Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial

Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. A single academic medical center. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetamin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2019-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1584-1591
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Sylvia H, Wolf, Bethany J, Robinson, Stefanie M, Nelson, Cecil, Hebbar, Latha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1591
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1584
container_title Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
container_volume 20
creator Wilson, Sylvia H
Wolf, Bethany J
Robinson, Stefanie M
Nelson, Cecil
Hebbar, Latha
description Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. A single academic medical center. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects. Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group. Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/pm/pny253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158245497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607349473</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607349473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rFEEQhgdRTIwe_APS4CUeNunv3vE2rF-BQEDiyUNT01MdO8x0j92zC-uvt8OuiiJ1qKJ46qWq3qZ5yegFo624nKfLOe65Eo-aU6a4XkktzONjzYVRJ82zUu4pZVquxdPmRFClmaHytPl6FZcMO4xpW8iukJsMI-kcLjCFmOZvGIlPmXQRxjssAUjnF8xkgwUyQiTvcAw7zPu3pCOfIQ5pCj9wILc5wPi8eeJhLPjimM-aLx_e324-ra5vPl5tuuuVE2u6rLRmQirVg9RoZGsc97SXRksGAjmX69Z5SUHI3g9onHEKWQ8gJbRS9WwQZ835QXfO6fsWy2KnUByOI0SsZ1nO1JpLVaUr-vof9D5tcz2uUkJLzgRl_A91ByPaEH2qP3IPorbT1AjZSiMqdfEfqsaAU3Apog-1_9fAm8OAy6mUjN7OOUyQ95ZR-2CknSd7MLKyr46LbvsJh9_kL-fET9psls4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2364213012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilson, Sylvia H ; Wolf, Bethany J ; Robinson, Stefanie M ; Nelson, Cecil ; Hebbar, Latha</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sylvia H ; Wolf, Bethany J ; Robinson, Stefanie M ; Nelson, Cecil ; Hebbar, Latha</creatorcontrib><description>Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. A single academic medical center. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects. Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group. Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-2375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30561704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acetaminophen ; Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Analysis ; Cesarean section ; Clinical trials ; Intravenous administration ; Medical centers ; Medical colleges ; Morphine ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Product development</subject><ispartof>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1584-1591</ispartof><rights>2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30561704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sylvia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Bethany J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stefanie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Cecil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebbar, Latha</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</title><title>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><description>Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. A single academic medical center. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects. Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group. Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.</description><subject>Acetaminophen</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Medical centers</subject><subject>Medical colleges</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Product development</subject><issn>1526-2375</issn><issn>1526-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rFEEQhgdRTIwe_APS4CUeNunv3vE2rF-BQEDiyUNT01MdO8x0j92zC-uvt8OuiiJ1qKJ46qWq3qZ5yegFo624nKfLOe65Eo-aU6a4XkktzONjzYVRJ82zUu4pZVquxdPmRFClmaHytPl6FZcMO4xpW8iukJsMI-kcLjCFmOZvGIlPmXQRxjssAUjnF8xkgwUyQiTvcAw7zPu3pCOfIQ5pCj9wILc5wPi8eeJhLPjimM-aLx_e324-ra5vPl5tuuuVE2u6rLRmQirVg9RoZGsc97SXRksGAjmX69Z5SUHI3g9onHEKWQ8gJbRS9WwQZ835QXfO6fsWy2KnUByOI0SsZ1nO1JpLVaUr-vof9D5tcz2uUkJLzgRl_A91ByPaEH2qP3IPorbT1AjZSiMqdfEfqsaAU3Apog-1_9fAm8OAy6mUjN7OOUyQ95ZR-2CknSd7MLKyr46LbvsJh9_kL-fET9psls4</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Wilson, Sylvia H</creator><creator>Wolf, Bethany J</creator><creator>Robinson, Stefanie M</creator><creator>Nelson, Cecil</creator><creator>Hebbar, Latha</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</title><author>Wilson, Sylvia H ; Wolf, Bethany J ; Robinson, Stefanie M ; Nelson, Cecil ; Hebbar, Latha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6613455ba46e7497c2f0b47641a3e22489cf40a34bfde7c7c5e1baa44a945b1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Medical centers</topic><topic>Medical colleges</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Product development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sylvia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Bethany J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stefanie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Cecil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebbar, Latha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Sylvia H</au><au>Wolf, Bethany J</au><au>Robinson, Stefanie M</au><au>Nelson, Cecil</au><au>Hebbar, Latha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1584</spage><epage>1591</epage><pages>1584-1591</pages><issn>1526-2375</issn><eissn>1526-4637</eissn><abstract>Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. A single academic medical center. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects. Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group. Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30561704</pmid><doi>10.1093/pm/pny253</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-2375
ispartof Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1584-1591
issn 1526-2375
1526-4637
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158245497
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acetaminophen
Analgesia
Analgesics
Analysis
Cesarean section
Clinical trials
Intravenous administration
Medical centers
Medical colleges
Morphine
Narcotics
Opioids
Pain
Pain perception
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Product development
title Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T02%3A53%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20vs%20Oral%20Acetaminophen%20for%20Analgesia%20After%20Cesarean%20Delivery:%20A%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pain%20medicine%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Wilson,%20Sylvia%20H&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1584&rft.epage=1591&rft.pages=1584-1591&rft.issn=1526-2375&rft.eissn=1526-4637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pm/pny253&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA607349473%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2364213012&rft_id=info:pmid/30561704&rft_galeid=A607349473&rfr_iscdi=true