetaminophen</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Medical centers</subject><subject>Medical colleges</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Product development</subject><issn>1526-2375</issn><issn>1526-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rFEEQhgdRTIwe_APS4CUeNunv3vE2rF-BQEDiyUNT01MdO8x0j92zC-uvt8OuiiJ1qKJ46qWq3qZ5yegFo624nKfLOe65Eo-aU6a4XkktzONjzYVRJ82zUu4pZVquxdPmRFClmaHytPl6FZcMO4xpW8iukJsMI-kcLjCFmOZvGIlPmXQRxjssAUjnF8xkgwUyQiTvcAw7zPu3pCOfIQ5pCj9wILc5wPi8eeJhLPjimM-aLx_e324-ra5vPl5tuuuVE2u6rLRmQirVg9RoZGsc97SXRksGAjmX69Z5SUHI3g9onHEKWQ8gJbRS9WwQZ835QXfO6fsWy2KnUByOI0SsZ1nO1JpLVaUr-vof9D5tcz2uUkJLzgRl_A91ByPaEH2qP3IPorbT1AjZSiMqdfEfqsaAU3Apog-1_9fAm8OAy6mUjN7OOUyQ95ZR-2CknSd7MLKyr46LbvsJh9_kL-fET9psls4</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Wilson, Sylvia H</creator><creator>Wolf, Bethany J</creator><creator>Robinson, Stefanie M</creator><creator>Nelson, Cecil</creator><creator>Hebbar, Latha</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</title><author>Wilson, Sylvia H ; Wolf, Bethany J ; Robinson, Stefanie M ; Nelson, Cecil ; Hebbar, Latha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Medical centers</topic><topic>Medical colleges</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Product development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sylvia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Bethany J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stefanie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Cecil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebbar, Latha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Sylvia H</au><au>Wolf, Bethany J</au><au>Robinson, Stefanie M</au><au>Nelson, Cecil</au><au>Hebbar, Latha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1584</spage><epage>1591</epage><pages>1584-1591</pages><issn>1526-2375</issn><eissn>1526-4637</eissn><abstract>Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen.
Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial.
A single academic medical center.
Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.
This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects.
Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group.
Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30561704</pmid><doi>10.1093/pm/pny253</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-2375 |
ispartof | Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1584-1591 |
issn | 1526-2375 1526-4637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158245497 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acetaminophen Analgesia Analgesics Analysis Cesarean section Clinical trials Intravenous administration Medical centers Medical colleges Morphine Narcotics Opioids Pain Pain perception Patient satisfaction Patients Product development |
title | Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T02%3A53%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20vs%20Oral%20Acetaminophen%20for%20Analgesia%20After%20Cesarean%20Delivery:%20A%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pain%20medicine%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Wilson,%20Sylvia%20H&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1584&rft.epage=1591&rft.pages=1584-1591&rft.issn=1526-2375&rft.eissn=1526-4637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pm/pny253&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA607349473%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2364213012&rft_id=info:pmid/30561704&rft_galeid=A607349473&rfr_iscdi=true |